User talk:KeMang??

Howzit boetie?

hey friend. how is petrus steyn today? Catpritchard (talk) 08:41, 2 July 2017 (UTC) Hi Cat, doing great! This is so informativeTwinMosia (talk) 08:45, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up.TwinMosia (talk) 08:57, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

pleasure. twin., hope you're having fun. Catpritchard (talk) 08:58, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cat

Hi Cat, please have a look at my first edit on Coalbrook and let me know for starters.TwinMosia (talk) 13:45, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jacob Mfaniselwa Nhlapo

Hello TwinMosia,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jacob Mfaniselwa Nhlapo for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TimothyJosephWood 14:37, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Met on Strand Street

Hi there! This is me. Jim.henderson (talk) 16:06, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jim. Thanks for helping me find the hotel!TwinMosia (talk) 16:09, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No notification without signature...

... that's why you get a link instead. Best regards --−Sargoth 09:19, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Cuban

Hello, I'm FlightTime. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Mark Cuban. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

Also, the information you keep adding is NOT NOTABLE, however that's my opinion. So the best course is to start a discussion on the talk pae and seek consensus - FlightTime (open channel) 16:37, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:CH Olivier.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:CH Olivier.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:31, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mmanthatisi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moshoeshoe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:VKB Landbou

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:VKB Landbou requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from Vkb.co.za. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:37, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, thanks for email and message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~.

I deleted your article because

it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the subject organisation company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company organisation he claims or interviewing him its management. Much of your text was unsourced or referenced to sites that were not independent third-party sources.
Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls like yours were
The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced or self-sourced claims presented as fact include: focus is on offering solutions...the company caters for farmer's basic needs... VKB’s primary strategy is to support producers to produce more efficiently and profitably... forms the cornerstone of the rural economy... VKB is a proud sponsor... just company spam
it's all about what the company organisation sells, little about the company itself other than locations. To show notability you need hard verified facts such as the number of employees, turnover or profits .
there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. That's particularly the case when they are spamlinks to affiliated sites.
Also note that copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial, and text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required.
You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also guidance for editors with conflicts of interest and writing about yourself.
If you work directly or indirectly for the organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:KeMang??. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=KeMang??|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:15, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Petrus Steyn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robertson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heilbron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frankfort.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello, I'm Mr.weedle. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Postmasburg, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mr.weedle (talk) 03:50, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK.. I'm putting it up again! TwinMosia (talk) 04:31, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Postmasburg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anglo American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Bushra Razack, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:TwinMosia/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 00:55, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TwinMosia! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 00:55, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The article has been drafted and referenced accordingly. What's the fuss??? TwinMosia (talk) 01:29, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Bushra Razack, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:TwinMosia/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:52, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bushra Razack

Translating? Xx236 (talk) 06:37, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bushra Razack

The article Bushra Razack has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. BoraVoro (talk) 07:20, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks. I have started to add some references TwinMosia (talk) 15:44, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hi TwinMosia! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 11:56, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Use of multiple accounts

Hello, TwinMosia, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as MollelwaFahaSaBasotho (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. 2A00:23EE:1510:6CAE:C0A5:6BFF:FEDF:5D04 (talk) 09:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

Thanks. We have of recent made one PC available for the public at our museum and gallery. This could be the reason, we are introducing Wikipedia to our wider community. As a matter of fact, we could use more laptops and pc's.

Thank you TwinMosia (talk) 09:16, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo. And then?? What do we do, we are not privileged like these people with Apple or macbooks.

Give us a break MollelwaFahaSaBasotho (talk) 06:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:TwinMosia/sandbox

Hello, TwinMosia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:TwinMosia/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DHL, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South African.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]