Talk:Henry C. Berghoff/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Henry Berghoff (talk · contribs) 05:34, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Alexeyevitch (talk · contribs) 23:47, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'll be reviewing this article. If you have any questions, just ask here or on my talk page. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 23:47, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Considering how much this article relys on, WP:SCHOLARSHIP, this might be something we will need to resolve. I notice that they add a reference list at the bottom which is good but I'm noy sure about including Suggestion Instead use "website=Newspapers.com" use "via=Newspapers.com" and add the correct publisher to "publisher=" and the location the newspaper published in "location=". fortwaynebeer.com/berghoff-brewing is not a reliable source.
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Article is neutral with no edit wars etc.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.