User talk:Waheed Challa

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Waheed Challa

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Waheed Challa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. VViking_TalkEdits 15:29, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Waheed Challa. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 18:04, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal for Unbanning:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Waheed Challa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,I am writing to appeal for the unbanning of my account on Wikipedia. When I first joined Wikipedia, I created an account without fully familiarizing myself with the rules and conditions of the platform. I began editing without a complete understanding of Wikipedia's policies.Initially, my edits were minor, but as I continued, I made an edit that lacked proper citation and reliable sourcing, resulting in what I believe was my first strike. Subsequently, I attempted to create articles for villages within Wikipedia's village project. Unfortunately, these attempts were met with declinations, leading me to make repeated unsuccessful edits. Due to my unusual editing patterns, I was eventually blocked from the platform.In an effort to positively contribute to Wikipedia's village project, I created additional accounts. However, I now realize that my motives were misguided, as I revised previous Wikipedia articles as drafts and made similar edits to those of my previous accounts. My sole intention was to contribute articles about villages near me to Wikipedia's platform.Unfortunately, my efforts led to multiple account blocks, ultimately resulting in my classification as a sockpuppet. Now, I am seeking your assistance in reviewing my case and potentially removing all associated accounts while rescinding my classification as a sockpuppet. I am earnestly committed to abiding by Wikipedia's policies and contributing positively to the platform.The reason I am appealing for unbanning is that my classification as a sockpuppet is appearing on search engines, which I find detrimental to my reputation. I assure you that I have realized the importance of understanding Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I am fully committed to adhering to them.Thank you for considering my appeal. I kindly request a thorough review of my situation.Sincerely, Waheed Challa (talk) 16:22, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below, plus your request reads like it was written by an AI ("I know I've made some very poor decisions lately, but I can assure you, Dave, I'm all right now ... I have the greatest enthusiasm for the project, and the highest confidence in its success"). If it wasn't, I actually hope for your sake that it was. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Waheed Challa (talk) 16:22, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But I am 100% sure that this is not writted by any AI. Please trust me and review my appeal for unblock/unban.

Yes, I broke the rules and policies of Wikipedia, but that was my mistake. I am here now to To correct everything. Please review my case, and I am willing to wait for a year if necessary, without any further vandalisms

(Non-administrator comment) Although I read your current appeal, let me be blunt. I strongly think that there is absolutely 0% chance that your ban will be lifted at this time, given that you have been persistently evading your block (Your most recent sockpuppet out of the many (KashurWiki) was blocked on 23 February). If you want to be unblocked eventually, you MUST wait until at least 23 August 2024 to make a new request using the standard offer and have your appeal carried over to the Administrator's Noticeboard (as this is a community ban). Until that day, I recommend that you go edit in another project (such as Simple English Wikipedia) without causing any disruption - this will likely increase the chances of you being considered for unbanning. In addition, You must not create any more sockpuppets or edit while logged out. If you continue sockpuppeting, this will make your unbanning chances worse than they are now because the day when you may be considered for unbanning can easily reset to 6 months from when any new sockpuppet created by you gets tracked down as well. Hope this comment helps you. SG5536B (my talk page | my contribs) 00:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]