User talk:Unicorn212

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Blackguard 16:45, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Shraavya Reddy. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 17:27, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Renjzzz

Is that an alternate account of yours? —SpacemanSpiff 17:12, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ISE Education Media

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ISE Education Media, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. shoy (reactions) 14:03, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Careers&Campuses

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Careers&Campuses, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 14:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but in this edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from Careers&Campuses, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 14:26, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Careers&Campuses. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 14:47, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Unicorn212, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as 59.89.226.202 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 15:48, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Careers&Campuses

The article Careers&Campuses has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of any notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 17:45, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tata motors finance LTD. (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abdullah Alam was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of websites and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tata motors finance LTD. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Abdullah Alam (talk) 10:06, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Unicorn212, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Abdullah Alam (talk) 10:06, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ISE Education media

Hello Unicorn212,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged ISE Education media for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Abbottonian (talk) 18:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tata motors finance LTD. (October 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Tata Motors. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This subsidiary doesn't appear to be notable on its own.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tata motors finance LTD. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:13, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Unicorn212. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 1989 17:51, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G

Hello, I'm Abvayad. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kamaal_Rashid_Khan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Preceding undated comment added 17:54, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Your recent editing history at Kamaal Rashid Khan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 18:24, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tata motors finance LTD.

Hello, Unicorn212. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Tata motors finance LTD.".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 17:31, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Unicorn212. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Roby Varghese Raj

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Roby Varghese Raj requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. FITINDIA 16:20, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Unicorn212. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thamifrst.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:THAMIred.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:THAMIred.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:57, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs

Just to let you know that my discussion for Stay Out (band) is already open. When you see that an article has an AfD tag, please do not make a second nomination over it. Instead, consider commenting on the first discussion. Thank you. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 16:35, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JalenFolf: hi sorry that happened by a mistake, today lot of thinks happened like the same, my brother used my laptop when am not at home. he tried to learn wiki edits. sorry for the mistake, this wont happen again. Unicorn212 (talk) 16:58, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that it has been compromised. If your account is locked, please contact trustandsafety

wikimedia.org. Otherwise, if you are able to confirm that you are the user who created this account, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section), then add this below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}}.Beeblebrox (talk) 21:59, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, this is based on your own remarks in the above section, wherein you blame your little brother for your error. Users are expected to maintain control of ther accounts at all times. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:00, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Would oppose any unblock unless it came with a conditional TBAN from any and all new page patrol and deletion-related activities. ~~Swarm~~ {talk} 23:58, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Beeblebrox: @Swarm: when i left for shopping this all happened, and i know this is my fault i didnt log out or shut down my system, but by mistake this all happened. seriously i want to be back and to help in editing articles. so i will take all the responsibility for what happened last day so please unblock my account or give me an idea for what do i want to do next. Unicorn212 (talk) 10:38, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Unicorn212 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this is happened for the first time and with out any warning blocking is not so good, i tried my best to be a good editor in wiki u can check my talks with other admins too. (wherein you blame your little brother for your error) its not an error from my side and i didnt blame my brother. i said that just happened by mistake and will not happen again. i will keep every thing locked. Thank you Unicorn212 (talk) 09:44, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Once you state that your account was compromised, it will remain blocked, as we have no way of knowing who is sitting at the computer using this account. Even if you can somehow demonstrate you have regained control and will keep it that way, your edit history gives me pause in unblocking you. Per Swarm's comment above, you will need to agree to a topic ban from NPP and deletion-related activities. I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 10:55, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Swarm: @331dot: yes am ready to agree to the topic ban. i need help for that, please help me in that topic. Unicorn212 (talk) 11:11, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are agreeing to that topic ban, we will need to know what it is you do intend to do if unblocked. Please articulate this in a new unblock request, which will be reviewed by someone else. 331dot (talk) 14:50, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

sorry no more request no more need for to be a wikipedia editor, you all admin peoples can do what ever you want to do with my account, i said its not my mistake and agreed to go with tban from npp and afd activities. seriously i dont know why a single day mistake taken like this, and no one is intended to help. am fed up and am stopping my wiki edit job. bye bye Unicorn212 (talk) 15:44, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to hear that, and no one wants that, but in order to unblock you we need to know that doing so provides a benefit to the project, and part of that is knowing what you intend to do. Agreeing to a topic ban is a good start, but not enough by itself. If you don't know of anything you want to edit at this time, you can request unblock when you do. I'm sorry that you have made this decision. 331dot (talk) 16:02, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot:Seriously i want to be one of the afc and np reviewer and you can check my contribution list too, in that you will see a detailed edit related to movies and film personalities, but the afd process is all happened in a single day 14 jan from a specific time log of 7:34 to 12:08. still now i agree its my mistake and laziness is all reason for this block, to avoid the shutdown and starting up time i dont switch off my lap. Even after all this i know i cant become a reviewer i agreed the tban, am totally desp for what all happened and if i agree i will lost my chance to be a reviewer, that's why i asked your help. if i agreed to go with tabn then do i can again apply for np and afc reviewer. Unicorn212 (talk) 16:29, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, not sure what you're trying to say. If you agree, then no, you cannot apply for or work in NPP or AfC, or anything related to deletion. ~~Swarm~~ {talk} 04:01, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Swarm: simple i want to become afc and np reviewer is there any possibilities, i accept my mistake. from now this will not happen, so is there any other chance to be an npp and afc reviewer. if i accept the tban and you remove my block is like in future i cant do any thing related to npp and afc. so am not accepting the tban, bcos its my first mistake if you are willing give me a chance other wise am stopping this and from now am not going to use wiki. Unicorn212 (talk) 09:12, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thamifrst.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thamifrst.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sanjay Reddy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanjay Reddy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Reddy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi (talk) 02:06, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]