Jump to content

User talk:WikiEnthusiast1001

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

CS1 error on Sindh Police

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sindh Police, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:53, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Sindh Police

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sindh Police, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:53, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Punjabi people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Statesman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:25, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peshawar Services Club moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Peshawar Services Club. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 12:12, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agha Ibrahim Akram, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FF.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Sarfraz Ali (general)
added a link pointing to NSWC
Yunus Hussain
added a link pointing to Tarn Taran

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 13:36, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 13:39, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pakistan Air Force Academy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Noor Khan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:519E:587D:39D0:BDC2 (talk) 12:50, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Asim Munir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Asghar Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1971 war.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Off-topic remarks

[edit]

You need to stop making off-topic remarks in article talk discussions and in edit summaries, such as here and here. It is none of your business to suggest who should be editing what on Wikipedia. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 22:12, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seems I struck a nerve, so much for donning a Rhino skin. Your stubbornness on the Robert Cawthome page was quite laughable. It's time to act more maturely. It’s not your place to come to my talk page complaining when you’ve repeatedly refused to acknowledge your mistakes. WikiEnthusiast1001 (talk) 22:19, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you keep bringing up Robert Cawthorne? I made my points at the AFD, the discussion was closed, and the page was deleted. I accepted the consensus, and that’s the end of it. In every AFD, people debate whether to delete or keep, and ultimately, the decision is made one way or the other. There are always some editors who turn out to be wrong in the end. Should we keep criticizing those who were proven wrong? You need to drop the stick and move on. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 23:19, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]