User talk:Vikramkumar81

Vikramkumar81, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Vikramkumar81! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018

Hello, I'm Daiyusha. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Bhagalpur, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Daiyusha (talk) 07:06, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bhagalpur, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please give proof for what you are editing Daiyusha (talk) 08:24, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vikramkumar81 If you need a place to experiment or to create a draft you can always use your sandbox. This will allow you to create the section you want to add to Bhagalpur then go find all the reliable sources you need and properly cite them. Once you have properly cited the information then you can integrate your draft back into the article. If you keep reverting reviewers who are declining your edits because of no/unverifiable sources you could potentially violate WP:3RR policy. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 08:35, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jamia Imam E Aazam

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jamia Imam E Aazam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ravensfire (talk) 17:33, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Vikramkumar81! Thank you for your contributions. I am Dreamy Jazz and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 23:15, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sain Martin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sain Martin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PlotHelpful (talk) 11:46, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Issues

Hello Vikramkumar81,

An article you recently created Sandeep Aggarwal has copyright issues in the first and second paragraph. I have taken the liberty to remove the introductory and replace with something shorter. Feel free to re-write that section again. Happy editing. PlotHelpful (talk) 12:48, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Nisha Pandey) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Nisha Pandey.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Thanks for your new article on Nisha Pandey. Other editors have noted that the article needs more sources to verify the statements made about her career, and to provide more evidence that she is notable. Without this type of evidence, other editors could recommend that the article be deleted.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:51, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Private company limited by shares. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Sjö (talk) 06:59, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nisha Pandey

A tag has been placed on Nisha Pandey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A7, G3 - copypasted lead and sources from Ravi Kishan (lead is complete fake), the rest seems to describe a non-notable artist (per Google zero evidence of notability)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GermanJoe (talk) 10:13, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Goods and Services Tax (India), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. [1] GermanJoe (talk) 10:33, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please also read WP:COI and WP:PAID, and disclose a conflict of interest as paid editor. Editing without such a disclosure violates WMF's Terms of Use for this website. GermanJoe (talk) 11:10, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sandeep Aggarwal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sandeep Aggarwal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandeep Aggarwal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GermanJoe (talk) 11:05, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:20, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vikramkumar81 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Basically I was giving right information if any doubt please notify me and then you blocked me & without any notice you can't blocked me, I apologizes for Submit some edit

Decline reason:

We can block you, and we have, and no notice is required. You spammed links to a website for either promotional or SEO purposes, which will not be permitted. You will need to agree to stop this activity and tell what constructive contributions you want to make to this encyclopedia instead. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 12:17, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

talk

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vikramkumar81 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I agreed to stop this types of activity and constructive contributions I want to make to this encyclopedia instead. I won't do same thing in future, I will give only genuine information about any topic. I apologizes for this types of activity. I humble request for unblocked my account, Because I was giving some good informative article so I promised in future I will not do any spamming types of activity.

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Read our guide to improving articles
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
  - do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 11:27, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vikramkumar81 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm really really sorry for this message, Please give me a last chance. I agreed to stop this types of activity, I won't do same thing in future, I will give only genuine information about any topic. I apologizes for this types of activity. I humble request for unblocked my account, Because I was giving some good informative article so I promised in future I will not do any spamming types of activity.

Decline reason:

I provided you a means to prove you should be unblocked. You have refused to follow those instructions, therefore there are no grounds for me to unblock you, and nobody else has seen fit to do so either. Yamla (talk) 12:26, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you rejecting the opportunity I provided you above, to be unblocked? If so, please explicitly state that you are unwilling to follow those steps to be unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 11:57, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No I am not rejecting the opportunity, I am just asking some process, Yamla9

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vikramkumar81 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am really really sorry for this message, Please give me a last chance. I will be follow these step always when writing article and edit information.

1. - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
  - do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});

Decline reason:

Only one open unblock request is required at a time. I will leave the request above open for you. SQL ^{Query me!} 17:39, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Materialscientist (talk)

The steps provided need to be followed before you are unblocked; they are not meant to be a process you simply agree to. 331dot (talk) 12:41, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Materialscientist (talk)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vikramkumar81 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm really really sorry for this message, Please give me a last chance. I apologizes for my mistakes. I humble request to you for unblocked my account, Because I will writing quality of articles so I promised in future I will not do any spamming types of activity.

Decline reason:

You already have an open unblock request above. Opening more requests will not speed up an unblock in any way. I will leave the request above open, again. SQL ^{Query me!} 09:09, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Materialscientist (talk)