User talk:Vensatry/Archive 30
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Vensatry. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | → | Archive 35 |
DYK for List of cricketers who have taken five-wicket hauls on ODI debut
On 7 July 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of cricketers who have taken five-wicket hauls on ODI debut, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Uvais Karnain was the first cricketer to take a five-wicket haul on his One Day International debut? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of cricketers who have taken five-wicket hauls on ODI debut. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
FL
I had resolved your comments nearly 20 days back. Still I barely heard from you there. I would be grateful if you can talkback and strike your oppose (resolved comments).—Prashant 11:48, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Ezhavathu Manithan
On 9 July 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ezhavathu Manithan, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the soundtrack of 1982 film Ezhavathu Manithan featured songs from a pre-recorded album of L. Vaidyanathan, composed using the lyrics of Subramania Bharati's poetry? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ezhavathu Manithan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Gatoclass (talk) 22:48, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 July 2015
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation annual plan released, news in brief
- In the media: Wikimania warning; Wikipedia "mystery" easily solved
- Traffic report: The Empire lobs back
- Featured content: Pyrénées, Playmates, parliament and a prison...
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Reviews
Sure, I'll try to have a look at it later today -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:47, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Uyarndha Manithan
On 16 July 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Uyarndha Manithan, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the Tamil film Uyarndha Manithan was adapted from the 1966 Bengali film Uttar Purush? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Uyarndha Manithan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Thank you for helping create Wikipedia Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 July 2015
- Op-ed: On paid editing and advocacy: when the Bright Line fails to shine, and what we can do about it
- Traffic report: Belles of the ball
- WikiProject report: What happens when a country is no longer a country?
- News and notes: The Wikimedia Conference and Wikimania
- Featured content: When angels and daemons interrupt the vicious and intemperate
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 22 July 2015
- From the editor: Change the world
- News and notes: Wikimanía 2016; Lightbreather ArbCom case
- Wikimanía report: Wikimanía 2015 report, part 1, the plenaries
- Traffic report: The Nerds, They Are A-Changin'
- WikiProject report: Some more politics
- Featured content: The sleep of reason produces monsters
- Gallery: "One small step..."
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Hi. Hope you're well. For the above FLC, could you please point out what is wrong with numbers in the awards/nominations section? Nominator has also recently made a substantial change to the lead so that it mentions more films. Best wishes, Cowlibob (talk) 19:50, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Cowlibob: Responded there —Vensatry (ping) 08:05, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Vivvt has sorted the issue now as you suggested, please take another a look. Cowlibob (talk) 22:18, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
This was opened on 3 June. By 3 August, it will complete two months and i shall close it before proceeding to FAC. I request you to suggest necessary changes if any at the PR page before it gets closed, as i want the FAC process a bit hassle free. Yours sincerely, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:59, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Pavanjandhyala: Although I'm not good in this, I'll see what I can do. —Vensatry (ping) 17:14, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Second solo FAC
My second solo FAC attempt is here. May the force be with me. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:29, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 July 2015
- News and notes: BARC de-adminship proposal; Wikimania recordings debate
- Recent research: Wikipedia and collective intelligence; how Wikipedia is tweeted
- In the media: Is Wikipedia a battleground in the culture wars?
- Featured content: Even mammoths get the Blues
- Traffic report: Namaste again, Reddit
The Signpost: 05 August 2015
- Op-ed: Je ne suis pas Google
- News and notes: VisualEditor, endowment, science, and news in brief
- WikiProject report: Meet the boilerplate makers
- Traffic report: Mrityorma amritam gamaya...
- Featured content: Maya, Michigan, Medici, Médée, and Moul n'ga
The Signpost: 12 August 2015
- News and notes: Superprotect, one year later; a contentious RfA
- In the media: Paid editing; traffic drop; Nicki Minaj
- Wikimanía report: Wikimanía 2015, part 2, a community event
- Traffic report: Fighting from top to bottom
- Featured content: Fused lizards, giant mice, and Scottish demons
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
- Blog: The Hunt for Tirpitz
Hi Vensatry, would you have any time to spare to take a quick look at the above which is at FLC at the moment? Many thanks, The Rambling Man (talk) 12:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: Sure. Tomorrow —Vensatry (ping) 15:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
+DYKs
Hey, just in case you were interested, you could use something from List of international goals scored by Wayne Rooney or List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Lance Gibbs at DYK. Both fresh lists, almost certainly meeting the DYK criteria...... The Rambling Man (talk) 20:41, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Done Feel free to suggest more hooks if necessary. —Vensatry (ping) 07:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK review
Hi. Your nomination has been marked ready to go. This is just a reminder that you need to review another candidate before your nomination will move. Thank you. -SusanLesch (talk) 15:37, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 August 2015
- Travelogue: Seeing is believing
- Traffic report: Straight Outta Connecticut
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Vensatry, I have resolved your comments at the FLC. Do let me know if there's anything more to resolve. Thanks for your insights and suggestions. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 09:12, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Ssven2: Give me a day or two! —Vensatry (ping) 11:10, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
I really didn't know that one had to expand the parent article before doing this. Thanks again for letting me know. BTW, do let me know if you want to make any further comments at Enthiran's FLC. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 12:46, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Read WP:CFORK and WP:FLCR —Vensatry (ping) 13:00, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
A gentle reminder. You said you would revisit the page. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 14:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Regarding the images of Srinivas Mohan, indha image saripattu varuma, Vensatry? Mohan uploaded the image himself. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 13:07, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Saw that, seems like a legitimate one. You may add it to the list if you want. —Vensatry (ping) 13:51, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Would this image be alright for Cyril? — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 01:04, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think BH owns it. Seems like a thumbnail for his profile —Vensatry (ping) 05:42, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- Would this image be alright for Cyril? — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 01:04, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
I left a message on Azealia's talk page requesting him to re-review the article. He simply removed my message as per this edit. What do I do now? — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 08:41, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- No need to worry as there seems to be a consensus for promotion. —Vensatry (ping) 10:33, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Tourism
I've doubt in section headings as some FA's have Landmarks as heading and some have Tourism, places of interest. What is the perfect section heading for district pages? could you even check Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Indian_cities#Tourism.2Flandmarks.2Fplaces_of_interest.--Vin09 (talk) 12:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- 'Tourism' and 'Places of interest' sound like a tourist guide. —Vensatry (ping) 12:36, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- So, Landmarks is the one to be used?--Vin09 (talk) 12:51, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- You may use whatever title you want, but make sure it adheres to MOS:HEAD —Vensatry (ping) 13:08, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Fine, Thanks.--Vin09 (talk) 13:15, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- You may use whatever title you want, but make sure it adheres to MOS:HEAD —Vensatry (ping) 13:08, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- So, Landmarks is the one to be used?--Vin09 (talk) 12:51, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
FLC
Hi. Hope you're well. I have resolved your comments at the flc page. I hope it's alright now. Thanks.Krish | Talk 05:01, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. —Vensatry (ping) 07:17, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Why I'm not surprised? You do this all the time. I don't know what is your problem. Is this your deliberate attempt to sideline my flc? I see this all the time and your comments always comes when my flc is about to pass. No one can be so much busy like you pretend to be. Infact, your history suggests you have edited Wikipedia on a daily basis in last few days.Krish | Talk 18:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Man, gimme a break! I'm sick of you! —Vensatry (ping) 19:23, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- I don't understand your issue with that flc. If you can calculate it's 7+1 eight nominations. Plus, popular nominations are announced separately. I am fed up of your questions. Really! This time it is making me sick. I know you want at least 1 month to clear my flc. Take your time. Come up with more silly issues like this. Thank you.Krish | Talk 12:46, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- If you think I'm silly, I'm not willing to continue the review. You may collapse my comments and inform the delegates. I don't mind. —Vensatry (ping) 13:06, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- I didn't mean to say that. I said clearly about that nomination thing. Same pattern is used in all the flcs, so why this sudden question? I just wanted to say that. I didn't say don't review or something like that.Krish | Talk 13:22, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- If you think I'm silly, I'm not willing to continue the review. You may collapse my comments and inform the delegates. I don't mind. —Vensatry (ping) 13:06, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- I don't understand your issue with that flc. If you can calculate it's 7+1 eight nominations. Plus, popular nominations are announced separately. I am fed up of your questions. Really! This time it is making me sick. I know you want at least 1 month to clear my flc. Take your time. Come up with more silly issues like this. Thank you.Krish | Talk 12:46, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Man, gimme a break! I'm sick of you! —Vensatry (ping) 19:23, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Why I'm not surprised? You do this all the time. I don't know what is your problem. Is this your deliberate attempt to sideline my flc? I see this all the time and your comments always comes when my flc is about to pass. No one can be so much busy like you pretend to be. Infact, your history suggests you have edited Wikipedia on a daily basis in last few days.Krish | Talk 18:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Left a note there. I'll make sure that I won't review any of your nominations in future. —Vensatry (ping) 13:35, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- You know what, I was actually expecting this kind of behaviour from you. I knew you would leave a note, bad-mouthing me. I kindly request you to add the resolved comments tmplate, if you can. So, i guess you did your job in ruining my current flc as i'm sure it will definitely fail. So, thank you for failing my flc. I really appreciate it.Krish | Talk 14:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- For god's sake, please stop pestering me. I'm saying this in the nicest possible way! —Vensatry (ping) 15:25, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- But, what you did was definitely not nice.Krish | Talk 15:32, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- In what way, you are perfect? —Vensatry (ping) 15:36, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- At least, i don't try to ruin other's flc or fail them. At least, i don't take 20 days to review a list not even an article.Krish | Talk 15:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- 'Ruin other's flc', what does it even mean? I left my initial comments on 11 Aug and have been re-visiting the page every-now-and-then since 16 Aug. That said, even if somebody takes 20 days to rev-visit a candidate that's really not an issue. As I said earlier, you cannot command anybody to review/re-visit. They have other commitments even with in WP. —Vensatry (ping) 15:44, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- At least, i don't try to ruin other's flc or fail them. At least, i don't take 20 days to review a list not even an article.Krish | Talk 15:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- In what way, you are perfect? —Vensatry (ping) 15:36, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- But, what you did was definitely not nice.Krish | Talk 15:32, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- For god's sake, please stop pestering me. I'm saying this in the nicest possible way! —Vensatry (ping) 15:25, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- You know what, I was actually expecting this kind of behaviour from you. I knew you would leave a note, bad-mouthing me. I kindly request you to add the resolved comments tmplate, if you can. So, i guess you did your job in ruining my current flc as i'm sure it will definitely fail. So, thank you for failing my flc. I really appreciate it.Krish | Talk 14:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) I suggest you both move on from this discussion which isn't helping anyone achieve anything other than a headache. For you guys it must be getting late, so just chill out and do something else for a bit. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:48, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Exactly! But see what he's doing here and in his talk page. —Vensatry (ping) 15:55, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Multiple FLCs
Hi Vensatry, in answer to your question, the FLC guidelines state "Users should not add a second featured list nomination until the first has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed" so I wait until I get at least two supports and have no serious issues outstanding before nominating another list. Right now I have Riverside (3 supports, no outstanding issues), Broad (3 supports, no outstanding issues), Rooney (4 supports, one comment for a reviewer to re-visit), and now McLean (1 support, no outstanding issues). I also contacted SchroCat before nominating the third, but since I'm on top of all the nominations, and I'm waiting until each list has "substantial support" before nominating the next, there shouldn't be a problem. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: Sorry missed this. I know we are allowed to add a second nomination if the first one gains substantial support. But cumulative nominations? —Vensatry (ping) 15:51, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- As I said, I contacted SchroCat about it, because the state of my other FLCs was so advanced, it was deemed fine. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:55, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Om DVD
This is truly weird. Isn't it? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:18, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Indeed. I haven't really heard about this film. :) —Vensatry (ping) 10:34, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- I too came to know about this film recently during my visit to Bangalore. Whenever Kannada films running in theatres are not performing well, Om is screened again and the collections are really good every time! I don't know what made the makers stand silent for not selling the satellite rights and DVD rights for almost twenty years. Strangely, Uppi 2 (same director), the sequel of Upendra (released 15 years ago), is being screened in theatres right now. Having said that, i haven't watched Om yet and i don't know whether i can. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:59, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Ha, take 10 theatres in the city. 6 will show Tamil/Telugu, 3 constitute Hindi/English and the rest will screen Kannada movies. :) —Vensatry (ping) 15:40, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Harsh enough, but that's the reality. That's why i said Om is re-released only when there are no other viable options. In a span of 20 years, this happened nearly for 150 times. I don't think so that Upendra's other successful films (as a director) enjoy this privilege. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:57, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- I don't watch Kannada movies. Leave Upendra, even the Rajkumars and the Vishnuvardhans hadn't drawn my attention. But I've seen almost all of Vishnu's Tamil films. Shankar Nag was an excellent filmmaker, but yet to watch a film of his. :) —Vensatry (ping) 16:12, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- My situation is more or less the same. I know about Upendra because of his limited works in Telugu and thanks to the infamous A (recommended by Ssven2) and Upendra (whose strange concept and abrupt climax made me see Upendra 2 recently, which too ends on a similar note). I saw Power and Aptharakshaka of Puneeth Rajkumar and Vishnuvarshan due to the former's original and the latter's remake. I too heard good things about Shankar Nag's direction, mainly about his screenplay abilities. Let's see. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:20, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- None of the Kannada actors have really impressed me; Ramesh Aravind is an exception though. The 70s was a golden period for Kannada cinema. The new wave cinema in South Indian had actually begun in Karnataka during that time. Puttanna Kanagal, a path breaker in the middle-of-the-road cinema in South India, is one amazing writer/filmmaker. And yes, Shankar Nag was renowned for his screenwriting abilities. I actually discovered him through Ilaiyaraaja. —Vensatry (ping) 16:35, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- My situation is more or less the same. I know about Upendra because of his limited works in Telugu and thanks to the infamous A (recommended by Ssven2) and Upendra (whose strange concept and abrupt climax made me see Upendra 2 recently, which too ends on a similar note). I saw Power and Aptharakshaka of Puneeth Rajkumar and Vishnuvarshan due to the former's original and the latter's remake. I too heard good things about Shankar Nag's direction, mainly about his screenplay abilities. Let's see. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:20, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- I don't watch Kannada movies. Leave Upendra, even the Rajkumars and the Vishnuvardhans hadn't drawn my attention. But I've seen almost all of Vishnu's Tamil films. Shankar Nag was an excellent filmmaker, but yet to watch a film of his. :) —Vensatry (ping) 16:12, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Harsh enough, but that's the reality. That's why i said Om is re-released only when there are no other viable options. In a span of 20 years, this happened nearly for 150 times. I don't think so that Upendra's other successful films (as a director) enjoy this privilege. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:57, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Ha, take 10 theatres in the city. 6 will show Tamil/Telugu, 3 constitute Hindi/English and the rest will screen Kannada movies. :) —Vensatry (ping) 15:40, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- I too came to know about this film recently during my visit to Bangalore. Whenever Kannada films running in theatres are not performing well, Om is screened again and the collections are really good every time! I don't know what made the makers stand silent for not selling the satellite rights and DVD rights for almost twenty years. Strangely, Uppi 2 (same director), the sequel of Upendra (released 15 years ago), is being screened in theatres right now. Having said that, i haven't watched Om yet and i don't know whether i can. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:59, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Ilaiyaraaja? How? And yes, Ramesh Aravind is a good director also, though i feel Uttama Villain could have been handled in a better way, especially Margadarsi's film. In Kannada cinema, i think the golden days were done with Vishnuvardhan who too went on to act in mediocre films. And perhaps that made Kannada audience embrace other language films more. Strangely, bigger stars like Shivrajkumar, Puneeth, Upendra, Sudeep and Darshan are acting mostly in the remakes of Telugu and Tamil films these days, and few of them even made me loose my interest on the originals also. Darling (Telugu) Kannada remake is one such classic example. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:49, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- No, I guess Vishnu had started to fade away right from the early 80s. He was perhaps the first superstar of his generation in the whole of South India. I'm not very impressed with Ramesh, the dir. But as an actor he is truly amazing. Sathi Leelavathi is a fine example. Coming to Shankar Nag, I was actually listening to a song in Geetha for which IR had composed the music. It was only after that I discovered other films of his like Accident. They both were good friends actually. —Vensatry (ping) 17:17, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oh! i got it. Aravind did a good job in Rudraveena as well, albeit in a cameo appearance. I respect Vishnuvardhan for his work, mainly in films like Nagarahavu. Similarly, i liked Upendra's work as a director more than an actor. Dare i say, he was one of the primitive Kannada directors to start using the "shock and awe" techniques in filmmaking with some really different scripts. But i must admit that his last directorial Upendra 2 was too complicated where the message "If you are not now here, you can be nowhere" is conveyed using a protagonist who represents the feeling of "you". The prequel explored the influence of money, love and responsibilities on the feeling of "Myself"/Human Ego using four characters who represent them, which made it more interesting. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:29, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, I guess he did the same role in its Tamil remake as well. Vishnu started off really well, under the likes of Girish Karnad, B. V. Karanth, and Puttanna Kanagal. He did lead roles in Tamil even before Kamal started doing one. I know Upendra makes films but is he really that talented? I was under the impression that he is just another Crazy Star! —Vensatry (ping) 17:48, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- I really hate that so-called Crazy star. Coming to Upendra, i too never knew till Ssven2 recommended me to watch A. It was a simple love story in the backdrop of film industry and casting couch, but the way he executed it makes it very unique. I later watched Upendra, that was way ahead of A in terms of being whacky. IMHO He is a good actor and a maverick director. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:58, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, I guess he did the same role in its Tamil remake as well. Vishnu started off really well, under the likes of Girish Karnad, B. V. Karanth, and Puttanna Kanagal. He did lead roles in Tamil even before Kamal started doing one. I know Upendra makes films but is he really that talented? I was under the impression that he is just another Crazy Star! —Vensatry (ping) 17:48, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oh! i got it. Aravind did a good job in Rudraveena as well, albeit in a cameo appearance. I respect Vishnuvardhan for his work, mainly in films like Nagarahavu. Similarly, i liked Upendra's work as a director more than an actor. Dare i say, he was one of the primitive Kannada directors to start using the "shock and awe" techniques in filmmaking with some really different scripts. But i must admit that his last directorial Upendra 2 was too complicated where the message "If you are not now here, you can be nowhere" is conveyed using a protagonist who represents the feeling of "you". The prequel explored the influence of money, love and responsibilities on the feeling of "Myself"/Human Ego using four characters who represent them, which made it more interesting. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:29, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
provisional population
Provisional population results means?--Vin09 (talk) 12:26, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
I thought it was official, so we need to follow census of India? If you could check Mumbai page too. I've added there and some top 10 city pages.--Vin09 (talk) 12:26, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- As the name implies the results are provisional and not final. The citypopulation.de data is based on the final calculations which are available here. I've done some calculations here. —Vensatry (ping) 12:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- I think this reference is official to use?--Vin09 (talk) 12:36, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- That's nothing but the "provisional" document. The final population figures are available (state/city/UA/town/village) in the census website. You need to download it from here. —Vensatry (ping) 12:40, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help, I've followed same kind of reference for mandals pages like this, but for cities, I've used the former one in most of the pages, so needs to be replaced with the new one which you said. A small doubt in your reference, whether to which one to download Part-B-ebook(CRC)? or Town Amenities? one. I see both are same for Krishna district of Andhra Pradesh for example.--:Vin09 (talk) 12:47, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- The first one (PDF) is a comprehensive one while the second one (Excel file) lists just numbers. —Vensatry (ping) 13:04, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help, I've followed same kind of reference for mandals pages like this, but for cities, I've used the former one in most of the pages, so needs to be replaced with the new one which you said. A small doubt in your reference, whether to which one to download Part-B-ebook(CRC)? or Town Amenities? one. I see both are same for Krishna district of Andhra Pradesh for example.--:Vin09 (talk) 12:47, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- That's nothing but the "provisional" document. The final population figures are available (state/city/UA/town/village) in the census website. You need to download it from here. —Vensatry (ping) 12:40, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- I think this reference is official to use?--Vin09 (talk) 12:36, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
In Hyderabad(FA article), demographics section lists the provisional reference. So, confused now in secondary cities pages, to which one to use?--Vin09 (talk) 13:15, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- The article was promoted long back. The final results have just been released that many are not even aware of it. —Vensatry (ping) 15:53, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- There are official references for Guntur, Nellore and Visakhapatnam, I asked this long back at User_talk:Vensatry/Archive_28#Doubt. I'm adding these three cities figures on Urban agglomeration page. Is it okay to add them?--Vin09 (talk) 17:31, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Can you show me the links for the official refs? —Vensatry (ping) 17:41, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Performed an edit based on your reference for main city population of Kurnool, could you check it?
- Can you show me the links for the official refs? —Vensatry (ping) 17:41, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- There are official references for Guntur, Nellore and Visakhapatnam, I asked this long back at User_talk:Vensatry/Archive_28#Doubt. I'm adding these three cities figures on Urban agglomeration page. Is it okay to add them?--Vin09 (talk) 17:31, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Guntur-U/A, Main city
- Nellore-Nellore city.
Forgot to add Vizag->GVMC ref
- The newspaper source seems fine. The corporation sites just give an estimate, better don't add them. As for Vizag, the city and UA are one and the same. —Vensatry (ping) 18:04, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- So, Guntur city and Vizag are ok? I won't add UA of Guntur. So, what about Nellore?--Vin09 (talk) 18:08, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Also, did you check Kurnool?
- (edit conflict) For city you may add the updated figures, but for UA follow the census website. —Vensatry (ping) 18:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- So, Guntur city and Vizag are ok? I won't add UA of Guntur. So, what about Nellore?--Vin09 (talk) 18:08, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
@Vensatry: Thanks for your valuable info. Please let me know if my edit is ok on here.--Vin09 (talk) 18:19, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
A doubt regarding ref. census main site, your ref, which one to use, both are from census, but some difference in population for Mangalagiri town.--Vin09 (talk) 10:17, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- One is provisional and the other is final. I've been telling this to you since yesterday! —Vensatry (ping) 11:03, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- No I'm not referring to that chart listing, which is provisional one, this is different, the reference which I state above is search box in census site, from there I got the above one.--Vin09 (talk) 11:26, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Good catch! Both are final, but the pdf link includes outgrowths, so is the inflation. —Vensatry (ping) 11:33, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- I think I got the answer, in pdf those are urban agglomerations, as per 2011 census all outgrowths are considered as UA. I've check it for Tadepalle, Guntur district, it worked if the OG Navuluru was subtracted from UA it is giving the main one. The search box defines main town as (M) and pdf has (M+OG). Anyways, thanks for taking your time in helping.--Vin09 (talk) 11:36, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Good catch! Both are final, but the pdf link includes outgrowths, so is the inflation. —Vensatry (ping) 11:33, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- No I'm not referring to that chart listing, which is provisional one, this is different, the reference which I state above is search box in census site, from there I got the above one.--Vin09 (talk) 11:26, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
I have expanded the parent article to a certain extent. Quoting P. S. Veerappa, "Vensatry, Enna Mudivu Seidhirukkiraai?" — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 01:53, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Check the nom page. :) —Vensatry (ping) 05:41, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks bro. Wanted to use a devil-grin so as to give one of the actor's guffaw effects, LOL. BTW, I'm working on List of players who have scored 10,000 or more runs in Test cricket. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 05:59, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah I could sense that! —Vensatry (ping) 06:34, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hey wait, you grabbed my future project. —Vensatry (ping) 06:34, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Actually, I kind of tried to make it easy for you (We could be co-nominators for the FLC if you like). Just figuring out what more to add. A secondary source would be needed though for both the Test and ODI lists. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 07:00, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- No worries, good work! You could add a bit of history in the opening para. Something like before Gavaskar who held the record, who held the record for the longest period, etc., —Vensatry (ping) 07:58, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Actually, I kind of tried to make it easy for you (We could be co-nominators for the FLC if you like). Just figuring out what more to add. A secondary source would be needed though for both the Test and ODI lists. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 07:00, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hey wait, you grabbed my future project. —Vensatry (ping) 06:34, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah I could sense that! —Vensatry (ping) 06:34, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks bro. Wanted to use a devil-grin so as to give one of the actor's guffaw effects, LOL. BTW, I'm working on List of players who have scored 10,000 or more runs in Test cricket. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 05:59, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
I have added some history regarding who held the record before Sunny (Good old Gary Sobers did so before Geoff Boycott took over and then Sunny took over). Do check if everything's alright before it is nominated for FLC. Thanks. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 12:27, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- I suggest you wait for sometime before nom the list as my candidate seems to be a border-line case of 3(b) violation. Cheers —Vensatry (ping) 12:44, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Bipasha Basu filmography
Hello! Your submission of Bipasha Basu filmography at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Dravecky (talk) 07:31, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Your revert
I noticed you reverted Prasannarane61993's edit. Please don't bother assuming good faith. The user has been removing Bombay and inserting Maharashtra on various article. Just revert them and leave a warning for disruptive editing next time. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:31, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- Ah, didn't see his edits. Sure! —Vensatry (ping) 18:34, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- It's alright. :) --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:56, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Check
Could you check if my edit is correct here.--Vin09 (talk) 11:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
I've started a discussion at Talk:List_of_cities_in_India_by_population#Census_reference. You can have your views, as in the talk page it can be a future reference. Thanks.--Vin09 (talk) 12:07, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- Vin09, the same sources lie before you as well. Why do you want me to do the crosscheck? —Vensatry (ping) 12:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 August 2015
- In focus: An increase in active Wikipedia editors
- In the media: Russia temporarily blocks Wikipedia
- News and notes: Re-imagining grants
- Featured content: Out to stud, please call later
- Arbitration report: Reinforcing Arbitration
- Recent research: OpenSym 2015 report
DYK for List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at the Riverside Ground
On 16 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at the Riverside Ground, which you recently nominated. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at the Riverside Ground. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
BlueMoonset (talk) 17:01, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
(Note: this should have been acknowledged on 16 August; apologies for the delay.)
DYK for List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Lance Gibbs
On 24 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Lance Gibbs, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that West Indies cricketer Lance Gibbs took a pair of five-wicket hauls on two different occasions at the Old Trafford Cricket Ground? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Lance Gibbs. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:49, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Oru Indhiya Kanavu
On 29 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Oru Indhiya Kanavu, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1983 Tamil film Oru Indhiya Kanavu was based on a play by the director Komal Swaminathan himself? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Oru Indhiya Kanavu. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 September 2015
- Special report: Massive paid editing network unearthed on the English Wikipedia
- News and notes: Flow placed on ice
- Discussion report: WMF's sudden reversal on Wiki Loves Monuments
- Featured content: Brawny
- In the media: Orangemoody sockpuppet case sparks widespread coverage
- Traffic report: You didn't miss much
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 09 September 2015
- Gallery: Being Welsh
- Featured content: Killed by flying debris
- News and notes: The Swedish Wikipedia's controversial two-millionth article
- Traffic report: Mass media production traffic
- Technology report: Tech news in brief