User talk:Unitedman97

September 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Group H, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 18:55, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Group H. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 18:56, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Patrice Evra, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Besim Šerbečić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bosnian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:57, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FK Mladost Kikači moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, FK Mladost Kikači, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:29, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Asmir Begović, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Azerbaijani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Image of safet sušić coaching bosnia and herzegovina on 2014 fifa world cup.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Image of safet sušić coaching bosnia and herzegovina on 2014 fifa world cup.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 22:18, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of hooligan firms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FK Borac (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:19, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:FK Mladost Kikači concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:FK Mladost Kikači, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Hello, I'm Hounder4. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Manchester City F.C. have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. – Hounder4 19:34, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry man, I like using Wikipedia and contributing, that was some sort of parody. All best wishes to you! Unitedman97 (talk) 19:50, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:FK Mladost Kikači

Hello, Unitedman97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "FK Mladost Kikači".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 20:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Crest of Mladost Kikači.jpg

The file File:Crest of Mladost Kikači.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adnan Nezirov Zvezde Granda 2017.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Adnan Nezirov Zvezde Granda 2017.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:36, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, I'm DatGuy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Super League have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 19:31, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Football is not dead bro, not yet 💪 Unitedman97 (talk) 19:40, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Juventus F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 21:08, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UEFA Futsal Euro 2022 Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UEFA Futsal Euro 2022 Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Demi Lovato, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 22:10, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important notices

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:50, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at UEFA Euro 2020, you may be blocked from editing. Wavehunter (talk) 17:33, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 17:53, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Unitedman97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just wanted to ask why other users can't edit the results of teams at the European Championship, it's not fair to get a block because of one simple question, I just wish that just like you can edit everything so that I can edit, I didn't mean anything bad. please unblock me because I think I can contribute my knowledge to this our community because I have been on Wikipedia since 2015. Please reconsider this decision again. Unitedman97 (talk) 18:13, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were doing just fine until you decided to start inserting your homophobic opinion into articles. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:01, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I just wanted to know how to progress on this community because I'm editing from 2015., and I still can't edit semi-protected or fully-protected pages. I'm not a vandal brother, and please reconsider your decision again. I don't want to be on a blocked users list because I think I didn't deserve that treatment. Unitedman97 (talk) 18:22, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason=I just wanted to know how to progress on this community because I'm editing from 2015., and I still can't edit semi-protected or fully-protected pages. I'm not a vandal brother, and please reconsider your decision again. I don't want to be on a blocked users list because I think I didn't deserve that treatment.Unitedman97 (talk) 18:23, 4 July 2021 (UTC)}}[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Unitedman97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry if I have offended anyone on Wikipedia in any way, and if my personal opinion has ever compromised on Wikipedia. I promise you that this will not happen for my views to emerge in a public place, familiar with the neutral position of all editors I ask the administrator to unblock me and allow me to edit again on the English Wikipedia. Unitedman97 (talk) 01:52, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Special:Diff/1024063634. You're a troll. Please go away and bother some other website. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:17, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Unitedman97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not troll, I'm not, please unblock me, I'm sorry for what I've done. Unitedman97 (talk) 15:15, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia has very low tolerance for hate speech. Come back in a few years, once you are able to demonstrate substantially more maturity and once you are able to account for your earlier homophobia. Yamla (talk) 15:59, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Unitedman97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Is there any way to unblock me please??, Please give me another chance, if I screw up, then block me forever, ok??, Please bruh, there are many other things I want to edit, I really don't care about homophobia, I'm here to edit articles to contribute Wikipedia, that's why I'm here. Pls bro, have a little feeling in your heart, be human, pls give another chance. Not after 2,3,4 years. I want to edit again now. Pls pls pls 😓 Unitedman97 (talk) 19:56, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's clear that you lack the maturity and skills needed to participate here. I am declining your request and removing talk page access to prevent more time wasting; you may use WP:UTRS for further appeals but I strongly advise you to wait at least six months, if not much longer, per the standard offer. 331dot (talk) 20:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS 45318

UTRS appeal #45318 is now closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:54, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]