User talk:Weatheriscool777

Wild edits

@Weatheriscool777 Please don't make such edits on 2023 Atlantic Hurricane Season . Wikipedia is not for jokes. Hurricanehiker 2208 (talk) 01:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"I'm deeply sorry for doing this, I promise my edits will be beneficial instead of completely messing with it and vandalising it."

               -Weatheriscool777

October 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 01:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll also add that your sandbox has been deleted per U5 as Wikipedia is not a web host for your fantasy hurricane season. I've also rejected your submission of the draft. If all you intend to do is vandalise articles and create made up stuff as article, then Wikipedia is not the place for you as an editor. -- Whpq (talk) 20:36, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 2023 Atlantic hurricane season, you may be blocked from editing. AgisdeSparte (talk) 00:39, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2023 Atlantic hurricane season. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈) 23:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:2023 hypothetical hurricane season

A tag has been placed on Draft:2023 hypothetical hurricane season requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Hypothetical pages are not encyclopedic.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~ Hiking Hurricane _(contribs) 19:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Weatheriscool777/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Weatheriscool777/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Hypothetical pages are not encyclopedic.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~ Hiking Hurricane _(contribs) 19:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 hypothetical hurricane season (October 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Whpq was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not a web host for made up hurricane seasons

Whpq (talk) 20:19, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Weatheriscool777! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whpq (talk) 20:19, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Please stop using Wikipedia as a free webhost for things you've made up. This is an encyclopedia project. I realize that you're very young, and that you are frustrated, but this is how the real world works, and it's not going to change to suit you. I recommend that you wait a couple of years until you are mature enough to help us out. Acroterion (talk) 01:18, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To add on to this advice, if you do want to work on hypothetical storms, the Hypothetical Hurricanes Wiki is a better place for it. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:49, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to make new Wikis

I have gotten 2 new Ideas, Hurricane Categories, and bee swarm simulator. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 23:13, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hurricane categories is already listed at Saffir-Simpson scale Insendieum (talk) 00:35, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Weatheriscool777: WP:DAW. Please see WP:YFA.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:44, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Categories of hurricanes(Real to hypothetical) (October 14)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Phuzion was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Phuzion (talk) 23:28, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop the disruption!

You CAN and will be blocked if you continue this! It is not worth it. Stop trying. Insendieum (talk) 23:45, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Insendieum, I’ve already reported this user to the WP:AIV. Clearly WP:NOTHERE. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈) 23:50, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 23:50, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Weatheriscool777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here It has been a full year since I was last on this wiki. I am much more mature than I was earlier. I promise with my soul that I won't vandalize the wiki pages anymore.

Decline reason:

This is obviously not truthful. You realise we can see your edit history, right? We can see it hasn't been a full year? Additionally, Confirmed to F0rce 23(Hurricanehunter) which I'll go and block forthwith. Yamla (talk) 21:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This acount

This account may or may not come back sometime in the future but must take strict procautions for a while... Weatheriscool777 (talk) 23:40, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Weatheriscool777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here this is my 2nd unblock chance. I will right a paragraph full of reasons why I won't vandalise wiki pages, And why I should be unblocked.

First of most, it has been a full year since i've been blocked and now i'm ready to redempt.

I'm much more mature than last time i've visited this website and edited it.

Second of all, over the past couple years of writing i've written over 20 documents.

As of me boosting my skill to write paragraphs like this one.

Next, If I think about vandalizing again I will take it out on a different object or website.

Finally, I promise very clearly I'm willing for the last try.

This time, I WILL NOT EDIT PAGES UNLESS I ASK THE OWNER OF IT. I hope this paragraph will persuade you. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 23:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's been a little over 10 months, not a year. Articles do not have owners- they are written and owned by the community as a whole. You have also evaded this block, which now means unblocking you won't be considered before six months from today. Further block evasion will reset this timer. I actually don't think you've demonstrated more maturity yet. You furthermore indicate that you don't really have specific edits you want to make and you may not return at all. You have given no reason here to remove the block. 331dot (talk) 08:49, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts at the bottom. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply". 331dot (talk) 08:49, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My current block...

lightly for about the past year, I've been blocked. What does that mean? It means it could be another year before they unblock me. It's been a while and I truly have matured in small ways. Someday I might get unblocked and I will make my place right, and set things right. When I get unblocked I won't vandalize even if I'm mad/angry. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 17:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe the admins/moderators don't know that I'm not lying. They think I am, but it isn't true. I wasn't lying.

But they are right that I did vandalize the other articles. I'm deeply sorry for that.

If the recent unblock posts didn't persuade you, then this won't. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 17:30, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't very smart of me to create several different accounts to vandalize and invade the wiki further.

But that was me in the past who was younger, much less mature and self-controllable. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 17:31, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your bad behavior certainly extended to 3 September 2024 when you attempted to mislead us about how long it had been since you had last edited. --Yamla (talk) 22:08, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was estimating, not trying to fool you guys, it has been about a year since I was banned to be more precise. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 01:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Man, I grinded down you guys trust by a lot. At most unban me by February 2025. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 01:47, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I won't give up, and I don't wish to. This is why I've been begging on this Wikipedia for the past week to get unbanned. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 01:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And, I have evidence that I will stop vandalizing and using sockpuppets.

I could quit right a 2-paged paragraph for you guys to unban me.

A normal vandaliser would've given up trying to get unbanned.

But I won't because I will no longer commit such crimes against the community. Weatheriscool777 (talk) 01:52, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Six months from now is 2025-03-07. We expect zero further edits, including to this talk page until then. At that time, you will have to address your previous bad behaviour and will have to address your attempt to mislead us here in September, 2024. ZERO FURTHER EDITS including to this talk page, until then. --Yamla (talk) 09:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]