User talk:VS6507/Archive 3
RE: Corbin Fisher "Fighting Copyright Infringement"
[edit]Aleksa,
After reviewing the article and doing my own research on the topic, I have found that several of the claimed lawsuits did not happen. Although Corbin Fisher did go through great efforts to fight copyright infringement, the frivolous comments made on fighting copyright infringement were not done so by the company, or approved by the company as an entirety. The segment does not pertain to the article and does not contain fully factual information. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia and I believe we are all here and editing to come closer to the truth; therefore, I do not see any value in posting inaccurate information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.160.247.182 (talk) 18:38, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Re: cocktail You felt my contribution weighs little. Perhaps, the very probable explanation of the origin of the word cocktail, which has been a mystery for over 150 years, has little constructive bearing. I could show you 15 different 18th century references that predate the 1803 and 1806, Maybe I could go into detail and describe the different cocktails which are all named after events related to horses, such as horses neck, stinger, old fashioned, and the cocktail itself. All early literature prior to 1800 specifically denotes a cocktail as a "half breed" racing horse, so you want me to type that all out, or just leave it at "The word cocktail very likely derives from the half breed racing mare." I am a very busy man, I encourage you to be kinder.174.70.125.76 18:53, 20 November 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.70.125.76 (talk) help me understand how this information is not constructive, thank you64.134.188.239 (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Page blanking
[edit]You reverted this edit on Samadha Ashram as an "unexplained page blanking". In general, for a new article that has only be substantively edited by a single author, especially when the article has been tagged for speedy deletion for some reason (copyvio, in this case), if the article author blanks the page, we can interpret that as a good faith request to have the page deleted, and apply the {{db-author}} tag. There is no need to revert such a blanking. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:04, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- You're right, I wasn't looking the whole history backlog of the page (and that's quite difficult to do with script such as Huggle). I'll try to be more cautious next time. Thanks for your notice. Regards. Alex discussion ★ 16:11, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
I am withdrawing the article submission on Walden C. Rhines. Is there a way to simply delete the entry entirely? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glforte (talk • contribs) 18:56, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- If you want for the page which content you are the only substantial contributor to be deleted, you simply put {{db-author}} on the top of the page and soon some of the administrators will check the article and delete it. Kind regards. Alex discussion ★ 19:04, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- I have undid the revert done to your edit and requested speedy deletion under the G7 criteria. Since you blanked the page, it's a self-request for deletion, which is what the G7 criteria is for. You're not an administrator, so you can't delete the entry yourself. Lugia2453 (talk) 18:59, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- I know, I was going to put the template myself, but I saw you've already done that. Alex discussion ★ 19:04, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi there ALEX, AL from Portugal "here",
regarding your reversion in this player/manager's article, i don't doubt your best intentions and judgement, but my edit was 100% correct. Please allow it to remain, this situation (my edits as anon being reverted) seems to occur more often then not even though i never: 1 - vandalize; 2 - add potentially libelous language; engage in POV.
Happy weekend --AL (talk) 15:28, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
- Was i unpolite, here or in my summary in Mr.Clemente's article? I don't think so, but sorry if i was. --AL (talk) 20:53, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Fair enough, sorry for bothering you! Goodbye --AL (talk) 04:02, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Johnharrison1995
[edit]I am in a wikipedia class at the University of Memphis and I am required to make or write on an article already on wikipedia. I cheer for the university and am very knowledgeable about the topic. The edit you undid was not my final article and I was actually adding more too the sub article to make it more substantial to the over all article. My final edit will be approximately three times as long and more descriptive and not as objective as the edit you undid. For my wiki class I was required to unload a little summary of my article that is why it looked as it did. This article will be substantial when I am done, but thank you for your concerns.
Johnharrison1995 (talk) 19:40, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Johnharrison1995
- (talk page stalker here) With all due respect to whoever 'required' you, you can't write a new article on a subject we already have - but it looks like you are adding to an existing article. Without having any knowledge of the subject myself (we don't really have cheerleaders over here except for the few teams playing American sports), I must remind you that no matter how much you know, you must not use yourself as a source and must make reference to reliable independent sources WP:RS. YouTube is not one of these and tends to get removed, as does Facebook. College and university team sites are also not independent, but you might get away with one that has a factual section covering the topic in more detail than just referring to their own teams. Over to Alex who will explain why he reverted you. I would reckon that you shouldn't make any article edits that are not objective (they WILL be reverted), and that you should be sure to get the RS in. Peridon (talk) 21:52, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- I agree with what Peridon said, but I must add that this edit couldn't be alright, and most of the user would revert it, as you can't add to identical headings one over one. Additionally, you shouldn't make controversial edits like this one, without considering dispute resolution and established consensus on the article's talk page. And I must agree that YouTube is definitely not considered a reliable source (which need to be used in writing articles). I hope this clarifies you the situation. Alex discussion ★ 22:05, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Chapmantown
[edit]Dear Aleksa, I wondered where all my work went! Glad there is an active editor. I am a much published local historian [this can be seen by looking up my name on Google]and have written a biography of A.H. Chapman and live (and today write you)in the earlier Chapmantown. My purpose is not at all hostile. I was delighted to happen on the term Chapmantown and my afternoon's work here clarified the history and geography of the term Chapmantown. Most people do confuse the areas I have distinguished here, so your item is a wonderful opportunity to inform people. If your concern is a matter of tone, I would be happy to correct that. If you can help me identify any other part of my essay that troubles you, please alert me and I will be happy to cooperate.Michele shover (talk) 23:01, 25 November 2013 (UTC) Michele Shover Professor of Political Science, retired, California State University, Chico
What are you doing?, First you refused to "google" the actor and nominated it straight for deletion and didn't even bother FIXING (one of the first rules of wikipedia) the article and instead nominated it for deletion and now you are reverting the "capitalisation" which i tried to fix, you have NO RIGHTS to do that..Its now impossible to MOVE it back to PROPER CAPITALISATION and also, learn the rules regarding nominating articles for deletion.....Its a well referenced, well sourced article of a person that passes NOTABILITY, nearly 9000 views now..It doesn't matter what the outcomes of the AfD is, even if deleted, it will be re-created as it p[asses basic notability requirements...--Stemoc (talk) 10:20, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Either way, it doesn't matter. You should've read AfD rules, where is said that you shouldn't rename the article until the process is over (that's just making more job for admins). The article should stay, that's your opinion, but the final decision is not up to you, than to a community through a consensus. You should refrain from making such unilateral actions forth... Alex discussion ★ 10:25, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- renaming doesn't include capitalisation and this was on Afd not Speedy Deletion and you must refrain from touching the article if you have no intention of fixing it.--Stemoc (talk) 10:36, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- In Wikipedia, a page can be renamed if the existing title is incorrect; this is called moving a page. (So every change is also a rename.) Also here's short guide from WP:AFDEQ: While there is no prohibition against moving an article while an AfD discussion is in progress, editors considering doing so should realize such a move can confuse the discussion greatly, can preempt a closing decision, and can make the discussion difficult to track. So, why just making job more difficult when we can move the page after AfD process is closed? Alex discussion ★ 10:44, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- and again, its does NOT include fixing capitalization and how would changing a w to W make any difference?, Had i moved it to his full name which was "Christopher Wood (actor)", then yes, that may have been a problem but all i did was fix capitalisation and i did not change the current wording.--Stemoc (talk) 11:11, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Brilliant Idea Barnstar | |
"I am here to improve this incredible project of free encyclopedia." I used to have this on my userpage and someone once gave me a barnstar for it, so I am doing the same. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 17:54, 26 November 2013 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for November 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alfred de Montesquiou, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Stop Now!
[edit]I am afraid people have to know of the continuous changes in this severe serial killer case. I was tasked with spreading the word. It is classified who gave me this mission. But I can tell you now. That unless you retract your speedy deletion nomination or show me a point in the terms and conditions why I cannot spread the news on the zodiac killer. I am afraid. It must stay. If you try to change it. There will be severe consequences.
Yours Sinserly
Goldrawer7 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldrawer7 (talk • contribs) 21:43, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
sorry
[edit]Yesterday. I was appauled. I spent at least an hour on that work. That's an hour of my life i'll never get back. Oh and there will be severe consequences, is not a threat simply an outburst of justice. For example. If you do delete my page. Perhaps the severe consequences might be any edit or creation of a page will be put up for speedy deletion. Only once however. This is not a threat to your life. I can assure you that. Send me a message back
Yours Sinserly
Goldrawer7
Samuel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldrawer7 (talk • contribs) 10:06, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
netconf
[edit]Hi Aleksa, I think you made a mistake when you undid my edits on the NETCONF page. The figure I removed is wrong (check RFC 6241 if you want) and the text was not correct either. Since there is also an SVG of the image, I do not see why an additional ASCII art is needed. I have a fixed version of the SVG image but I do not yet have upload rights. Can you please put my edits back? Schoenw (talk) 09:02, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Ctenophore in Europa Report
[edit]I would like to send you an email from John Bair who was interviewed for Making of Europa Report, which you used to undo my edits. In his email, John said that a ctenophore really was the primary source for designing the creature. I was hoping you and others would simply look at the film and see that the image of the animal's body is similar to ctenophores depicted in biology textbooks. But you evidently did not. So I went to the trouble of asking John to confirm my view, and he does. I don't know how to attach our emails to this form, but if you give me an email address I can reply with the attachment. Since you blocked me from further edits as a vandal, I hope that you will edit it to reflect the truth about the creature. 71.174.143.126 (talk) 23:25, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
RE: Trevj RfA q 11
[edit]Message added -- Trevj (talk) 12:50, 3 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Speedy deletion contested: Liquid Image corporation
[edit]Hello Aleksa Lukic. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Liquid Image corporation, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:07, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Regarding your edit to Belye Medvedi
[edit]You can view the full list of stub types at WP:STUBS |
Hello VS6507,
I noticed you marked an article as a stub using the {{stub}}
template. Did you know that there are thousands of stub types that you can use to clarify what type of stub the article is? Properly categorizing stubs is important to the Wikipedia community because it helps various WikiProjects to identify articles that need expansion.
If you have questions about stub sorting, don't hesitate to ask! There is a wealth of stub information on the stub sorting WikiProject, and hundreds of stub sorters. Thanks! --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:50, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- While tagging that page, I used Page curation which doesn't feature specific stub type determination. I will try to manually specify stub-type next time. Additionally, you can ask script developers about your concerns. Kind regards. Alex discussion ★ 04:25, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
the whitney gang
[edit]I am the sister of emma Mackenzie and she was the dads leslie whitneys partner and was sentenced a day earlier due to childcare arrangements in the court, the nappy bag drug barons etc was based on my sister, as it was meant to be herself who smuggled drugs, there is references to her but she is not named. thanks176.249.95.119 (talk) 06:10, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
LungiMayte
[edit]It was fairly obvious from the first edit that LungiMayte was trying to create a redirect and didn't know how. From there it spiraled out of control because no one looked at what was going on, they just saw the page blanking. Now he's at a level 3 warning for no good reason. I've let him know how to do redirects. It might be a good idea to reduce to a level 1 warning message, all things considered. Just a heads up. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:47, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Template:Ottawa Rough Riders
[edit]Please take better care when reverting other users, sometimes IPs are removing vandalism. Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 07:50, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Liquid Image Corporation entry
[edit]Hi:
Why are you requesting "speedy deletion" of the entry I wrote? I am one of the co-founders of the company and it is a historical recording of events from 10-20 years ago. That is what Wikipedia is for.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.215.114.94 (talk) 05:26, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: User:Carlos Jordan (Sir Los)
[edit]Hello Aleksa Lukic. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Carlos Jordan (Sir Los), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. GedUK 13:25, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep a note of it - it's unreferenced. Too long without launching = FAKEARTICLE. Launch without refs = prod BLP. Spammy stuff has to include I or we, or phone numbers, or PR speak. BTW I got your problem dealt with by oversight. I'm not sure if it's within the scope of the admin - but it definitely is of oversight. They go that little bit further... Peridon (talk) 19:12, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Alright. Thanks for that. (And sorry for late reply.) Alex discussion ★ 02:20, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Charles Hastings Collette speedy declined
[edit]A 19th century author still in print is certainly significant and likely notable. Cheers Dlohcierekim 02:40, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry. There were no sources and I didn't mention anything notable, although I didn't check it outside of Wikipedia. Thanks for a tip. Alex discussion ★ 02:48, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I try to search, 'cause people don't always write solid stubs. For authors and books, you can use world cat to at least get an inkling. Dlohcierekim 02:54, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
It was supposed to be funny
[edit]because adobe after effects is free content, after piracy atleast — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.148.77.55 (talk) 03:19, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- We at wikipedia have no sense of humor that I am aware of. Dlohcierekim 03:26, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Exactly. Not to be so hard BTW, some joke now and then is welcome, but not in the articles, that actually damages Wikipedia. Alex discussion ★ 03:32, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Kristijan Golubović
[edit]{{German Wiki}} Kristijan Golubović ist frei seit dem 16.12.2013 ist aus dem Gefängnis entlassen wurden in Beograd
sein Status ist nicht its not "Incarcerated" Kristijan its Free
You can read of Kristijan all "Zeitungen" in jugoslawia https://www.google.de/#q=kristijan+golubovi%C4%87&tbm=nws
Der Status muss sein - Frei- seit dem Datum 16.12.2013
Ich hoffe Sie können mich verstehen, mein English is verry bad sorry ... i speak Jugoslawia and German
You can the Artikel ändern of Free pleace bitte ändern Sie Status in "Free" i have right doing (ich habe richtig gemacht).
Vielen Dank
Liebe Grüße
Adrian Schleicher (From Germany) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.238.82.232 (talk) 03:36, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Intercostal nerve block, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Injection and Aspiration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
to assure u that u didn't make any mistake .
[edit]sir, actually u didn't commit any mistake but u had keft a song "kya hua tera wada" and I thought that I should add it here, still I didn't knew how to format the text . could u please do that,sir. 59.178.141.186 (talk) 15:37, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Haitian Americans
[edit]I don't know why you felt the need to remove my small edit to the Haitian Americans page. A considerably large Haitian American population are Jehovah's Witnesses, and yet you removed the edit. I am unsure why you did this but it certainly was constructive.
Is it allowed to add College Details on Wikipedia ?
[edit]Is it allowed to add College Details on Wikipedia ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niyazsky (talk • contribs) 12:59, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Child editors
[edit]Fair comment. However, this editor is sixteen by my calculations. I think we have admins who are younger than that. Deb (talk) 15:17, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- I don't like deleting articles that are obviously meant as user pages. On reflection, I think your best course of action would be to ask someone else to do the deletion. Deb (talk) 21:32, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
SliceMix
[edit]Just curious as to why you changed the CSD on SlixeMix from G11, as the purpose is clearly advertising/promoting a company? Flat Out let's discuss it 09:57, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, when I was reviewing the page, this revision was most recent. So, I thought it was some kind of mistake. Anyway, the page ought to be deleted soon and particular user should be blocked for disruptive edit warring. Alex discussion ★ 10:04, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
DYK for Aeromobil
[edit]On 31 December 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aeromobil, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the roadable aircraft prototype Aeromobil 2.5 successfully performed a flight in early 2013? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Aeromobil. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Pliva
[edit]Hi,
All corrections I made on Pliva are correct. We have new CEO (Tihomir Tim Orešković), also Pliva is not part of TAPI (only API manufacturing site in Savski Marof is part of TAPI Croatia which is part of TAPI but TAPI Croatia is in same time under Pliva's CEO Tim Orešković) I work in Pliva at one of key positions. Please allow me to improve our wikipedia profile. There are many errors.
Kind regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.141.71.137 (talk) 19:55, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
ZAAPTV
[edit].: Hi Aleksa, Thank-you for your heads up about ZaapTV. You are correct, i will remove the Facebook link. I do not think though the article needs to be reverted to its original state since this content has no source and is clearly full of marketing BS. Please advise - we can go to the article's talk page maybe? Regards 172.56.16.197 (talk) 17:38, 8 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.56.16.197 (talk)
- You are welcome to improve the article, just be more careful about the external links you use. Regards, Alex discussion ★ 17:47, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 19:45, 13 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
just what am I missing? TheLongTone (talk) 19:45, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
hi
[edit]I left explanation but you removed it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.165.157.220 (talk) 18:27, 16 January 2014 (UTC) and I removed dead links, is that a vandalism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.165.157.220 (talk) 18:29, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Perhaps too quick with the reverts?
[edit]Although a rather crappy alternative to the original photo, I don't think this constitutes valid use of rollback. — MusikAnimal talk 18:32, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- MusikAnimal. Yeah, you're right, it was too hasty revert. Appearantly, I hurried up a little with that revert, because Huggle showed a red icon indicating that the edit was likely to be a vandalism, maybe because the concerning user has recently been blocked. Thanks for heads up! Alex discussion ★ 18:43, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Some help with redirecting
[edit]Hello Aleksa. I noticed you tagged the redirect of Hiihdon lajiosa for speedy deletion, which is fine, I simply want to redirect it from here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_walking to here https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Hiihdon_lajiosa directly, but I have no clue how to do that.KMuuli (talk) 10:07, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:Medical Citation needed, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo, or other unlikely search term.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template meteor_sandwich_yum (talk) 06:07, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
{{hangon}}
to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
N/A. Overturned by User:JamesBWatson and I accepted. Feel free to delete this message. meteor_sandwich_yum (talk) 01:15, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Histmerges
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Nyttend (talk) 01:36, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Responding to your emailed questions: not necessarily, and not at this time. If you want answers that are more detailed, let me know and I'll respond by email. Nyttend (talk) 14:47, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- Nyttend Thanks for reply, and yes, I would like more detailed answers. Alex discussion ★ 15:31, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'll send it after thinking it over a little bit more. I don't mind you seeing my email address; the point is that I'd simply rather conduct business on-wiki unless it wouldn't be appropriate. Of course a longer answer will need email, but I figured that this wouldn't. Nyttend (talk) 21:41, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- Hello, just wanted to let you know that I finally responded. I'm sorry for the delay; I simply forgot. Nyttend (talk) 13:01, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- I'll send it after thinking it over a little bit more. I don't mind you seeing my email address; the point is that I'd simply rather conduct business on-wiki unless it wouldn't be appropriate. Of course a longer answer will need email, but I figured that this wouldn't. Nyttend (talk) 21:41, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
In case you missed it
[edit]I expect you to either provide at least one link to a place on OR OFF Wiki where I "openly advocate communism" or to retract the personal attack you made on me at Articles for Deletion. I'm serious. Carrite (talk) 21:28, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- It may be that I didn't use best words, but you still may be closely related to communism/Marxism. Here are the diffs: [1], [2], [3]. I did not intend to offend you, on the contrary, I find being a communist a humane and good thing. Alex discussion ★ 21:36, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ground biscuit, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Amazon and Pound (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
your recent edit regarding Mark Lundberg
[edit]Aleksa,
Regarding your recent change to Mark Lundberg i do, in fact think you have made a mistake because i am a child of Mark Lundberg and I believe that that is constructive information I can Give you the names of my half sisters if you would like to include them because they are the children of Mark Lundberg's first wife Melody Lord Lundberg. Now i do not care how many contributions you have made to wikipedia.com but i find that, this edit was a mistake and i suggest that you fix it. if you don't i will take matters into my own hands and fix it myself and once the information is back i trust and hope that you leave this article alone. If you are not aware by now i am angry about this change you have made. So miss Aleksa please fix this article.
Your's Truly, Noble Lundberg 67.80.65.230 (talk) 16:12, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Ground biscuit
[edit]Hello! Your submission of Ground biscuit at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
quack quack
[edit]you changed something on a talk page, the thing i wrote, you shouldn't have removed the talk words, i just want to suggest you that.
that's it.
are you male or female??
Refs
[edit]Please read WP:MEDMOS. Basically please use refs that are secondary sources from the last 5 years. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 04:45, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Jmh649. I know that. But what specifically did you have in mind? (Considering I haven't been active for a while.) Any particular article or diff? Thanks. Alex discussion ★ 12:57, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- My apologies. I appear to have placed this in the wrong spot :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 13:06, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 23
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Verbalisation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Client (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Russian_Federation_(orthographic_projection)_-_Crimea_disputed.svg
[edit]Thanks for your edit on File:Russian_Federation_(orthographic_projection)_-_Crimea_disputed.svg! EvergreenFir (talk) 03:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Belated thanks
[edit]I know this is terribly late but I wanted to take a moment to thank you for your participation at my RfA. While you did not support my nomination, I still appreciated your participation in the process. I look forward to the opportunity to work together in the days to come. Best wishes, -- — Keithbob • Talk • 19:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Seviceman
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. eh bien mon prince (talk) 04:34, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Koreni (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Epics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Your unexplained move of AC power plugs and sockets - British and related types
[edit]Please do not take such actions without bothering to read the talk page which clearly states: Created following a proposal made by Jeh to redefine the present AC power plugs and sockets article, and its related detailed articles. This detail new article combines the British related elements of the AC power plugs and sockets article with the full BS 1363 and BS 546 articles. The proposal can be found at Move all detail info to group-specific articles? Your unwarranted interference has been reverted. The cooperative work of breaking up the unwieldy AC power plugs and sockets continues, please do not disrupt it again. If you have anything to contribute to the discussion, please do so on the talk page of AC power plugs and sockets. Deucharman (talk) 20:53, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 31
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bipolar disorder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SIS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blagoje Jovovic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ostrog (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi
[edit]I've replied mate IJA (talk) 22:06, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 23:31, 30 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Piguy101 (talk) 23:31, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Кarl Marx listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Кarl Marx. Since you had some involvement with the Кarl Marx redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 11:43, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 1
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mathematics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greek. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
[edit]Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Stana Katic. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 00:24, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- Please read Talk:Stana_Katic#RFC:_Should_article_include_Serbo-Croatian_forms_of_Stana_Katic.27s_name.3F. Your edit is going against consensus found in the RFC. --NeilN talk to me 00:28, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
The mop
[edit]Hello! I saw that you are using the File:Admin mop.PNG on your userpage. That symbol is usually reserved for those editors who are administrators. Since you are not an admin, it would be best if you choose another kind of mop/broom/cleaning utensil so there is no misunderstanding. All the best, w.carter-Talk 21:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Well, I used it as a sign of admin-related areas. But I can remove it if you insist. Alex discussion ★ 22:04, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- You do as you like, I only noticed it since I myself had my fingers slapped for using it. ;) I now use the File:Besom broom.jpg instead, but there are many more. Cheers, w.carter-Talk 22:09, 8 January 2015 (UTC)