User talk:VanessaSmith766

VanessaSmith766, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi VanessaSmith766! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:16, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Trottier article:

This is in reference to your edit to Justin Trottier's article here. The description you used was "(Updates to media work)". However, in addition you removed all refernces to Trottier's ties to Men's Rights organizations. These have been shown by multiple reliable sources. For instance The Toronto Star has said:

Beaulieu added that he explained his reasoning to Justin Trottier, a prominent men’s rights activist and CAFE member.

Source

Are these sources in error? The reference to him founding CAFE is Now Toronto, which I am not 100% sure passes as a reliable source by Wikipedia Standards.

For the time being I have reverted the article to an older version before your chances. I would recommend we go to the talk page of the article to discuss how to move forward with the article. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 06:37, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Canadian Association for Equality with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 19:40, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Canadian Association for Equality, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Valenciano (talk) 19:45, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CAFE Article

Hi there, I have some concerns about this and other edits that you made to the article on the Canadian Association for Equality - in that edit, for example, you removed a very large block of text from the page (including multiple entries from the "controversies" section), when the edit summary refers to/explains the removal of only a single sentence. I've reverted the edit for now - can you please come to the article's talk page and state your reasons for wanting to see that section of the article removed? Fyddlestix (talk) 03:10, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Signing posts

Hi, Just a quick request - when signing posts on talk pages (this is done by typing four tildes), can you please be sure to put the signature at the end of your post, instead of at the beginning? It makes the conversation much easier to follow - see WP:SIGHOW. Thanks! Fyddlestix (talk) 21:29, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm Fyddlestix. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Canadian Association for Equality without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You have been warned about blanking content from this article repeatedly. The content you keep trying to remove is well-cited and there is no reason for it not to be there. Please stop. Fyddlestix (talk) 00:47, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of JimSmith123 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 01:23, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Fyddlestix (talk) 02:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]