User talk:Udar55

hey

Shane Burgos

I would like to thank you yet again for improving my Chase Sherman and Hayder Hassan article and I was wondering if you could quickly check through the Shane Burgos article I just made. Thanks loads. Rickyc123 (talk) 14:59, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Rickyc123[reply]

Chase Sherman

I would like to thank you for heavily improving the Hayder Hassan article and I was wondering if you would be able to check the Chase Sherman article I made. Rickyc123 (talk) 13:00, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Rickyc123[reply]

Ray Mercer

I'm not gonna bother anymore.Not the worth —Preceding unsigned comment added by Outerdrake (talk • contribs) 17:10, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just like the kimbo dispute below, you keep making up this fake pro exhibition records that don't exist! Its an oxymoron to create a record for an exhibition match for the very purpose of a exhibition is to not be included in any record.These tallies should only categorize for anything pro combat sports.That's why they are no amateur tally records.The exhibition match is already mentioned under "mixed Martial arts career".It is NOT a pro mma record.PERIOD

notice here their is no mention of the exhibition bout.http://www.sherdog.com/fighter/Ray-Mercer-22389

UpDATE: That's because you put that in kimbo's page,that doesn't mean wikipedia thought you were right.Kimbo's page is now locked.

The person below stated such.You thought the mercer fight should have been in kimbo's pro record and then you decided to make that phony record.

Even in mercer's discussion page, someone else complain about that phony exhibition record.So i'm not alone in this.If you want to put mercer's k1 record that's fine.but don't put something that's not sanction under professional combat sport record.

ps:you coded the last edit wrong, your vandalizing his page to the public. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Outerdrake (talk • contribs) 04:13, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kimbo Slice

Hey, I removed the win you added to his pro MMA record because the fight was an exhibition. If you visit his talk page you will see links provided stating such. Thesaddestday 21:49, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UFC Fight Night 13

Sorry, looks like I was a little quick on the draw there. I hadn't seen the new reports actually confirming matches for the event and confirming that those matches were for "UFC Fight Night 13". We've been having problems lately with UFC 83 & 84 (where everyone keeps fighting about where the event is and which set of fights might actually be the right ones for which event), so I've been keeping a close eye out for this article. Looks like there might actually be enough information to keep it by now. Gromlakh (talk) 23:31, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EliteXC: Street Certified

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article EliteXC: Street Certified, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 03:29, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied at Talk:EliteXC: Street Certified. From a quick skim of articles relating to EliteXC, few of them cite any reliable sources which demonstrate the sport's notability in the context of including it in an encyclopedia. The sport as a whole appears to be notable, but I don't see why the individual matches are. --Nick Dowling (talk) 05:48, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It would probably be better to place those references in the article rather than on my talk page. I still don't see how this event is notable when most individual sporting matches aren't notable (for instance, individual matches in major football leagues which are also generally very high rating TV shows). --Nick Dowling (talk) 22:51, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest that you review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. I don't think that Wikipedia is or should be an unofficial results database for this or any other sport. If you're not happy with the offical websites, then start a Geocities page or something. --Nick Dowling (talk) 00:47, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EliteXC

On it! Gromlakh (talk) 01:55, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beefed up the article, added several references, etc. It's on my watchlist now, so I'll help keep an eye on it. Hope that helps! Gromlakh (talk) 02:55, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Affliction: Banned

A tag has been placed on Affliction: Banned, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Affliction: Banned and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste:talk 04:40, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gangsters

I haven't actually seen the film in question, but the article was unclear about its factuality. The editor that added that to the article originally was on an agenda-driven crusade so I wasn't prepared to accept his word for anything, but if you're sure the film is a reliable source then I'm entirely happy to accept it. Orpheus (talk) 23:00, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An extra source - brilliant! (edit: and bloody interesting, incidentally.) Not necessary from my point of view, but let's face it - more sources are never a bad thing. If you wouldn't mind adding it to the article (if you haven't already), that would be extra spiffy. Thanks for correcting the article. Orpheus (talk) 23:12, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Affliction: Banned

Why did you add the professional MMA organization template to Affliction: Banned? It seems that none of the other events have this template at the bottom and it should probably be sufficient that it is on the Affliction Entertainment article. Is there any reason I shouldn't remove it from Affliction: Banned? --jhanCRUSH 08:33, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

An editor that expressed concerns before now completely ignores the sources and wants to say which sources are valid and which isn't. This in no way helps with the wiki article. Please have a say here:Talk:Strikeforce Sea888 (talk) 23:58, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to ShoMMA, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Drr-darkomen (talk) 22:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tvnationvol1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tvnationvol1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:21, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:StrikeforceMiami.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:StrikeforceMiami.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:29, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Strikeforce at E3

The article Strikeforce at E3 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Not officially announced by the organization, and the only reference qualifies as a rumour mill.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 14:49, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Cole Province

An article that you have been involved in editing, Cole Province, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cole Province. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. jmcw (talk) 10:11, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:28, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ShoMMA

I wanted the page to be consistent with ShoXC, take a look at ShoXC, it's easier to read now.Sportslogo (talk) 16:43, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. This joker has now made a request for meditation. I have included you in it. Here is the notification:

(Justinsane15 (talk) 00:22, 27 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Udar55, I've put up a request to change something on the ShoMMA article in its talk page. Since you seem to be the champion of this article, I'd like your input as to what you think. Dachknanddarice (T‖C) 21:10, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I got your message and had a chance to look at your addition to the Strikeforce challengers page. It looks good but I would add one thing. Be sure to add the chronological order in the inbox like the ufc articles do. Otherwise i think it looks great.Dachknanddarice (talk) 22:34, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea to add a chart... I'll try and get to some of these so that you don't have to do all the work but since I do most of my editing offline here at my job, I don't tend to get a ton of time to do these things very quickly. It might be best if you work from Strikeforce Challengers 2 and work your way up and I'll start at Strikeforce Challengers 15 and work my way down and we'll meet in the middle somewhere. What do you suggest? Dachknanddarice (T‖C) 01:47, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation of ShoMMA

A request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to ShoMMA was recently filed. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is entirely voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the request page and the guide to mediation requests and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request welcome at the case talk page.

Thank you, AGK 23:46, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The Request for mediation concerning ShoMMA, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. An explanation of why it has not been possible to allow this dispute to proceed to mediation is provided at the mediation request page (which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time). Queries on the rejection of this dispute can be directed to the Committee chairperson or e-mailed to the mediation mailing list.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK 00:10, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.)

Articles for deletion nomination of Jimi Manuwa

I have nominated Jimi Manuwa, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimi Manuwa. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Paralympiakos (talk) 17:54, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KSW XIV

Is there any reasonable cause, why you removed most of the references?Nilgsson (talk) 17:50, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 21:50, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate it...

Thanks for being so open-minded with the suggestions on the ShoMMA article. I read and commented on your request on the WP:MMA talk page and want to offer any help you might need in adding those articles and making sure they link up with major Strikeforce events. We should give LOL and the others another day or so to make up their minds just so we can have concensus however. Thanks again, and let me know if I can be of any help. Dachknanddarice (T‖C) 16:44, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Emilio Miraglia

Er, well, actually it's because you were adding those articles that I created it. I saw that the redlink needed filling. :-) Please do fill it out some - the Italian Wikipedia isn't very informative, I'm afraid.

Excellent articles - keep up the good work, and happy editing! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 20:25, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DREAM

Before we get into an editing war, Dream's official page is calling the event Fight for Japan or more specifically FIGHT FOR JAPAN DREAM JAPAN GP- 2011 (http://www.dreamofficial.com/free/news/detail.php?id=1302851145). I'm not sure where you are getting DREAM Japan GP - 2011 Bantamweight Japan Tournament‎ from(?)(Justinsane15 (talk) 00:56, 16 April 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Ok I saw the talk page now, although nightmareofbattle is a blog, I guess we can leave it since the more reliable sources I like to use seem to be conflicting at this time.(Justinsane15 (talk) 01:05, 16 April 2011 (UTC))[reply]

I agree DREAM.17 seems to work best and seems to be the most logical name as well.(Justinsane15 (talk) 04:38, 23 April 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Carano

What source says that she only pulled out because of the advice of her doctor? Every article I have read on the subject says that she failed her medicals and the doctors would not clear her to fight. 74.65.191.70 (talk) 19:43, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Read the Yahoo source I linked to. It clearly states that she did not get medical clearance from her own doctors. Udar55 (talk) 22:09, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AaronBok Fedor vs. Henderson

Hello. Thank you for your help, as you can tell, I am new at this wiki editing thing (a member since one week ago!). I will follow your advice. Thanks. Btw... FEDOR VIA SUBMISSION ARM BAR 1ST ROUND!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AaronBok (talk • contribs) 01:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MMA Barnstar

		The MMA Barnstar
		I, Buddy23Lee, hereby award Udar55 the The MMA Barnstar for their valued contributions to WikiProject MMA. Awarded July 25th, 2011

You're a prolific contributor to Wikipedia's MMA projects who's well overdue for one of these. Thanks for your additions to the Bill "The Grill" Cooper article! :) Buddy23Lee (talk) 21:38, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ProElite: Arlovski vs. Lopez

The article ProElite: Arlovski vs. Lopez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOT#DIR, WP:NOT#NEWS - Wikipedia is not a directory of sporting events. No independent sources anyway.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:08, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Udar55! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:43, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

sources

Hey, I just saw that you changed my reference edit for chris leben drug test. Are you saying that mmamania.com is not a reliable source? Because many of those articles come from other sources. (AaronBok (talk))

Template for fight card results

Thanks for your message. "the format has long been established and followed" is not a valid reason to reject a constructive update with unbiased content and no malicious intent. However, since you are the second person to do undo my contribution, I have initiated a discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts to create a formatted template for fight card results. The version with more information should stand until differences of opinion on presentation are resolved. Therefore, if we do not hear a valid reason to discard the tabular format, I will start restoring the contribution. Thanks. 58.104.6.200 (talk) 07:26, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Carlo Prater, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page WEC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MMA Fight Pit: Genesis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MMA Fight Pit: Genesis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MMA Fight Pit: Genesis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 15:55, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

UFC Event Pages & article naming scheme.

I'm not sure if you have the MMA Wikiproject on your watchlist. A discussion was started there yesterday about the naming scheme for UFC event articles. Your thoughts and input would be welcome. --TreyGeek (talk) 18:01, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Road to Hell (film)

Hello, Udar55, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Road to Hell (film), appears to be directly copied from http://www.cinema-suicide.com/2008/08/05/albert-pyun-presents-streets-of-fire-2/. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Road to Hell (film) if necessary. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:55, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from UFC on Fuel TV: Sanchez vs. Ellenberger. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 12:34, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Valentin Trujillo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atotonilco (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. When you recently edited Shawn Jordan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page America (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Strikeforce: Tate vs. Rousey, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 18:55, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shark Fights 18

The article Shark Fights 18 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that this MMA event is notable, only sourced to routine coverage of the fight card.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king ^(edits) 23:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shark Fights 18 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shark Fights 18 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shark Fights 18 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mt king ^(edits) 20:31, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3RR

Please revert this edit or I will report you to WP:3RR/N, as an aside the edit sum is provocative as you are fully aware admins have asked us to redirect to the Omnibus rather than take to AfD. Mt king ^(edits) 20:04, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Mt king ^(edits) 22:02, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Udar55. Thank you. Mt king ^(edits) 00:35, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DRN request

I am a mediator/clerk at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. It has been asserted in this edit that you no longer wish to pursue the dispute which you listed at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. If you do not wish that listing to be closed, please so indicate there (not here) within 24 hours (i.e. by April 3, 2012, 13:30 UTC). I will place it on hold until then. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) | DR goes to Wikimania! 13:27, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bellator Fighting Championships vs UFC

Your objections to treating the UFC events the same way as the Bellator Fighting Championships seem to me as one more born out of causing disruption to WP to make a point than a wish to improve the coverage of UFC. Mt king ^(edits) 02:22, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Given the close of yet another UFC event AfD as a redirect (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC 149 (2nd nomination)) and given the closing admin comments that in relation to the keep !votes "there are very few (if any) that have a valid, policy-based rationale.", and the fact you have not made any comments at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mixed martial arts/MMA notability regarding why the stand alone articles should remain (other than your desire for process), you position is becoming untenable. Mt king ^(edits) 01:03, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dangeroustonight.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dangeroustonight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:27, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. When you recently edited Bellator Fighting Championships: Season Six, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ron Sparks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of EliteXC: Showdown for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EliteXC: Showdown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EliteXC: Showdown until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mt king ^(edits) 11:44, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Strikeforce Challengers: Larkin vs. Rossborough

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Larkin vs. Rossborough has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king ^(edits) 21:21, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Strikeforce Challengers: Fodor vs. Terry

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Fodor vs. Terry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, all but one is either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king ^(edits) 21:23, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Strikeforce Challengers: Wilcox vs. Damm

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Wilcox vs. Damm has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king ^(edits) 21:24, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Strikeforce Challengers: Healy vs. Beerbohm

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Healy vs. Beerbohm has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the single source is not independent.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king ^(edits) 21:26, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Strikeforce Challengers: Woodley vs. Saffiedine

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Woodley vs. Saffiedine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king ^(edits) 21:26, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Challengers411.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Challengers411.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 00:50, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Strikeforce Challengers: Bowling vs. Voelker

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Bowling vs. Voelker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king ^(edits) 01:09, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Strikeforce Challengers: Wilcox vs. Ribeiro

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Wilcox vs. Ribeiro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king ^(edits) 01:09, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Strikeforce Challengers: Riggs vs. Taylor

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Riggs vs. Taylor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king ^(edits) 01:10, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Strikeforce Challengers: del Rosario vs. Mahe

The article Strikeforce Challengers: del Rosario vs. Mahe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king ^(edits) 01:10, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Strikeforce Challengers: Lindland vs. Casey

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Lindland vs. Casey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king ^(edits) 01:10, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Strikeforce Challengers: Johnson vs. Mahe

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Johnson vs. Mahe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king ^(edits) 01:11, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Strikeforce Challengers: Kaufman vs. Hashi

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Kaufman vs. Hashi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king ^(edits) 01:11, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. When you recently edited The Todd Killings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ne'er-do-well (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Strikeforce Challengers: Bowling vs. Voelker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Strikeforce Challengers: Bowling vs. Voelker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strikeforce Challengers: Bowling vs. Voelker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mt king ^(edits) 20:59, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

UFC event articles

Well put. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:34, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SPI Mistake

Udar55 I apologize for including you in the Sock-puppet investigation. I was using my iPad and it looked like you had only made contributions to that discussion and were a days old account. Once the Check-user was declined, I removed you and two others who were obviously not new accounts. You can see the Diff from when I opened the SPI and when the Check user was declined here.

I'm certainly not trying to fight anyone who wants to voice their opinion about a deletion, my main concern was the previous sock-puppetry on MMA AfD's and the obvious WP:CANVASSING and WP:MEAT issues on that and other AfD's.

If you or anyone else wants to explain What makes one of those fights significant that I can add to the article and cite from a non MMA only source, I will gladly do so. Seriously, Just point me in the right direction and I'll do the hard work. Other than that , I and others just feel the MMA events that are not "game changers" and cannot be described with any prose or demonstration of lasting significance, belong on the omnibus for the year. No one is trying to wipe MMA off Wikipedia.

Again, sorry, and I'm glad you removed the user message about the SPI before I got a chance to. I will probably cross post this on other users pages, but I don't mean it any less, I just don't have time to be this thorough on every page today, and I want to apologize sooner than later. Again, it was an honest mistake out of concern, I apologize. Newmanoconnor (talk) 20:01, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, I'm not on an MMA vendetta or anything against you. Please see the NI and my talk page for more info. I'm sorry I've frustrated you so much. It is not personal at all.

I do have a question, Would you be interested in helping to keep the Omnibus(s) updated if the guidelines Dennis has come up with so far are decided upon?The notability discussion seems to have digressed into more attacks and defensiveness and alot of well we're not going to contribute anything anymore. You seem very passionate about MMA, but you also seem passionate about film and I really would value your input. I'm sorry I've frustrated you, I may have someone close the AfD's per nom request once I get a response from another editor who interjected some advice and questions today.Newmanoconnor (talk) 18:37, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. When you recently edited Kaitlin Young, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kansas City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

By the way, I wanted to say thank you for keeping a positive tone at the ANI. By assuming good faith of the AFD nominator, you made it possible for me to come in and defuse the situation rapidly, and helped make him a part of the solution. I would gladly buy you a beer if you were nearby. This is exactly the type of attitude I hope to foster at the MMA discussions, and your contributions are certainly appreciated. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 23:09, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Running Man Barnstar
		I second that emotion? I was impressed anyway. I'm glad you started the ANI, I like this outcome better. Newmanoconnor (talk) 23:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strikeforce

So correct me if I'm wrong here, i know you have more knowledge about this than I do, Strike force was purchased by UFC?

But it is still a stand alone promotional org?

If yes to both, I think that we should get your deleted content back and build a Strikeforce Omnibus, unless you don't want to.Newmanoconnor (talk) 23:26, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Strikeforce Challengers: Evangelista vs. Aina

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Evangelista vs. Aina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT , there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king ^(edits) 07:38, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Strikeforce Challengers: Villasenor vs. Cyborg

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Villasenor vs. Cyborg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT , there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, and are from a single MMA centric websource

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king ^(edits) 07:40, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Strikeforce Challengers: Kennedy vs. Cummings

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Kennedy vs. Cummings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT , there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king ^(edits) 07:40, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We need your help

Man if you and the ther constructive editors that want all stand alone articles don't help us, The Omnibus will never get changed to include the detail you want, and more single articles will get deleted at AfD. The whole process has now been derailed by some jerk,Dennis Brown has quit, All the Admins are ignoring the area. Newmanoconnor (talk) 18:32, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Overeem and UFC 146.

I noticed you re-added the paragraph I removed from UFC 146, concerning Overeem's appeals process. Can you explain why you feel this information is relevant to this event? His positive test and subsequent removal is certainly relevant, as it drastically altered the card. But his appeal took place AFTER he was no longer a part of the show. The results of this appeal had no ramifications for the card, only for Overeem's own fight licence (that is, if he had succesfully appealed, dos Santos would still fight Mir and Overeem would still sit this one out).

I thank you for leaving (and re-adding) some of the other changes I had made, instead of just reverting. I hope we can come to an understanding on this issue. InedibleHulk (talk) 19:56, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. I've had my own experiences with the omnibus crew, and I can understand how their type of tenacious "diplomacy" can wear an editor into a compromise that may not be best for Wikipedia. I'll reluctantly accept throwing them a bone for now, but will revisit the article after the show's in the books, when we have actual occurences we can all (hopefully) agree establish notability on their own. Maybe we'll get lucky, and one of the "cabal" will decide to actually watch this show and finally realize it's not at all similar to a hockey game. Should be a good one! Go Junior! InedibleHulk (talk) 22:16, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And now I see User:Mtking considers this entire section "undue weight". So much for appeasing him, I guess. If you'd like to reconsider removing the appeal paragraph in light of this, let me know (or remove it yourself). InedibleHulk (talk) 22:24, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I reverted it. Yes, your movie analogy makes sense. Unfortunately, a lot of common sense seems to fail WP:SOMETHINGORANOTHER in this flame war/debate. Your first round TKO prediction also makes perfect sense. I think it would be safe to add it to the results section already, but that MIGHT cause some concern ;) Good to meet you, too. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:17, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Strikeforce Challengers: Wilcox vs. Ribeiro for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Strikeforce Challengers: Wilcox vs. Ribeiro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strikeforce Challengers: Wilcox vs. Ribeiro until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mt king ^(edits) 02:50, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Strikeforce Challengers: del Rosario vs. Mahe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Strikeforce Challengers: del Rosario vs. Mahe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strikeforce Challengers: del Rosario vs. Mahe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mt king ^(edits) 02:51, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Strikeforce Challengers: Lindland vs. Casey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Strikeforce Challengers: Lindland vs. Casey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strikeforce Challengers: Lindland vs. Casey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mt king ^(edits) 02:52, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ONE Fighting Championship: Champion vs. Champion

The article ONE Fighting Championship: Champion vs. Champion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT , there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king ^(edits) 23:56, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Something Weird Video, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hardcore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:33, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strikeforce Heavyweight title now defunct.

Yep... Cormier vs. Mir will not be for the title. http://sports.yahoo.com/news/sources-daniel-cormier-frank-mir-tabbed-fall-strikeforce-040600508--mma.html JonnyBonesJones (talk) 11:24, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MMA

Hello,

i noticed you edited a Mixed Martial Arts page in August, but you haven't listed yourself as a Participant on the Wikiproject for Mixed Martial Arts pages. I've decided to try to drum up interest to get more people involved!

Kevlar (talk) 01:29, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MMA Welcome!

Welcome to our new members who joined in August! ChrisGualtieri, LlamaAl, Paul "The Wall", Ruslan90, SiMntjMMA, Udar55, and Zwarrior2. Posting this to your talk pages and PW:MMA Talk page. Kevlar (talk) 06:08, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Strikeforce Challengers: Kennedy vs. Cummings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Strikeforce Challengers: Kennedy vs. Cummings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strikeforce Challengers: Kennedy vs. Cummings until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mt king ^(edits) 07:20, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus Aurelio

Sorry about changing the name to the other Aurelio, Sherdog had the old Pride fighter linked on their Bellator page, so I got mixed up.Luchuslu (talk) 15:51, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to UFC 154, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Mt king ^(edits) 20:38, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mixed martial arts. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Elen of the Roads (talk) 03:47, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alexander Sarnavskiy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mt. Pleasant

David Rickels (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mt. Pleasant

Giva Santana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mt. Pleasant

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WT:MMA#RFC on WP:MMA's use of Flag Icons in relation to MOS:FLAG

I think you might like to have a look at the outcome of the RfC on flags in MMA articles here. Can you please remove the ones you have re-added to UFC on FX: Sotiropoulos vs. Pearson. Mt king^(edits) 06:24, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. They were already taken care of by the time I got there, so no need for me to remove them. Udar55 (talk) 15:41, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MMA templates

So I did some experimentation with the templates to see how they'd work. Look at my test article here, with a sample card pulled from the Bellator article you mentioned at WT:MMA. Mainly that's to show you how much work/typing/copy-paste is involved in each option. There's a slight difference as you set the font size to 100% while the template (and the Suggested Improvement 2) have the font size set to 85%. Of course, the nice part of templates is you can change it once and affect everything... Not sure what you think but thought I'd toss it out there. Something to remember is you do still have to manually add the closing -| and {{notelist|close}}, barring a footer template. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravensfire (talk • contribs) 16:34, January 8, 2013‎

Hey - wonder if you might have a bit of time to glance at something. I decided to experiment with switching an existing article over to the new event result format using the templates as much as possible. I've got some visual concerns with the end result so I copied it over to a user page. Would you mind taking a look here and see what you think? Did I miss something? Remember that the MMAevent template has a smaller font size so it's going to look smaller than the Bellator article. I know we can do some padding tricks to get the spacing if needed but I would like someone else to look at it and offer thoughts before I get crazy. Thanks! Ravensfire (talk) 17:22, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Ultimate Fighter: Team Jones vs. Team Sonnen, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jon Jones and Kevin Casey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by DPL bot (talk • contribs) 05:55, January 10, 2013‎

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Will Brooks (fighter), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saitama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tim Persey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tim Persey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Persey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mkdw ^talk 07:54, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hey! Good work updating results. Don't forget to provide a source, the Sherdog play-by-play would be useful. LlamaAl (talk) 01:35, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reversions of my edits

I don't know why you reverted my redirects of two Strikeforce Challenger articles when they're not notable as events on their own. All of the AfD discussions of these articles have resulted in delete decisions, so why not just redirect them to the list of Strikeforce events? Mdtemp (talk) 19:31, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2012 in UFC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hugo

Tony Fryklund (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Strikeforce

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bellator Fighting Championships: 2013 Summer Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ron Sparks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:36, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jodorowsky's Dune, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Stanley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:29, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bellator MMA: Season Nine

Thanks I appreciate the nice comment JMichael22 (talk) 23:06, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fight Master: Bellator MMA

Sherdog Radio and Joe Riggs on Sherdog.com confirmed last night that he and Mike Bronzoulis will be fighting at the finale so really it's not a spoiler it came straight from the horses mouth him self. Most MMA websites are confirming it even tho Bellator it's self hasn't announced it. JMichael22 (talk) 16:56, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Souza

He goes by "Kevin Souza", not Edimilson, like Alan Blecher doesn't go by John Belcher. So I reverted the edit. Here's a source for proof: http://www.ufc.com/fighter/Kevin-Souza 173.171.83.140 (talk) 18:43, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MMA fighter format

Hello Udar.

The "MMA fighter format" you are referring to cannot possibly override wiki-wide guidelines, such as MOS:DATE and WP:STRONGNAT. They will have to accomodate for them.

I'm going to revert your last change. Please don't change again. If you disagree, then start a discussion on Talk:Alexander Gustafsson or in an appropriate forum (which, I cannot say).

Thanks.

HandsomeFella (talk) 15:37, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of EliteXC: Primetime for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EliteXC: Primetime is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EliteXC: Primetime until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Holdek (talk) 05:46, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eerie, Indiana: The Other Dimension, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Daniel Clark and Bruce Hunter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bellator MMA: Season Nine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Volkov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fadiora-Berry Bellator

Hello Udar55, I saw that you reverted my edit, I have changed this again to TKO (elbows), the video can be found on youtube for your reference - please see the article talk page also, thanks. 195.162.87.201 (talk) 23:00, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Ultimate Fighter Nations: Canada vs. Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrick Côté (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bellator MMA: Season Ten, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Volkov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Grizzly II: The Predator for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grizzly II: The Predator is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grizzly II: The Predator until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beerest 2 talk 15:29, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bellator MMA: Season Ten, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pat Curran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Extralarge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LA7 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Prisoner of Rio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Great Train Robbery and Mark Slater

SST: Death Flight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Barbara Anderson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phantasm V: Ravager, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Hartman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mighty Mo (kickboxer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DREAM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fifty/Fifty (1992 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Butler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zack Mwekassa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jozsef Nagy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timebomb (1991 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page VOD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ali Bagautinov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Belarusian

Rashid Magomedov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Alexander Yakovlev

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DeepStar Six, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TriStar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cast

At WP:FILMCAST, #3 states, "A 'Cast' section may be maintained but with more detailed bulleted entries, or a table or infobox grouping actors and their roles may be placed in the plot summary or in the 'Casting' subsection of a 'Production' section." The approach will depend on the article, and for Surf Ninjas, the simple cast list can be put in the plot summary. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 18:45, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Andrei Arlovski August 2014

Hey, thanks for finishing up the edits on Arlovski's record. There was so much wrong, and I'm rather new to editing. I got a headache and quit. Really glad you finished it up! Thanks again!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by NuclearSun (talk • contribs) 19:10, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Source

Hi. Regarding this edit (and any similar ones), please take note of the sources. The source states that the "contracts" of the former Invicta fighters were acquired by the UFC, and that the reality series is a part of the deal. Thanks. -- James26 (talk) 08:12, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Micah Miller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Bowles. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kickboxer (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3-D. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patrício Freire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jiu-jitsu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sam Alvey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chihuahua, Mexico. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:06, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UFC

I appreciate your edits but i wish you wouldn't have been nasty with me here iwas merely making sure all the info was sourced, kind regards. Lukejordan02 (talk) 03:23, 23 Novemberixab 2014 (UTC)

Well, you could have bothered to fix them rather than just delete the whole sections twice in some Draconian manner. Udar55 (talk) 04:27, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't no they was fixable. Lukejordan02 (talk) 06:17, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jake Steinfeld, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slasher. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bill Cosby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TUF fights

Not going to edit war over informational tags but it is a pretty long standing consensus that with respect to TUF fights only the final is considered top tier - other TUF fights are considered exhibition. I would not consider taking Heather Jo Clark to Afd (1 win and 1 loss in my count and likely to have a third with the last win) but Randa Markos (1 top tier fight and that a loss) is far from meeting WP:MMANOT.Peter Rehse (talk) 23:48, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Desmond Green, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steven Silver. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Dead Town

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Dead Town, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://readbookonlinefree.blogspot.com/2012/06/read-dead-town-online-free.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:38, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Your addition to The Dead Town has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 01:29, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to The Scorpion King 4: Quest for Power has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 01:40, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Kikaider Reboot

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Kikaider Reboot, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.filmyboxoffice.com/news/new-kikaider-reboot-theatrical-poster-debuts.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Kikaider Reboot and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Kikaider Reboot, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Kikaider Reboot. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Kikaider Reboot with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Kikaider Reboot saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 02:13, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Your addition to Road to Hell (film) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:35, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion

Hello, Udar55. You have new messages at Talk:UFC on Fox: Lawler vs. Brown.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Hot Zone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Mann. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tiffany Shepis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Gunn. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic UFC 193. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! George Ho (talk) 23:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Udar55, I would just like to ask if you are going to be participating in the DRN mediation case for the UFC 193 article. Participation is voluntary, but it would be helpful to have an indication that you are either: a) not going to participate, b) reserve the right to participate, but do not currently wish to, or c) you currently wish to participate. Remember to keep the discussion focused on content, not editors, if you decide to participate. Cheers, Drcrazy102 (talk) 05:21, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Luiz Firmino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strikeforce. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kimbo Slice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Street fight. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Attila Végh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Volkov. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bellator MMA in 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Page. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Udar55. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bellator MMA in 2016

Come on man you delete all my stuff. Your template is so cheap lol. Back in the 90s...You need to evolve!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by KINGFEDORQc (talk • contribs) 14:19, November 29, 2016 (UTC)

I disagree. The tables are awful. Udar55 can you revert the Rizin events pages as well?Rideonbus (talk) 17:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

KINGFEDORQc We have moved past the 90's - that's the hard-coded table madness you are using. The templates give us a uniform appearance and layout across all articles. They were created after discussion on the MMA wikiproject. You *should* be using the templates, not the gawd-awful hardcoded template garbage. Ravensfire (talk) 19:08, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Further note - I reverted the template removal on a couple of other articles. KINGFEDORQc has removed them from various other MMA articles and created a couple using the ugly table wikicode. I'm definitely not planning on touching the newly created articles and probably won't revert the other articles as they are fairly small entities and frankly not that interested in getting in an edit-war with someone who's almost certainly a previous user returning under a new account. Ravensfire (talk) 22:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And for those interested, this MMA project talk archive page explains some of the formatting stuff. Uggh, I'd forgotten how much drama was happening around this stuff back then. Chased me away for a while in pure frustration. Ravensfire (talk) 00:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Heather Hardy

Why did you remove these tags without addressing them or leaving an edit summary? Chris Troutman (talk) 14:29, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

It looks like you're adding release information for some slightly obscure films. Thanks for taking the time to work on them. A lot of these Wikipedia articles are in pretty terrible shape, and what little information is in them is usually unsourced. What we really need is for people to add inline citations. Adding even more unsourced content to them just compounds the issue. Although it's often difficult to find sources about films that didn't receive a wide release in the US, Google Books is a good starting place for any research. WP:FILM/R may also be helpful. If you get stuck, feel free to ask for help at WikiProject Film or on my talk page. I work in this topic area fairly often, especially low-budget horror and exploitation, and I have a fair idea of where to find sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:26, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of {{Persondata}}

Hi Udar55,

I'm the bot who is deleting {{Persondata}}. I noticed your edit on Delson Heleno in which you added {{Persondata}}. This template is deprecated and deleted. Please stop adding {{Persondata}}. In case you want to support the Persondata project you can help with the migration of the dataset to Wikidata at KasparBot's tool. See Wikipedia:Persondata or contact my operator T.seppelt in case you have any questions.

Thank you very much, -- KasparBot (talk) 01:00, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image use

Hi Udar55. The licensing of each image you see on Wikipedia is determined by it copyright status and not every image file you see on Wikipedia is licensed the same. Some files are licensed as public domain or licensed under a free licensed suitable for Wikipedia and these are often collectively referred to as "free images". Other files are licensed as non-free content because of their copyright status and these file are commonly referred to as "non-free images". Non-free image use is highly restricted and each use of such an an image must satisfy Wikipedia's non-free image use policy. One of these restrictions is WP:NFCC#9, which says that non-free content can only be used in the article namespace. For this reason and as explained in WP:UP#Non-free files, non-free content such as File:Tales from the crypt presents demon knight.jpg and File:kungfupanda.jpg cannot be used (i.e., displayed) in User:Udar55/sandbox. Perhaps you did not notice the edit sum I left the previous time I removed such files; therefore, I'm posting this here to provide more explanation. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask as WP:MCQ or WT:NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, I'm Chris troutman. I noticed that you recently removed content from Heather Hardy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:35, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Colour Out of Space

Hi Udar55. While I'm not sure that I agree with "notability isn't required for a listing of feature length film adaptations", per the guidelines as Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Novels#Adaptations, I concede that the Bloody Disgusting review is probably sufficient, so thank you for adding that source. One question I still have, however, is about the "Behind the Couch" source, which seems to fall afoul of WP:BLOGS (and I couldn't find any exceptions made for it at the WP:RSN archives) and isn't citing anything that couldn't be covered as an appropriate use of Wikipedia:Citing IMDb. I was wondering if there was a reason you were including it. Canadian Paul 19:56, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Hello, I saw that you removed a maintenance tag from Lil Peep without any explanation. Please provide that explanation on the talk page. In the future, it would behoove you to employ edit summaries in the normal fashion so that others can accurately review your edits.

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! 2600:8800:1880:C359:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26 (talk) 00:56, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Udar55. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hellraiser Judgment

"That is a ridiculously long intro against Wikipedia standards" - Actually, it is completely within Wikipedia's standards and meets the length required for Featured Article or Good Article status.

"...all of the info is covered in the main article" - Exactly. That's the point of the lead section; to summarise all of the key points in the article, which your revert did not. Dark Knight 2149 23:24, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I took a look at some of the articles you created. Word of friendly advice, the leads were often bare bones or too short on several of them. Please look into WP:LEAD and Template:Leadtooshort. Dark Knight 2149 23:27, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tattletales

Please stop adding unsourced episode lists to the Tattletales article. Lists of game show episodes do not meet guidelines in WP:EPISODE (specifically, content "must still be notable, and contain out-of-universe context, and not merely be a list of episode titles or cast and crew: Wikipedia is not a directory.") This is not a television series with fictional plot synopses that is appropriate to be chronicled within an article, and the specific details of results from a television game show episode do not meet WP:GNG. This content falls under WP:LISTCRUFT. AldezD (talk) 19:23, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Udar55. You have new messages at Talk:Tattletales.
Message added 12:43, 22 March 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

AldezD (talk) 12:43, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Tattletales#Episode lists". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! AldezD (talk) 01:21, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jackie McKeown, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:27, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dejdamrong Sor Amnuaysirichoke, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:33, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Jake Butler. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:34, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the source

Hi Udar55, Greetings to you. I understand there are source in the body text, however, not every page (MMA fighter's page) has the source on body text on achievements section such as award from other media (best fighter of year xxxx, breakout fighter of year xxx and etc) and secondly, it take a lot of reading just to find the source in the body text to relate back to the achievement section for any reader to verfify the content. Please keep the source for ease of referencing, instead other editors could come in and remove the content as no source indicated (especially for biography of a living person) and we have to go back and add all back. Content support by source is the key cornerstone principle of Wikipedia. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 21:56, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Suspiria (1977 film). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Dark Knight 2149 12:47, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Number 5 7 16:44, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leonardo Leite, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brazilian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Lil Peep. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:41, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 6ix9ine. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:34, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

MMA Suggestion - Can you take a look at this suggestion if is good? Colton Meltzer (talk) 22:48, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Udar55. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rashad Coulter

Hi Udar55, Greetings to you. Just to let you know that I have added links to some other associated pages and some refs. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk)

Hellraiser

Hi Udar55, I don't disagree that funding came from new World, but I can't see information that the film was an Officail UK-American co-production. I've found several going beyond BFI stating it's a UK production with funding from New World, but none that identify it as a production company, because it doesn't appear to be one. Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:56, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Andrade vs Namajunas

My apologies on the TKO/KO thing on the fight and the somewhat of an edit war on it. I didn’t watch it myself (wanted to but I had other plans) so I was unaware Bruce Buffer announced it as KO. Additionally Sherdog did originally (like the first 30 minutes or so after the fight) have the result listed as a TKO right after the fight ended, but corrected it that’s where I got the TKO from.--Rockchalk7 17 18:13, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Color Out of Space (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UFC 244 Main Card Main Event Note

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:UFC_244 This is 500th event of UFC (UFC 244) and the BMF championship does represent the historical UFC 500th event and winner. This page need be juiced a bit.Regice2020 (talk) 20:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bloodfist 2050 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bloodfist 2050 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloodfist 2050 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:04, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion invitation

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mixed martial arts § The Sherdog requirement. Cassiopeia talk 01:42, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb

Just as a heads up, we don't use IMDb as a source per WP:RS/IMDb. Try to find specific sources about premiers and other information for filmographies. Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:38, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that you have made an edit summary that did not appear to be appropriate, civil or otherwise constructive, and it may have been removed. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

I would suggest reading WP:RS and MOS:FILM. If you want to understand why we don't use IMDb as a source, please read WP:RS/IMDb. Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:15, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2nd

Please refrain from making abusive or otherwise inappropriate edit summaries. Your edit summary may have been removed. Please look at pages regarding Civility and Personal attacks in your spare time. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:46, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As a heads up, per WP:STICKTOSOURCE, the sources need to state what is being said. AllMovie has a year, but doesn't state that it's a release date/year or not. That requires clarification. Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:46, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, i've posted a discussion on your edits to the Lamberto Bava on the talk page. Let's discuss it there. Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:24, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bill Cooper (fighter) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bill Cooper (fighter), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Cooper (fighter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jerome Le Banner

Hey just wondering where you got the official time for the stoppage in Le Banner's last bout this past week. Just want it to update his Sherdog profile with the result.HeinzMaster (talk) 02:54, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't find an official time so had to go with the clock in the bout and the moment the ref waved it off. Udar55 (talk) 14:29, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read articles

Hi. Please could you at least read an article before reverting sensible edits? You have reinserted a clear and obvious error on the DJ page. NEDOCHAN (talk) 14:17, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mario Miranda (fighter) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mario Miranda (fighter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario Miranda (fighter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 17:52, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lumumba Sayers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lumumba Sayers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lumumba Sayers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 14:22, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ryan Benoit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Dodson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bellator

Hey. If Bellator is confirmed to be off Showtime, it's reasonable that one should find reliable citation(s) for that information and add it to the "broadcast partners" sub-section instead of just straight-up deletion. Spagooder (talk) 02:12, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Udar55 (talk) 15:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Xtro3DVD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Xtro3DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]