User talk:TylerNguyen1

May 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Toilet (disambiguation) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Toilet (disambiguation) was changed by TylerNguyen1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964486 on 2016-05-15T19:57:57+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:57, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gir (character)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Gir (character) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. shoy (reactions) 19:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Your recent edit to List of frozen yogurt companies appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Every time you edit this article you get a warning not to add companies that do not have Wikiarticles. The notice is there for a reason. Meters (talk) 05:14, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So I can create U-Swirl ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TylerNguyen1 (talk • contribs) 08:00, June 4, 2016‎

Sure, if you can provide enough WP:RS to show that the company is notable enough to warrant an article you can write the article and then add the link to this article. Otherwise the article will likely end up being deleted. Meters (talk) 08:07, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gir (character)

Hello TylerNguyen1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gir (character) for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. NJR4 (talk) 16:14, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You must of forgotten! Ha ha!

Speedy deletion nomination of U-Swirl

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on U-Swirl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Meters (talk) 18:48, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read my response above? I said that you would have to provide reliable sources to show that the company is notable enough to warrant an article. That is not even close to being an appropriate article. It is completely unsourced, it is not written in an encyclopedic manner, the info box you attempted to use does not exist, and your experience from your one visit is not something wikipedia should mention. I suggest that you read WP:YFA, and try creating your articles as drafts so that they can be reviewed before they are moved to artcile space. Meters (talk) 18:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You meany Meters!

Your contributed article, List of Nicktoons characters

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of Nicktoons characters. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Nicktoons. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Nicktoons – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of tomboys in fiction, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 01:20, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Nicktoons characters

The article List of Nicktoons characters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Duplicates content from the shows' articles and "List of (show title) characters" articles. Redundant. No reason to group all the characters from all of these shows into one article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 16:09, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Nicktoons characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Nicktoons characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nicktoons characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 03:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When and why are you tring to delete my page? It's unfinished, and I bet you don't know some of those characters.

June 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:TylerNguyen1, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are being warned for altering the timestamp on my comment. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 04:45, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at List of Nicktoons characters, you may be blocked from editing. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 01:37, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with this edit to List of Nicktoons characters. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:53, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of tomboys in fiction. SummerPhD^v2.0 16:16, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at McDonalds, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Class455fan1 (talk) 19:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 15:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Modern, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 19:27, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of BFDI

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BFDI, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tevlev3 (talk) 04:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC) You suck.[reply]

How the Grinch Stole Christmas (2018 film): My enemy using it

On How the Grinch Stole Christmas (2018 film) the latest editor is ElectricBurst1996, he's the one saying I'm vandalizing Wikipedia, now I'm saying he's vandalizing me! July 10, 2016 3:39 (PT)

What do you mean? Nobody's your enemy here. Sro23 (talk) 22:43, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My enemy is ElecticBurst1996. Boo to EletricBurst1996.

July 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Sro23 (talk) 02:52, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. –Darkwind (talk) 02:56, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to be blunt with you; based on your editing patterns, I don't think you have the maturity necessary to participate constructively as a Wikipedia editor. In the recent past, you've done various things like putting fake "block notices" on other people's talk page because you think someone is your "enemy", you've removed deletion templates from an article because you "don't want it to be deleted", and in general have failed to participate constructively. As an actual administrator, I can tell you that although your current block from editing is temporary, if you continue to willfully disregard Wikipedia policy and community standards when the block expires, it is likely you will earn an indefinite block. –Darkwind (talk) 03:00, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, Yeah, whatever.

Please read

I strongly recommend you focus on editing articles and refrain from talking about other editors. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:33, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=I understand to not vandalise Wikipedia due to obious nonsence ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:37, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to unblock myself

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TylerNguyen1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand to not vandalise Wikipedia due to obious nonsence

Decline reason:

I don't think you quite understand the concerns that have been raised about your conduct. Huon (talk) 21:24, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TylerNguyen1 (talk) 21:21, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to unblock myself again

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

TylerNguyen1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I now understand not to make disruptive edits on this Wiki and know that this Wiki is only for informational and unbiased edits TylerNguyen1 (talk) 19:34, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Welcome back; please have a look at the concerns below before continuing to edit. If you understand them, you're free to edit immediately; if you have questions, please do ask first. Good luck and have fun, and thank you very much in advance for helping the encyclopedia. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:33, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a long time since you were blocked. Can you describe to us what kinds of edits you'd make? For example, can you give us a statement that you'd like to add to an article and a citation to a reliable source that verifies it? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:29, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are many things I'd like to edit, but one example is the article Enterprise, Nevada. In the history section of the article, it states that Enterprise was created in 1996, but there is a more detailed reason as to why. I would like to add (in bold) "Enterprise was formed as an unincorporated town on December 17, 1996, in response to a petition from residents who hoped it would help preserve the community's rural identity. This was made to ward off annexation from nearby Henderson.

Source: https://www.lasvegasadvisor.com/faq-general-paradise/

Again, this is just one of the edits I would like to make. TylerNguyen1 (talk) 22:56, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have found another source from the Las Vegas Sun. It also has been featured as a citation in the Paradise, Nevada and Whitney, Nevada articles. Source: https://lasvegassun.com/news/2003/jul/18/las-vegas-bright-lights-but-not-a-big-city/

TylerNguyen1 (talk) 01:23, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TylerNguyen1, this is pretty close to the first source's wording – please be careful not to plagiarize sources. However, in this case, there are few other ways to state the facts. "Prevent ... by", perhaps. Materialscientist and NinjaRobotPirate, it's been over three years. I recommend an unblock; the original block was meant to prevent disruption by a lack of maturity that has ceased to exist. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:14, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can't ping Materialscientist. You'll have to post to User talk:Materialscientist. I'd be OK with unblocking, but I suggest that TylerNguyen1 stick to more reliable sources like the Las Vegas Sun than sites like lasvegasadvisor.com. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:47, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it took a moment for me to remember this. Already done and answered positively at Special:Diff/948972157. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:32, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Sorry I responded late, I was busy at the time. I promise I will make constructive edits on Wikipedia from now on! TylerNguyen1 (talk) 03:50, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, TylerNguyen1. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your return. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:34, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]