Jump to content

User talk:Ultimate of Ultimate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Ultimate of Ultimate, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 17:42, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimate of Ultimate, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Ultimate of Ultimate! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Ultimate of Ultimate! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 23:49, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: VAX LIVE (June 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability - ref 2 & 3 are the same AP article just reprinted
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 17:41, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: VAX LIVE (June 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 19:26, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 23:50, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ultimate of Ultimate (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am here to build an encyclopedia. Ultimate of Ultimate (talk) 23:54, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You seem to be here to promote an event. If not, please describe the contributions you wish to make, as well as the nature of any conflict of interest you might have with this event. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 07:21, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ultimate of Ultimate (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want ask how Draft:Post-COVID-19-pandemic was vandalism. I also was not trying to promote any events. Ultimate of Ultimate (talk) 16:44, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You forgot to address WP:COI and your exact relationship to this concert. Yamla (talk) 17:33, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I did not mention a concert in any of my unblock requests so I do not know what you are talking about. Ultimate of Ultimate (talk) 17:39, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confer Draft:VAX LIVE for event promotion. You had also posted copyrighted content twice on COVID-19 pandemic in British Columbia. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 19:33, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to write Draft:VAX LIVE in a neutral encyclopedic tone so I don't understand how it is promotion and the submission got declined twice with the reason being no significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject, which I do not think is the same thing as being declined for promotion, so I am confused. I tired to fix the copyright violations on COVID-19 pandemic in British Columbia by rewording the content into my own words but that was also a copyright violation, so I added, "Information is unavailable because of copyright", to the section that was entirely copyrighted content but that got removed for being vandalism but I do not see how it is vandalism. Ultimate of Ultimate (talk) 20:28, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I really can't figure out whether you're a troll or just plain incompetent. Either way, you should not be unblocked as your behavior to date has been nothing but disruptive, and based on your comments you have nothing positive to contribute to this encyclopedia.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:48, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How do I stop being incompetent? Ultimate of Ultimate (talk) 04:26, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Only you can answer that yourself, do not use the help me tag to ask a question like that again - RichT|C|E-Mail 10:29, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ultimate of Ultimate (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am here to build an encyclopedia and only I can answer if if I'm incompetent.

Decline reason:

Regardless of stated intent to be constructive, no evidence of ability or progress towards doing so. Instead, lots of behavior indistinguishable from goofing off or trolling (see also deleted content on simple-wiki). DMacks (talk) 11:13, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't see how my behavior is indistinguishable from goofing off or trolling when my edits on encyclopedic articles are neutral and encyclopedic. I see that the Simple English Wikipedia article "Tree tree rat", an article I created, was deleted for having no meaning or little meaning but I don't see how that is the case and that article was the equivalent of the English Wikipedia article "Tree squirrel" . Ultimate of Ultimate (talk) 16:27, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:VAX LIVE

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Ultimate of Ultimate. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:VAX LIVE, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ultimate_of_Ultimate&oldid=1059821737"