User talk:Vanished user llkdfkj4isw4/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Vanished user llkdfkj4isw4. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Disambiguation link notification for September 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Icelandic Sportsperson of the Year, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sigurður Einarsson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
WP:MOSBIO
Ethnicity or sexuality should not generally be emphasized in the opening unless it is relevant to the subject's notability. Similarly, previous nationalities or the country of birth should not be mentioned in the opening sentence unless they are relevant to the subject's notability. And with on click of the mouse, what you failed to find. Murry1975 (talk) 11:14, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- WP:MOSBIO, where I told you and you looked up but could'nt see, and there was a discussion on the football project, which I will find when i get the chance. Murry1975 (talk) 15:40, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- You cant find it?, the link is above, the MOSBIO guideline lead to a discussion at project football, which is followed- its the same guideline. If you are struggling because English isnt your first language, there are other language wikipedias. Murry1975 (talk) 17:11, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- If you cant read the guideline linked and see in the first section what we have discussed, turn the computer off, and make yourself a nice cup of tea. If you cant read the notice at the top of my talkpage, the same applies. Murry1975 (talk) 17:23, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- I've read it thanks - I asked you for the two "easy to follow" policies you found "with on click". Again, if you want to police articles - learn the difference between a policy, a guideline and your opinion. If you demand high standards of "politeness" from others don't be impolite yourself. If you want to question other editors' use of the English language don't abuse the language with your semi-literate edit summaries! Clavdia chauchat (talk) 17:36, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- Opinion? My opinion isnt invovled here. Can you link me to the guideline to back your edit? Go for it. Murry1975 (talk) 17:41, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- I've read it thanks - I asked you for the two "easy to follow" policies you found "with on click". Again, if you want to police articles - learn the difference between a policy, a guideline and your opinion. If you demand high standards of "politeness" from others don't be impolite yourself. If you want to question other editors' use of the English language don't abuse the language with your semi-literate edit summaries! Clavdia chauchat (talk) 17:36, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- If you cant read the guideline linked and see in the first section what we have discussed, turn the computer off, and make yourself a nice cup of tea. If you cant read the notice at the top of my talkpage, the same applies. Murry1975 (talk) 17:23, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
- You cant find it?, the link is above, the MOSBIO guideline lead to a discussion at project football, which is followed- its the same guideline. If you are struggling because English isnt your first language, there are other language wikipedias. Murry1975 (talk) 17:11, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ryan-Zico Black
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ryan-Zico Black, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 11:52, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Icelandic Sportsperson of the Year, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swimming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Phacochoerus africanus
I'm thinking the task force needs a mascot. Hmlarson (talk) 05:25, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
- Lol, I love it! Clavdia chauchat (talk) 10:30, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject volleyball - invitation to discussion
This is an special invitation for experienced editors to the discussion in WikiProject Volleyball about the proposal for Notability Guide for Volleyball Players. Your wise and kind participation will be highly appreciated. Osplace 20:35, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
GAR for Hope Solo article
Hope Solo, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hmlarson (talk) 05:56, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Euro
Hey, good work and thanks for adding the informations (and the kind words). Kante4 (talk) 14:57, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Umeå IK, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Women's football (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:06, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Quarter Million Award
The Quarter Million Award | ||
For your contributions to bring Hope Solo (estimated annual readership: 414,000) to Good Article status, you have been awarded the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. Hmlarson (talk) 01:40, 23 October 2013 (UTC) |
The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:
This editor won the Quarter Million Award for bringing Hope Solo to Good Article status. |
Thank you for your contributions to the Hope Solo article, GA review, and community re-assessment. Your many contributions are very much appreciated! Hmlarson (talk) 01:40, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks Hmlarson, you made a great job of that article and are doing just as well with the Wambach one. Clavdia chauchat (talk) 19:34, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Esther Hernández may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- {{Spain-footy-bio-stub}
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:10, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, BB! Clavdia chauchat (talk) 00:12, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rachel Williams (footballer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Rachel Williams joins Chelsea|publisher=[[She Kicks (magazine)|accessdate=6 November 2013|date=6 November 2013}}</ref>
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:59, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elisabetta Bavagnoli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hometown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
License tagging for File:AGSM-Verona.png
Thanks for uploading File:AGSM-Verona.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Category:Glasgow City L.F.C. players
Category:Glasgow City L.F.C. players, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. NSH002 (talk) 23:30, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note at CfD. I only got involved because I chanced on this article in the printed version of The Independent (the pic in the online piece is not the same as the one in the printed edition, which actually shows some players of the club, not the opposition, and which also has a pic of Montgomery). It piqued my interest because I'd just read and watched Chrissie's evidence to the select committee inquiry on Women and Sport. See the links in the "Further reading" section at Chrissie Wellington - a pretty thorough demolishing of some of the attitudes you see in comments on the Independent piece - even ignoring the fact that she beats most of the men in her races. A strange fact: she is, by any objective set of criteria, one of the most outstanding athletes in any sport, of any era, of any gender, and yet she gets hardly any coverage. That reflects more on the media than it does on her achievements. Anyway, after reading the Independent, I tried to find the club on Wikipedia - not straightforward! I did think of pointing Glasgow City at the club, but settled, for now, for just putting a hatnote on Glasgow. BTW, I did grow up in that part of the world, though I am not Scottish. --NSH001 (talk) 08:49, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Portal
Would you be interested in helping me create and curate the portal? Hmlarson (talk) 21:12, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
Quick word of thanks for your work developing further the Hólmbert Aron Friðjónsson article, great work finding those Icelandic refs. I know it is likely to be deleted in a few days, but at least we've kept it interesting for the 2000+ people who have viewed it so far this week :) --nonsense ferret 23:59, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
The support comment made my day. :D Beyond that, thank you for all the work you're doing on women's football/soccer articles. It is very much appreciated. :D
LauraHale (talk) 20:30, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- I take great pride in the fact that for a while, the quality of women's national football team articles was better than the men's. It is good to see these articles worked on. (I've actually been learning a bit about blind football recently. I really wish they had a women's version because fun game to watch.) On the other front, New Zealand is probably next. The current article titles fail WP:V because two teams exist and the rules are gender segregated. The Pillars of Wikipedia still apply. Anyway, please do keep up the good work. :) --LauraHale (talk) 21:16, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Australia national association football team". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 01:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GiantSnowman 17:05, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Barnstar for you
The Running Man Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your continued work on sports articles despite the frustrating challenges of the Wikipedia environment. Someone needs to create a warthog barnstar. ;) Cheers! Hmlarson (talk) 02:08, 4 December 2013 (UTC) |
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 07:16, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Relative popularity of the Socceroos versus Matildas in people's interests
Google tracks search volume for teams. This shows the relative number of searches for Socceroos, Matildas, and australia national soccer team. The relative volume of searches for the men's team and women's team was the same in April 2004, June 2004, July 2004, September 2004, November 2004, December 2004, February 2005, March 2005, April 2005, May 2005, August 2005, November 2010, December 2010, February 2011, April 2011, December 2011, January 2012, March 2012, April 2012, May 2012, July 2012, August 2012, January 2013, February 2013, April 2013, August 2013, December 2013. The Matildas topped the men in August 2004, July 2005, September 2007, December 2008, and July 2011. --LauraHale (talk) 12:13, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- [1] [2] When only Australian searches are factored in, the differences change. In August 2004, the Matildas had a 66 while the Socceroos had a 4. From December 2005 to April 2006, the Matildas beat the Socceroos based on interest. Again, the Matildas beat the Soccers from July 2006 until June 2007, August 2007 to pretty consistently going forward with one or two months where the Socceroos had more Australian interest.--LauraHale (talk) 12:28, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- This academic paper says that soccer is the most popular football code in Australia for women. For men, not so much. --LauraHale (talk) 13:05, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- This chapter from a textbook published by the University of Oxford Press says that soccer in Australia has traditionally been for women, ethnic immigrants and homosexuals. This counters the narrative of the sport being exclusively male (and white).--LauraHale (talk) 13:14, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Regarding the "success" of the A-League, this source shows they have had financial troubles in the extreme, losing AU$20 million in the past year on top of the AU$27 million they lost during the 2011-2012 season. --LauraHale (talk) 13:16, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Related to this, I did an interview on Wikinews. It can be found at n:Wikinews interviews academic Steve Redhead about Australian women's soccer. --LauraHale (talk) 13:10, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patrizia Panico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waldstadion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 11 December 2013 (UTC)