User talk:Virk Khatri

July 2022

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kapoor, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:07, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Kaur. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:03, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Virk, you may be blocked from editing. Stop readding unreliably sourced content WP:BRD The wiki source you added is unreliable. See WP:RS. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:00, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. For uncivil comments at here. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:01, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk Answer the question.

are you a Sikh?

do u have any information about sikhism apart from google? Virk Khatri (talk) 16:03, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please study basic policies of Wikipedia instead of asking people of their background. Anybody can edit Wikipedia backed by reliable sources. Also refrain from WP:OWN behavopr . You make another comment like this, I'm reporting you. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:05, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Virk. Stop adding unreliable and/or unsourced content. You can't force your way in Wikipedia. Have issues, bring reliable sources in teh talk page and gain WP:CONSENSUS. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:21, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk Stop vandalising the Articles with False information. Virk Khatri (talk) 16:57, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 16:59, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:14, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:17, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:ChinnaRajputJattGujjar per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ChinnaRajputJattGujjar. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 18:25, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]