User talk:Onekooleskimo
Welcome from the Eskimo
[edit]Please feel welcome to make any comment here...simply press the edit button to the right of comments submitted and away you go...I will eventually see it and if you leave an address I will be happy to contact you and reply to anything you have a question about. You may also simply e-mail me at ONEKOOLESKIMO@YAHOO.COM
or you may simply use the tool bar on left , e-mail function
Comments Submitted
[edit]Hi Onekooleskimo,
Welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your edits, and for taking the time to properly format your message on my talk page. I certainly don't have a personal agenda involving HDG, but Wikipedia has policies regarding the content of our articles (and yes, I was "elected" to uphold Wikipedia policy). The purpose of Wikipedia is to be a neutral, unbiased compilation of previously written, verifiable facts. Some of your recent edits to the HDG state opinions as facts (violating WP:NPOV) and fail to cite sources. Even if you know that something is true about HDG, you still need to cite your sources because Wikipedia doesn't allow original research. I'm going to go edit the article now and see if I can help out. Canderson7 (talk) 23:17, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- I hope my emails have helped clear things up for you. I've made one more change to the article. The statement: "Tidewater is the alpha bull of private marinas" is an example of POV, and is not allowed. I've removed that phrase. Remember to cite your sources; Wikipedia can only publish content from other reliable sources. Canderson7 (talk) 01:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
First of all, welcome. You're being bold with your contributions, and that's great! Check out Wikipedia:Vandalism to learn about what is and is not vandalism. I see that the IP user corrected capitalization and removed a section about the city's politics. It doesn't seem that that section was written in a neutral point of view. The user's edit summary was "Attempted to clean up this poorly written article". I don't see a personal dislike of the content. Please see the five pillars that define Wikipedia's character, and when dealing with other Wikipedians, please assume good faith. As you have read or will read in the five pillars, this is a collaboratively written encyclopedia licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License, and by editing, you are allowing those edits to be copied and revised by anyone. No one needs your express permission to add to or remove your contributions. You can still reply on my talk page or you can reply here. WODUP talk/contribs 05:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi eskimo you jackass, as you can clearly see if you have half a brain which I suspect you dont, I was editing the Wikipedia article entitled Havre de Grace, MD because it was of poor quality not becuase I disagreed. None of the infomration removed from the article was factual and the article contained numerous misspellings so get with the program you idiot or everyone will go back to reading Encarta if people are prevented from editing poorly written pages.
american revolution changes
[edit]About the african american slave and not slave sentance...it is mentioned futher in artical but the sentance referances to a link that does not aupport the sentance. The fact that the entire free world does not have a problem with that is of no consiquence...this is wikopedia...where you guys like to play edit war. Futher the thomas hutchen para 's are not referanced and they gotta go....in fact if you say 2 plus 2 is four...we need a referance to basic math. those are the rules as explained to me. contact me before you revert...as the guide lines say.
== New message..............> press edit == —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Onekooleskimo (talk • contribs) 17:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC).
Sorry about removing your contributions
[edit]I apologize for removing one of contributions to Wikipedia. If you tell me what contribution I removed, and from what article, I will probably be able to tell you why. Hakufu Sonsaku 18:56, 3 December 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hakufu Sonsaku (talk • contribs) 18:55, 3 December 2006 (UTC).
- Hi again Onekooleskimo,
- Regarding your edit here, it is not appropriate to make a comment on the main page of an article; I have moved it to the talk page. Could you please explain to me what the problem is with the article at the moment. No references or sources were removed by Wikipedia editors; the only removals were of content not befitting an encyclopedia article. What are the "sources, (links), [that] do not reflect the content they are the alledged source of"? I'm not sure what you mean by that. Canderson7 (talk) 20:24, 3 December 2006 (UTC)