User talk:Wattsj528

Welcome!

Hello, Wattsj528, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Spiffy Pictures, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Melcous (talk) 23:28, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Spiffy Pictures

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Spiffy Pictures. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Hole and Stoty; Jack's Big Music Show. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Hole and Stoty; Jack's Big Music Show – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Melcous (talk) 23:28, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at The Pirates Who Don't Do Anything: A VeggieTales Movie, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Angelina Ballerina with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:11, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:FourSeasons-Sherry&11Others.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:FourSeasons-Sherry&11Others.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Kipperlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kipperlogo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:CliffordtheBigRedDoglogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:CliffordtheBigRedDoglogo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:06, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Arthurlogo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Arthurlogo.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:06, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at The Pirates Who Don't Do Anything: A VeggieTales Movie. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:19, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at I Swear. Laber□^T 20:05, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at I Swear, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 20:07, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at I Swear shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Meters (talk) 20:17, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give I Swear ‎ a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name I Swear (John Michael Montgomery song) . This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. I see what you were trying to do now, but you cannot move an article that way. You lost all of the edit history. Meters (talk) 20:21, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 Hours for Edit Warring at I Swear. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 20:30, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make a major change to an article (like, for example, making it a disambiguation page), and others object, you need to discuss the matter before reverting them. Edit warring is absolutely unacceptable, and further edit warring will result in longer blocks. You have 0 edits to any talk page during this incident, and that needs to change as well. Please review our policies. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 20:31, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at The Pirates Who Don't Do Anything: A VeggieTales Movie shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Meters (talk) 21:37, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at The Berenstain Bears (2002 TV series). Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Stop making these undiscussed moves. The article clearly states that this show started in 2003, not 2002, so I've undone your move. Meters (talk) 21:44, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you have sources showing htat th eshow is actually from 2002 please discuss them on the article's talk page. Meters (talk) 21:49, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at I Swear ‎. Stop moving this article. You have been asked to discuss the move, and you you have already been blocked once for edit warring over this. Discuss it or leave it alone. Meters (talk) 21:58, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Pirates Who Don't Do Anything: A VeggieTales Movie

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for Edit Warring at The Pirates Who Don't Do Anything: A VeggieTales Movie. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 14:25, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You need to start discussing edits at the article's talk page if other editors object. Wikipedia is a consensus-driven project, not one where you get to bash other editors over the head until they give up and go edit something else. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 14:25, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Our Time Family Entertainment

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Our Time Family Entertainment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KDS4444^Talk 22:55, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Meters (talk) 19:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Our Time Family Entertainment

Hello Wattsj528,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Our Time Family Entertainment for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:55, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising and other persistent disruption in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:01, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:OurTimeFamilyEntertainmentlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:OurTimeFamilyEntertainmentlogo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Spiffy Pictures for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spiffy Pictures is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spiffy Pictures until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RL0919 (talk) 21:31, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]