User talk:Wiki-ny-2007

Welcome!

Hello, Wiki-ny-2007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Flamgirlant 09:08, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re. your question about Joshua Lederberg's first wife:

Hi Wiki-ny-2007,

You ask about 'the status' of Joshua Lederberg's first wife. If you look a little further down in his article, you can see that his first wife, Esther M. Zimmer Lederberg, has her own article in Wikipedia.

She died 15 months ago.

Regards, Shadow600

Shadow600 (talk) 19:50, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Tekserve-img.png

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Tekserve-img.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 23:41, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Madoff

Regarding this edit, wouldn't "since 1999" be ample clarification of the previous nature of the investigations? Frank | talk 00:42, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, roadfan!

Hello, Wiki-ny-2007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

If you are interested, there is already a community of users who are roadfans or who edit articles about roads, just like you! Stop by any of these WikiProjects — WP:HWY (worldwide), WP:CRWP (Canada), WP:INR (India), WP:UKRD (United Kingdom), or WP:USRD (United States) — and contribute. For those in the United States, there is an excellent new user's guide. There is a wealth of information and resources for creating a great article. If you have questions about any of these WikiProjects, you can ask on each project's talk page, or you can ask me!

If you like communicating through IRC, feel free to ask questions at #wikipedia-en-roads as well. Here, there are several editors who are willing to answer your questions. For more information, see WP:HWY/IRC.

Again, welcome! Imzadi 1979 → 03:00, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Dawson

Hi! I noticed you added the death report of Richard Dawson to his page. I have a feeling it might be YAIR (yet another Internet rumour), since the first I heard of it was a posting to alt.obituaries by "Letstrolltonight", not exactly a confidence-inspiring handle. Unless/until a reliable source like the LA Times or CNN reports it, it would be best not to edit his entry - Wikipedia requires reliable sources, and one of the things it constantly gets in trouble about is people passing on Internet death rumours. Thanks! --NellieBly (talk) 02:00, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No harm, no foul. Trolls can be convincing, as many of us have found. Cheers! --NellieBly (talk) 02:18, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2001 anthrax attacks

Hi,

The content that you have restored to 2001 anthrax attacks with this edit contains wording such as

"The Washington Post^[1]^[2] (which got a lot of the information wrong)"

In my view, such wording should not be added, and must not remain in a Wikipedia article, and I ask you to remove the content that you have restored to the article. Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Aside from this, I have repeatedly stated that using the DOJ source is fine, if it is used in an appropriate way. I hope that you would seriously reconsider your thoughts about my motivation, and I suggest that you read or re-read the discussion on the talk page of the article. Cs32en Talk to me 18:26, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Elen of the Roads (talk) 21:10, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tilde

For using tilde characters, or, alternatively, the edit toolbar page, see WP:Signatures. Regards, Cs32en Talk to me 22:35, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of North General Hospital

A tag has been placed on North General Hospital requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. VQuakr (talk) 21:45, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

talk page edit

Please don't make changes to other's comments on talk pages as you did with this edit. See the take page guidelines for more information. —EncMstr (talk) 02:25, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Dumpson.png

Thanks for uploading File:Dumpson.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:07, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sarin gas attack on the Tokyo subway

Good find of that link to the Tokyo Metropolitan Police wanted poster for this page. (Though I altered your text a little). I have borrowed the link and added it to the Aum Shinrikyo page, but I have added it where the other poster is displayed. See diff. Not sure if that is per the WP manual of style or not, but it seems to work. :-) - 220 of ^Borg 02:29, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Oates

Bravo on the upload! – Lionel ^(talk) 08:16, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Voa-photo-Daniel-Oates.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Voa-photo-Daniel-Oates.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ryan Vesey Review me! 19:35, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

Do not continue to restore File:Voa-photo-Daniel-Oates.jpg on commons and locally. The image is a copyright violation of the associated press. Ryan Vesey Review me! 19:44, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for uploading File:Mmwr-aids-first-report-101.png to Commons and posting notice of it on the HIV/AIDS page. That is very useful. Also, some of us Wikipedians meetup regularly in NYC. Do you also live in NYC? Our meetup page is at WP:MEETUP/NYC if you are nearby and free to join. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:21, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of links

I removed links to an unreliable site, added by its webmaster, where the content is of uncertain copyright status and much of the other content is in violation of copyright. The original sources (where they exist) can be cited, but not the unreliable site to which the original citations pointed (per WP:ELNEVER etc). Guy (Help!) 13:32, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ed Lake's book

The book is published at CreateSpace, this is a self-published book, to assert parity with works published by Harvard University Press and others is ridiculous, I'm afraid. Lake appears to be using Wikipedia as a vehicle to promote himself and his ideas. Guy (Help!) 18:59, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Fuze-102.png

Thanks for uploading File:Fuze-102.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fuze-102.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fuze-102.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:21, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

request for removal of IP block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Wiki-ny-2007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. Place any further information here: 166.84.1.1 is an IP address owned by panix_(ISP), a three decades old ISP. The only people with access to it are actual and verified customers and staff. wiki-ny-2007 (talk) 04:05, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

As below; converted to soft block. Kuru (talk) 18:08, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo: Thoughts? Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:14, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Jackmcbarn: A prolific sockmaster was using Panix as a webhost, and the 166.84.1.1 address was particularly sticky with, until now, zero collateral. Although there are legitimate users on the Panix IPs, the ISP does offer webhosting and colocation anonymizing services that allow for socking. I've switched the block to a soft block, so Wiki-ny-2007 can edit, but if the disruption starts up again I'll reblock it. Wiki-ny-2007 has other IPs available to them and we can consider IPBE if need be.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:42, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Jackmcbarn:

@Ponyo: (I hope that's the right syntax to reply...)

Thanks for clearing this up. I've forwarded your note about the "sock puppet" issue to Panix staff, and based on their long internet history, I'm sure they'll take approrpriate action. (Disclosure: I worked there for a decade). wiki-ny-2007 (talk) 16:54, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wiki-ny-2007. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wiki-ny-2007. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wiki-ny-2007. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Frampton

WTF ? you know this needs a source. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:53, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hi Wiki-ny-2007! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Sam Sloan that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 06:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTFORUM

Hello. Talk pages are for the discussion of article improvement. They are not a forum for general discussion about the subject or any kind of fan chat. Please see WP:NOTFORUM. -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:05, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/19/AR2010021902369.html

[2] ttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2010/02/20/GR2010022000200.html

[1]

[2]