User talk:Virtuista

Recent edit to Lok Virsa Museum

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lok Virsa Museum, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 09:07, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Unblock Virtuista (talk) 12:29, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Virtuista (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 103.255.6.83. Place any further information here. Virtuista (talk) 12:29, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That IP address still shows up in the Composite Blocking List and has received 8 reports in the past 24 hours. Please resolve the problem there, then once the IP address is no longer listed, you are welcome to make a new unblock request here. Yamla (talk) 12:37, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Whale Cloud Technology Co., Ltd

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Whale Cloud Technology Co., Ltd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 16:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at Jimfbleak. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Virtuista|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article:

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls. Most of your supposed references were from the company itself or were press releases or interviews
The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability. Your article is entirely about what you sell, plus some supposed awards; there is nothing that supports it being notable such as the number of employees, turnover or profits

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews. Your text is just a product list, with lots of random bolding, which looks spammy, and lots of unsourced or self-sourced promotional claims, such as provide practical guidelines to its customers on their digital transformation journey by acquiring best practices and insights... helps telecommunication companies align the most practical approach... well-designed process... to make businesses more streamlined and intelligent, launch customer-specific process in an agile and efficient way... provide to 150 customers and so on. It's a sales pitch with no verifiable facts.
As usual in company spam, there is a self-serving list of supposed awards, all bolded (see WP:MOS}, but nothing negative of course
There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:46, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Jim. I have a question:

How do I use the template mentioned below and do I need to address you in the disclosure?:

"you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at Jimfbleak. The template

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by {{{employer}}} for their contributions to Wikipedia.

can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:

Virtuista, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by InsertName for their contributions to Wikipedia.

." Virtuista (talk) 10:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your second box is correct, post it on User:Virtuista Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jim, please let me know how to submit pages for review? Virtuista (talk) 11:43, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've made these edits, pleas check

Before you make your review request live by removing the nowikis, you should note that

you need to add a publisher= parameter to each ref, so we know the source as well as the title, and the titles should be written in normal English.

Your headquarters and number of employees don't appear in the main text, and you don't have any financials such as turnover and profits at all.

Your lead needs breaking into shorter paragraphs, not the present wall of text

Avoid weasel words like "solution" "forge" etc

move the page to Draft:Whale Cloud Technology

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:27, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thank you for these edits. They helped me understand the language to be used. I have made all the changes recommended above and moved the article to draft space. Please see it at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Whale_Cloud_Technology

As I have made changes according to your recommendations, Can I move the article to Wikipedia if the review takes too long?

Virtuista (talk) 11:36, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whale Cloud Technology (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.

Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse.

This draft contains marketing buzzspeak.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Whale Cloud Technology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Whale Cloud Technology, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:52, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Virtuista! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 14:52, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Virtuista! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Looking for Help on "Corporate Notability", has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Whale Cloud Technology, you may be blocked from editing. You had already had the rules about paid editing explained to you, and had already made the required disclosure. You knew that you should not move a draft into article space but leave that to a reviewer. So you went ahead and moved the draft into article space and moved it back. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:17, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Robert,

Thank you.

I was not aware that I was not supposed to move the article to Wikipedia while I had submitted it for review because there is no update on the review process. So I thought it was ok to move it & wait for a reviewer to arrive. But only when I moved the draft did I see the notice at the top of the page that it was under review. I immediately moved it back to Draft space and gave the same reason to my edit (You can review my reason for move on the page's edit history). Therefore, it was an unintentional mistake at my part. I didn't know.

Secondly, I took advice from Teahouse about the language of the article and made changes which are also viewable from the edit history. I removed a large chunk of data that wasn't corroborated by independent, reliable, noteworthy resources. I also removed several links which contained blogs.

Whale Cloud is a 5G , AI services provider & an emerging company. I see that there are several wikipedia articles written on similar subjects. Therefore, with your help, I'd like to improve my own editing to finally bring this up to speed for publishing.

I look forward to your reply.

Virtuista (talk) 17:20, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whale Cloud Technology (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.

Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse.

You have already had the paid editing rules explained, and have made the required disclosure. You knew that you were not allowed to move this draft into article space, even only to move it back.

This draft is not significantly different than it was three weeks ago when it was declined.

If this draft is resubmitted again without explaining on the draft talk page how it satisfies corporate notability, it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may be requested.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Whale Cloud Technology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Whale Cloud Technology, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:22, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whale Cloud Technology (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

see WP:SOLUTIONS

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Whale Cloud Technology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Whale Cloud Technology, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:50, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whale Cloud Technology moved to draftspace

I believe it has been previously pointed out to you that as a paid editor you are not to move things to main article space past the AfC process. Please do not move this again until it has been approved. Thank you. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:52, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whale Cloud Technology (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Whale Cloud Technology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Whale Cloud Technology, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 15:49, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Whale Cloud Technology

Hello, Virtuista. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Whale Cloud Technology, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Whale Cloud Technology

Hello, Virtuista. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Whale Cloud Technology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Maulana Shaykh Abdullah Faiz ad-Daghestani.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Maulana Shaykh Abdullah Faiz ad-Daghestani.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:WhatsApp Image 2024-05-08 at 01.38.37 f628ac3c.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:WhatsApp Image 2024-05-08 at 01.38.37 f628ac3c.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]