User talk:Wikiboss1311

Welcome!

Hi Wikiboss1311! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! TolWol56 (talk) 16:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Wikiboss1311 (talk) 15:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moved draft

Hi, you had moved your draft on Ross Dickerson to the User: namespace, which is reserved for user pages and other related pages, and not intended for draft/article content. I've moved it instead to the Draft: namespace, at Draft:Ross Dickerson. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:47, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a new editor here so I don't have much experience as this is my first draft. So, thank you very much for guiding me! Wikiboss1311 (talk) 15:56, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ross Dickerson (June 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ross Dickerson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ross Dickerson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:56, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikiboss1311! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:56, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Theroadislong Thank you your guidance, I will surely get in touch with experienced editors at Teahouse to learn more about editing. Wikiboss1311 (talk) 16:04, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
16	Jonas Geissler (talk)	Add sources
22	Jaan Tõnisson (talk)	Add sources
19	Library Network of Western Switzerland (talk)	Add sources
3	Willis E. Bell (talk)	Add sources
18	Ralf Stegner (talk)	Add sources
2	Imran Butt (field hockey) (talk)	Add sources
11	Alexander Radwan (talk)	Cleanup
14	Thomas Bareiß (talk)	Cleanup
42	West Valley High School (Alaska) (talk)	Cleanup
12	Macit Karaahmetoğlu (talk)	Expand
6	Knut Abraham (talk)	Expand
15	Ulrike Harzer (talk)	Expand
8	Timon Gremmels (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
22	Swedish Social Democratic Youth League (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
103	La Movida Madrileña (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
517	Quds Force (talk)	Merge
12,778	TikTok (talk)	Merge
98	BBC Persian (talk)	Merge
120	Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf (talk)	Wikify
12	Ottilie Klein (talk)	Wikify
151	Nina Flowers (talk)	Wikify
3	Prophecy of Melkin (talk)	Orphan
3	Rosie Mancari (talk)	Orphan
2	Sassy Ross (talk)	Orphan
3	Peggy Schierenbeck (talk)	Stub
4	Christoph Schmid (talk)	Stub
47	Korean Movie Database (talk)	Stub
16	Christian Dürr (talk)	Stub
8	Gero Storjohann (talk)	Stub
2	Johannes Schätzl (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:10, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Wikiboss1311! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, AFC submission declined, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ross Dickerson

Hello, Wikiboss1311. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ross Dickerson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ross Dickerson

Hello, Wikiboss1311. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ross Dickerson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:25, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikiboss1311. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Wikiboss1311. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Wikiboss1311|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 87.200.176.195 (talk) 20:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have not been compensated directly nor indirectly for any sort of editing, it was just a random edit. Why do you think? Wikiboss1311 (talk) 22:52, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Picture Chainlink.png

Thanks for uploading File:Picture Chainlink.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:32, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chainlink (blockchain), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Network, CCIP and VRF. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Chainlink Decentralized Oracle Network.png

Thanks for uploading File:Chainlink Decentralized Oracle Network.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:02, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]