User talk:WiedenKunst

March 2021

Hello WiedenKunst. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:WiedenKunst. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=WiedenKunst|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. JBchrch (talk) 23:38, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JBchrch,

thank you for you comment. The story is as follows, first I am a fine artist and I have many fine arts friends. Second my dog had an accident and I had a bill of 4700 Euro to pay. Many of my friends have donated me money to pay this bill. After I got the most of it I wanted to be thankful in the way to publish them in wikipedia, because many have reached the encyclopaedic criteria of wikipedia, with their awards, exhibitions, publications and vitae. I am still about to pay of my depts because of the bill and there are still artists especially woman, who have difficulties to access edit and publish on wikipedia. The underrepresentation of woman in wikipedia is a big problem. In Oslo I met Marte on a conference "Feminism+Art" on this issue.

So I would negate that I am a payed advocate, since 1.) I do not follow any profit oriented aim 2.) I have a feminist political agenda to educate and help woman (artist) to be present at Wikipedia. All in all I am not a Wikipedia professional by myself and need comments and corrections in the outcome.

Strongly I want to negate any intention of SEO miss-use! My payment that is a friendship price / hour is to be for consulting regarding Wix Versurs WordPress, a Word Press Site installation and design and education and support for a possible entering the wikipedia. I didn´t give any guarantee that the article she wrote herself will be published.

The author of the article is Marte Bjorndal herself and not me. I just have published it and helped on the technical side.

She could have published the article from her account too, with my assistance.

So I would rather ask and expect a support of you and the Wikipedia Community to say what changes are necessary in the article that Marte is on Wikipedia since she has reached the appropriate public relevance.

I am not a paid advocate i a commercial and regular business sence. I just want to support artists and scientist in beeing visible on this great free plattform of knowlegde and information. And my "clients" are my friends.

Sincery Yours, WiedenKunst (talk) 07:19, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WiedenKunst and thank you for this thorough answer. I am sorry that you had to go through this and I hope that things are better. However, I need to inform you of the following points, which derive from our core policies and principles:

If you are editing articles about your friends — even if you are not compensated — then you are in a position of conflict of interest. This does not mean that it is impossible for you to edit such articles, but we ask you should comply with the following rules, from our Conflict of interest policy:
- you should disclose your COI when involved with affected articles;
- you are strongly discouraged from editing affected articles directly;
- you may propose changes on talk pages (by using the {{request edit}} template), or by posting a note at the COI noticeboard, so that they can be peer reviewed;
- you should put new articles through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process instead of creating them directly;
- you should not act as a reviewer of affected article(s) at AfC, new pages patrol or elsewhere;
- you should respect other editors by keeping discussions concise.
Your article on Marte Bjorndal has been deleted by a Wikipedia administrator because it was written in a way that was indistinguishable from outright promotion or advertising. In the future, you also need — and in addition to the foregoing rules — to write articles from a neutral point of view, using reliable and independent sources, and avoiding self-published and primary sources.
Finally, and most importantly, Wikipedia editors are very committed to promoting gender equality on the encyclopedia. If you want to add articles about women or are concerned about their under-representation on this website, there are many projects you can involve yourself with, starting with the ongoing Feminism and Folklore 2021 writing contest!

More generally, the more you will contribute on projects that do not involve your friends and simply try to contribute to this incredible project for the sake of it, the more fun you will have!--JBchrch (talk) 09:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear JBchrch, thank you so much for your kind and informative answer. I really didn´t know that for my support of somebody about Wikipedia article publication and get some money I come into COI with the guidelines.

I want to say and this is important that Marte Bjørndal currently refuses to answer the question wheatear she will pay my support or not. Since her article has not yet full-filled the crieteria. And was not published in the first attempt.

So I am not a payed author and in future I will respect the rules you described!

Thank You so much also regarding and for the reference fot the feminist writing contest :)!

Sincerly, WiedenKunst (talk) 12:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Marte Bjørndal/

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Marte Bjørndal/, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JBchrch (talk) 23:47, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Philipp Straub moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Philipp Straub, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 16:50, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Thank you very much. I think my article is ready now. I am asking kindly you for a review of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Philipp_Straub --WiedenKunst (talk) 16:54, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Philipp Straub (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please establish which WP:NMUSICIAN criteria is being met.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Philipp Straub and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Philipp Straub, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 10:41, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WiedenKunst! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 10:41, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of BWM Architects for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BWM Architects is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BWM Architects until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

☢️Plutonical☢️ᵀᵃˡᵏ ᵗᵒ ᵐᵉ 19:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the company is notable, please add inline citations to the text where they should be, use newspapers and other reliable sources which mention the company and its projects. I added some references so that you can understand the difference between having links at the bottom of the page and inline citations. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 00:21, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Philipp Straub

Hello, WiedenKunst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Philipp Straub, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Erich Bernard

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Erich Bernard, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:38, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]