Jump to content

User talk:Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr/Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


News archive search request

[edit]

Hi there Laura, I've noticed from your previous contributions to AfDs that you seem to have access to a "bigger/better than google" news archive service. Are you able to review Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maynard (Australian media personality) and help determine if he was the subject of "significant coverage" when he was the Triple J breakfast guy (he was called "Maynard F# Crabbes" (pronounced F-Sharp) back then, and was one of the stereotypical "wacky breakfast radio guys". I grew up listening to him, and I'm sure that he would have had a profile or ten done in the weekend newspapers etc. Thanks. The-Pope (talk) 00:08, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kym Tollenaere

[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Jonathon Charlesworth

[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Brent Dancer

[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 12 April 2012 (UTC)


DYK for Luke Doerner

[edit]

Orlady (talk) 16:04, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Matthew Swann

[edit]

Orlady (talk) 16:04, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

[edit]

Much thanks on behalf of the National Teams Task Force for your effort to create articles for every women's national team.

To take a little load off your shoulders, I'll work on Mauritius and maybe a few after that. All this time I thought they didn't have a national team! Whatever, I guess I didn't look hard enough. Again, thank you so much. -- BCS (t · c · !) 19:40, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The initial edit. More to come. -- BCS (t · c · !) 21:14, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Women's national football teams

[edit]

Thanks so much for your great work here. I'll try to help over the weekend! Clavdia chauchat (talk) 21:38, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed your concern, added a citation with a bit of extra information, and fixed a minor error and added a citation on that. Thanks Secret account 06:04, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review request

[edit]

Hi Laura. I added an alternate hook to the Aspioti-ELKA DYK here. If it isn't too much trouble I would really appreciate if you could review it. Of course I would understand if you didn't feel so inclined. Thanks again. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 06:14, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. It was very nice meeting you. :) Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 21:37, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bollywood Striptease

[edit]

I've rectified the problems. Please review again. Thanks! --SupernovaExplosion Talk 06:51, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK question, Softball at the Summer Olympics, Belinda White

[edit]
Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Softball at the Summer Olympics, Belinda White.
Message added 18:15, 14 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK Nomination for RST

[edit]

Laura, thank you very much for your directed feedback. In response to your critique: I can remove the Origins section of this article altogether; however, RST actually evolved from Gray's Biopsychological Theory, which grew out of Eysenck's related work, the Extraversion-Arousal hypothesis. Because the users on the Talk page of RST specifically asked for these additions (i.e. the evolution and historical context of the theory) and because there is a stub page on Wiki for Gray's Biopsychological theory, there are several ways I can address your critique. 1) I can remove the information on Gray's Biopsychological theory from RST page, use that information to expand the stub page on Gray's Biopsychological page, then link that Wiki page to the RST page so users who are interested still have access to that relevant information. The information presented in this Origins section is neither debated nor from a non-neutral POV. 2) Alternatively, I can leave the Origins section as part of RST article and focus on improving clarity? You mentioned that the Origins section was a "mess" -- would additional definitions of relevant terms, rather than just linking to the relevant term pages on Wiki, help clarify? 3) I cited the hook in both the lead and relevant body paragraph; I am currently adding citations/ relevant work for when you get an opportunity to look at the rest of the article (beyond the Origins section). I appreciate your time and efforts very much! Plroseman (talk) 18:20, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for stopping by the Teahouse

[edit]
Hi! Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr, thanks for visiting the Teahouse! As an experienced editor, your knowledge is very valuable to new editors (as you know). Teahouse Hosts help new editors at the Teahouse and beyond. If you'd like to get involved in assisting new editors at the Teahouse, please learn more here. heather walls (talk) 21:14, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hope your dissertation is going well!

Womens national teams

[edit]

Sure that I can help. Only that it's difficult found info about some national teams. FIFA does not provide info about Brunei, Cambodia, Kuwait,... Greetings. --Raymond Cruise (talk) 21:39, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How are you

[edit]

Are you okay? Back in Oz? Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:27, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Okay, now that's gotta be in violation of WP:USERSPACE or something... if someone took something out of my userspace, put it in main space, and claimed it was their work (by not including the history) I'd have a shit fit. Definitely not what you need to come back to. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:55, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • You're welcome. You know how to know you're a Wikipediholic? When you email a university in Japan asking for first edition book cover scans, because you read somewhere that they have the books.
Mind you, Indonesians are terrible with maintenance and record-keeping, so I don't think I could find them here. Jakarta, at most. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:34, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination for Personality judgment

[edit]

I have addressed your concerns concerning the nomination for the personality judgment page on its nomination page. Thank you for your review of the article! Please let me know if you have further concerns. Whitmb11 (talk) 22:32, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 April 2012

[edit]

Mauritius

[edit]

That's great! I'll keep an eye out. Good luck with the others! Maybe I'll work on Seychelles or Réunion... -- BCS (t · c · !) 23:56, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Belinda White

[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 16:21, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Softball at the Summer Olympics

[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 16:22, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

problems with dyk

[edit]

Ha!

Just as you posted on my talk page, I got an answer from Rob SchnautZ (WMF) on |here, saying "I spoke with Laura Hale over IRC and she was able to clear up what the issue is here. I agree; we can't have en:WP:DYK submission as a requirement in a course without making sure students understand and follow the rules of DYK. This is being addressed."

But there are also problems a GAN, with new editors passing articles without reviews. Maybe there's active online ambassadors somewhere, but I have yet to see one. Somewhere I saw that an article "review" process was being proposed - details unclear. MathewTownsend (talk) 22:15, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Laura. Just wanted to point out, in case you were unaware of it, an example of an education project that was actually successful in its use of assessment processes: WP:MMM. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 00:50, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and if you're interested in more links (both good and bad), just let me know. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:51, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Jodie Stevenson article has not been expanded within the DYK time frame. SL93 (talk) 01:10, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I made a mistake. Sorry. Your nomination has been passed. SL93 (talk) 01:15, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Education Program Metrics and Activities Meeting

[edit]

Hi. You might be interested in this. outreach:Wikipedia Education Program Metrics and Activities Meeting. The next meeting is April 23. You can also add your name to the list here to get meeting announcements in the future. meta:Global message delivery/Targets/Wikipedia Education Program meeting. Pine(talk) 10:50, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at SarahStierch's talk page.
Message added 20:43, 18 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Sarah (talk) 20:43, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition of {{COI}} to Dimensional models of personality disorders because "Classwork appears to be creating a COI, with editors primary concern being coursework instead of WP" is absurd. The editor has repeatedly responded to requests to improve the article, and continues to do so...they do not have a COI with the topic. Using the COI template as such is inappropriate.Smallman12q (talk) 11:52, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Dimensional models of personality disorders. Thank you.Smallman12q (talk) 02:40, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jodie Stevenson

[edit]

The Bushranger One ping only 16:19, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for ISF Women's World Championship

[edit]

The Bushranger One ping only 16:19, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Oman women's national football team, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 23:26, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:2011–12 Ivy League men's basketball season/GA1

[edit]

I have responded to your concerns at Talk:2011–12 Ivy League men's basketball season/GA1.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:21, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When you get a chance please complete the procedure at WP:GAC for passing an article.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:43, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you don't include a topic in the template, how does a bot know what page to put it on at WP:GA?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:57, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The other bot that does Wikipedia:Good articles/recent‎ watches Wikipedia:Good articles subpages, so I think two things didn't get done. When you have time, make sure the article gets listed whereever it should.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:11, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Incomplete DYK nomination

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Burundi women's national football team at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 14:11, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Yesterday's GAC

[edit]

Why did you erase my last comment? Do you want me to finish the promotion?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:43, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Starlight Spectacular (Canada's Wonderland)

[edit]

Hi, thanks for the review of the article! References are nearly impossible to find for this subject (all the articles on the internet state the same thing over and over and over), the one Facebook source is the only evidence that the show is returning in 2012 (unless you want another forum source) and reference #3 is really the only thing on the internet that describes what the show was (videos are the only source possible for the summary of the show).

I probably won't bother fixing these errors as (like I mentioned before) are pretty hard to find. I'm worrying about another article that has a chance at GA and possible FA now so if I feel bored, I'll try to fix non-reference errors.--Dom497 (talk) 19:01, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cape Verde and Chad

[edit]

I guess that if there is no indication that the teams even exist then there's no way that an article on them could pass WP:GNG. If, however, there is enough information on the other 2 topics of women's football in those countries in general, I'd say it would be a good idea to put the info into articles with those suggested titles :) If you keep me updated with which new women's national football team articles are being created, I can update the map as and when required. Delsion23 (talk) 21:47, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Your GA nomination of Kelsey Wakefield

[edit]

The article Kelsey Wakefield you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Kelsey Wakefield for things which need to be addressed. Ruby 2010/2013 02:22, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gilleys Shield (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Perth
Togo women's national football team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Handball

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


DYK nomination of Burundi women's national football team

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Burundi women's national football team at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cloudz679 12:28, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting for your comments on the accuracy of "women's players" and proposal of (another) alternative hook at the nomination page. Thank you. Cloudz679 15:42, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hook

[edit]

What do you think about this one: ... according to one reviewer, the reggae drum fill in "Watch n' Learn" originates from Bob Marley's 1983 single "Buffalo Soldier" ... ? — Tomica (talk) 10:00, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not unless you can explain what reggae drum fill is in the article or with a wiki link because as an outsider, I have zero idea what that means. --LauraHale (talk) 10:03, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Wiki linked it. I think its good now. — Tomica (talk) 16:48, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I resolved some of your queries for the article and posted comments on the article's GAN. — Tomica (talk) 18:59, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Hi LauraHale, I've reviewed your GA nomination and placed it on hold pending resolution of some small concerns. Regards, Resolute 22:55, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. It's election day where I am, and I'm swamped with other things today, so I'll revisit the article tomorrow. Thanks for the quick response! Resolute 18:38, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Looking good. I am about ready to pass it, but I have one remaining question: The National Water Polo League article suggests that Arancini would have been on three championship winning teams. That is something I think deserves notation. Thanks, Resolute 01:40, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Stumbled across a new editor...

[edit]

Hi Laura! I stumbled across a new editor tonight, Ballyyagran 6356, who is writing content about the women's sport camogie. Might be someone worth recruiting for your women's sports initiative :) Sarah (talk) 04:57, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


There is, in fact, at least one team whose fans do something special during the playing of the national anthem: the Baltimore Orioles have for decades shouted "O!" say does that, etc. The difference, though, is that that actually relates to the team. Meanwhile, I would be surprised if the Hawks are the only team anywhere in which fans cheer during the anthem. If they were, that might be of some interest (its alleged "flag code violation" is not - that was an overenthusiastic user who heard something about it on what was probably a slow night on Fox News.) ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots00:08, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are several in hockey alone. Dallas Stars fans are well known for yelling out "STARS" at the right points of the anthem, and in Calgary we yell out "C/SEE" and "RED" (owing to our "C of Red"; I think Washington may have copied that), while in Winnipeg, they yell "TRUE NORTH" during the Canadian anthem to match the owner of the team. That said, I was going to bring the "why do we care" aspect of Chicago fans applauding into the conversation, but Laura simply beat me to the punch with a far more bold action! Resolute 00:20, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If there's a place for it at all, that info for the various cities could be in the "Performances of the National Anthem" article (or whatever it's called), although I think the "O!" thing still belongs in the O's article (also), as it's strongly identified with them. As for "violating the flag code", that's silly. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots00:28, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


The Signpost: 23 April 2012

[edit]


Sorry

[edit]

Sorry for adding the POV and COI tags to an article you created. --Tomtomn00 (talkcontributions) 16:45, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Precious

[edit]
good sports
Thank you for expanding our knowledge of sports, of women in sports, and for reviewing with courage, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:40, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Re RFC on USEP

[edit]

Laura, I've seen the RFC you are drafting in your user space re the U.S. Education Program. Found it from a link Mike Christie had in a proposal he made. I note that a number of editors have contributed to the RFC draft. I am an active Campus Ambassador and will surely weigh-in on this if the RFC goes live, but are you looking for inputs to the draft now? I will be happy to contribute. --Mike Cline (talk) 13:06, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, at this point, I don't know if it will ever move to the main space. My basic conclusion is there is a clear need for such an RfC but I don't feel ready to be the one to move it into the main space. If some one is willing to fix it up to the point where they are happy to do that themselves, I would be happy to support it... but yeah, basically won't pull the trigger myself. Helping improving it based on feedback to get it there is cool. Anyone can edit the draft. --LauraHale (talk) 13:12, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Commenting again: I probably undid your contribution. I was under the impression based on your comment that you wished to IMPROVE the draft with moving it to the main space. As your comment expressed an opinion on a draft of an RfC that was not yet ready for the main space, I removed it. Please only update the draft to fix the text with the idea of moving to the main space. --LauraHale (talk) 14:00, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Justin's tweets

[edit]

"No detailed explanation..."---sorry, but that's BS. You know damn well what my reasons are. I can't believe you haven't even thought of retaining the "As of" template: it's obvious that this is in flux. Just another reason to vote against the article going to the front page. Drmies (talk) 23:42, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zanzibar's team

[edit]

He Laura, Going through your Zanzibar women's team article, I think there might be an inconsistency in the sources regarding the Hijab and have pointed out so Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Hook_of_Zanzibar_women.27s_national_football_team_in_Queue_1 at the DYK page. Your input would be appreciated! L.tak (talk) 17:49, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding some of your recent edit summaries, and your posts in the recent AfD from Fleeson's class - please go reread WP:CIVIL. Kevin Gorman (talk) 22:01, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr. You have new messages at Kevin Gorman's talk page.
Message added 22:59, 27 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Kevin Gorman (talk) 22:59, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As a sidenote, I figured you might enjoy this article. It was written by a USEP student, and is about a female artist who was prominent in southern California in the first half of the 20th century - but about who, before the Wikipedia article went up, you could find almost nothing online. It's written based on a handful of paper sources with more to come, including a multipage profile in the la times. (One of the refs is missing a publication name because she forgot it currently, but that'll be fixed sooner or later - it's a reputable publication and I've held the ref in hand, just neither of us can quite remember what it was currently, and we only recorded the name and author, not publication.) Kevin Gorman (talk)
[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Andorra women's national football team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Women's football and EFA
Anguilla women's national football team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to AIA
Cape Verde women's national football team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to San Vicente
Lady Gaga on Twitter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Madonna
Softball in Australia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Perth
Sydney Uni Water Polo Club (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to David Hudson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Association for Psychological Science syllabus

[edit]

Your edit summaries on a few articles [1][2][3] indicate that you seem to have mistaken students from a Dickinson College class with Fleeson's. The Dickinson class has no relation to Fleeson. It isn't a part of the Education Program, so there are no ambassadors assigned to it. The class would appear to be working from the Association for Psychological Science sample syllabus (pdf), which has steps for nominating articles for DYK (in week 7) and GA (in week 10). Hope that clears up any confusion. Gobōnobo + c 12:39, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]