User talk:USDM420X

July 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 8.38.177.4 (talk) 17:19, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Unikitty!. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:44, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rainbow Butterfly Unicorn Kitty, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Rainbow Butterfly Unicorn Kitty was changed by USDM420X (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879816 on 2019-07-08T20:28:47+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:28, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits, as you did at Unikitty!. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Woody (talk) 20:45, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Clod has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Clod was changed by USDM420X (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.975592 on 2019-10-06T01:11:25+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:11, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Corn & Peg, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 19:45, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know that Corn & Peg is a ripoff of MLP actually, but I will stop with the funny editing. USDM420X (talk) 01:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cockatiel. Largoplazo (talk) 01:42, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Pensus—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:54, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of impostors, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sea Cow (talk) 13:51, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:48, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

USDM420X (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for excessive vandalism. USDM420X (talk) 19:45, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That is correct, thank you. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 20:04, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.