Jump to content

User talk:W.carter/Archive 10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5←Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12→Archive 15

Article

Take a look at the article Clark Olofsson that I have created. Swedens most known criminal. Any help is appreciated.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:03, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello BabbaQ, I'm at work now but I'll take a look at it later tonight. After a very quick look, I saw that there are some things that can be improved. I'll get back to you. :) Cheers, w.carter-Talk 15:12, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 Done Fixed the article as much as I could for now. Please revert things you don't like and feel free to ask again if you think I can help you any further. Best, w.carter-Talk 18:52, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 July 2015

replacing entire page

You "sounded" like you knew my one project here: Joseph Rescigno. I've just replaced the entire page, leaving in place the AUTHORITY CONTROL and DEFAULT SORT that had been added (but correcting spelling in both). I saved the stuff I deleted, not knowing whether I was doing this right. So I hope I'm being a good citizen. But I'll check in later today and will try to conform to any rules I'm still ignorant about.

On another note, you mentioned a user page. I'm not really sure of the purpose. I can't really donate time here and don't expect to contribute more. (Actually, there are a couple of names in my text that really deserve for someone to take up the cause and write an entry on. Is there a way that I can draw attention to those? or should I just trust in the passage of time?)

Anyway, thanks for your efforts and kindness. Will be out for an extended period but will check back in in the evening. Valuenyc (talk) 15:08, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello Valuenyc, I am at work now and can do very little editing right now, I'll take a look at the page you mention later tonight (in about 5-6 hours). You just have to be a bit patient. :) I will respond to you after that. All the best, w.carter-Talk 15:18, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello again Valuenyc, I will now start to take a closer look at the article. It was ok that you substituted the text this time, since there were not many more editors than you writing the article. There are some things that needs to be conformed to Wikipedia standards, I will start fixing them for you. As for a user page, such a page is only if you want it, if you are considering doing more work here. Otherwise, just skip it. If there are names of people that you want someone to do articles about, you just make links of them. These links will be displayed in red and by that indicate that someone should take notice of them. Just don't make too many! I'll make one for you in the article so that you know what I mean. I'll get back to you when I have done some work on the article. Best, w.carter-Talk 20:00, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

 Done I have done as much as I can for now for the article. I have not removed any text, but there was a bit of rearranging and a lot of cleanup from that dreadful Word-code that had tagged along. I have replaced all the bad coding with real Wiki-code and conformed the article's layout to the Wikipedia standard. You may not agree with all of my edits, but trust me, I'm only helping you getting a nice article here. You had also made a lot of bad links that led to pages with lots of people with the same name as the ones you intended. I have fixed those for you. You can read about all my edits in the edit summaries.

Also, do not worry, nothing is ever lost on the Wikipedia. All texts are kept in the "History" of each article, and can be retrieved should need arise. :) Best, w.carter-Talk 21:22, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Aha. I did see those red links when I was working in the sandbox. I just didn't realize that it could be a good idea to create them on purpose. (I have only three more names in mind.) As to the rest, I'll need a little time to see what you mean about the coding. When I saw the page and printed it, nothing popped off the screen/page at me. I realize that perhaps I should have saved to a text file. Maybe that would have avoided some problems. So sorry I didn't think of that. I am no fan of Word HTML so I think I have a good idea what you are talking about. You've done more than I expected. Thanks. Valuenyc (talk) 22:16, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Gasp! I put all those "%20" codes in there by hand because I thought I'd read that underscores were not preferred. Ugh. Now I think I over-interpreted, over-applied a caution about *external* links (at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Wiki_markup#External_links). Ouch.  :-( There's just so much to take in, even for someone very familiar with basic HTML. So sorry.
Can you name one or two other kinds of codes so I can get some idea of what to look for in the future? But please, no hurry. You've done more than I'd have asked for. Thanks. Valuenyc (talk) 23:08, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

More explaining

Well, you are on the right track with the "overthinking", try to purge your mind of anything HTML, that is not Wiki. And don't be sorry, you are still learning and we have all been there. I used to bug the hell out of my first Wiki-mentor with exactly the same mistakes you make. Now, for getting the links right, the trick is to actually go to the page/article, copy the name of the article from the headline of the page and place inside the double square brackets. That way you get all the characters, spaces, caps, etc. right. Furthermore, you will be absolutely sure that you link to the right page. Since this is an international site, there are so many articles with the same name so there are bound to be mistakes if you don't check that. Like you did with the link La Gioconda as opposed to the right link La Gioconda. Click on both links here and check in the code/editing window and you'll see what I mean.
Code. The "%20" codes were not so bad, they were easy to spot. What was worse, was the quotation marks. When you hit the (") or (') keys in Word, the citation marks automatically get converted into "slanted" typographical marks:
“ ” whereas the Wiki-code is to use only straight marks: " ".
The difference is not easy to spot in the text, so I'm enlarging them here. It is easier to see in the code/editing window, take a peek.
The same goes for the single ones: ’ vs. '.
If you type with the same keys directly in the WP the marks will always be straight. So it might be a good idea to remove the formatting from the text before pasting it into the WP, otherwise each mark has to be hunted down and replaced. I have no idea why the code is supposed to be this way, only that it is the consensus of the WP community that it should be like that.
There are also many features imbedded in the WP itself that takes care of things like {{break}} in section and "|frame|" for pictures, so you don't need to write them. The Wiki-code is ancient and designed for users who are not so programing savvy.
The article looks much better now with proper references and all, but there are still some things that might be improved. The articles here should be written in as neutral a tone as possible with everything sourced. I have this trick when I write: I read the article I'm working on out loud, pretending I'm a news reporter on BBC reading the news on-air. That is when you hear if something is not completely neutral or too personal. Like the caption on under one of the pictures:
Trumpeter Joseph Rescigno playing Petrushka (which he had played under Pierre Monteux) for his first two grandchildren, the future Maestro Joseph Rescigno and the future physicist Thomas N. Rescigno. The boys' mother stands between them.
This sounds way too personal, with facts that only people present at the event and close to the subject of the article would know about. A better caption would be:
Joseph Rescigno playing the trumpet for his grandchildren Joseph Rescigno, Thomas N. Rescigno and their mother.
The fact that Thomas would become a physicist, should only be mentioned in the text if it can be supported by an independent source as a reference, and the name of the piece played, or who he played it under, is of no importance in the caption. This is why editors should never write about subjects close to them, It is so hard to be so clinical about something that is dear to you. I am not an article reviewer, more of a writer/techie, so I have not corrected any of the text. But you should be hard on the text, and yourself, and go through the text to look for, and correct, such things before a reviewer comes along and slap another tag on the article. This "stark" way of writing is actually harder for newcomers to accept that all the learning of code and stuff. Be strong! Cheers, w.carter-Talk 10:37, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Okay, I got some of those variant names but obviously not all. So thanks. I'm well familiar with the font/typographical issues; just didn't know I needed to attend to them here. Not hard and will do. But especially thanks for picking a single illustration of language to modify. It will help me focus as I go thru this. A lot. Valuenyc (talk) 13:36, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) Please ask again if you run into some more snags. Best, w.carter-Talk 14:08, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

"recognitions" section

By the way, I didn't get around to thanking you profusely for moving the para that you moved to a "Recognition" section. That para bothered me enormously; it was the one thing that made me most miserable. No matter how I tightened it and cut back on the references, it just seemed wrong where it was. But I didn't have the command of wikipedia to realize that I could create that section. I did study some model articles, but didn't get that idea. (Now I can expand it! No, only kidding. I promise.)

You made a much much better encyclopedia entry by just doing that. I tightened up the two picture captions, too. But now I have to leave it alone for a bit and come back to it in a week or two. It's just really hard to judge it at this point. And that would be true writing about a person or writing about accounting. We all get wedded to what we write at least for a time.

Q. What's the difference between a professional writer and an amateur writer?
A. The professional has a larger waste basket.  ;-)

Again, you've been most kind. Valuenyc (talk) 02:25, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

LOL! Then I'm on the brink of becoming professional. I'm glad you agree about the section. I think that if you work too long on a text, you become physically blind. Another editor with a birds eye view of the thing have a much better chance of spotting something like that. That is why the best articles have many editors, someone always sees something. Until later, w.carter-Talk 08:14, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

A Barnstar For You

Moved to User:W.carter/things I have received

@Anna Frodesiak:What?!? A barnstar just for asking? In that case I can ask again. Thanks! w.carter-Talk 01:37, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Darn right! You got a lead image where before there was none for an article that gets 4,000 hits a day. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:54, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 July 2015

Kim Jong-un

File:Kim Jong-un sketch.jpg Just to be sure, it was you who got this made, right? Did you know it is used on many language Wikipedia's now. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:59, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello Anna Frodesiak, yes and yes. I know the artist and asked them to make a quick sketch just for fun when I saw the debate about a pic for the article. They were not expecting that response. :) w.carter-Talk 01:18, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Well then, please see Talk:Kim Jong-un#The current image as it is maybe time to update to an even better image (something your friend could make?) and please accept the following. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:26, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
And we could also really, really use replacements for these [1][2]. I just thought I'd ask. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:56, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
@Anna Frodesiak: So what is wrong with this? At least for one of them? It's better than the pic at least. ;) w.carter-Talk 02:11, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
I'm not crazy about that pic. It has "that's all we've got available, so we'll made to with it." written all over it. Besides, we need a set of two, ideally in the style of an aircraft emergency procedure card. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:14, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Point taken. But Anna, judging from your user page, you are an artist, can't you make something? w.carter-Talk 02:22, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
I'm no artist. I just doodle. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:31, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

@Anna Frodesiak: No luck. :( We got no on all the drawings. The artist is very busy, and sends their regrets. Let's hope someone else takes on your challenge. w.carter-Talk 16:39, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

No worries. I'm still grateful for the first image. Thanks for asking. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:52, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Moved to User:W.carter/things I have received

Meow!! :) Thank you ChamithN, it's good to hear from you. That was really kind of you, I try my best. Cheers, w.carter-Talk 08:44, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 July 2015

A barnstar for you!

Moved to User:W.carter/things I have received

Why thank you Brackattax! :) That was really kind of you, and very random since I have no clue why. w.carter-Talk 14:07, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Interesting times indeed, and not in a good way

Have you seen this yet? (TV news report here.) Ceannlann gorm (talk) 19:32, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Another (earlier) news report. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 19:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! I just got home, heard something briefly on the radio though. I thought they were joking at first. Well, why am I not surprised. <Bleep!>ers! Let's stay tuned for more info, there may also be an article in this. w.carter-Talk 19:49, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Aye, aye, Sir! Ceannlann gorm (talk) 19:52, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
On a grimmer note, assuming it was not abandoned in place for some reason, it's quite possible that it went down with it's crew. (Caching is unlikely [though not totally impossible] since that is usually done much closer to shore.) Ceannlann gorm (talk) 20:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
@Ceannlann gorm: It is reported here but I can't find anything else right now. Hmmm... I have never done a recent events article, so I don't know if it is notable enough yet. Thoughts? w.carter-Talk 20:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Definitely notable IMHO, but we need more hard info before we get cracking, assuming someone hasn't already beaten us to it. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 20:07, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
@Ceannlann gorm: Hard to say, there isn't even any good name for it yet. I checked around by using the name of the diving team, that should show up in any article. w.carter-Talk 20:11, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

I got a stub with three refs, what do you say we take it live and see what happens? w.carter-Talk 20:46, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

@W.carter: I'm game. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 20:49, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Ok, let's dance, ladies! w.carter-Talk 20:52, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

We are rolling: 2015 Swedish submarine incident. Could you start with the cats? w.carter-Talk 20:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Already on it. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 20:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, didn't see that, you were too fast! w.carter-Talk 21:06, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
UPDATE: There is some speculation that the wreck is actually that of the Som-class submarine Com [Catfish] (ex HMS Fulton), lost during delivery to by Russia in 1916. I'm doubtful myself, but I thought that I should mention it. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 21:13, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
CORRECTION: It was actually lost the year after it was delivered, in a collision with the Swedish steamship Ingermanland, if I've gotten the name correctly. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 21:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Do you have a link for that speculation? w.carter-Talk 21:18, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

No, so far it's just being reported secondhand on some of the military / tech oriented BBs & web forums such as secretprojects.co.uk and TheMess.net. Russian (or possibly Swedish government) disinformation do you think? Ceannlann gorm (talk) 21:24, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

@Ceannlann gorm: Too early to tell. I'm sticking to hard facts in the article right now. I'm adding what I can find so far. w.carter-Talk 21:27, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
This may prove helpful. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 21:30, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
@Ceannlann gorm: Interesting, but unfortunately that site is a no-go for refs. But we are prepared when the conformation comes. Btw, I'm working tomorrow and will not be able to do very much editing then. Care to take that watch? w.carter-Talk 21:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
I should be available for most of the day, disasters (feline and otherwise) permitting. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 21:39, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
That's great. The first round of cat food is on me. Will also be interesting to see if the article attracts some other editors. Thank you for good teamwork as usual! :) Cheers, w.carter-Talk 21:45, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Submarine, day 2

@Ceannlann gorm: Lunch. I listened to an interview with someone from the military. They don't have anything new until the tapes are analyzed and are very cautious about speculations. I think it is best that we do the same. Giving space to speculations as is done in the overall article Swedish submarine incidents is not very professional or WP, IMO. I'll be back later tonight. Best, w.carter-Talk 10:46, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

I was thinking the same thing. I was going to mention the Som/Com speculation though via a reference to an article on the find in the online edition of the Daily Telegraph, but I'll hold off for a few hours to see if anything else turns up in the meantime. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 11:11, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

People are really trigger happy around here! What is wrong with waiting for the facts before writing? w.carter-Talk 13:25, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Classy, dude, real classy. I thought we were in agreement over there, I even offered to cut a sentence, and here you go talking behind people's back. Thumbs up to you. Manxruler (talk) 13:36, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, if you took this the wrong way. It was an offhand comment since that sentence is not the only one, and I used it as an example. I had no intention of going behind your back. Perhaps I was out of line, and in that case I apologize. w.carter-Talk 13:46, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
In case this is the Som/Com, I'll put a couple of more commented out cats in the article, and hold off a bit longer mentioning that DT aricle. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 13:57, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
You do that. I'm too busy removing my foot from my mouth... w.carter-Talk 13:59, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
@Ceannlann gorm: I see that the news has begun to trickle out to the rest of the world now. It's in Reuters, Sky, Independent, Guardian, everywhere! I have no idea how to hold off against such an avalanche of speculations. :-/ w.carter-Talk 14:17, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
There is a post on TheMess.net claiming that the Armed Forces just released a statement saying that they pretty sure it's the Som. Attempting to independently confirm. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 14:24, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
@Ceannlann gorm: That statement has been confirmed by the Swedish Radio So go ahead and add to the article, I'm a bit tied up here and can't do any real editing. And Manxruler, once again, I apologize. w.carter-Talk 14:30, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
(Edit Conflict)Got the statement that was been talked about. If the translation is correct, then the PR office is saying that it's 'most likely' that it is the Som. Good enough for government work, or should we wait for further confirmation, given that it's not unheard of for public relation types to foul up, especially when under pressure from higher up? Ceannlann gorm (talk) 14:35, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
EDIT: Roger that. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 14:36, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
@Ceannlann gorm: I may not trust the military, but if the facts are good enough for Sveriges Radio to broadcast, I think it can warrant a mention in the WP. w.carter-Talk 14:40, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Done. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 14:54, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. w.carter-Talk 15:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
I'm being called away (visiting relatives inbound). Sorry to leave you in the lurch! Ceannlann gorm (talk) 15:41, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

@W.carter: Apology accepted with regards to the offhandedness. Happy continued editing. Manxruler (talk) 16:00, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, Manxruler. Very civil of you! Best, w.carter-Talk 16:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

Hello sir. I'm trying to import a logo to an article from another website bcoz the appropriate logo is not available in our wikimedia. So please help me to do so.

(Maheshlightp (talk) 07:50, 8 August 2015 (UTC))

Hello again Maheshlightp! Logos can be tricky since most of the time they are protected by copyright. Only the most simple logos (made up of just ordinary letters in a common typeface) like this one, or very old and of obscure origin like this one can be uploaded to the Commons for use on the Wikipedia. Read the "Licensing" plates on those pages. All other logos have to be uploaded on the Wikipedia itself, in a small size under the Fair Use criteria, such as this one, and only used in that article. Look at the "Licensing" for it. Read about that here: Wikipedia:Non-free content. The process for doing this can be a bit tricky, so I can help you with it if you don't get it right. Which article and logo is it? By the way, there are no "Sirs" on the Wikipedia, we are all just editors here. w.carter-Talk 09:09, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Updated

For those of you who are interested, there are some new posts at the You know you're really into editing on the English Wikipedia when.... One of them is curtsey of out latest admin. w.carter-Talk 13:51, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of William Blair Bruce

Hello! Your submission of William Blair Bruce at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:40, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Please see new note on DYK nomination template. Yoninah (talk) 01:14, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK for 2015 Swedish submarine wreck discovery

Gatoclass (talk) 16:52, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK for William Blair Bruce

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:38, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Brucebo

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:38, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Henry Dewar

Hello! Thanks for reviewing the DYK nomination. I'm doing a whole series of these international rugby players KIA in WWI, with the idea of having GA/DYK for each article by the centenary of the death of the player. No more All Blacks until September 1916 but lots of others in the meantime. I've set up a project page for it, in case it's of interest to you. FunkyCanute (talk) 11:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi FunkyCanute, that is quite an undertaking! I'm impressed. I only have an occational interest in rugby, but hey, who can resist the All Blacks , rather the military side of the articles. Feel free to give me a 'ping' when you have some other article in your series ready, I'll be happy to review it so it can make the date in time. Cheers, w.carter-Talk 11:42, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
I've basically committed to writing 130 articles over the next three years, since they're nearly all stubs or non-existent. Now that I've written that down, it seems a little insane. In the meantime, there are Pierre Guillemin (18 August) and William Middleton Wallace (22 August) at GAN. They're a bit more spread out after the end of September. FunkyCanute (talk) 12:02, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
See, perhaps you needed to "say it out loud". :) As for reviews, sorry I meant DYK reviews, I'm not an article/GA reviewer but DYKs I can do. Guillemin was already fixed and I could not find any nom for Wallace. w.carter-Talk 12:14, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
I missed the timeframe for DYK nomination of WMW. I'll be put it forward if/when it passes GA. FunkyCanute (talk) 12:21, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Ok, see you! w.carter-Talk 12:40, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Moved to User:W.carter/things I have received

Thank you Rob! That was extremely thoughtful of you. It came naturally this time since the nominator was such a team player. Oh, while I have you "on the phone", shouldn't the Trans Am Totem DYK in prep 1 have a "(pictured)"?. See you around the DYK, w.carter-Talk 19:05, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Yes, you're right, I missed that. Fixed. ~ RobTalk 02:06, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Bulverket) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Bulverket, W.carter!

Wikipedia editor Compassionate727 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice job with the article. One of the few articles I've ever encountered in the new pages feed that didn't have a taggable problem.

To reply, leave a comment on Compassionate727's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Signing this thread to leave a time stamp for archive bot. w.carter-Talk 09:46, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

A barnstar for you!

Moved to User:W.carter/things I have received

Ahh, you are too nice! Virtual hug received with gratitude. Hope you had a pleasant vacation and welcome back to "work". See you around, w.carter-Talk 07:49, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

Tony de Peltrie - thanks

Hello W.carter. I am a „café linguist“ from the Café Bistro Les Gâteries rue Saint-Denis, Plateau Mont-Royal, Montréal. A reference to your café ornithologist. In this café I learned to write English after I arrived from Germany, and less French. Thanks for your help and I saved your other correction in a document too. That’s for me a way to learn the WP syntax. I did know nothing about HTML last December as I started my first article at WP. I like your correction, and will ask you again some day for to correct my next article about a computer graphic pioneer. Best regards.--Maxim Pouska (talk) 18:43, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Bonsoir chère Maxim! It sounds like a nice café. It was my pleasure to help you, you are more than welcome to ask me for help anytime. I love languages and I speak and understand French very well, although my writing and spelling leaves much to be desired... Same with German, but on a more basic level. Getting help from other editors who have been around longer, and chatting with them, is the very best way to learn the ways of the WP— the "café way". :) And so much more pleasant than just reading information pages. Tschüss, w.carter-Talk 19:04, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Gnisvärd

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:33, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

The tanks continue to advance

The March of the Empire.Audio file "Play" not found

The Russian Wikipedia now looks like the next to be purged. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 09:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

You never cease to be amazed by what they can think of next to control their citizens. I bet you'll never see a ban on articles about vodka since the government makes money on that. w.carter-Talk 09:57, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Indeed. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 10:00, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
I see that Russia has made a tactical retreat (for the moment at least). Ceannlann gorm (talk) 10:49, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Some analysis of the incident over at the Verge. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 17:47, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Even if I'm pretty sure they have seen this, maybe you should tip off the people at our eminent paper The Signpost. I'm sure they would like to mention this in the next issue. w.carter-Talk 17:54, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Done. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 18:52, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Nice! You have a flair for digging up stuff so if you find something, tip the paper. I'm sure they are grateful for that. Best, w.carter-Talk 19:13, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 August 2015

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Leadership

You are invited! → World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Leadership ← Come and join us remotely!
World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Leadership
Dates: 7 to 20 September 2015

The Virtual Edit-a-thon, hosted by Women in Red, will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in Leadership to participate. As it is a two-week event, inexperienced participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in leadership. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. RSVP and find more details →here← --Ipigott (talk) 10:20, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

ITN for Neonatal tetanus

--SpencerT♦C 20:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations! Ceannlann gorm (talk) 14:32, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! :) I heard it on the radio, thought it sounded notable, nominated, and that was it. w.carter-Talk 14:38, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
I've decided to have a crack at an ITN nomination myself. We'll see what happens. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 22:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
It's great that you at least try. :) That shows initiative and courage. It's a very tough section and the facts to go with the news have to be rock solid as well as of global interest. I was simply lucky with my nomination. With so many alert editors it's very hard to be the first one to report some news. Best, w.carter-Talk 15:11, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

No other ways!

Hi W.carter! Its been long since we talked last, how are you? I want to make an announcement but I can't figure out any other way but to drop a note on few intimate editor's talk page, including you! I appreciate if you can have few minutes to spend on reading this thread on my talk page. If you feel that I deserve a scholarship, I appreciate your endorsement on that thread. Please don't consider this an unusual spamming, I don't have any other way of announcing this. Thank you very much! Have a nice day! Jim Carter 12:53, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello Jim, I'm truly sorry to hear about the loss of people dear to you and your financial hardships, a fate that you unfortunately share with many Wikipedians. There is great comfort in editing and being part of a community when the world around you turns to ruin. I wish that I could endorse a program that granted anyone who wished, a laptop for this. But the resources of the foundation are limited and I don't know how to choose who would be the most worthy candidate. I'm also a little confused by this. At the top of your talk page you have a banner ridiculing the way the Wikimedia foundation asks for donations to keep this project running, and now you want to use a part of those donations for yourself? Or have I read this wrong? Small tip though: When my computer broke down and I didn't have the money to buy a new one, I got hold of a simple, cheap Bluetooth keyboard (second hand on eBay) and connected to my phone. With that I could edit despite the small screen. My sincerest wishes that things will improve for you, w.carter-Talk 15:05, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
I really respect your point of view, W.carter, it is thoughtful. ..now you want to use a part of those donations for yourself? ...: I'm obviously not asking for a grant for my personal use, you might not be aware but I have locally been organizing/attending workshops and edit-a-thons to encourage people from rural India to help smaller communities (Indian language Wikipedias). And it's a bit assuming bad faith on your part when you said that I'll use it for myself, though indirectly. The Program itself is started by Wikimedia Foundation's sister project to help India based editors (India is still a developing country) who are in need for help. And FWIW, the laptop will not stay with me indefinitely, if given, it's a community property and I will be returning it to the them after a definite time so that another editor who is in need can use it. It may clear some doubts you might have, they are not giving it just because the editors need it, but they want few deserving editors to use those infrastructure scholarship for Wikipedia's benefit. However, since you don't feel that I'm eligible enough to get a grant, the matter ends here. Though unrelated but I'm curious, Wikimedia Foundation spends chunks of bills in things like Wikimania etc, since according to you WMF's funds are limited, should they stop giving Wikimania scholarships? Cheers, Jim Carter 16:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
@Jim Carter: As I said, I don't know nearly enough about how the economy of the Wikimedia foundation works to cast my vote in this, or how to best distribute the funds, and therefore I will not. As you saw, the part you cited was a question, and it was relevant since you focused on yourself, your needs and hardships in the appeal on your talk page rather than what you describe above. It would be better if you discussed this with people who can actually evaluate the benefits of such an endorsement rather than with friends such as me. All the best, w.carter-Talk 16:52, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Actually, I shouldn't have described anything of it here on Wikipedia since it's barely relevant here. The things which I mentioned here on your talkpage will go here because it's relevant there. On Wikipedia I wished to get endorsement from editors who thinks I'm here to build Wikipedia onwiki/offwiki. Anyhow, I can't mention all this to those who are not aware of me and my works and they might think this to be unnecessary canvassing. So I asked only friends of mine to determine. Anyway, let's get back to work! Jim Carter 17:13, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

So you don't have to cook

Smörgåsbord of Thanks
Thanks for giving me my first piece of Wikilove — and for your many contributions to English Wikipedia, especially your image contributions, userboxes, and helping other Wikipedians at the Teahouse! GrammarFascist contribstalk 21:22, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Aww... if that was your first, it was way, way overdue! :) Cheers, w.carter-Talk 21:27, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

I've had some thanks for individual edits, which are always gratifying, and other thanks in the form of talk page conversation, but yes, that was the first time someone used the Wikilove feature on me. I used to be a lot quieter. Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by GrammarFascist (talk • contribs) 03:20, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi

If you find time for it you can take a look at the articles Gustav Laabs, Lars-Åke Wilhelmsson and Rickard Olsson that I just created. Any help is appreciated.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:09, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello BabbaQ, this week I have promised my work to biographies about women, see the "Women in Red" notice a bit further up this page, but I will take a look at your articles next week if that is ok with you. (Who can resist a mix of SS-officers and drag queens! :D ) Best, w.carter-Talk 20:17, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
@BabbaQ: I see that other helpers beat me to it. The articles look very nice now, but please call again if you need help with some other articles. If I'm free, I'll help you. Best, w.carter-Talk 19:44, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for participating

Logo of Women in Red Logo of the Smithsonian Institution
Thank you for your interest in Women in Red and for your participation in the virtual Women in Leadership Edit-a-thon, 7-20 September 2015. It was a resounding success with over 160 new articles. Your contributions are appreciated! We'll keep you posted on future events. --Ipigott (talk) 09:22, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:W.carter/Archive_10&oldid=1145997080"