User talk:User178198273998166172
User178198273998166172, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi User178198273998166172! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC) |
March 2017
[edit]
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to White Friday (1916)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Infoboxes
[edit]The purpose of an infobox is to give a quick and somewhat graphic overview of salient facts from the article. A list of dozens of "commanders" is not useful there. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 02:36, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Alexander Mozhaev for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexander Mozhaev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Mozhaev until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Seraphim System (talk) 22:10, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Hello, User178198273998166172. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Jerzy Pilat, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Onel5969 TT me 19:28, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello, User178198273998166172. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Dariusz Maciag, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Onel5969 TT me 19:30, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Afro-Norwegian) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Afro-Norwegian, User178198273998166172!
Wikipedia editor Megalibrarygirl just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
{{{3}}}
To reply, leave a comment on Megalibrarygirl's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Megalibrarygirl (talk) 02:34, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 7
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black Monday (1360), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Killed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Guy de Beauchamp II) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Guy de Beauchamp II, User178198273998166172!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
This has been tagged for one issue.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn (talk) 17:11, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Jacques de Châtillon de Dampière
[edit]Hi, I'm Boleyn. User178198273998166172, thanks for creating Jacques de Châtillon de Dampière!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for several issues.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 17:12, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Jean V de Hangest
[edit]Hi, I'm Boleyn. User178198273998166172, thanks for creating Jean V de Hangest!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. At the moment, this has no reliable sources and thus the notability isn't clear enough. Are you able to add to it? Thanks for taking the time to start this article.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 07:47, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Włodzimierz of Cracow
[edit]Hi, I'm Boleyn. User178198273998166172, thanks for creating Włodzimierz of Cracow!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as needing additional references.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 08:00, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Flags in Infoboxes
[edit]Please see WP:INFOBOXFLAG:
Generally, flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a "country", "nationality" or equivalent field: they are unnecessarily distracting and give undue prominence to one field among many.
- General Ization Talk 02:32, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, User178198273998166172. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Ioan Glogojeanu
[edit]Hi, I'm Boleyn. User178198273998166172, thanks for creating Ioan Glogojeanu!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add clear references.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 20:04, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, User178198273998166172. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Copyright problem on Battle of Paderborn (1945)
[edit]Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://www.militaryhallofhonor.com/honoree-record.php?id=3022 or elsewhere online. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:35, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Required notice relating to Syrian Civil War related pages
[edit]A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. ST47 (talk) 20:26, 10 October 2019 (UTC)- @ST47: Clear 1RR violation: Revert of this edit and revert of this edit. The latter revert comes after the above warning. — MarkH21 (talk) 03:41, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks @MarkH21:, I hadn't noticed that the second edit had been a revert when I looked at it earlier. ST47 (talk) 04:00, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- Actually @MarkH21:, I'm not going to count [1] as a revert, as it does introduce a source, whereas the removal of the term "invasion" at [2] was because it was unsourced. Even if a block is technically permitted under the sanctions, in this case @User178198273998166172: did actually attempt to work towards addressing other editors' concerns, and I'm not inclined to punish that. This revert, on the other hand, is outright WP:TEND/WP:BATTLEGROUND behavior, which I hope User178198273998166172 will not repeat. ST47 (talk) 04:07, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks @MarkH21:, I hadn't noticed that the second edit had been a revert when I looked at it earlier. ST47 (talk) 04:00, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Taunting other users
[edit]Please have a look at WP:GRAVEDANCING before making comments like this edit again. It's not a very good look. Thanks, ST47 (talk) 22:28, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The article 2019 Ménaka helicopter crash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Military aircraft accidents are rarely of note and although sad occurence it is not noteworthy for a stand alone article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 22:36, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
ITN recognition for 2019 Chilean Air Force C-130 crash
[edit]
On 16 December 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019 Chilean Air Force C-130 crash, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:56, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of 2020 New Taipei helicopter crash for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020 New Taipei helicopter crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 New Taipei helicopter crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sandstein 10:30, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
March 2020
[edit]
Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to User talk:RobertPaulsonn can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. (WP:GRAVEDANCING is not appropriate, regardless of the circumstances.) Steel1943 (talk) 18:39, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Re: Afro-Polish
[edit]The total population is stated as "Between 4,000 - 5,000<ref name=African/>", but the source [3] does not exist and archives of it at web.archive.org don't exist either. Please suggest another source if possible? --Gryllida (talk) 08:20, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Beshogur (talk) 21:03, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Cabayi (talk) 21:13, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Russian soldiers Sheykhalan 1915.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Russian soldiers Sheykhalan 1915.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (t · c) buidhe 22:20, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Speedy deletion nomination of Babak Samidli
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Babak Samidli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 07:20, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Beshogur (talk) 23:12, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Ferdinand Belmont for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferdinand Belmont until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Lettlerhello • contribs 13:53, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |