User talk:Tvaughn05

This user may have left Wikipedia. Tvaughn05 has not edited Wikipedia since June 5, 2012. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

WikiProject Indiana Alerts have been posted:

Popular page listing

Articles for deletion

20 Nov 2024 – Vine, Indiana (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Mangoe (t · c); see discussion (5 participants)
19 Nov 2024 – Layton, Indiana (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Mangoe (t · c); see discussion (1 participant)
19 Nov 2024 – Graham, Indiana (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Mangoe (t · c); see discussion (5 participants)
15 Nov 2024 – Lochiel, Indiana (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Mangoe (t · c); see discussion (1 participant)
13 Nov 2024 – Hewa S. Khalid (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Aintabli (t · c); see discussion (2 participants; relisted)
14 Nov 2024 – Handy, Benton County, Indiana (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Mangoe (t · c) was closed as delete by Asilvering (t · c) on 21 Nov 2024; see discussion (4 participants)
13 Nov 2024 – Roy Shattuck (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Bearcat (t · c) was closed as delete by OwenX (t · c) on 20 Nov 2024; see discussion (6 participants)
13 Nov 2024 – Gravel Hill, Indiana (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Mangoe (t · c) was closed as delete by OwenX (t · c) on 20 Nov 2024; see discussion (3 participants)
13 Nov 2024 – Free, Indiana (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Mangoe (t · c) was closed as delete by Liz (t · c) on 20 Nov 2024; see discussion (4 participants)
13 Nov 2024 – Foresman, Benton County, Indiana (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Mangoe (t · c) was closed as delete by Liz (t · c) on 20 Nov 2024; see discussion (4 participants)

(10 more...)

Good article nominees

28 Sep 2024 – Henry C. Berghoff (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Henry Berghoff (t · c); see discussion

Articles to be merged

03 Sep 2024 – Edwardsville Formation (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Borden Formation by Allan Nonymous (t · c); see discussion
03 Sep 2024 – Spickert Knob Formation (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Borden Formation by Scope creep (t · c); see discussion

Welcome!

Hello Tvaughn05, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Incidentally please do not create information about yourself in the encyclopedia. Many thanks. -- Francs 2000 21:40, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Watson

Hi, thank you for your contributions. Your edits have been reverted, with the exception of the link to J. K. Rowling, accidentally removed during a previous edit. All other examples already were linked in the page, and repetetive links are not in keeping with Wikipedia style. Also, the original quote, "brightest witch of your age" needs brackets for "[her]" since it was changed for sentence context. Questions? Write me :) Radio Kirk talk to me 01:58, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for removing most of my edits on Emma Watson. I was not sure which ones would be repetative, and which ones would not be.

It can be tricky at times, especially in longer articles; I've had to copy+paste into an editor some of the pages I work on so I can check for repeats. Anyway, good catch on the missing Rowling link; the page recently underwent some reorganization and that one got lost. Radio Kirk talk to me 02:06, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Blanking" your talk page

In case you're not aware, "blanking" one's talk page is a common trick used by vandals to hide their histories (it doesn't work, either—the page history is visible for as long as Wikipedia exists). Please see this link for an explanation. Radio Kirk talk to me 19:30, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fr. John Corapi

(copied form User talk:DESiegel):

Thank you very much for editing the article on Fr. John Corapi. I'm trying to learn how to write aricles in a Neutral PoV better. Tony 23:37, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are quite welcome. Please note that the articel should read like a neutral account, not an exceport from hsi own work nor form the work of a fan. Statements of fact should be distinguished from opnions, adn all opnions should be attributed to a specific source, preferably with a reference cited. The articel is still far from the best on wikipedia, but it is significantly better than it was. I wish i could find an outside source on the effect or prominence of Corapi's talks and preaching. DES ^(talk) 00:04, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dukes of Hazzard reverts

Just curious, why are you reverting my "Dukes of Hazzard" edits?

ClintFord 05:30, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts, part II

Actually, I had been working on fixing the broken image when you reverted. I will try again to make the picture visible. Just FYI.

ClintFord 05:34, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bo_duke.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bo_duke.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 05:53, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I forgot to add the copyright information. I added it last night. Thank you.

Tvaughn05 12:40, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Carrie Underwood & Kelsey Picture

YO I liked that photo of Carrie on your page:I uploaded it. Anyway,is Kelsy a celeb or sum friend of yours. No offense just curious.Batzarro 17:37, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I love it too!! Thanks for uploading it!! Kelsey is one of my friends, (soon to be a celebrity..lol) Thanks Man! Tvaughn05 18:44, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SMBI

Of no interest to me at all, but I noticed the "complete rewrite" on Recent Changes. Really good decision to go in there, scrap the drivel and write a good enough article with just the important stuff. Had to drop you a line to say it had been noticed =) doktorb | words 21:42, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for noticing! I saw it on one of the cleanup templates, so I thought, better get to work. =) Tvaughn05 21:43, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Claudio Soto

No prob. The Special:Wantedpages doesn't appear to accurately reflect the actual most "wanted pages". --LeFlyman 01:31, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the "speed delete" template, after I google-searched and found additional publications that reference the researcher. Looks like it should be ok!--LeFlyman
- Okay, Thank you! Tvaughn05 22:30, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional characters

Articles on fictional characters are fine - please do not delete them. PMA 08:26, 25 January 2006 (UTC) (Wiki vet since 2001)[reply]

RE:RFA

Thanks for your vote --A dam1213 Talk + 06:37, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP: Admin Intervention again Vandalism

Hello Tvaughn05, just wanted to let you know that when you list a vandal on the WP:AIV page, you have to post it at the bottom of the page. You accidentally replaced the example that was under hidden text, which is just there so users know the format, thus, the vandal you reported didn't get listed. I noticed this and have blocked the vandal, so no harm done; this is only a friendly notice for the future. Also, when signing you name, please use four ~~~~, so that a timestamp comes out. This way, administrators can know what time you placed your warning to the vandal compared to his or her last vandalism (so we know if he or she has stopped vandalising). There is a way to add a customized signature so that it comes out when using the four tildes. simply go to "my preferences" and under nickname, enter all the special wiki markup you want to make the signature come out, then press save. Doing this will allow your username, and any other special feature you'd like to add to your sig come out when using the tildes. If you have already done this, then enter four tildes, instead of three so that the timestamp comes out next it. Thanks for reporting the vandal. -- PRueda29 / ^Ptalk29 / ^Pcontribs29 19:09, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, I clicked the add button that was in the instructions. I listed another vandal in the same way!! I'm sorry! Thanks for the tip on the signautre, I just missed a tilde =). I appreciate you letting me know this! Ø tVaughn05 ^talk_contribs 19:11, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Your new vandal has also been blocked, but by another user. -- PRueda29 / ^Ptalk29 / ^Pcontribs29 19:14, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking talk pages

Hi

New to this so please bear with me :) The link you posted implies that it's OK to delete comments from your talk page after you've replied to them, which I've done...

-- 213.208.103.139 23:08, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! I will leave you a Wikipedia welcome message in a second. (You should create an account!). Although it is Okay to delete comments from your talk page after replying to them, you should keep them, or archive them, because in the case that you are brought before the arbitration committee, they will review your talk page. If you need help here on Wikipedia, feel free to contact me!! Ø tVaughn05 ^talk_contribs 23:12, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! -- 213.208.103.139 23:18, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Esperanza!

Welcome, Tvaughn05, to Esperanza, the Wikipedia member association! As you might know, all the Esperanzians share one important goal: the success of this encyclopedia. Within that, we then attempt to strengthen the community bonds, and be the "approachable" side of the project. All of our ideals are held in the Charter, the governing document of the association.

Now that you are a member you should read the guide to what to do now or you may be interested in some of our programs. A quite important program is the StressUnit, which seeks to support editors who have encountered any stress from their Wikipedia events, and are seeking to leave the project. So far, Esperanza can be credited with the support and retention of several users. Redwolf24 runs the spam to keep members up to date. Also, we have a calendar of special events, member birthdays, and other holidays that you can add to and follow.

In addition to these projects, several more missions of Esperanza are in development, and are currently being created at Esperanza/Possibles.

I encourage you to take an active voice in the running of Esperanza. We have a small government system, headed by our Administrator general, Celestianpower, and guided by the Advisory Committee comprised of FireFox, Flcelloguy, Titoxd, and Karmafist. The next set of elections will be in February, and I would be glad to see you vote, or even consider running for a position.

If you have any other questions, concerns, comments, or general ideas, Esperanzian or otherwise, know that you can always contact Celestianpower by email or talk page or the Esperanza talk page. Alternatively, you could communicate with fellow users via our IRC channel, #wikipedia-esperanza (which is also good for a fun chat or two :). I thank you for joining Esperanza, and look forward to working with you in making Wikipedia a better place to work!

Cheers, Sango 123 (talk) 00:00, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"RfA"

I noticed. I didn't get to see it but he definately seemed to he high strung. 68.39.174.238 01:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Succesful RfA!

Thank you for your support during my RfA! The community has decided to make me an administrator, and there's work to be done. I look forward to seeing you around the project in the future, and if you see me do anything dumb, let me know right away! Regards, CHAIRBOY (☎) 23:44, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About Vandalism

I think you somehow blamed me for putting those messages in the article Great Sphinx of Giza. I want to clearify that I didn't put them there, I simply saw them and thought I should delete them.

RE:RFA

Thanks for your vote --A dam1213 Talk + 06:37, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An Esperanzial note

As I remember, the last spam that was handed out was on the 20th of December last year, so I think it's time for another update. First and foremost, the new Advisory Council and Administrator General have been elected. They consist of myself as Admin General and FireFox, Titoxd, Flcelloguy and Karmafist as the Advisory Council. We as a group met formally for the first time on the 31st of Decembe. The minutes of this meeting can be found at WP:ESP/ACM. The next one is planned for tonight (Sunday 29 January) at 20:30 UTC and the agenda can be found at WP:ESP/ACM2.

In other news, Karmafist has set up a discussion about a new personal attack policy, which it can be found here. Other new pages include an introductory page on what to do when you sign up, So you've joined Esperanza... and a welcome template: {{EA-welcome}} (courtesy of Bratsche). Some of our old hands may like to make sure they do everything on the list as well ;) Additionally, the userpage award program proposal has become official is operational: see Wikipedia:Esperanza/User Page Award to nominate a userpage or volunteer as a judge. Also see the proposed programs page for many new proposals and old ones that need more discussion ;)

Other than that, I hope you all had a lovely Christmas and wish you an Esperanzially good new WikiYear :D Thank you! --Cel e stianpower ^háblame 16:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Message delivered by Rune.welsh using AWB. If you wish to recieve no further messages of this ilk, please sign your name here.

Thanks for helping to empty Criterion Collection

I award this Working Man's Barnstar to Tvaughn05 for their repetitive work needed to empty Category:Criterion Collection.

--Syrthiss 03:06, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maintenance of AID

Hi there,

I see you have been updating votes on AID nominations. Maybe you will be interested in my proposal to coordinate such maintenance work on AID: Wikipedia:Article_Improvement_Drive/Maintenance. --Dijxtra 12:31, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Clinton_Duffy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Clinton_Duffy.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags.

My RfA

I really appreciate your support for my admin nomination, especially with me being a relatively new user. Cheers, OhNo itsJamie ^Talk 04:15, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

Hi Tvaughn, if you would like to use signatures like mine, you can use my User:Quarl/advanced_sig.js script. One way to use it is to copy parts of User:Quarl/monobook.js to User:Tvaughn05/monobook.js. You need the lines for library functions and the advanced_sig.js line. See also WP:US. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-02-01 11:04Z

Thank you

For your kind support of my Rfa, which passed. If you should ever have any complaints about my admin actions, please let me know. Also, should you ever need my help with anything, please do not hesitate to ask! Thanks again! All the best Banez 17:06, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Who's playing Jesus?

Hi. I doubt very much that the picture you posted at Jesus Christ Superstar shows Ian Gillan. According to the article and what I know of this, Gillan sang on the original album but never appeared in any production. If you carefully read the text at the page you took the picture from, you can see that although one might think the album is the cast album of the musical, it's really the album of the score of the musical. As the article says, this album, the one that topped the charts, was made before the play was ever produced.

I haven't been able to figure out which production your picture is from and who is playing Jesus. —JerryFriedman 21:45, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA Thanks!

Okay, this is perhaps a bit overdue, but thank-you for your support in my recent RfA! I passed with a final ~~vote count~~ consensus of (82/1/0), which was a lot of support that I really appreciate. I'll try to live up to the expectations; and on that note, if there's ever something I do wrong (or don't do right), please spit in my general direction. Cheers! --P e ruvianLlama^(spit) 05:31, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Esperanza User Page Award

Hi Tvaughn05! You've signed up to be a judge for the Esperanza User Page Award! You'll be assigned three user pages to examine. Pick your favorite one and award it 1-10 points in four categories:

Attractiveness: general layout, considering colour scheme and/or use of tables if applicable
Usefulness: links to subpages or editing aids, helpful information
Interesting-ness: quirky, unique, captivating, or funny content
General niceness: at the judges' discretion

Please see the Scores section on this page for additional information on your job as a judge.

Keep in mind that your scores are a secret! Email KnowledgeOfSelf with your scores and final picks. Please contact him for information on how to email him. As soon as all the scores have been tallied, a winner will be announced! Thanks.

You'll have to choose your favorite amongst the following three user pages:

Thank you and good luck! -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 21:58, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

Hi, just wanted to thank you for voting on my RFA, which went through with a count of (58/0/1), far better than I'd expected. I intend to take things slowly and start using the extra abilities gradually, but if there's anything I can do just leave a message. Cheers, CTOAGN (talk) 13:34, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frog won!

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Frog was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Dijxtra 21:24, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another Esperanzial note...

Hi again Esperanzians! Well, since our last frolic in the realms of news, the Advisory Council has met twice more (see WP:ESP/ACM2 and WP:ESP/ACM3). As a result, the charter has been ammended twice (see here for details) and all of the shortcuts have been standardised (see the summary for more details). Also of note is the Valentines ball that will take place in the Esperanza IRC channel on the 14th of February (tomorrow). It will start at 6pm UTC and go on until everyone's had enough! I hope to see you all there! Also, the spamlist has been dissolved - all Esperanzians will now recieve this update "newsletter".

The other major notice I need to tell you about is the upcoming Esperanza Advisory Council Elections. These will take place from 12:00 UTC on February 20th to 11:59 UTC on February 27th. The official handing-over will take place the following day. Candidates are able to volunteer any time before the 20th, so long as they are already listed on the members list. Anyone currently listed on the memberlist can vote. In a change since last time, if you have already been a member of the leadership, you may run again. Due to the neutrality precident, I will not vote for anyone.

Yours, as ever, Esperanzially,
--Cel es tianpower ^háblame 09:00, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
(message delivered by FireFox using AWB on Celestianpower's behalf)

Thank you

Hello Tvaughn05, thank you for you support in my RfA. I was promoted with a final count of 48/1/0! If you see me making any mistakes, let me know ASAP. -- WB 02:13, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

71.109.108.252

Hi, thanks, i accidentally pressed it, sorry, want to talk? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.109.108.252 (talk • contribs)

No Problem, welcome to Wikipedia! Tvaughn05 _e ^(Talk)_(Contribs) 00:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting

Thanks for doing RC patrol. When reverting vandalism, please try to make sure you get all of it. I usually do this by comparing the current version to the last version by a logged-in user. Check it out [1]. I've done the same before :) Mak emi 01:18, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, I was reverting a bunch of changes in a really small time. =) -- Tvaughn05 _e ^(Talk)_(Contribs) 23:28, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you!

Hi Tvaughn05. On behalf of my right eye, I'd like to thank you for giving me your support on my recent RfA. It ended with a final tally of (73/2/2) and therefore I have been installed as an administrator now, and I'm ready to serve Wikipedians all over the world with my newly acquired mop and bucket. If you have any questions, do not hestitate to forward them to my talkpage. Once again, thanks for your support.

Soothing R 20:46, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for signing my manifesto. If you have any comments, questions or concerns, please direct them towards my talk page or the manifesto's talk page. Thanks again. The Ungovernable Force 11:18, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Aubrey

Thanks very much for your praise of my article. PedanticallySpeaking 15:48, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem, you did a very good job. -- Tvaughn05 _e ^(Talk)_(Contribs) 15:49, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

It's done in javascript. When I click on the signature button at the top, it pastes in my entire signature, not, just the ~~~~. See inside User:Brian0918/monobook.js. — ₀₉₁₈^BRIAN • 2006-02-20 17:34

That's pretty cool. Thanks a bunch! -- Tvaughn05 _e ^(Talk)_(Contribs) 20:32, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

enjoy your time off

Enjoy your break! Since you are taking a wikibreak until at least March, let me thank you for your vote at the Esperanza AC elections. Don't work on that homework to hard. ;-) KnowledgeOfSelf 02:31, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Thank you for supporting me in my successful RFA. Please drop a note on my talk page, should you need assistance with anything, or have questions about any of my actions. -Kmf164 (talk | contribs) 02:32, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Homework

Good luck with all the homework! It's never much fun when it gets in the way, but we hope to have you back soon! -- Nataly a 12:59, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome template

Don't forget to substitute message templates on user talk pages. Using {{subst:User:Tvaughn05}} would be easier on the servers. Also, if you put a </div> tag at the end it would put a bottom on the box. Thanks. I hope you have a productive wiki-break. --Tantalum T e lluride 01:32, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

With apologies for the impersonal AWB-ness of the message... Thanks for your support on my recent request for adminship. It passed at 91/1/0, and I hope I can continue to deserve the community's trust. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help you, and if I make a mistake be sure to tell me. My talk page is always open. (ESkog)^(Talk) 02:18, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your voting!

Hi, thanks for your voting on my RFA. It has finished with the result 88/14/9, and I am promoted. I am really overwhelmed with the amount of support I have got. With some of you we have edited many articles as a team, with some I had bitter arguments in the past, some of you I consider to be living legends of Wikipedia and some nicks I in my ignorance never heard before. I love you all and I am really grateful to you.

If you feel I can help you or Wikipedia as a human, as an editor or with my newly acquired cleaning tools, then just ask and I will be happy to assist. If you will feel that I do not live up to your expectation and renegade on my promises, please contact me. Maybe it was not a malice but just ignorance or a short temper. Thank you very much, once more! abakharev 07:34, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AID

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Contact lens was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Happy Birthday!

I am aware that you are on WikiBreak, but the Wikipedia:Birthday Committee would still like to wish you a happy birthday! JaredW! 12:18, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday, Tvaughn05!

Thank you!

Hi Tvaughn, a belated happy birthday and thank you for your vote in the Esperanza Advisory Board elections! Please let me or any of the other members of the board know if there's anything we can do for you! --Joann e B 20:59, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

File:Re-exposure of elephant - lahugala park1.jpg

I think I'm the one on its head.

Thanks for your support in my RfA. It passed, with a final tally of 62/0/1. I'm touched by all the kind comments it attracted, and hope I'll be of some use with the new tools. You know where I am if you need to shout at me. Flower party? 15:54, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi, sorry to mess up your new talk page, but if you decide to return to Wikipedia, please get in touch. I promise there are some Wikipedian's who are constantly shifting through the mess that editors come up with because of their faith in the community and value of the site. Hey it looks like you were a member of Esperanza? Anyway. I know you have more life outside of Wikipedia, so I hope all is well, and on the off chance you do choose to return you're full of editing spirit. Best wishes, — CuaHL ☺ 23:18, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Edit Day!

Wow, been here a year already! Happy edit day from me, along with the rest of Esperanza! ~Linuxerist E/L/T 02:59, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy first edit day. I hopr you return to celebrate it with us. Regards, ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 07:17, 2 May 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Happy First Edit Day

Happy First Edit Day, Tvaughn05.
It's good to know that you're so dedicated!

Editing Since December 11, 2005

Primat e ^#101 01:39, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

price info

hi my name is Neil. i have just brought a fencing sword on the blade it says Toledo spain. the handle is a head of a lion and the bit that covers your fingers ia an eagle with a red cross in the middle. im just wondering if you could tell me if it is a good one and how much it is worth roughly. thankyou my email address is nco08424@bigpond.net.au

Lowell/Schools

I checked you website out and noticed you created the st ed website. I was not aware of that when I tried to write the school an email. It was bounced back to be assuming i was spam mail. I wrote XVI and let them know of the problem but have yet to recieve a response. ANYWAYS, I was trying to figure out what the official name of Saint Edward School in Lowell Indiana is. The reason I am confused is because the the website abbreviates it, ads an S at times, the stone picture shows one spelling and a few more I cant recall now. M8gen 22:47, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

The article Beauty and the Geek, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup.

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page.
You have been left this message by PocKleanBot, an automated process that notifies editors that articles to which they may have contributed on more than one occasion in the past now need cleanup. If you have any comments or object to this message being left, please leave a message on PocKleanBot's talk page.

Smile

Sir james paul has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

WikiProject Harry Potter

Hello, Tvaughn05. Over at WikiProject Harry Potter we're trying to compile a list of active participants. Your name, along with all other project participants, has been placed on the inactive list. If you'd like to get involved again, please place your name back on the active list, and take a look at the project talk page for the latest happenings.

RHB(AWB) 23:42, 30 December 2006 (UTC), on behalf of WPHarry Potter[reply]

CHICOTW

I see your user name listed as a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago. I do not know if you are aware that we are attempting to revive the CHICOTW. See our results history. We could use additional input in nominating future articles, voting on nominees and editing winning nominees. Should you contribute you will receive weekly notices like the following:

	Chicago Collaboration of the Week
Last week you voted for the Chicago COTW. Thank you! This week Rich Melman has been chosen. Please help improve it towards the quality level of a Wikipedia featured article. See the To Do List to suggest a change or to see an open tasks list.
	Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago

TonyTheTiger 00:48, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:She Said Yes.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:She Said Yes.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. 86.152.203.212 13:02, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP Christianity

Hi, I saw your name on the WikiProject Christianity Membership page.

I've made some changes to the WP Christianity main project page, added several sup-project pages, created a few task forces section, and proposed several more possible changes so that we can really start making some serious progress on the project. Please stop by and see my comments on the project talk page here and consider joining a task force or helping out with improving and contributing to our sub-projects. Thanks for your time! Nswinton 13:18, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deleted

The image you uploaded at Image:Nash_bruce.jpg has been deleted. You uploaded it as public domain, but the photographer has contacted Wikipedia to say that (a) it is not out of copyright, as you claimed, and (b) he refuses any right to use it under an unfree license. We cannot have this image on Wikipedia.

Please be more careful when verifying copyright and license status of images in future. Thanks, Guy (Help!) 11:37, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Rocko group.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rocko group.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:14, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:5smoothstones cover.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:5smoothstones cover.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 04:41, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:ClaudioSoto.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ClaudioSoto.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:34, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007 Wikiproject Christianity Newsletter

The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter
Volume I, no. 1 - June 2007

Project News

Four articles are at FA level and sixteen are GA level articles. You can help by adopting a topic.

There is a lot of work for this Wikiproject. Go to tasks to find out how to help.

Please help with the Destubbification Drive.

John Carter created the template {{Christian list}}.

There are currently five article being peer reviewed by the peer review team. Please stop by and see if there is any way that you could contribute to those articles.

It has been proposed by John Carter that the various other projects which relate to Christianity ought to all at least tag those articles which fall within their scope. That way, this project would have a better idea which articles do not fall within the specific scope of any of the other related projects. Articles can be "tagged" by placing {{ChristianityWikiProject}} in the articles talk page.

Current proposals and discussions

We're sorry if you did not want to receive this newsletter, but this is sent to all Wikiproject Christianity Members as it is the first newsletter. If you would like to recieve this in the future, or if you wouldn't, you must add your user name accordingly here.

If you've just joined, add your name to the Members section of Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy!

Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 2 – July 2007). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!

Contributors to this Issue

Christianity Articles by Quality

Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.

Christianity articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
Quality	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	Other	???	Total
FA	10	8	37	126		3	1	185
FL		1	14	20				35
FM					202	1		203
A	1			1				2
GA	21	16	191	450		34	2	714
B	223	259	800	2,212		382	223	4,099
C	343	807	2,294	6,652	1	2,454	637	13,188
Start	223	223	1,313	18,711	2	10,470	997	31,939
Stub		10	259	14,641		8,272	482	23,664
List	13	39	701	1,006	2	78	27	1,866
Category				2	22,980	1,314		24,296
Disambig			1		322	18		341
File					878	32		910
Portal					374	1		375
Project					175	14		189
Redirect	6	40	109	689	1,696	585	2	3,127
Template				1	2,184	112		2,297
NA				11	23	12		46
Other					114			114
Assessed	840	1,403	5,719	44,522	28,953	23,782	2,371	107,590
Unassessed						2	1	3
Total	840	1,403	5,719	44,522	28,953	23,784	2,372	107,593
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 368,252			Ω = 4.99

We couldn't do it without you!

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

June 2007 Automatically delivered by HermesBot

Non-free use disputed for Image:Slingshot57.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Slingshot57.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Staythecourse cover.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Staythecourse cover.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Beauty geek.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Beauty geek.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:54, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Slingshot57EP cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Slingshot57EP cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 03:22, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I need help

How did you personalize it like that. Please help or maybe if it is posible mak me one --Roxmysoxo 02:26, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Jesus Christ Superstar.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jesus Christ Superstar.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eachwiped (talk) 08:41, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Celeb_joanne.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Celeb_joanne.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 09:51, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CMTCrossroads.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CMTCrossroads.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Iraq.odyssey.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Iraq.odyssey.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:She Said Yes.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:She Said Yes.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Springfieldchurchsimpsons.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Springfieldchurchsimpsons.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jesus_Christ_Superstar.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jesus_Christ_Superstar.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 20:03, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Elenavotsi.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Elenavotsi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Clinton Duffy.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Clinton Duffy.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs (talk) 11:24, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MarianCatholic.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:MarianCatholic.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:31, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DU campus.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:DU campus.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CHICAGO survey

Image:Dave_Fletcher.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dave_Fletcher.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 23:29, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CHICAGO

You have been marked as an inactive member of WP:CHICAGO since you have not updated your status at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please correct your status. If you consider yourself a member you may want to get involved in the Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago 3. Also, if you are a member, be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 16:19, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bo Duke.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Bo Duke.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Britneysaints (talk) 13:09, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Kelseylynn.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Kelseylynn.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 05:07, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Tvaughn05! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 51 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Clinton Duffy (scientist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Frcorapi.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Frcorapi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:She Said Yes.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:She Said Yes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:59, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Loyola

Just so you know, I removed this bit here. I think it veers too closely into mission-statement language, and offers nothing specific. (Those two "in"s also seem a bit awkward to me.) We'd be better offer describing some statistics, or some specific honors the school has received. Zagalejo^^^ 02:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing that for me - I was working on it in a different tab while you were editing and didn't notice the discrepancy, you were right in removing that. Thank you so much! Tvaughn05 00:29, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Saint Edward Catholic School (Lowell, Indiana) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saint Edward Catholic School (Lowell, Indiana) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint Edward Catholic School (Lowell, Indiana) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:LHSschool.jpg

The file File:LHSschool.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MarianCatholic.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MarianCatholic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Luke Duke for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luke Duke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Duke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

''Flux55'' (talk) 19:33, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]