User talk:Viatori

Proposed deletion of Honto

The article Honto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, small hamlet in the French Pyrenées, part of the commune Saint-Michel, Pyrénées-Atlantiques

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Thanks! Markussep ^Talk 12:48, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ulumbarra Theatre moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ulumbarra Theatre, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:45, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Boris Johnson

Hello. You have recently contributed to this article or its talk page. Please see this discussion on the talk page. You are welcome to take part if you are interested. Thanks. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:12, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ulumbarra Theatre (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Slywriter were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The intro needs to be rewritten to less promotional tone. Sourcing also quite thin.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ulumbarra Theatre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ulumbarra Theatre, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 03:05, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Golden Viatori! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Slywriter (talk) 03:05, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lockwood South moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lockwood South, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, I'm reasonably certain the article does mean guidelines, there are at least hundreds of pages related to Victoria, Australia with only one or two references and only a single sentence (I am in the process of fixing some of these pages up however). I've made about 20 pages using the same sources, all have been reviewed and accepted. I am open to being wrong though. In terms of notablillty, according to Wikipedia:Notability_(geographic_features):

Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low. Even abandoned places can be notable, because notability encompasses their entire history.

The subject of the article being a populated area with almost 1,000 residents means it no doubt conforms to notability guidelines.

The Golden Viatori (talk) 09:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lockwood South (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Lockwood South instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article appears to have been copy-pasted from this draft. A history merge has been requested.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lockwood South and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lockwood South, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:27, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nowa Nowa

Thanks for adding Nowa Nowa to the List of reduplicated Australian place names — I can't believe I never noticed its absence. Stayed at the caravan park once, never forgotten, a jungle festival of eccentric humor. And the beautiful quirky public petanque court, like it was crafted by Leunig. Doug butler (talk) 12:28, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've been editing a lot of pages related to Victorian localities so I hopefully I'll be able to find more missing places from the list. Gotta love Australian place names, they have a certain feel to them that no other country seems to have. The Golden Viatori (talk) 12:34, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the good work. Doug butler (talk) 12:54, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Albacutya moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Albacutya, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 07:18, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Albacutya has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Albacutya. Thanks! Hitro talk 07:19, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lockwood South

Hello, Viatori. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lockwood South, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lockwood South

Hello, Viatori. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lockwood South".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:35, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lockwood South

Hello, Viatori. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lockwood South".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:45, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Victorian Localities & Suburbs

Discussion of interest to you regarding Victorian Localities & Suburbs. -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 11:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bradford, Victoria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion of WikiProject Bendigo

Hi Viatori, I have recently been pondering joining your humble WikiProject Bendigo (what a good idea). However, I just wanted to ask your advice about the possibility of expanding the WikiProject.

We could do this by advertising the project to other editors, tagging all Bendigo-related articles with a talk page banner, and adding Article Alerts, article statistics, and any other templates that may be needed to the main page. These steps would make it much easier for the WikiProject members to edit and maintain their articles. This article explains what else could be done with the WikiProject: Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide.

Please let me know what you think. Sincerely, Lotsw73 (talk) 22:51, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your message, Sadly at the moment most of our members have been very busy in the real world so the project is pretty dead at the moment. I am hoping to bring it back to life but real world stuff sadly always gets in the way. I agree with all of your propositions here and I welcome new members to the project, we certainly need a way to organise Bendigo related articles and expand the wikiproject to new members.

Viatori (talk) 01:49, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, taking you and your fellow editor's circumstances into account, would you like me to begin advertising the project and working on these above suggestions with your permission? Lotsw73 (talk) 04:25, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's more than fine, feel free to do whatever you feel will help out. Viatori (talk) 04:57, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then, thank you very much! Lotsw73 (talk) 05:44, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Bendigo

Hi Viatori,

Owing to the lack of participation of WikiProject Bendigo members (including myself), I feel that we will have to postpone the Location of the Fortnight collaboration that we set up.

I doubt many more editors will join the WikiProject, which is a shame. So, considering that we are the most active Bendigo article editors, perhaps just you and I could tackle certain Bendigo articles instead? A few of the localities and outlying towns still need their 2021 populations added...

All the best, Lotsw73 (talk) 12:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotsw73 Perhaps that is the best plan of attack. Viatori (talk) 13:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rod Fyffe

Hi Viatori, I thought I'd pass on the news that former Bendigo mayor Rod Fyffe has passed away. There have been several newspaper articles online that have published obituaries on his life. Perhaps this would be the opportune time to begin an article on him. Would you consider contributing together to create this article? We can begin it as a draft initially and go from there... Mr Sitcom (talk) 13:57, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually thinking the same thing when i heard the news, it might actually be a good idea to start. I have a book about Bendigo which has a profile on him so that can also be a useful source. I will start Draft:Rod Fyffe. Viatori (talk) 14:35, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great minds think alike... I'll see what else I can add to the article. Mr Sitcom (talk) 01:39, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mayors of Bendigo

Hello again! Recently I noticed you added the new Andrea Metcalf article to the WikiProject Bendigo page; nice work with the article! This got me thinking that perhaps more articles about the mayors of Bendigo could be created... What do you think? Mr Sitcom (talk) 05:09, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr Sitcom Hi, thanks for your message! I have been considering it and I do want to try to make a page for each mayor (at least post amalgamation). right now I've been working on Draft:Barry Ackerman as he has a page in the Bendigo Local Heroes book, so researching him has not been two much of a challenge, same goes with Margret O'Rourke. After those two pages are created, I suppose going backwards in chronological order wouldn't be too difficult, depending on what you're thinking?

Viatori (talk) 05:17, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that is a fair way to go about the task. I have actually placed that book on reserve from the library, so I can take a look and see whether I can add anything else to the articles. Mr Sitcom (talk) 06:20, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr Sitcom That's great. there's also some good resources in the upstairs section of the library, although most of it is pre amalgamation and you can't take it with you. the books there did prove to be a useful resource for the Rod Fyffe article however as he had a pre amalgamation career on the council. Viatori (talk) 07:24, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]