User talk:WesternChristianitytestballi

WesternChristianitytestballi, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi WesternChristianitytestballi! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Question

Do you have an affiliation with the accounts User:Corinal, User:Raginbakin or the subreddit r/GenZedong, which has recently organized coordinated efforts and WP:CANVASSed editors to alter Wikipedia articles related to the authoritarian communist regimes in China, Cuba and elsewhere? Snooganssnoogans (talk) 20:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's a wild accusation out of nowhere. I don't know who they are. Also my information is not even poorly sourced so don't know why you're insinuating I am adding misinformation. Is my edits poorly sourced or do you just feel strongly towards anyone who adds in decent information like in https://www.npr.org/2020/09/23/913650298/as-u-s-views-of-china-grow-more-negative-chinese-support-for-their-government-ri ?? You seem a lot more emotionally involved and I only added in few edits without edit warring and you're already biting my head off. WesternChristianitytestballi (talk) 20:14, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I simply learn about these things from university and figured since they are woefully missing in the article, and why I would add them in.

But if you don't agree, then I am cool with that. You don't need to aggressively criticise me. I was going to add in this last edit. But if you don't agree, then I am not going to waste time debating it. Because I don't really care so much to put lots of time in making sure certain information, is added in or not mentioned. I don't intend to be a long time editor or put lots of time in it. Hence the below edit is completely your choice on whether to add in or not. I am done here.

....

According to Elsbeth Johnson, a senior lecturer at MIT’s Sloan School of Management and Rana Mitter, a professor of the history and politics of modern China at Oxford University, they wrote in Harvard Business Review that many Chinese do believe that their form of government is legitimate and effective and do not believe that democracy is necessary for economic success. They note that strong economic growth and improvements in opportunity and living standards have led to many Chinese seeing the government positively, and that many Chinese people see their own government as being more legitimate and effective than the West’s. They noted a July 2020 polling data from the Ash Center at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government that showed 95% satisfaction with the Beijing government among Chinese citizens and stated that their experience on the ground in China, confirms that trend.

https://hbr.org/2021/05/what-the-west-gets-wrong-about-china WesternChristianitytestballi (talk) 20:29, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey my username got pinged, Snooganssnoogans, why do you have this strange obsession with stalking random editors who made edits on an article you happen to as well, making false and unfounded accusations of ""affiliation"" (whatever that means) and continue to do so over a month after such edits took place. It seems you have some vendetta against editors who disagree with what should be in articles about this topic, and assume they are from some subreddit you also have a strange obsession with. You continue to claim both I and this editors are part of some "canvassing" despite you continuously acting in that way.

Please stop pinging me, or harassing others because of your vendetta. Corinal (talk) 01:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peng Shuai RfC

Hello WesternChristianitytestballi, not sure whether you've noticed, but if you're interested, would like to hear your thoughts on this. CurryCity (talk) 01:12, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi WesternChristianitytestballi! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How long should it take?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MangoTareeface9. Thank you. Estnot (talk) 15:08, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:MangoTareeface9 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MangoTareeface9. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:36, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]