Jump to content

User talk:Undercaker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Millar (May 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul W was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Paul W (talk) 21:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Undercaker! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Paul W (talk) 21:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Paul W Hi Paul. Thanks so much for the feedback here. I really appreciate it. I'm a total novice when it comes to creating a new page so any and all advice is very welcome. I will review this and resubmit as and when. Just to clarify, it is 'evidence for notability' that you are looking for with this kind of submission, is that right? Many thanks again. Undercaker (talk) 21:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The key is verifiability (WP:V) - statements about the subject, particularly in a biography of a living person, need "an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material". Many thanks. Paul W (talk) 16:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oswald of East Anglia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dane. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:55, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Something in the Water (June 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iwaqarhashmi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Waqar💬 17:03, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 20:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Something in the Water (2024 film) has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Something in the Water (2024 film). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Robert McClenon Thanks Robert. I appreciate you leaving a more detailed message. This is the first page about a film that I've created. If you can, are you able to recommend *specific* sources and references for film that aren't IMDB or reviews? I'm aware this film exists - I saw it today - so I'm a little lost as which websites and publications consitiute 'reliable' in Wikipedia's view. Thanks again for taking the time, Robert. Undercaker (talk) 21:17, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:Undercaker - Reviews are the reliable sources that are significant coverage of any film. You have put in footnotes for two reviews, but you didn't summarize them, so what you should do is to add a Reception section summarizing what the reviews said. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:01, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Robert McClenon Thanks Robert. I have done that and resubmitted, so fingers crossed. Thanks for your help. Undercaker (talk) 22:44, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 11:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SafariScribe Thanks for the feedback. Have resubmitted without IMDB references Undercaker (talk) 11:21, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Something in the Water (2024 film) has been accepted

[edit]
Something in the Water (2024 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ae245 (talk) 11:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ae245 Thank you very much. Much appreciated. Undercaker (talk) 11:57, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antony and Cleopatra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Hollingworth.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]