Jump to content

User talk:WikiVuclip

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiVuclip, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi WikiVuclip! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ganjil (November 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 04:52, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
Information icon

Hello WikiVuclip. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:WikiVuclip. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=WikiVuclip|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 09:33, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong: I've disclosed as you suggested, but may I know a site like below would be suffice as a reliable source? https://hype.my/2021/247117/interview-fattah-amin-diana-danielle-ganjil/ -- it's an interview with the director of the series and discloses the premise of the show.

AfC notification: Draft:Ganjil has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ganjil. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:54, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ganjil (December 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Rusalkii (talk) 05:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ganjil (January 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by WikiAviator were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
WikiAviator talk 05:16, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ganjil

[edit]

Information icon Hello, WikiVuclip. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ganjil, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:57, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ganjil

[edit]

Hello, WikiVuclip. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ganjil".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:16, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]