User talk:Voorts/Archive 14
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Voorts. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | → | Archive 20 |
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bob Stewart (politician) on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you
|
The Copyright Barnstar | |
| Not this barnstar's intended use, but you did write an article about a landmark copyright ruling. A new FAC for WikiProject Law based on an offhand comment on the WikiProject's talk page is impressive and probably far beyond the realms of what the original poster expected. Cheers and here's to many more — Tim O'Doherty (talk) 21:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC) |
- Thank you Tim! voorts (talk/contributions) 22:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Promotion of Shostakovich v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.
 | |
| my story today |
|---|
Congratulations! Do you have an idea when this should be TFA? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:11, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you, Gerda! I'll have to think about it. The Iron Curtain premiered on May 12, and the court made its decision on June 7, so maybe I'll nominate it for one of those dates. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- Both dates are free in WP:TFARP, where you could drop a note, perhaps for the decision date. As both date connections are rather week, you could also go for no specific date in WP:TFAR, and let the coordinators select where it fits best to provide diverse topics. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree that they're pretty week and will probably just got the TFAR route. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:38, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: I've nominated the article for a non-specific January date. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:38, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree that they're pretty week and will probably just got the TFAR route. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:38, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- Both dates are free in WP:TFARP, where you could drop a note, perhaps for the decision date. As both date connections are rather week, you could also go for no specific date in WP:TFAR, and let the coordinators select where it fits best to provide diverse topics. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
RFC/N discussion of the username "WookeyF"
A request for comment has been filed concerning the username of WookeyF (talk · contribs). You are invited to comment on the discussion here. Shadow311 (talk) 17:03, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Drafts
Why do you decline literally every draft submission you review? Without going in to detail on the reasons why? Pegasussy (talk) 21:20, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- If you're referring to Draft:16th Signal Regiment (United Kingdom), I gave you a detailed reason for why I declined it, which you then deleted from the draft. As @TheresNoTime noted on your talk page around 20 minutes ago, please refrain from attacking other editors. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:13, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- I have since added a lot more references from reliable sources like the BBC. It was declined again, what is the issue now? And yes both pages 16th and 22nd Signal Regiment Pegasussy (talk) 23:20, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- You added those references to the article on the 22nd Regiment after I declined the previous draft, and it hasn't been declined since then. As for the 16th, another user declined that after I declined it, and you deleted their feedback from the draft along with mine. Please refrain from deleting AfC comments from reviewers from drafts going forward. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:29, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Can you review it? Pegasussy (talk) 23:31, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- I do not take requests to review. I review articles in the AfC queue at random. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:33, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ohhh makes sense Pegasussy (talk) 23:35, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- I do not take requests to review. I review articles in the AfC queue at random. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:33, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Can you review it? Pegasussy (talk) 23:31, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- You added those references to the article on the 22nd Regiment after I declined the previous draft, and it hasn't been declined since then. As for the 16th, another user declined that after I declined it, and you deleted their feedback from the draft along with mine. Please refrain from deleting AfC comments from reviewers from drafts going forward. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:29, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- I have since added a lot more references from reliable sources like the BBC. It was declined again, what is the issue now? And yes both pages 16th and 22nd Signal Regiment Pegasussy (talk) 23:20, 26 November 2023 (UTC)