User talk:Vasudeva Kutumbakam Nepal

This is Vasudeva Kutumbakam Nepal's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clinic One (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:NORG. Mere existence is not enough for inclusion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clinic One and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Clinic One, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 07:01, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vasudeva Kutumbakam Nepal! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 07:01, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clinic One (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Relevant guideline is WP:ORGCRIT. The organization's own website cannot be used to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clinic One and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 19:52, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clinic One (September 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Greenman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Greenman (talk) 13:24, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Clinic one logo.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Clinic one logo.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clinic One (October 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Resubmitted after rejection; there are still no sources other than the clinic's own website and social media pages, and the only difference compared to when it was rejected a month ago is that a lot of promotional details have been added.

bonadea contributions talk 11:29, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello Vasudeva Kutumbakam Nepal. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Vasudeva Kutumbakam Nepal. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Vasudeva Kutumbakam Nepal|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 11:30, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BonadeaI am just a employee in Clinic One and I am paid for digital marketing intern. The Company is legal and I am given responsibility to just update the information of Clinic One in every online platform. You can also look after Our website and social media post they are more knowledge oriented rather than promotion oriented. I am just 18 years old and I am very new to this platform and I don't know how to write and provide valuable information in wikipedia. Can you please guide me for its development. kushal (talk) 14:29, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining your connection with the company. Before making any other edits to Wikipedia, you need to make a disclosure as described above (in the paragraph that begins "Regardless, if you are receiving..."

You should perhaps let your employers know that you can't simply create a Wikipedia article about Clinic One. Wikipedia is not an online portal like Linkedin or a social media website where a company can create a profile or a company page. A Wikipedia article about a company has to be based on what people who are not connected to that company have said about it in reliable published sources. The company website, Facebook page, Youtube channel etc. are in fact not relevant for Wikipedia. Please read this information, which will tell you exactly what kind of sources are necessary. If there is no such sourcing, then I'm afraid there can't be a Wikipedia article about the clinic – and if there should be such an article in the future, the company's employees should not edit it. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 19:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vasudeva Kutumbakam Nepal! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Archer1234 (talk) 07:55, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. You have been adding a 'religion' parameter to infoboxes that do not support it. If you use the "Show preview" button you should see a warning message that alerts you that the parameter you seek to add is not supported. Archer1234 (talk) 07:57, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Rinku Singh (baseball), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Archer1234 (talk) 07:59, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Archer1234. An edit that you recently made to Naya Muluk seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Whatever you are attempting to do, appears to be indistinguishable from vandalism. Test in your sandbox first. Archer1234 (talk) 19:22, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clinic One (October 20)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No independent sources, no significant coverage. Please stop submitting this.

bonadea contributions talk 16:29, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Vasudeva Kutumbakam Nepal, you explained here that you are an intern working for Clinic One. You were then asked to make a formal disclosure of this before making any other edits. I didn't remind you while you were only editing articles that had nothing to do with Clinic One, but now that you have again submitted the draft, you are asked to disclose your paid status on your user page. I will copy the instructions from the notice above:

You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Vasudeva Kutumbakam Nepal. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Vasudeva Kutumbakam Nepal|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}.

Please also stop submitting the draft – it has now been rejected three times, and a rejection means that it shouldn't be resubmitted at all. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 16:33, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Clinic One

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Clinic One, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Tulsi 24x7 10:33, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Deb (talk) 10:49, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vasudeva Kutumbakam Nepal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I also want to contribute in wikipedia and I have not done this for promotion oriented and it was done for information oriented For instance you can look the wikipage. Even the prime minister of Nepal Sher Bahadur Deuba was vaccinated by clinic one if you want proof of it I am ready to provide it to you. Rest your desicision is valid to me.If you think I am here just for promotion then you can look my global statistic of wikipedia account and I have made more than 200 edits Vasudeva Kutumbakam Nepal 06:29, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your edits were in violation of WP:PROMO and almost certainly, in violation of WP:COI. As you see no problem with this and as you are bringing up completely irrelevant information (e.g. the Prime Minister), there are no grounds to consider lifting the block. Yamla (talk) 09:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.