User talk:Waggers/Archive 16

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
99	Romsey (talk)	Add sources
10	Weston, Southampton (talk)	Add sources
13	Botley, Hampshire (talk)	Add sources
3	Vladimír Lulek (talk)	Add sources
98	Didcot (talk)	Add sources
19	Eastleigh railway station (talk)	Add sources
85	Babybird (talk)	Cleanup
16	Highbury College (talk)	Cleanup
233	Horsham (talk)	Cleanup
33	Water-meadow (talk)	Expand
1,236	Staten Island (talk)	Expand
895	Operation Enduring Freedom (talk)	Expand
277	Network congestion (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
4,037	Al-Qaeda (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
609	Islamic terrorism (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
126	Consumer-to-consumer (talk)	Merge
937	Throughput (talk)	Merge
18	Anston (talk)	Merge
68	Lancet surveys of Iraq War casualties (talk)	Wikify
1,577	Hamid Karzai (talk)	Wikify
136	Barnstaple (talk)	Wikify
21	Network Interface Layer Security (talk)	Orphan
2	Urszula Plewka-Schmidt (talk)	Orphan
1	Kierkegaard Society of the UK (talk)	Orphan
10	Itchen Abbas (talk)	Stub
3	Allington, North Wiltshire (talk)	Stub
5	Chartwell Green (talk)	Stub
43	Alan R. Katritzky (talk)	Stub
7	Hound, Hampshire (talk)	Stub
6	Itchen Abbas railway station (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:44, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
	Highfield, Southampton (talk)	Add sources
	Totton and Eling (talk)	Add sources
	Baron Swaythling (talk)	Add sources
	Cranbury Park (talk)	Add sources
	Otterbourne (talk)	Add sources
	Barton Peveril Sixth Form College (talk)	Add sources
22	Communications in the Isle of Man (talk)	Cleanup
6	Mill Chase Academy (talk)	Cleanup
	Philip Rahtz (talk)	Cleanup
170	St Mary's Stadium (talk)	Expand
166	Tommy Knight (talk)	Expand
	Russell Bencraft (talk)	Expand
	Iran and state-sponsored terrorism (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2,291	Voice over IP (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
	Blackwater, Hampshire (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
	Mark and recapture (talk)	Merge
	Kashmir conflict (talk)	Merge
	Scale-free network (talk)	Merge
51	Iraq Body Count project (talk)	Wikify
	Pakistan and state sponsored terrorism (talk)	Wikify
	NetFlow (talk)	Wikify
	T. Wilson (Petworth cricketer) (talk)	Orphan
	Robert Rumsey (talk)	Orphan
3	Michael Baer (talk)	Orphan
5	Boyatt Wood (talk)	Stub
77	Brandon Bollig (talk)	Stub
	St. George Catholic College (talk)	Stub
	Peartree (ward) (talk)	Stub
	Gwynnes Limited (talk)	Stub
	Bevois Valley (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:36, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on Voronezh

The vandalism by 217.118.95.124 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), who you just blocked, is being continued by 109.106.138.97 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). Thomas.W ^talk 11:57, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Thomas.W: Thanks, now also blocked. WaggersTALK 11:58, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 1

My edit to the May 1 page was anything but Vandalism. How will people know about the mentions of the date in pop-culture and media if the information is suppressed?Bigbug92 (talk) 12:19, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Antoniopadillarocks

Did you block me on April 29? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antoniopadillarocks (talk • contribs) 10:28, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Antoniopadillarocks: Yes. WaggersTALK 10:56, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it was 15:48, 28 April 2014 (UTC). WaggersTALK 11:02, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you block me on April 28 or April 29? Because — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antoniopadillarocks (talk • contribs) 20:58, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator intervention against vandalism

You declined at Administrator intervention against vandalism, so I thought I would bring some evidence to the table. Could you explain this to me please? How is it possible that the IPs edit is a perfect match to a revision of the article way back on the 7th July 2013? The only explanation is as I said before, the IP simply reverted the article back to the old revision. To camouflage his actions the IP used a misleading (but believable) edit summary. However like all lies, they are easily proved false.

As we know, the IPs edit summary was regarding his use of AWB, but wait, how is it possible that the IPs edit summary is the exact same as User:ChrisGualtieri's on the 11th July 2013? Strange eh?

In summary, the IPs edit is a carbon copy of the article on the 7th July 2013 and the edit summary was copy and pasted from ChrisGualtieri's edit summary on the 11th July 2013. I hope this evidence is to your satisfaction. Antiochus the Great (talk) 09:30, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, if you were to actually examine the IPs edit, it doesn't appear to be a typical AWB edit. This in itself is enough to arouse suspicion. Antiochus the Great (talk) 09:32, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Antiochus the Great: Thanks, that's helpful. It would have really helped if you'd provided that diff of the old edit so that it was clear which one you were referring to. I've now blocked the IP and reverted their edit; apologies for the confusion. WaggersTALK 09:38, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No apologies needed, I should have provided the evidence when I reported the IP. Thank you for the assistance and much appreciated. Antiochus the Great (talk) 09:43, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The edit summary was indeed copied because that version of AWB is not possible to use and it lacks the link to AWB which is automatically generated. And the "Use dmy dates|date=September 2010" template is not something which would be added by any script or any mere revision. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:10, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thought I would bring this to both of your attention as this is most certainly related to the above. Look at this edit. Why is an IP reverting the article back to ChrisGualtieri's revision on 11th July 2013? So first they revert to the 7th July 2013 and copy and paste Chris's edit summary, and now they simply revert to Chris's revision. Very unusual. Antiochus the Great (talk) 15:09, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Might be using a proxy? Anyways, I'm not liking this. I think the page needs some protection. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:20, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Revision to Sherlock Holmes & the case of the Silk Stocking

Sorry to offend - the entry was not intended to indicate that you had made a mistake, but to query why Nancy Banks-Smith should think that referring to Edward the Seventh - an entirely accurate statement for a film set in 1903 - should be "intended to tickle American tootsies". Any thoughts? Regards 86.137.202.191 (talk) 19:40, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@86.137.202.191: No offence caused, but such questions really need to be asked on the article's talk page (if you go to the article and click on the "Talk" tab at the top, that's where to ask it) rather than on the article itself. I'm afraid I can't help you with the answer myself but editor who regularly monitor the article will see your message on the talk page when you post it there. For more information on talk pages, please see WP:TALK. Best wishes, WaggersTALK 18:34, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't seen the production since it was broadcast, but what I suspect Banks-Smith meant is that he may have been referred to off-handedly as "King Edward the 7th" rather than simply "the King." After all, when discussing the current monarch in everyday conversation, you wouldn't say "I enjoyed watching Queen Elizabeth the Second's jubilee concert." It would sound ridiculous. You'd simply say "I enjoyed watching the Queen's jubilee concert." In any case, it's a criticism Banks-Smith made in a professionally-published article and used as a cited example of the mixed reviews the production received - we can't start adding editorial comments into articles saying we disagree with it, that's not how Wikipedia works, as I have always understood it. Angmering (talk) 07:34, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
8	Horton Heath, Hampshire (talk)	Add sources
17	Southampton Common (talk)	Add sources
10	Hockley Railway Viaduct (talk)	Add sources
13	St Mary's, Southampton (talk)	Add sources
25	Sholing (talk)	Add sources
9	Harefield, Southampton (talk)	Add sources
1,293	Mujahideen (talk)	Cleanup
528	United States special operations forces (talk)	Cleanup
15	Stubbington House School (talk)	Cleanup
31	.berlin (talk)	Expand
26	Woolston, Southampton (talk)	Expand
18	Hampshire Senior Cup (talk)	Expand
65	Opposition to the War in Afghanistan (2001–present) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
32	Politics in the British Isles (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
142	Iraqi insurgency (Iraq War) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
7,045	Osama bin Laden (talk)	Merge
7	Uxbridge Cricket Club Ground (talk)	Merge
73	Harkat-ul-Mujahideen (talk)	Merge
140	Levellers (band) (talk)	Wikify
3	Yorkshire County Cricket Club in 2005 (talk)	Wikify
151	65daysofstatic (talk)	Wikify
3	Derek Lane (talk)	Orphan
1	William Young (cricketer) (talk)	Orphan
1	John White (cricketer, born 1855) (talk)	Orphan
210	Chicken egg sizes (talk)	Stub
7	Goodworth Clatford (talk)	Stub
7	Upper Clatford (talk)	Stub
4	Seale Chalk Pit (talk)	Stub
24	Main river (talk)	Stub
6	Bevois (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:51, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
8	Wessex Lane Halls (talk)	Add sources
27	Mr Smith (The Sarah Jane Adventures) (talk)	Add sources
143	University of Lincoln (talk)	Add sources
38	WestQuay (talk)	Add sources
259	Newcastle Brown Ale (talk)	Add sources
7	Crownhill (talk)	Add sources
19	Borough of Ashford (talk)	Cleanup
242	Aftermath of the September 11 attacks (talk)	Cleanup
141	History of Liverpool (talk)	Cleanup
21	History of the Port of Southampton (talk)	Expand
11	Royal South Hants Hospital (talk)	Expand
9	Index of New Hampshire-related articles (talk)	Expand
268	Al-Qaeda insurgency in Yemen (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
72	Preventive war (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
539	Clash of Civilizations (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
24	Fahid Mohammed Ally Msalam (talk)	Merge
51	British Gas plc (talk)	Merge
79	Manhunt (military) (talk)	Merge
40	Liss (talk)	Wikify
72	City of Canterbury (talk)	Wikify
18	Global Islamic Media Front (GIMF) (talk)	Wikify
5	Jens Geiger (talk)	Orphan
5	Immigration into Hampshire (talk)	Orphan
0	Bergvik, Ekerö kommun (talk)	Orphan
8	St Denys (talk)	Stub
2	Itchen Valley (talk)	Stub
0	Long Common (talk)	Stub
6	Central Baptist Church, Southampton (talk)	Stub
3	Christ Church, Freemantle (talk)	Stub
6	Southampton City Art Gallery (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:21, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TemplateData

When you added this TemplateData, did you use a script, or create it by hand? I'm trying to figure out how likely it is that TemplateData contains a space (" ") in the "description" field. My theory is that if that's done by a script, it's going to be more common. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 17:08, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Whatamidoing (WMF): "Script" is a little strong - I generated it with the aid of an Excel spreadsheet I've made that helps to convert the table containing the list of parameters and their descriptions that often appears on /doc pages, into Templatedata. To date I haven't shared that spreadsheet with anyone just yet, so presumably that means fields with a " " description shouldn't occur in the TemplateData of many templates. Hope that helps, WaggersTALK 17:32, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that's good to know. By the way, have you seen the new script? Click here, and then on the "Manage template documentation" button to have a look. (It's just a sandbox, so you can change anything you'd like there.) I'd be interested in hearing how you think it compares to other approaches you've used. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 23:14, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Whatamidoing (WMF): The script looks excellent, much more user friendly than anything I've previously tried. I couldn't get the previous TemplateData-generating javascripts to work at all (hence going down the spreadsheet route). Is the new script available to use in earnest on en.wiki yet? WaggersTALK 14:27, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so, but I'll ask around this morning and see if we could get it installed here. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 16:57, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I received an immediate response: the last fix that the devs were worried about should appear at MediaWiki.org in another hour or two, and since you were interested in it, one of them has volunteered to backport it and make it appear here sooner than it otherwise could. As a result, it's possible that this tool will be enabled in the next couple of days (my guess is next Thursday at the latest). Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 17:09, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Whatamidoing (WMF):That's excellent news, thanks for the updates. WaggersTALK 11:25, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hampshire cleanup listing

A trial run is available at Hampshire. --Bamyers99 (talk) 14:29, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Bamyers99: Thanks, that's brilliant - it's going to be so helpful for the project. WaggersTALK 07:18, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Immigration into Hampshire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clapton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly request

Hello there Waggers! I'm noticing a couple things about your signature that I'd like to discuss with you. First, your signature is 305 characters long, which is a violation of our signature length policy. Since the MediaWiki software does not allow signatures of a length greater than 255 characters, I'm assuming that you are properly SUBSTituting your signature from a template; while this is frowned upon due to the risk involved and the likelyhold that if you're doing this then you are likely violating other policies, it is allowable. Please do use caution and watch that template page like a hawk. Finally, you are using a lot of obsolete <font> tags in your signature, which there is a whole discussion about on VPR if you are intrigued. As such, I'd like to offer you a replacement chunk of signature code that would allow you to deal with all of these issues in one shot and maintain the general appearance of your existing signature. If you are interested in that, I suggest replacing:

'''[[User:Waggers|<span style="color:#9E7BFF;">W</span><span style="color:#9172EC;">a</span><span style="color:#8467D7;">g</span><span style="color:#7A5DC7;">g</span><span style="color:#7A5DC7;">e</span><span style="color:#8D38C9;">r</span><span style="color:#7D1B7E;">s</span>]]'''''[[User talk:Waggers|<span style="color:green;"><small>TALK</small></span>]]''

with:

[[User:Waggers|<b style="color:#98F">W</b><b style="color:#97E">a</b><b style="color:#86D">g</b><b style="color:#75C">ge</b><b  style="color:#83C">r</b><b  style="color:#728">s</b>]][[User talk:Waggers|<small  style="color:#080">''TALK''</small>]]

which will result in a 247 character long signature (58 characters shorter) with an appearance of: Waggers TALK
compared to your existing 305 character long signature of: WaggersTALK
— Either way. Happy editing! — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 12:27, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's awesome, duly changed. Many thanks Technical 13 Waggers TALK 13:17, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome. — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 13:22, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

thnx --Crystall Ball (talk) 12:15, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
83	South Western Main Line (talk)	Add sources
14	Civic Centre, Southampton (talk)	Add sources
24	King Edward VI School, Southampton (talk)	Add sources
46	Itchen Bridge (talk)	Add sources
37	Chandler's Ford (talk)	Add sources
1,013	Surrey (talk)	Add sources
36	St John's College (Portsmouth) (talk)	Cleanup
35	Stockbridge, Hampshire (talk)	Cleanup
74	Pakistan and state-sponsored terrorism (talk)	Cleanup
11	Romsey railway station (talk)	Expand
20	Marchwood (talk)	Expand
5	2006 English cricket season (talk)	Expand
23	Meon Valley Railway (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
21	Detentions following the September 11 attacks (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
17	Farnborough (Main) railway station (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
383	Peccary (talk)	Merge
50	Season ticket (talk)	Merge
23	Alton Line (talk)	Merge
32	The Spinto Band (talk)	Wikify
561	Imperial College London (talk)	Wikify
227	Dozen (talk)	Wikify
1	Björndal (talk)	Orphan
2	Funtley Deviation (talk)	Orphan
2	Måstad (talk)	Orphan
4	Hiltingbury (talk)	Stub
2	Nicholstown (talk)	Stub
8	Bassett Green (talk)	Stub
7	Woolston railway station (talk)	Stub
4	Allbrook and North Boyatt (talk)	Stub
7	Redbridge Community School (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:31, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tool is live

Hi Waggers,

I meant to say something before, but in case you haven't noticed already, the TemplateData tool is live now, due to your request. I just tried it out a few minutes ago, and it was great. It did take a second or two for the button to appear (in the upper left, when you edit the /doc page), but if you run into any problems, please let me know ASAP. Thanks, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 22:59, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Exciting news! I'll have a play. Thanks for the heads-up Waggers TALK 09:15, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Townhill Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maisonette. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For blocking a nasty new vandal. Bearian (talk) 22:01, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Datestamp for achive bot): Bearian (talk) 22:01, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]