User talk:Vagodin

Welcome to my talk page. Please leave a message below.

Jeez, that wasn't even decent vandalism. Psycho Smiley 14:54, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I know. At least if your going to vandalize, do it right. :) --Vagodin 03:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revert warring is not the way to achieve agreement

Please stop revert warring on Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy. Discuss it on the talk page instead. Thank you. All the best, --Durin 19:33, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was enforcing the consensus of the community by reverting vandalism. --Vagodin ^Talk 19:42, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. But, when a revert war begins the appropriate action should not be to continue the war. You can make a report at WP:AN/I to get administrator assistance. I applaud your sentiment, just not the actions. --Durin 20:08, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

cartoons

Showing the figures of Mohammed is disturbing muslims. And it is a insult to Islam. In Islam making and also looking the figures of Mohammed is forbidden.That is raping the holy things of Islam.And it is not about "freedom".--Erdemsenol 00:39, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a Muslim encyclopedia so it does not matter what is forbidden in Islam. The fact that the cartoons offend muslims is not a good enough reason to remove them. --Vagodin ^Talk 01:03, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Critism is different from insult!

Resid Gulerdem 22:50, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RAvingAtheist, I saw your posts at eteamrevolutions, and I wanted to extend an invite to visit the ChurchofReality.org (discussion board is at myreality.churchofreality.org)

We would value your contributions and insight, as christians do visit the site and 'try' to argue with us.. heh.

Your friend (sarcasm) montrosse came to our site and gave us the link to eteamrevolutions (how I found you). He also took with him a debate that we were having with him and posted it on the eteam forums.. he intentionally left out some information, never posted the link back to our site. When I tried to post the real link of the discussion to our site, it was deleted, 3 times and then I was banned. heh.

Anyway, I hope you visit RavingAtheist, I go by Castlevania.

Nick

Yikes, that wasn't nice then! I'll check out your site. Sorry for the delayed response, I do not check this as often as I used to. --Vagodin ^Talk 03:26, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Mixed martial arts article improvement drive

Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts is now taking suggestions for the new MMA article improvement drive! Please add your input to decide what our first collaboration should be. VegaDark 21:40, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UFC 84

A discussion is happening right now on the fate of UFC 84. Because the outcome of this discussion could affect other MMA event pages and how/when they are created, your input would be greatly appreciated. The discussion is happening here. Thank you for your assistance! Gromlakh (talk) 17:52, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Fierz

Not sure if Martin Fierz is notable but your opinion is welcome. SunCreator (talk) 00:21, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:SDnet.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:SDnet.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:15, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]