User talk:Uskudargideriken

Welcome!

Hello, Uskudargideriken, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Lattice Compatibility Theory, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 12:50, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lattice Compatibility Theory

The article Lattice Compatibility Theory has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced original research.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiddle Faddle 12:50, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lattice Compatibility Theory

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lattice Compatibility Theory, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Fiddle Faddle 12:51, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:26, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

After more than six years of trying to use Wikipedia to promote your ideas, have you still not grasped the point? Your self-promotion will not be accepted here, and you would be better off spending your time in other ways. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:36, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Uskudargideriken (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a Turkish student, working on special functions, you can check my IP, but what is wrong and where ıs the self promotion??? Uskudargideriken (talk) 10:07, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request does not address the reason for your block. Apply at your primary account. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:27, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Uskudargideriken (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It is said I am abusing multiple accounts: This is my unique account on my unique IP, Kindly, either prove the opposite or unblock Uskudargideriken (talk) 20:55, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It is abundantly clear that this account is the latest incarnation of User:Mmbmmmbm. Please do not abuse the unblock protocol, request unblocking at the primary account. Acroterion (talk) 20:47, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Uskudargideriken (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have nothing to do with User:Mmbmmmbm. Moreover I use my unique account. I think the problem is that I am referring to these pages:

[[1]]
[[2]]
[[3]]

So, if these pages are suspected , just unblock me and I will never use them. thank you for understanding.

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Uskudargideriken (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a Turkish student, working on special functions, I still ask for checking my IP during 3 years , It seems that an administrator who blocked me is now banned from WP. Moreover, another administrator's reason was strangely: " It is "abundantly clear'' that this account is the latest incarnation of xxx ".

I wish this abundant clearness to be demonstrated through a checkuser .So please unblock. Uskudargideriken Uskudargideriken (talk) 06:28, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Uskudargideriken (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

(second claim)I am a Turkish student, working on special functions, I still ask for checking my IP during 3 years , It seems that an administrator who blocked me is now banned from WP. Moreover, another administrator's reason was strangely: " It is "abundantly clear'' that this account is the latest incarnation of xxx ".

I wish this abundant clearness to be demonstrated through a checkuser .So please unblock.

Decline reason:

I have hard time believing that a new account would just jump into an edit war, 2 minutes after creating an account. We can't check your IP because we don't store this information for so long. Furthermore, the admin who blocked you is not banned and even if they were, this wouldn't have automatically invalidated all his admin actions. Max Semenik (talk) 17:26, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Uskudargideriken (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Now, I see, it is not the matter of being a reincarnation or so... But in that case, is a "jump into an edit war" a reaseon for an indefinite block????

If these are the rules then Ok.Otherwise I ask for being unblocked or for a definite block. Preventively, here I confirm hat I will never engage any war or so.

Thank you for understanding. Uskudargideriken (talk) 22:34, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your're being disingenuous, you're blocked for being a sock puppet, and part of the evidence for this is you jumped straight into an edit war. PhilKnight (talk) 20:28, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Uskudargideriken (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is quite strange : * From one part: It is repeated (just said, without any proof) 100 times : "blocked for being a sock puppet" , "a reincarnation ", "It is abundantly clear" ..., * From the other 1 SINGLE checkuser proofs the opposite!!!! (This is my unique account on my unique TURKISH IP) , ** I ask here for the action of an adjuducator...as long as a checkuser action was desperately refused (why???) **** Of course, any administrator who wishes to act here is kindly asked, why the checkuser is continusely refused, while it can clear all issues???

Decline reason:

Enough. Coming out of nowhere and jumping into an edit-war started by a blocked user is sufficient for a WP:DUCK sock/meatpuppetry block. If you seriously wish to edit the English Wikipedia, you're going to need to be forthcoming. I'm revoking your access to this page. We've already wasted enough time with this behavior. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:57, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.