User talk:Vlioos

This is Vlioos's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome to my Talk Page! :)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:D'Aydrian Harding

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:D'Aydrian Harding, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 10:04, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: D'Aydrian Harding (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:D'Aydrian Harding and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 23:02, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vlioos! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 23:02, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: D'Aydrian Harding (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:D'Aydrian Harding and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 23:38, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello, I'm CFA. I noticed that in this edit to Draft:Kanel Joseph, you removed all the content from the page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. C F A 💬 00:38, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to replace it for she or he so it can get accepted Vlioos (talk) 00:48, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: LifeandScars (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by I dream of horses were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not reliably sourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:LifeandScars and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 06:16, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it has been used to evade blocks on one or more other accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock. To do so, first read the guide to appealing blocks, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} to the bottom of the talk page of your original account. JBW (talk) 10:21, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Vlioos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Community,

I sincerely apologize for my previous actions and any disruption I caused. I understand now the importance of following Wikipedia’s guidelines and maintaining a positive, constructive presence. I’m committed to contributing respectfully and following the rules moving forward.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,

vlioos Vlioos (talk) 02:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Dear Wikipedia Community,

I sincerely apologize for my previous actions and any disruption I caused. I understand now the importance of following Wikipedia’s guidelines and maintaining a positive, constructive presence. I’m committed to contributing respectfully and following the rules moving forward.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
vlioos [[User:Vlioos|Vlioos]] ([[User talk:Vlioos#top|talk]]) 02:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear Wikipedia Community,

I sincerely apologize for my previous actions and any disruption I caused. I understand now the importance of following Wikipedia’s guidelines and maintaining a positive, constructive presence. I’m committed to contributing respectfully and following the rules moving forward.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
vlioos [[User:Vlioos|Vlioos]] ([[User talk:Vlioos#top|talk]]) 02:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear Wikipedia Community,

I sincerely apologize for my previous actions and any disruption I caused. I understand now the importance of following Wikipedia’s guidelines and maintaining a positive, constructive presence. I’m committed to contributing respectfully and following the rules moving forward.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,
vlioos [[User:Vlioos|Vlioos]] ([[User talk:Vlioos#top|talk]]) 02:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

@Vlioos: Would you please provide us with a list of all Wikipedia accounts that you have ever used to make edits, whether they be on the English Wikipedia or any other project? The block is principally for abusing multiple accounts, so coming clean here might do a great deal. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

here you go its adionia, clioos, vlioos. all I'm asking is one more chance from the wikipedia community please and thank you. red tailed hawk (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vlioos (talk • contribs) 16:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC (UTC)

What was your reasoning around this edit to the user talk page your first account earlier today? --bonadea contributions talk 17:57, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

trying to make an article in my talk page Vlioos (talk) 18:03, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to reply to the message they gave me

don't mind the other massage I gave you. Vlioos (talk) 18:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]