This is an archive of past discussions about User:WODUP. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
{{unblock|blocked IP on a shared computer}}
You were blocked by Joke137 for the following reason (see our blocking policy):
User:Licorne sock
Your IP address is (deleted).
I've unblocked the IP address, then reblocked it to hit only not-logged-in editors. In theory, this should allow you to edit fully whilst logged in. If I'm wrong, shout me (using {{unblock}} again) and I'll see what I can do. Hope this helps. ➨ ЯEDVERS09:11, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for your help in RC patrolling. Be a bit careful with the use of the popups and make sure you revert to the right version. Here you wound up reinstating something which probably should not be reinstated. --Casper2k304:53, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
I saw that after the fact. I'm still trying to get the hang of popups. What a coincidence that earlier today, I corrected one of your revisions, and now you corrected one of mine. WODUP04:59, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
SUP DUDE< YOU PLAY BASS TO !!!!! HELL YEA. Sorry bout the stupid vandalisim thing. I had to do i once. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Eltonbitch (talk • contribs) .
I noticed the note you placed on the talk page of the person who recently added the link to the FE page. What about it is commercial? Anchoress16:03, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
The special offers link at the top contains the commercial content. "Here I'll be listing all the sales and different pages I recommend you check out at some point." The site then links to two commercial video rental web sites. WODUP (talk) 16:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
(This reply is also posted at Talk:Female ejaculation) Okay. If the link goes in, then it goes in (per WP policy). I feel, though, that the better solution would be to include the information from the web site in the article. WODUP (talk) 16:18, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Hot Six Revert
I have reverted your revert on the Hot six page. the information that was added is in fact relevant to the novel in question. I will admit that i could probably be better presented though. Kevmin07:23, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Sorry about that revision, thanks for correcting it, and thanks for letting me know about it. At first glance, cars dying seemed like a lot of the nonsense I've seen on here. Again, sorry, thanks, and thanks. WODUP Talk19:49, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
For your help with protecting King River Tasmania - It's good to see that there are active anti vandal workers out there! SatuSuro15:14, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
Thanks for applying to use VandalSniper! You have been approved. If have not already done so, you may find instructions to install VS on the project page.
As some of the libraries VandalSniper runs on are currently in transition, there have been a few issues reported with setup. At the moment, Linux is the most compatible platform for VS. If you have questions or problems, you may find help on the project page or its talk page. Please also feel free to contact me for help and I will do my best to assist you.
St. Pius X Catholic High School (DeKalb County, Georgia)
You say its vandalism, but I believe the edit you are refering to was an additinonal section I made for the St. Pius X Highschool clearly under the title of "Criticism". Everything put under there was true in the sense that many sources have criticized the school for the reasons I listed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kerouacknows (talk • contribs) 21:01, 14 November 2006 (UTC).
Yeah, sorry about that. A few of us here are trying to determine if AntiVandalBot has an "Anon Bias" by randomly selecting and vandalising articles, then testing the bot's response time for both reversion and and notification. So far its seems to us that AntiVandalBot is somewhat faster to pounce on anon edits, but not as quick to leave messages on thier talk pages about it; however, that result needs to be taken with a grain of salt because we have not yet controlled for other factors that could be effecting the response time. 129.108.96.22123:13, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
problem with edit of Marshan page
In September I put up a page for my band at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshan
Before I put it there, there was a disambiguation page. As the links on that page were not exact mayches for Marshan, but merely similar terms, I assumed that I should just replace that page with my exact match. You recently reverted the page back to the original disambiguation page. I'm not a wikifiddler so maybe I did something wrong, but it didn't seem like it to me. What should I be doing? There are no other exact matches for my term (Marshan) so should that page not show my band's information?
Boosy13:12, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
There are two things we need to discuss. The first is disambiguation pages, and the second is writing an article about your band.
If you need anything else or have any more questions, let me know, and I'll try my best to help. Thanks for your help on the encyclopedia. WODUPtalk/contribs07:26, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the info. I have updated the disambiguation page with an extra link for Marshan. I also updated the page with touring information that meets the notability requirements listed in one of the articles you listed. One think I am not sure about - because there is already a disambiguation page with the name Marshan, I had to create the new page with the name MarshanRock, but when the page is displayed the title should really just be Marshan rather than MarshanRock - how can I alter this?
Bad news: The content seems to be copied from the band's web site or the band's MySpace page, and those sources don't give permission to copy, distribute, and/or modify the content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. I had to replace the page with the {{Copyvio}} template. Either the sources need to have licenses compatible with Wikipedia, or the articles need to be rewritten so that there is no copyright violation. Please read and follow the instructions on the article page. WODUPtalk/contribs05:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Havre de Grace, Maryland
dec 2 06 1300 est
a user by the id of 130.49.5.102 has vandilized the havre de grace site by deleting submissions. his notes indicate his personal dislike of the content and he didnt contact me prior to doing it.
thanks onekooleskimo
signed but i dont have tides...
First of all, welcome. You're being bold with your contributions, and that's great! Check out Wikipedia:Vandalism to learn about what is and is not vandalism. I see that the IP user corrected capitalization and removed a section about the city's politics. It doesn't seem that that section was written in a neutral point of view. The user's edit summary was "Attempted to clean up this poorly written article". I don't see a personal dislike of the content. Please see the five pillars that define Wikipedia's character, and when dealing with other Wikipedians, please assume good faith. As you have read or will read in the five pillars, this is a collaboratively written encyclopedia licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License, and by editing, you are allowing those edits to be copied and revised by anyone. No one needs your express permission to add to or remove your contributions. I'm going to copy this section to your user talk page to make sure that you have a chance to read it. You can still reply here or on your own talk page. WODUPtalk/contribs05:35, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
vengfull arnt you...
you think you get the last word...you editors are like chat room [profanity removed].....i worked with another editor...but in keeping with your rules i will remove all mentions of any buismess venture...such as radio stations...ball clubs...just as you mentioned you removed the tidewater...in fact i think no more than 3 lines for tinh artical i necessary...had is at cooard XXXXX and is there. because somone somwhere might say info is biased ...inaccurate...not balanced so lets cut it all. and the article will say
havre de grace
coord XXXXXXXXX
hows that.
and by the way the sources were cut by another editor...you just dont like critizem...as you have shown...and ill bet you remove this and give your self an award.
im going to mention that anmin editors of wikopedia have removed content and sources ...ref: history of artical...its referanced and in wikopedia see artical history
leave the [profanity removed] thing alone...your acting like your in a chat room...and dont send me any links ...or other [profanity removed] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.250.238.56 (talk • contribs) 16:49, 3 December 2006 (UTC).
In regards to the multiple IfD nominations you completed today, you did not notify the uploader, User:Taelmx, that the images had been nominated. I have made that notice for you. The notification of the uploader is one of the three parts of the nomination of images at IfD. I would ask that in the future you notify the uploader. If you have any questions, please let me know.--Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr.)21:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent application to use AutoWikiBrowser. I have approved your request and you should now be able to use the AWB application. Be sure to check every edit before you save it, and don't forget to check out the AWB Guide. You can get any help you need over on the AWB talk page. Feel free to contact me with any questions, Alphachimp05:12, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
May you and your family have a Merry Christmas, as well as any other Holiday you may celebrate. I hope that warmth, good cheer, and love surround you during these special days. May God bless you during the Holidays. | AndonicOTalk | Sign Here01:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
WODUP you are way out of line deleting space food sticks.
1. I can't see the page you deleted - how do I know someone didn't vandalize it and you have deleted MY hard work??
2. I only took one sentence from the "fan page" which was advertising copy from the original product launch. that's not copyrighted material - that is historical fact - historical facts are not copyright-able. and I think I did site my source as the fan page.
This whole thing really makes me angry because you show a complete dis-regard for my TIME and EFFORT.
I'm not the only person who edited that page. I did start it.
I start things up - I don't flesh things out. That's what I do. There is nothing wrong with that.
I hope writing this enlightens you a little to my point of view. I'm sure you must think you are doing the right thing but I disagree. --cda21:47, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
I'll address your concerns, but I need to remind you of one of the entries under the Policies section on my talk page: Assume good faith. I know that right now you're a bit upset, and that's okay. We all get angry every now and then, but you say that I show a complete disregard for your time and effort. That is not the case at all. We're both here to write an encyclopedia, and I do appreciate your contributions to the project.
If I remember correctly, there was only one other contributor, who added a small addition to the article. It was not vandalized, and if it were and there was a good version in the page history, Angela or I would have reverted to it.
If I removed the copied text from the article, I don't think there would have then been sufficient context, and it may have been speedily deleted under criterion A1.
You are right in that history can not be copyrighted. Specific accounts, however, can be. The text from the web page was copyrighted. There's nothing to say someone can't paraphrase that content and use it as a source.
I hope I've addressed your concerns. Feel free to talk to me about any issues, or you can ask Angela on her talk page. Oh, and be sure to refer to the article as Space Food Sticks, with the first letter of each word capitalized. Any other capitalization results in a different page title and may be more difficult for others to find. Wodup03:57, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
I don't understand why you didn't just take out the text you found offensive. The entry, the dates, the manufacturer, the categories - they were all correct. The sentence I took from the fan page "non-frozen balanced energy snack in rod form containing nutritionally balanced amounts of carbohydrate, fat and protein," is just a part of history. It is not the fanpage author's writing. And how can I put that in my own words, that makes no sense at all. The interesting part is the wording that they used.cda14:33, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Two examples for you: Salem (cigarette) - pretty much similar to my Space Food Sticks entry. A kind of obscure brand name product, entry includes dates of manufacture, company info, the categories R.J. Reynolds brands;1956 introductions;Cigarette brands;Brand name products stubs and the entry also includes their slogan "You can take Salem out of the country, but...you can't take the country out of Salem." My point is that Salem cigarettes are including in Wikipedia with no problem. Why is something that I enter that is very similar in format not OK?! Here's another example: Slim Jim. How is the Slim Jim entry different from my entry of Space Food Sticks?--cda16:58, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
The article Space Food Sticks appeared to have mostly been copied from that fan page. Regarding Salem (cigarette), this page claims a copyright on the text of the article, however, the text of the article was added collaboratively over time by several users, not all at one time by one user. If the text that appears on the web site were added to the article at one time by one user, I would guess that it was a copyright violation and would tag for speedy deletion. As it is, I believe that that web site is wrong for copying our article and not following the terms of the GNU FDL.
You're welcome. I didn't think it really needed to be tagged in the first place, as the topic was notable and the problems were easily fixable; at the same time, I realized that put the onus on me, as it was "easily fixable." I'm not certain that Amazon.com had exclusive rights on that text, as it seemed not that professionally written.
WODUP you are way out of line deleting space food sticks.
1. I can't see the page you deleted - how do I know someone didn't vandalize it and you have deleted MY hard work??
2. I only took one sentence from the "fan page" which was advertising copy from the original product launch. that's not copyrighted material - that is historical fact - historical facts are not copyright-able. and I think I did site my source as the fan page.
This whole thing really makes me angry because you show a complete dis-regard for my TIME and EFFORT.
I'm not the only person who edited that page. I did start it.
I start things up - I don't flesh things out. That's what I do. There is nothing wrong with that.
I hope writing this enlightens you a little to my point of view. I'm sure you must think you are doing the right thing but I disagree. --cda21:47, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
I'll address your concerns, but I need to remind you of one of the entries under the Policies section on my talk page: Assume good faith. I know that right now you're a bit upset, and that's okay. We all get angry every now and then, but you say that I show a complete disregard for your time and effort. That is not the case at all. We're both here to write an encyclopedia, and I do appreciate your contributions to the project.
If I remember correctly, there was only one other contributor, who added a small addition to the article. It was not vandalized, and if it were and there was a good version in the page history, Angela or I would have reverted to it.
If I removed the copied text from the article, I don't think there would have then been sufficient context, and it may have been speedily deleted under criterion A1.
You are right in that history can not be copyrighted. Specific accounts, however, can be. The text from the web page was copyrighted. There's nothing to say someone can't paraphrase that content and use it as a source.
I hope I've addressed your concerns. Feel free to talk to me about any issues, or you can ask Angela on her talk page. Oh, and be sure to refer to the article as Space Food Sticks, with the first letter of each word capitalized. Any other capitalization results in a different page title and may be more difficult for others to find. Wodup03:57, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
I don't understand why you didn't just take out the text you found offensive. The entry, the dates, the manufacturer, the categories - they were all correct. The sentence I took from the fan page "non-frozen balanced energy snack in rod form containing nutritionally balanced amounts of carbohydrate, fat and protein," is just a part of history. It is not the fanpage author's writing. And how can I put that in my own words, that makes no sense at all. The interesting part is the wording that they used.cda14:33, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Two examples for you: Salem (cigarette) - pretty much similar to my Space Food Sticks entry. A kind of obscure brand name product, entry includes dates of manufacture, company info, the categories R.J. Reynolds brands;1956 introductions;Cigarette brands;Brand name products stubs and the entry also includes their slogan "You can take Salem out of the country, but...you can't take the country out of Salem." My point is that Salem cigarettes are including in Wikipedia with no problem. Why is something that I enter that is very similar in format not OK?! Here's another example: Slim Jim. How is the Slim Jim entry different from my entry of Space Food Sticks?--cda16:58, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
The article Space Food Sticks appeared to have mostly been copied from that fan page. Regarding Salem (cigarette), this page claims a copyright on the text of the article, however, the text of the article was added collaboratively over time by several users, not all at one time by one user. If the text that appears on the web site were added to the article at one time by one user, I would guess that it was a copyright violation and would tag for speedy deletion. As it is, I believe that that web site is wrong for copying our article and not following the terms of the GNU FDL.
The above text was previously archived and brought back for continuity.
I still don't understand why you deleted the entire Space Food Sticks entry instead of just the text you (wrongly) thought was copyrighted. I still don't understand. And I think it's rude of you to delete something through error and then tell me if I want it back I have to hunt it down. I think if you had manners you would fix your own mistakes. --cda23:59, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
I thought I had made it clear, but I'll try again.
I thought it was copyrighted.
I nominated it for deletion.
An administrator agreed and deleted it.
Also,
I am not an administrator.
I cannot delete and undelete pages (I do not have the delete and undelete buttons).
I did not delete the article you created.
User:Angela is the administrator that deleted the article.
If there's anything else, you probably should take my advice above, since there's nothing else I can do except tell you that there's nothing else I can do. Wodup01:27, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
The only part text that was not an exact copy of another website is "Space Food Sticks were snacks developed for space travel by Dr. Howard Bauman, for The Pillsbury Company." - an unsourced statement that isn't an article by itself. If there is any reliable source (not a fan site) that backs up this statement, I suggest it be added to the space food article. Angela.19:40, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Speedying of MOTD Archives
You're right that none of the criterion directly relate to this situation (unless we take it as a broad interpretation of G7, with the MOTD community being the author) but there was already a clear consensus at the MOTD board. I'm not a Wikipedia:Process wonk I'm afraid so I don't really mind if it's not been followed where we can use common sense. I mean there are always WP:SNOW and WP:IAR, as you note, but I don't see any need to invoke them paticularly. --Robdurbar08:47, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Feedback on your feedback. Thanks for informing me of the policies. Wikipedia has already grown to a complexity that creates barriers to effective use by new users; the community you represent is helpful. I had no intention of violating your policies, but rather added a link to a non-commercial site (as opposed to the listed one gunshows-usa.com). PS, I am not a vandal.
Davidleasure19:31, 28 January 2007 (UTC)DavidLeasure
The last time I checked, Wikipedia was the 12th most visited web site in the world according to Alexa; we're getting better at this encyclopedia thing every day. I do know, however, that the way we handle newcomers could use some work. New users don't want to read every policy and guideline when they get here; I've been here almost six months, and I don't think I know them all.
I'm not sure that that link you added is helpful at this time. If the site supports more listings in more locations (it only listed gun and rock shows in Colorado), it may be added again later, but you might want to leave a note on the articles' talk pages to see if anyone objects at that time.
Yeah, my sig came into being before that proclamation. I've mostly gotten a free pass because the sig still only takes up a single line in the edit box, unlike the huge 4, 5 or even 8 line sigs that were the focus of so many rfc's a few months ago. Anyway, the point to all this is thanks for the message, but in the lack of any significant outcry, I'm just gonna let it stay as is. I dont have any issues with people refactoring talk and discussion pages to eliminate it if they so desire (Cyde's solution, as I call it). Thanks for bringing it up, however. -Mask
I do see where you started using the signature while images were discouraged, but not to be avoided. That's fine. I do thank you for getting back to me about it. Cheers! WODUP01:13, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
First, please sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your message. Second, a topic is notable if it has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works from sources that are reliable and independent of the subject itself and of each other. .cmbl wasn't, and was tagged for speedy deletion and deleted. I didn't see it since I tagged it, so I don't know what improvements you made, but the article mustn't have asserted the notability of the file extension. WODUP20:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
I put {{hangon}} on it. This is that extremely popular YouTube series from last month with the girl who got all pissed off about getting the red car when she wanted a blue one that turned out to be a marketing campaign for Domino's Pizza. It has been the subject of non-trivial coverage.
I have never been slapped with a speedy tag before ... no wonder it was a bot. Remove it, please ... I have been on here long enough and with enough edits that I know what articles would be notable and survive a deletion vote, and this is one of them. Daniel Case06:06, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Okay. With your references, I see that it is notable. I'm not sure why it gets its own article (named after a YouTube user name) instead of being included on the Domino's Pizza article. Let's continue this discussion on Talk:MacKenzieHeartsu. Also, this is not a bot account. WODUP06:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Well, nonetheless as an NP patroller myself I must say I'm pretty impressed with the speed this thing works at. I'll have to try it myself. Daniel Case06:34, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
copyright issues
I probably did not do this correctly, but there are some copyrighted images which are falsely indentified as being PD in the States. Here's an example
You seem to think that I cannot use images of two logos of Chicago high schools. Do you really think that these schools will mind me using those images? -KingpinE706:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
I don't know if those schools would mind their logos being used, but as long as they're not licensed under a free license, it doesn't matter. I'm sorry, but that's the policy and the law. WODUP06:49, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
You need to be careful when using the {{db-Attack}} template on pages accusing people of homosexuality. Unless you personally know that the individual is NOT a homosexual, they could very well take offence that an editor thought being called a homosexual was "disparaging". This particular page could be just as easily speedied with a {{db-nonsence}} tag. NipokNek11:30, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
I didn't tag the article as an attack page because it mentions that he's homosexual. I tagged it because it seems to be an attack page. I'm not going to type it here, but the first sentence in the second paragraph is what sealed it for me. WODUP11:36, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
I realize that the page in general can be considered an attack page, I was only suggesting how it could be perceived by the subject of the page. NipokNek11:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
This is just a friendly reminder that Wikipedia Weekly has been released with a new episode!
For the first time in well, over a month, we've put something together. We've been a little busy / the tubes of the internets crashed so apologies on the delay. We're finally back to normal, we hope....
Anyways, all is good now, here's the new episodes!
Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!
You are recieving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to recieve such notifications please remove yourself from the list.
This is just a friendly reminder that Wikipedia Weekly has been released with a new episode!
This is a special episode we recored specifically dealing w/ the whole Essjay/Ryan Jordan situation. We recorded this before Jimbo's second comment, so it might be a little dated but still a good listen.
Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!
You are recieving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to recieve such notifications please remove yourself from the list.
On the permanent link, I see it as the "Revision as of 03:17, 4 March 2007 by Essjay". I think you've got your settings set to display times in your own time zone, and I've got mine to display in UTC. WODUP07:14, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my talk page!
Hi. Thanks for reverting my talk page from "Johnny the Vandal". You might not be aware of this, but any user attacking both my user page and that of User:Hephaestos, or several groups (Crass, The Offspring, Social Distortion) are automatically assumed to be sockpuppets of the notorious vandal "Johnny the Vandal" and are to be permanently blocked from editing on sight. Use the {{sockblock|Johnny the Vandal}} template to leave a note on the talk page. Thanks, again! -- Arwel (talk) 21:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Please don't skip warning levels as you did here. (from level 2 to level 4). If a user doesn't receive the proper hierarchy of warnings they may not be blocked when they are reported at AIV. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review!23:04, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
I don't feel that it is always necessary to give four warnings before blocking a vandal. Wikipedia:Vandalism#Warnings says that the warning templates need not be used in succession. In this situation, I didn't feel that a level 3 warning would've stopped the vandalism (I find now that the user continued to vandalise that page after the level 4 warning and had to be blocked). I left a level 4 warning to let the user know the seriousness of what was happening and what the next consequence would be. Even skipping the level 3 warning, I feel that the user was sufficiently warned. WODUP23:21, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Please use user talk pages to communicate with other users and sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Using the talk page is the only way to make the other user see the yellow "You've got new messages" bar.
This is just a friendly reminder that Wikipedia Weekly has been released with a new episode..... 13!
We've decided to avoid the direct link to the audio file in an attempt to prevent any sort of audio format war. You can download whichever version you want (we have OGG, MP3 and AAC on the site.
Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!
You are recieving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to recieve such notifications please remove yourself from the list.
Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Verdict
You said: "Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Verdict has a few socks of Martin181 categories. Since Martin181 is a sock of Verdict, would it be okay to recategorise the socks and suspected socks of Martin181 as socks and suspected socks of Verdict? It may be confusing to others who the sockpuppeteer and sockpuppets are otherwise. I started to do this, but then found that there was more than just one category that would need attention."
Yes, this would be perfectly fine. I've been meaning to do it myself but I haven't had the time yet. Please feel free to do this yourself or once I get some spare time, I'll do it. We initially didn't settle on which was the sockpuppeteer account and so various admins blocked the accounts as sockpuppets of one or the other. --Yamla03:17, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about not updating the history on SCA Peerages
The OGG version is here
The MP3 version (non free file format but it works on an iPod is here
In this edition
* We wrap up the Essjay affair, as the famous Wikipedian cuts ties to the online encyclopedia.
* A look at the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year Competition, which finished earlier this week. In addition, all the Featured Pictures of 2006 are available as a bittorrent download.
* The new “Username Usurpation” feature at the English Wikipedia.
* Jimmy Wales travels to India for the recent Indian WikiCamp, and narrowly survives an attack of ninja monkeys.
* One thousand Featured Articles at the German Wikipedia.
* 300 Spartans.
Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!
You are recieving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to recieve such notifications please remove yourself from the list.
This is just a friendly reminder that Wikipedia Weekly has been released with a new episode..... 15!
The link to all versions of Wikipedia Weekly 14 is at [6]
The OGG version is here
The MP3 version (non free file format but it works on an iPod) is here
In this edition
This episode sees Liam, more commonly known as Witty Lama, catching up with Rama’s Arrow and Ragib to talk about contributing to Wikipedia from and Indian and Bangladeshi perspective. Topics include their growing collection of Featured Articles, the success of the Indian WikiProject, and the problem of Internet access on the Subcontinent.
Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!
You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to receive such notifications please remove yourself from the list.
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Chaparral Middle School (Moorpark), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DGG22:08, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Notification!
This is just a friendly reminder that Wikipedia Weekly has been released with a new episode..... 16!
The link to all versions of Wikipedia Weekly 16 is at [7]
The OGG version is here
The MP3 version (non free file format but it works on an iPod) is here
Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in! Feel free to post to the mailing lists too.... apparently not many people know about us.... yet
You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to receive such notifications please remove yourself from the list.
Defamatory? Let me tell you about defamatory. (Political rant removed WODUP 04:26, 4 April 2007 (UTC)) I don't feel like saying anything more. --69.67.229.2704:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Regarding the Elkhart, Indiana article, you said that it had too many embedded lists. Would you recommend that I re-work it into more of an article form? Right now it's more of a headings with bulet points deal. Thanks for the help, I'm somewhat new on here and not sure whats standard. Acsmith308:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for helping with the encyclopedia. If you need any help, always feel free to ask me here on my talk page, or ask at the help desk, new contributors' help page, or on the IRC channel #wikipedia-bootcamp. You can use this web-based client to access IRC if you don't already have an IRC program.
It was User:Booshakla who first said that, but I, too, believe that the article would benefit from writing the bulleted lists as paragraphs. For more information about what's standard, we use the Manual of Style. Again, welcome and thanks! WODUP08:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
In case you want to know for some reason...
User:Saturation2 recently made a frivolous report against you at AIV, which obviously was rejected. He's currently about 2 centimeters away from being blocked for various reasons, so you shouldn't be concerned. Just thought you might want to know. -Amarkovmoo!04:33, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
While I didn't make the edit in question, and I can only assume one of my roommates did, I would like to point out that the Pussy, France article does list Patrick McKenna as a resident. This was not vandalism, as you seem to assume, but an attempt to sync the articles. I would assume that in a biography, current place of residence is considered appropriate information. While I have no been able to locate an article on google that seems to list Patrick McKenna and Pussy, France together, the problem is in the Pussy, France article, not in a specific action taken by this IP address (though, to be fair, she probably should have realized that the actor and the caterer were not the same person, and that the Patrick McKenna in the Pussy, France article should be delinked), if not deleted. 70.131.83.2107:44, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, I should have known that when the "No username exists" box comes up, it's a dead giveaway that the username is available. Thanks for doing that, or I may never have created the doppleganger. More mottoes to come, ~Magnusanimum(aka Steptrip)10:57, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
The two images are set side by side prominently. The comparison is important I believe, and does not intend to infringe Oldboy's copyrights. Malamockq02:16, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you, WODUP, for your constructive comments in my recent RFA, which passed with 86 support, 8 oppose, and 5 neutral !votes. I will keep in mind all your suggestions and/or concerns, and will try to live up to your standards. Please, if you have any comments or complaints about my actions as an administrator, leave a note on my talk page, and I will respond as soon as I possibly can, without frying my brain, of course.
Thank you once more,
· AndonicOTalk
When you are unable to create an account, because it's too similar to another, don't ask users to choose another name. Often administrators can, and will, create the accounts- while users cannot create these similar accounts, admins can. That having been said, thanks for your support. Ral315»02:46, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
If you really want to know the truth, I've been bogged down like mad and have been short on time to do the notifications, if you can do them it'd be great :) -- Tawker06:04, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
Hello WODUP, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Christmas tree-7534301.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:WODUP/Archive 2006. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk11:06, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
Eduemoni has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Ok, thanks for that template information...i wasn't sure where to find that template, and that's why i copied and pasted that text. I'll fix it though. ;) Elenseel05:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Do you just want to do this to change the name? Has there already been a discussion to see if there is consensus for this change? WODUP06:54, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
Why did I receive a warning for removing something untrue on Anelka's page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by NumberAte (talk • contribs)
That was how I responded when I saw that your very first edit added a personal attack into an article and your second edit removed without an edit summary the paragraph into which you inserted the personal attack.
Now that you mention your objection to that paragraph, I've done some research and I found a few sources that make claims similar to that that was in the article. The Orlando Sentinel sports producer Brant Parsons and tribalfootball.com both report that DiarioSport reports that Nicolas Anelka may return to Arsenal FC. The top Google search result for DiarioSport is www.sport.es which has this story which does seem to say that he might play for Arsenal. I must say, though, I don't know if sport.es qualifies as a reliable source.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot09:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
How do u?
do u know how 2 up load pics. cause i want 2 but dont know how Plez help! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Girlgirl2424 (talk • contribs)
Hi, I just want to let you know that your delivery included a break in the URL, so the link does not work. This should hopefully be corrected soon. Happy editing, +A.0u05:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know, and thank you for telling me before I finished the whole list! WODUP05:20, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
User: girlgirl2424
what if u have a pic of yourself on my pictures and want to place it on your user page i have no idea what 2 do. thanks 4 the tipGirlgirl242415:12, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Thankyou for your concern that my sites article can be seen as advertising. In no way am I advertising my product, and I know it needs to be reworded.
Can you please wait 24 hours for me to properly upload my pictures to my site, particularly those of the Eleanor Schonell Bridge, of which pictures are limited? (especially those taken during its construction)
Thankyou, and have a good day! --AustraliaOnline01:58, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
I suggested that it be deleted because the article didn't assert notability, and it's already been deleted. Like C.Fred said on Talk:Australia Online, based on your username, there might be a conflict of interest, and we do advise against creating articles about yourself, your friends, your band, your company, etc. If the subject warrants an article, one will eventually be created. WODUP23:15, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot08:15, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot08:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Re: Username
Hi WODUP, thank you for dropping me a note. No, I don't want to change my username. I just want to "secure" the account because it's my actual name (with space), and will later redirect the user page to User:IvanLanin, if permitted. Thanks. --ivanlanin♫ •• 14:26, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Okay. I assumed that you wanted to change your username. Your request should be completed shortly. Best regards, WODUP16:47, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot08:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
SISTER CINDY MAHONEY
I don't understand the reason why Cynthia L. Mahoney was chosen over the more commonly used (and better known) Sister Cindy Mahoney. As a nun, she is entitled to that title, regardless of denomination. Please explain. Thanks.La Strada19:33, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
As seen in the page log, Fresheneesz moved the page to her formal name. For more information about why, you'll need to ask that user directly. Cut-and-paste moves are not allowed an any circumstances because they do not reflect the page histories (which are important for copyright purposes).
That said, I just looked around Wikipedia and Google for more information on what she's called, and I do see that she's more often referred to as just Sister Cindy Mahoney. I checked the What links here feature and see that only one other article (David Worby) links to this article, and it links to Sister Cindy Mahoney. If you'd like to move the page, you'll need to make a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves. WODUP20:08, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Hey, Wodup - I had contacted the article subject about obtaining an image for her article, and she replied stating that she had already sent you one. Is it already uploaded? Thanks... Videmus OmniaTalk14:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Rog, thanks. Sorry to bug you about it - my primary gig is getting free images, and I see us lose some good ones that have been legally obtained because all the squares weren't filled. Glad you're on top of things, and thanks for scoring a good free image for us. Videmus OmniaTalk00:17, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
hi wodup, as you can see, i'm new to posting in wikipedia... and found out that it's a lot more complicated than i thought (lol), i'm an architects from mexico, after contributing an article and getting deleted very quickly i read that it is not advisable to do your own article 8autobiography).. i'm in an emerging design firm. we are starting to get published in international magazines, books, blogs, as whell as in mexico... how can i write the article without it being self promotion? any help wpuld be good. tank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Patoguerrero (talk • contribs) 07:07, 22 July 2007
(Link to self: Taller 13 Arquitectos) The reason we discourage writing about organizations with which you are related is because that can create a conflict of interest. If your firm is non-trivially covered in multiple reliable secondary sources, that's a very good way to demonstrate notability. You might want to create a request at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. If and when you do, please provide the references in your request. Cheers! WODUP17:36, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
I'm not exactly sure where the page came from 'cause I didn't make it, is it posible I have ben phished? Kokiri kid23:51, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
I think it's possible but unlikely that someone hacked into the Wikimedia computers and created that article. Maybe you forgot to log out while on a public computer, or someone else with access to your computer created it? WODUP03:21, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
I wasn't suggesting any hacking, I don't think anybody is lame enough to go to that much trouble to make a junk article. I think you're probably correct in saying I forgot to log out.
I'll be more carefull from now on. One last thing though, how do you see from what I.P address the edit came from? Thanks. Kokiri kid04:20, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks again. I thought checking I.P addresses was a simple process, and I on;y really wanted to do it to douse my curiosity, so thanks for the info. Kokiri kid04:35, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
The tip you gave me to clear my cookies seems to have helped my logging problems. :) Which is odd, my browser's cookies have rarely given me problems. Anyways, thanks! :) -WarthogDemon17:18, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
I understand why YouTube is frowned upon, it's user-contributed and sometimes contains copyright violations. I don't think AOL video is user-contributed, and I do think that there is an agreement between the artist and AOL to host that music video. A search of aol video in the talk, user talk, Wikipedia, and Wikipedia talk namespaces doesn't show me that AOL video is prohibited. Could you explain your reasons a little more? WODUP 01:56, 2 August 2007 (UTC) (copied to User_talk:TenPoundHammer at 18:51, 4 August 2007 (UTC))
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
date august 20 sorry about my page i was just seeing if it would work i didnt no about the sandbox i just made my account but it wont hapen again —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bballsam36 (talk • contribs) 00:20, August 21, 2007 (UTC).
Hello. No, you don't have to have e-mail enabled to create accounts for others at WP:ACC, but the people who request accounts need to list one so they can get their passwords. You don't need to be an admin to create accounts, but only admins can create accounts that are similar to existing accounts. Hope this helps; if you have any other questions, feel free to ask. WODUP18:08, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
Very nice answers, I must say (they're little niches of the administrator duties, so to get so many dead-on correct is a fantastic effort and makes me confident in my !vote). I was a little concerned with your answers to Q1-32, and wasn't sure where to !vote, so that's why you got singled out for the tough questions (and it seems to have got you a lot of well-deserved supports). Just letting you know in case you were thinking I held something against you and was trying to make you fail by asking you pain-in-the-ass questions :) Cheers, and good luck, Daniel01:45, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you. I agree that the answers to 1 and 2 are only fair when compared to other candidates who write paragraph after paragraph about what they've done or what they plan to do (I didn't think 3 was that bad), but that's how things are. I figured that's why you asked, and I thank you for asking those questions and not simply opposing. With those questions, you allowed me a chance (even with one wrong answer) to prove to you and others that I'm capable of wielding a mop. Thank you again. WODUP03:21, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
You have a couple of options. You can cut-and-paste threads to a subpage. This is what I do; there are some rather nice bots that can do this for you. You can allow your talk page to fill up and then move it to a subpage. You can also let it fill up, clear it, and post a link to the permanent version of the talk page. More detailed instructions are at Help:Archiving a talk page. If you have any other questions, you know where to find me. Cheers! WODUP17:26, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
I've added a question to your RFA. There's no need for you to answer it if you don't want to, as it's a rather tricky complex question and might possibly jeopardise potential supports (as it asks about specific conduct of a user), I'd understand. Of course on the flip side I would probably base my final decision on your answer to that question, since the username doppelganger thing is relatively insignificant. Cheers, –Chacor08:31, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
It was an advertisement published in numerous popular magazines including People, Marie Claire, and many others, which I believe has direct relevance to the article in question. Any advertiser in their right mind would desire for their work to be disseminated and attributed.
My goal is to make the article more informative, interesting, and accurate. What is yours? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dementedfool (talk • contribs) 07:01, August 29, 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure what problem. Is the site slow or are requests fulfilled slowly? Well, both happen sometimes so, no matter what, yes. Cheers, WODUP02:51, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
I mean the site is just loading pages at a far slower rate than normal. It's been like this for me for about 3 hours now, a longer ammount of time than ever before. → jacĸrм ( talk | sign ) 02:55, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Well, if other web sites (like Google or whatever) load quickly, then there's probably a struggling Wikimedia server somewhere. If so, I'm sure they'll get around to fixing it sooner or later. WODUP02:58, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations, I have closed your RfA as successful and you are now a sysop! If you have any questions about adminship, feel free to ask me. Please consider messaging me on IRC for access to the #wikipedia-en-admins channel. Good luck! --Deskana(apples)10:32, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations. Don't hesitate to ask anyone if you need advice, there's lots to go around. (If for some reason you want advice from a former admin, you know where to ask.) And also I apologise, I totally forgot about your RFA and the question I asked (until I saw Deskana delist your RFA as successful)... count it as a past-the-close switch-to-neutral. ;)–Chacor11:01, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to the task force for which there is little reward except for the occasional bit of humorous harassment! –Animum00:49, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Congrats on your new mop!
Oh! I didn't notice this message earlier. Thank you. That's a very nice new name, by the way. Query Me is very clever. :)WODUP05:48, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Why do you keep deleting my bands page? Asphyxiation(band) & Nick Ortiz
We DO have major significance if you couldn't tell by our endorsers and interviews etc.
Maybe I'll invest in one of those banners that says STOP: If you came here because I did X, .... WODUP17:54, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Or a quote on Doc glasgow's talk page by Jimbo that reads "There are people who have good sense. There are idiots. A consensus of idiots does not override good sense"; perhaps you should put that at the top of the page. –Animum00:05, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I ran into an edit conflict here, but quite frankly I'd spent too much time converting to the infobox to just abandon it. Sorry for any edits of yours that I overwrote. (And I didn't even think about the Chuck Norris thing, although given the amount of vandalism I should have.) Pairadox07:33, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
How come you created the account Wolfmaan even though there was a guy named Wolfman, and how come you created the account You know who when there was a user called You know who.? Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake)20:25, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Wolfman is a user who retired about 15 months ago; I don't think he'll be back. You Know Who. was created about a year ago and hasn't been used. WODUP20:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Very Confused
I recently started an article about Markler and it was deleted. The rules regarding relevance or notability are vague and Im not sure what fits this criteria. The comment said that it was an non notable website? It's not a website its a software company that is part of a new technology trend in the real estate industry. What needs to be included in the article for it to be considered valid. I used other articles about companies as a reference to how to write about this company. Please Help
Hello there. You're correct that the subject of the article was a company, not a website, and I apologize for the incorrect deletion summary. Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) says that a company is notable if it has been the subject of coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. That could be coverage in a news article, magazine article, an industry journal, or something like that. If the subject meets that notability requirement, you can recreate the article with information about how it meets that guideline. If the company doesn't meet our notability standards, there are still lots of ways to help the encyclopedia; take a look at Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia. Cheers, WODUP19:59, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
functionwelcomeACC(){f=document.editform,t=f.wpTextbox1;t.value+="== "+"Welcome!"+" ==\n"+"{{subst:"+"User:WODUP/Welcome after creating a requested account}} \~\~\~\~";f.wpMinoredit.checked=true;f.wpSummary.value="Welcome to Wikipedia!";f.submit();}addOnloadHook(function(){if(wgCanonicalNamespace=="User_talk"&&wgAction=="edit"&&document.title.indexOf("\(section\)")==-1){addPortletLink('p-cactions','javascript:welcomeACC()','welcome new acc','','');}});
If you don't want a tab, you can just change p-cactions to p-personal to make into a top-of-screen link (where the links to Special:Userlogout and Special:Preferences are). Another alternative is to add it to the toolbox; just ask me about how to do it if you want. :-) Hope that helps! —[[Animum | talk]]13:58, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Can do. I've done that in the past and still do when I can, but there is so much vandalism that goes in a span of seconds! --EndlessDan14:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Could you please explain to me why many of the mall pages in Michigan are being deleted? They are mostly very informative and would be very good articles for research for size and footage and anchors etc. I re-created Lakeview Square mall in Battle Creek, make it better and more informative and it was still deleted. Please explain why we can not have these pages so that they can be linked from city sites etc. --Vertigo31502:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Ahh. Now I remember supporting your Rfa! Congrats on becoming an admin:) I don't remember welcoming you to either wikipedia simple english or welcoming you to Meta though. Shalom:)--SJP00:33, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Well, I think he's gone, but if you could put a block on this guy (check his logs), I think the world would be happier. I put him on AIV. Into The FrayT/C23:09, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Wow, it was on AIV for five minutes and no one noticed. Thanks for letting me know. The world is happier now, isn't it? WODUP23:36, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
WODUP (talk • contribs • count • logs • email) 01:08, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
–Animum 00:05, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
-2007-05-19T11:06:00.000Z-Image:Christmas_tree-7534301.jpg){kind=link}
—[[Animum | talk]] 01:51, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
