User talk:Vikas2007shukla

This is Vikas2007shukla's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jupitus Smart was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We need references in reliable sources to evaluate this. And this is a Wikipedia entry, so don't use first person to describe the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Vikas2007shukla/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jupitus Smart 13:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Vikas2007shukla, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jupitus Smart 13:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vikas2007shukla (talk) 13:41, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir i have makes some changes.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vikas2007shukla (talk) 13:53, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir i have attached some social media profile pages link and IDMB links you can find them and checked again. please

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timothyjosephwood was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Vikas2007shukla/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TimothyJosephWood 16:04, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vikas2007shukla (talk) 08:14, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hello sir please check mention url and source Reliable Source

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Vikas2007shukla/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 11:46, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Kunal-Jaisingh.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kunal-Jaisingh.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 08:45, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kunal-Jaisingh.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Kunal-Jaisingh.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 11:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vikas2007shukla (talk) 17:17, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sir ,

Greetings of the day

Please have a look to Abhilash Kumar page i have aded some Citations and reliable sources.

September 2017

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Shrenu Parikh. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 21:49, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abhilash Kumar (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

Previously deleted by AfD. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhilash Kumar (2nd nomination), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhilash Kumar

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abhilash Kumar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:09, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abhilash Kumar (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

per previous comments. Do not resubmit

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abhilash Kumar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 13:37, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OVERLINK

Hi there, re: this, please don't add multiple wikilinks for the same subject. Wikilinks compete for user attention and make things rather distracting. If a link already appears in a section, please don't add a duplicate. See WP:OVERLINK for more info. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:10, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for advertising and sockpuppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 18:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that you shouldn't be using multiple accounts. Stick to just this one account and avoid advertorial content creation once your block expires. —SpacemanSpiff 18:21, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sapna Chaudhary

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sapna Chaudhary, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SorryNotSorry ✽ ✉ 06:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 07:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=dear team i am not pramoting any kind of url , recently add page of sapna chaudhary is a famous dancer in harana , I am so sorry any kind of violating policies, will not be repeat futer, plz unblock me, give me a chance to editing articles. Thank you}}

October 2017

{{unblock|reason=dear sir i am not pramoting any kind of url , recently add page of sapna chaudhary is a famous dancer in harana , I am so sorry any kind of violating policies, will not be repeat futer, plz unblock me, give me a chance to editing articles. Please sir i am feel gilty to braking policies, Please give me a chance to editing articles , Promises do not break the policy again. Thank you}}

Apology

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vikas2007shukla (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear SpacemanSpiff', I am extremely sorry for breaking the rules. I knew that was not allowed when I did it, and I apologize for acting as though I am above the rules that everyone must follow. It was selfish and impolite to both you and the rest of the staff. Once again, I'm sorry for my behavior. I will work hard from now on to show you my respect and obedience when it comes to the guidelines here at. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do to ensure you and the rest of the wiki that I greatly value my position on the team, and that I will not let the team down again. i am not pramoting any kind of url , recently add page of sapna chaudhary is a famous dancer in harana , I am so sorry any kind of violating policies, will not be repeat futer, plz unblock me, give me a chance to editing articles. Please sir i am feel gilty to braking policies, Please give me a chance to editing articles , Promises do not break the policy again. Sincerely, vikas2007shukla Thank you Vikas2007shukla (talk) 10:06, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You immediately resumed your previous behaviour after your previous block expired. Here you say, "i am not pramoting any kind of url". While true, this does not give me confidence that you actually know what you did wrong this time. Without that confidence, I cannot consider lifting the block. So, please explain what you did wrong and why we should believe you won't do it again. Yamla (talk) 11:53, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Apology

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vikas2007shukla (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked because of advertised and self promotion, I have never advertised anything, I have added reliable sources in some articles, in which I was told that you are doing self promotion, that source I had taken from news paper, Recently I created a page, aded also added News Paper Source which was a Famous in News Paper India. It is unacceptable to forgive my mistake, and I promise that such a mistake will never happen again. Please give me a chance once I can give my best. Please sir i am feel gilty to braking policies, Please give me a chance to editing articles , Promises do not break the policy again. plz unblock me, give me a chance to editing articles. Sincerely, vikas2007shukla Thank you Vikas2007shukla (talk) 12:12, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So you were knowingly breaking the policies, continued with promotional writing and using multiple accounts? You need to address specifically what precisely led your block and explain your actions better. There's also suspicion of copyright violations too that hasn't been addressed. Alex Shih ^Talk 03:45, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not comfortable with unblocking you, you were given a warning and a block when you used sockpuppets and yet you continued this advertising after that block expired. Also, your contributions to articles are distinctly different from your postings here or your emails, making me think that your article/draft postings are coming from some playbook or write up. —SpacemanSpiff 03:36, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User_talk:SpacemanSpiff Dear Sir, I believe you gave me warnings, but I am not part of any promotional content, you can see my containbush Special:Contributions/Vikas2007shukla . I had put a page but it was not noticeable. Forgive me for that. I promise that now such a mistake will never happen. Whenever you have to enter a page, you will get permission from everyone. Please give me a chance to give my best. With warm regard User:vikas2007shukla

User_talk:SpacemanSpiff I was blocked because of advertised and self promotion, I have never advertised anything, I have added reliable sources in some articles, in which I was told that you are doing self promotion, that source I had taken from news paper, Recently I created a page, aded also added News Paper Source which was a Famous in News Paper India. It is unacceptable to forgive my mistake, and I promise that such a mistake will never happen again. Please give me a chance once I can give my best. Please sir i am feel gilty to braking policies, Please give me a chance to editing articles , Promises do not break the policy again. plz unblock me, give me a chance to editing articles. Sincerely, User:vikas2007shukla Thank you

User_talk:SpacemanSpiff Dear Sir, I do not support any website nor do I ever promote them. I have just installed links to those websites (as citation) which is actually web site of news. please trust me will not future again, accept my request and unblock me. With warm regard User:vikas2007shukla

Apology

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vikas2007shukla (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Team, I would like to let you know that the reason of giving the account block was not true at all. I am giving you the reason why you should unblock my account: 1. Firstly, you said i am using multiple account by using same ip on the other hand i am using two different ip to login my account is true but i am wondering how can you judge this i am the same person who is using 2 different account from the same IP? As this is an Organization which has public IP and an orgainzation has a big or small team too. So, there could be the chances of beign using another account login from another team. 2. Secondly, it is listed that i am doing any type of promotion or advertisement, i don't know why you are saying like that. I was giving only the url of popular websites or blogs where i am listed thats it. For your kind information, neither i am a promotion company nor i need any promotion for my self. i just wanted to listed my self on wikipedia that is my dream. So, please i am urging you do not demolish my dream and please let me know what i am doing wrong so that i will improve myself. It is my humble request to you, please give me one more chance and accept my apology. With warm regard User:vikas2007shukla

Decline reason:

This request still does nothing to address the very obvious self-promotion from this account at AFC. Requests to unblock should address all the reasons for the block. GoldenRing (talk) 23:04, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Email

Please do not email me. I'm not the person who blocked you. I'll also point you at WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY, which is relevant. As I am not the blocking admin, your best path forward is to make your argument to be unblocked right here, on this talk page. --Yamla (talk) 20:41, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Yamla Please Forgive me but you can help me in unblocking me by keeping my side. Please help me.

Revoked email access

I have revoked email access as you're just misusing it you sent me four emails in the past two days and I'm sure many more to others. Talk page access will also be revoked if you continue the same behavior here. —SpacemanSpiff 20:58, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir Spaceman So, please i am urging you do not demolish my dream and please let me know what i am doing wrong so that i will improve myself. It is my humble request to you, please give me one more chance and accept my apology.

Nomination of Sardar Mohammad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sardar Mohammad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sardar Mohammad until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ammarpad (talk) 18:06, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Abhilash Kumar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Abhilash Kumar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 05:50, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]