User talk:Unicorn123SL

Welcome!

Hi Unicorn123SophieLiu! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 05:45, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I can edit on wikipedia now😀 Unicorn123SL (talk) 07:04, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm Melecie. I noticed that you recently removed content from Dapto railway station without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 💜 melecie talk - 06:07, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Unicorn123SL/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Unicorn123SL/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 00:56, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Democfest per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Democfest. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:09, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RoySmith. I did not do anything to the user Democfest. How could I ever do these things? So please unblock me from editing. I am not a sock puppet of the user Democfest. And for the record, if you block me one more time, you will be blocked from editing without even noticing. If you or anyone catch me from sock puppeting, then I will be blocked for real. Unicorn123SL (talk) 21:38, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Unicorn123SL (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I need to edit typos and fight vandalism Unicorn123SL (talk) 08:21, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Unicorn123SL[reply]

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser tool indicates that you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 08:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unicorn123SL (talk) 08:21, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn’t abusing multiple accounts. My family member was using the same ip adress. So can you unblock me?

Unicorn123SL (talk) 21:50, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give me a second chance because I will not let my family members creat an account on Wikipedia. Unicorn123SL (talk) 06:45, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Unicorn123SL (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not abuse multiple accounts. My whole family was using the same ip adress. If you catch me from abusing multiple accounts again, I will definetly be blocked. So can you give me a second chance?

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. Even if I believed your claim, and I strongly don't, it wouldn't matter; see WP:LITTLEBROTHER. Yamla (talk) 10:37, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Unicorn123SL (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should've let my family use my IP address.Unicorn123SL (talk) 22:27, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. 331dot (talk) 23:52, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Unicorn123SL (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I lied for the family member thing. I did not let my family member use the same IP address. I lied just because I can be unblocked. I knew I should've done that. I am so sorry. Can you give me another chance? I will never ever do these things again.

Decline reason:

As stated below, the standard offer is pretty much your only option now. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:11, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wait up, if you lied for the family member thing, why did you mention it? Waste of time. How can admins give you a second chance? Read the standard offer to being unblocked. Severe storm 28 01:17, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I lied just because I can be unblocked. I would never lie again.

Alright, but the checkuser tool has led to sockpuppets you used. Again, read the standard offer if you want to be unblocked, which means 6 months of inactivity on any user or IP address. Severe storm 28 01:23, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How can I read the standard offer? Unicorn123SL (talk) 01:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look of WP:SO, well, if you dare to make an strange unblock request again, a TPA revoke is needed for you PAVLOV (talk) 08:13, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Unicorn123SL (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am so sorry that I created many accounts. I was testing out reverting things and posting talk message to the person who was vandalizing it and blocking that user. I always wanted to do one of these things. That's the reason why you think I am a sock puppeteer. So I want to be unblocked.

Decline reason:

As stated above, multiple times, your only option now is to take the standard offer and wait at least 6 months before requesting an unblock. The fact you lied however about your family members gives me pause as if you will be unblocked. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:00, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Unicorn123SL (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can’t wait for 6 months because it is too long. I will tell you why I should be unblocked. The first reason is I understand why I am blocked. I am blocked because I am sock puppeteer. The second reason is that I want to fight vandalism when I see it. The third (and last) reason is I won’t create more accounts without explaining why again. If I was unblocked, I will do good things and become a good Wikipedia editor instead of creating vandalizm or creating multiple account just to vandalize Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Six months. Talk page access revoked, as it will be for all the other accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:18, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"I can't wait for 6 months because it is too long"? Then there's not a reason to unblock at all. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:03, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #65920

declined. Confirmed block evasion. --Yamla (talk) 11:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]