User talk:TMagen
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, TsipiMagen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Getting started
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Tutelary (talk) 14:53, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, TsipiMagen. In John Rawls you changed all "Rawls's" to "Rawls'", but either way is defensible: MOS:POSS. So, if you have a strong preference for "Rawls'", please take it to Talk. Wikiain (talk) 23:24, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- Mostly I have a preference for a consistent format within a single article. It's confusing to see both Rawls' and Rawls's within the same paragraph. Beyond that, I can live with either form. TMagen (talk) 12:11, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- Likewise - and that is the advice of MOS:POSS. The article mostly had Rawls's and I've changed the few Rawls' to Rawls's. Wikiain (talk) 23:24, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Discussion involving transgender issues
[edit]You may want to be aware of and possibly join in: Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 121#MOS:IDENTITY clarification. Skyerise (talk) 07:03, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
MOS:IDENTITY is being revisited: How should Wikipedia refer to transgender individuals before and after their transition?
[edit]You are being contacted because you contributed to a recent discussion of MOS:IDENTITY that closed with the recommendation that Wikipedia's policy on transgender individuals be revisited.
Two threads have been opened at the Village Pump:Policy. The first addresses how the Manual of Style should instruct editors to refer to transgender people in articles about themselves (which name, which pronoun, etc.). The second addresses how to instruct editors to refer to transgender people when they are mentioned in passing in other articles. Your participation is welcome. Darkfrog24 (talk) 02:16, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Asian 10,000 Challenge invite
[edit]Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 03:05, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Women in Red invitation
[edit] Welcome to... Women's History Month multi-language online editathon Facilitated by Women in Red | ||
Apologies for cross-posting and sending in English
|
--Ipigott (talk) 09:03, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, TMagen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to the Months of African Cinema!
[edit]Greetings!
The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.
This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.
On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:
- Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
- Country Winners
- Diversity winner
- High quality contributors
- Gender-gap fillers
- Page improvers
- Wikidata Translators
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)
AfroCine: The Months of African Cinema Continues….
[edit]Greetings!
Thank you very much for signing up to participate in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.
It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 200 articles created in over seven (7) languages! The figures soars to up to a thousand, if Wikidata entries are included. Furthermore, there have been about 5 in-person gatherings of Wikipedians in different countries across the world to create articles about African(a) cinema!
We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!
- Article suggestions can be found here. You can also add to this list.
- Some notable reliable sources for African cinema can be found here. Again, this list needs expansion.
- Interested in Wikidata translation? check out the Occupation Drive, which is being led by Wiki Loves Women, in support of the contest and the project!
- Please remember to list articles you have created or improved in the Article Achievements section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked.
Thank you once again for being part of this global event!
Kind regards.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, TMagen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The Months of African Cinema Global Contest
[edit]AfroCine Celebrates You! | |
Hello TMagen, |
AfroCine: Thank You!
[edit]Greetings!
The Months of African Cinema Global Edit-a-thon was concluded on 30 November 2018, and we've had amazing results. Over 570 articles were created across 8 language-Wikipedias. 7 in-person gatherings of Wikipedians were organized across different parts of the world.
All our winners have been recognized and you can check the complete list here.
For a pilot event, all our expectations were surpassed and we have you to thank for that. Thank you so much for being part of this global event! Thank you for helping to fix African content gaps on Wikipedia! We hope to see more of your participation in future AfroCine events and activities. Please remember to signup on the main WikiProject participants page, in order to get updated with these activities.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:50, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Mizrahi feminism moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Mizrahi feminism, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:11, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Mizrahi feminism has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin (talk) 14:38, 15 February 2019 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for February 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mizrahi feminism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page +972 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Mizrahi feminism) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Mizrahi feminism.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
When you translate an article from a foreign language Wikipedia, you should add attribution to the original authors, as I have done on the talk page of this article.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:31, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: Hi and thanks :) Is there any way to indicate that maybe 20% is translation and the rest was me? TMagen (talk) 18:01, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- I added the translation template because you stated in your first edit summary that you were translating the article. I guess you just have to use your judgement as to whether the template should be added, and I know no way to qualify it. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:17, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
License tagging for File:I Still Hide To Smoke.PNG
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:I Still Hide To Smoke.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Isabel Noronha) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Isabel Noronha.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Nice job on this and the other recent articles you've created. Keep up the good work.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 14:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Onel5969: - thank you so much! I plan to :) TMagen (talk) 15:31, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Efrat Mishori) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Efrat Mishori.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MainlyTwelve}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
MainlyTwelve (talk) 14:13, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Death of a Poetess) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Death of a Poetess.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MainlyTwelve}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
MainlyTwelve (talk) 14:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- @MainlyTwelve: Thank you! TMagen (talk) 14:44, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Miss Boston and Miss Hargreaves
[edit]Hello, TMagen,
Thanks for creating Miss Boston and Miss Hargreaves! I edit here too, under the username Girth Summit and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
The Sunday Telegraph and Sunday Times references are solid; the other ones are all to the author's publisher, her own website, and Waterstones - it would be good to get some more independent sources for some of the content if possible. It would also be great to get references for the award - each of the awards probably has a website that lists winners, shortlists and longlists?
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Girth Summit}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
GirthSummit (blether) 13:15, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Dana G. Peleg) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Dana G. Peleg.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MainlyTwelve}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
MainlyTwelve (talk) 14:30, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (The Dyke and the Dybbuk) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating The Dyke and the Dybbuk.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MainlyTwelve}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
MainlyTwelve (talk) 14:31, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Carmen Elmakiyes
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Carmen Elmakiyes, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 07:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Most other times I'd tag the article for improvement. However, given that she's a candidate in an election happening next week, that she fails WP:NPOL as an unelected candidate, and the focus of the article is on her political attributes, it's clearly an advert. After the election things will be different, as will your urge to create the biography I suspect. Cabayi (talk) 07:35, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- No - it isn't an advert. I don't even consider her standing for election to be very important, she is not in a realistic position to be elected, and I do not intend to vote for her party myself (so I wouldn't do a political advert). The Israeli electorate does not read English wiki, and she has had a Hebrew wiki article for several years now - with most of the exact same information as in this article. Her notability is not as an elected candidate, but because she is one of the leading social activists in Israel, and is in the news continually - and has been since 2012. She is primarily a Mizrahi social activist, not a politician, and THAT is the focus of the article, not "political attributes". She has been either the leading figure, or one of a small group, in several "burning" Mizrahi social issues since 2011, and that made her notable long before this election - which she became a part of only a few weeks ago. The proximity of this article to the election is entirely coincidental - as I have only started seriously editing in English for the past 6 weeks or so - and I have a list of Israeli feminist, filmmakers, poets, and social activists I am working my way through.
- As for improvement - as someone who has been translating articles from English wikipedia for many years - what isn't encyclopedic here? There are no superlatives (unlike many wiki articles) no opinions (likewise) nothing unsourced, the sources are mostly major media venues and government protocols... Nothing in the article is likely to be factually contested (for the reasons I listed, and also because they aren't generally considered divisive. So if you could be more specific, and not wrongly assuming this is an article about a politician, that would be very helpful. TMagen (talk) 07:48, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- As I said, it's down to the timing. Had this been created before the election was called I wouldn't bat an eyelid. After the election I would have little problem with it. Creating it now, during the campaign, for an unelected candidate, that's a problem. Cabayi (talk) 07:55, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- I understand your reasoning, @Cabayi:, but I have removed the tag because I don't think it's unquestionably promotion. I think it merits a deletion discussion. Deb (talk) 08:07, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- I appreciate the removal, but it someone else agrees that the timing is an issue, I am okay with putting it in a sandbox until next Wednesday when the election results are in. It really wasn't an intentional act, just unfortunate timing. TMagen (talk) 08:11, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Okay, it's now at Draft:Carmen Elmakiyes for the time being. Deb (talk) 11:49, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks Deb & TM, that resolves my issues. We really ought to have some kind of Purdah process, but this looks a good outcome. Cabayi (talk) 21:14, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Okay, it's now at Draft:Carmen Elmakiyes for the time being. Deb (talk) 11:49, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- I appreciate the removal, but it someone else agrees that the timing is an issue, I am okay with putting it in a sandbox until next Wednesday when the election results are in. It really wasn't an intentional act, just unfortunate timing. TMagen (talk) 08:11, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- I understand your reasoning, @Cabayi:, but I have removed the tag because I don't think it's unquestionably promotion. I think it merits a deletion discussion. Deb (talk) 08:07, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- As I said, it's down to the timing. Had this been created before the election was called I wouldn't bat an eyelid. After the election I would have little problem with it. Creating it now, during the campaign, for an unelected candidate, that's a problem. Cabayi (talk) 07:55, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Just to clarify for a passer-by, is the idea Cabayi and Deb that you agree she's likely notable but that, given the timing of current events, it's best to keep her out of mainspace to avoid the appearance of promotion? That's what I'm getting from the above conversation, although perhaps it's not so clear that everyone agrees on the subject's notability. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:16, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- I think it's more to avoid a dispute at the moment. If and when she is elected, she'll become notable by default. Otherwise, we can have further discussion. I haven't said that I think she's notable now, only that the article isn't eligible for speedy deletion. Deb (talk) 11:26, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Women in Red Barnstar
[edit]The Women in Red Barnstar | |
I just read the interesting article you created on Esther Shkalim. After reviewing your other contributions, I see that you have written many fine articles regarding women's biographies and women's works so I award you this barnstar as a token of appreciation, and as a thank you from WikiProject Women in Red. In case you are interested, here is a link to our mailing lists. --Rosiestep (talk) 11:22, 6 April 2019 (UTC) |
- @Rosiestep: - thank you so much! TMagen (talk) 14:44, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Lawyers and law students' signatures needed for Supreme Court amicus brief in favor of publishing the law
[edit]Hello, given your userbox I thought you might be interested in helping Carl Malamud's case for the public domain, crucial also for Wikisource: https://boingboing.net/2019/04/25/happy-law-day.html . Best regards, Nemo 21:07, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Shalom Dear TMagen! Can you make an article about Israeli film Ish HaHashmal? Thank you! --217.66.159.228 (talk) 17:15, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Copyright problem on The Matchmaker (2018 film)
[edit]Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:36, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oof, sorry, I know that and didn't mean to leave that. I'll change it. TMagen (talk) 12:44, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
While You Weren’t Looking moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, While You Weren’t Looking, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:37, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Female Eye Film Festival) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Female Eye Film Festival.
User:Onel5969 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Nice job. You might want to add it to List of film festivals.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 20:28, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, TMagen,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, The Matchmaker (2018 film), for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to prevent the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- Click
Publish Changes
button.
But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 20:33, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of The Matchmaker (2018 film) for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Matchmaker (2018 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Matchmaker (2018 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 23:58, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Golem
[edit]Dear TMagen! Can you make article about film Golem 2019? Thank you! --178.71.161.212 (talk) 20:12, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Using Visual editor to edit table templates
[edit]Please do not use Visual editor to edit tables as you did here. Visual editor is incompatible with wikicode formatting. See Wikipedia:VisualEditor#Limitations. But if you absolutely must use Visual editor you need to check how your edits have affected the wikicode by looking at your revision history -- then go back in with Source edit and fix the corruption. Thanks. Pyxis Solitary yak 00:49, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for writing up the Advocate article with the reviews. I think this is a lot better than the version posted in the draft. I was wonder if that should be histmerged or just forgotten about? I will tag a connected contributor part in the meantime. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:43, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- user:AngusWOOF - whatever you think is best. Just to be clear - I am not affiliated with Home Made Docs or any other commercial concern. TMagen (talk) 19:01, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- TMagen, it depends if you used that draft as a reference, or wrote yours completely from scratch. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:03, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- AngusWOOFI am aware of the draft's existence. Please note also that I am the main author of Draft:Rachel Jones - the original contribution is minor, and I wanted to write about the director, and was informed that a draft already exists. Because it was already submitted for consideration, and I am less familiar with enwiki rules than hewiki (where most of my experience is) I contributed to the draft rather than writing my own article. Was that a mistake? Should I just take my contributions and write a new article? TMagen (talk) 19:11, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- TMagen, it depends if you used that draft as a reference, or wrote yours completely from scratch. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:03, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- TMagen, that's fine for Rachel Jones to modify the existing draft. I was just wondering if that was done for Advocate or whether you wrote it regardless of that draft's existence. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- I wrote it regardless. TMagen (talk) 19:22, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- But regarding Rachel Jones, I am concerned about the template of undisclosed paid contribution. TMagen (talk) 19:24, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- TMagen, you can do the scrubbing of the Jones article for neutrality then and then add to the connected contributor paid template on the talk page that you checked the article. Then the UDP tag can be removed. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:27, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- TMagen, that's fine for Rachel Jones to modify the existing draft. I was just wondering if that was done for Advocate or whether you wrote it regardless of that draft's existence. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Rachel Leah Jones (film director) has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Tagishsimon (talk) 01:51, 15 September 2019 (UTC)I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Thanks for creating Loose Lips (novel).
User:Onel5969 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Keep up the good work on these novel articles. Nicely done.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 01:29, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Onel5969: Thanks! I will :) TMagen (talk) 16:45, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October!
[edit]Greetings!
After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.
The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.
On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:
- Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
- Diversity winner
- Gender-gap fillers
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]AfroCine: Thank You!
[edit]Greetings!
Thank you very much for participating in The Months of African Cinema Global Edit-a-thon which was concluded on 30 November 2019. We are happy to announce that the Wikimedia Foundation approved to award tokens for our winners during this edition of the contest. These prizes would be given in the form of vouchers (primarily Amazon gift cards, but we can work with other possible options in your country) and would be distributed in this manner:
- Overall Winner - $100
- Second place - $50
- Third place - $30
- Diversity Winner - $30
- Gender gap filler - $30
If you want your articles to be considered for the contest, please make sure that your articles have been listed and properly linked on this page. If you are not interested in the competition aspect and prizes, you can also choose to remove your session from that page.
Thank you so much for being part of this wikievent!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:30, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Rolon v. Kulwitzky
[edit]Concern has been expressed about the possibility that the text in this article (Rolon v. Kulwitzky) is a copyright violation of the material at the external link. I am trying to get access to that material but not yet successful. At the moment, this is just a heads up, but if you would like to comment it would be helpful.--S Philbrick(Talk) 17:08, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Sphilbrick: - which part? I didn't copy anything, I would appreciate understanding why there is a concern. I can always rewrite if any part came too close. Thanks! TMagen (talk) 20:48, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- TMagen, unfortunately I'm not at liberty at the moment to explain further. I'm arranging to get permission to give you more details. S Philbrick(Talk) 22:29, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- TMagen, The issue is now moot. Sorry, I know this is a bit puzzling but that's all I can say at this time. S Philbrick(Talk) 01:13, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Unblock please
[edit]TMagen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 77.125.44.172. TMagen (talk) 05:52, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I do not see a block on that IP address. If you are still unable to edit, you will need to tell the exact message that appears when you attempt to edit in order for us to help you. 331dot (talk) 09:41, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
331dot, This is the message:
You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia. You are still able to view pages, but you are not currently able to edit, move, or create them.
Editing from 85.115.44.0/22 has been blocked (disabled) by ST47 for the following reason(s): Server-multiple.svgThe IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider or colocation provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts and colocation providers may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
However - my IP is 77.125.44.172
What is going on? TMagen (talk) 16:28, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- The fact that the IPs are different would suggest that you are using a VPN or proxy, you will need to turn it off in order to edit. 331dot (talk) 16:45, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not - I just restarted my computer and didn't open any programs other than my browser in order to check it. The only VPN I ever use is my work VPN, and it doesn't mask my IP anyway. TMagen (talk) 16:53, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- 331dot I also restarted my internet so I'm on a diff ip address now, and I'm still blocked... 77.126.118.74 TMagen (talk) 17:03, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- The 85 IP comes up as a Forcepoint-Cloud-ES webhost. Have you changed any aspect of your editing habits since January 21(when you last edited before today), such as your physical location (I don't need to know specifically where you are)? 77.126.118.74 is also not blocked. 331dot (talk) 17:05, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- 331dot - Okay, now we're getting somewhere - That IS work related... Though I am not connected to work right now (I'm home) and also I'm not sure why my work-related address should be blocked either... What can I do about this? Is there any way to unblock the ip or make an exception? It's a well-regarded international company, not a hack farm or anything shady. TMagen (talk) 17:12, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- The 85 IP comes up as a Forcepoint-Cloud-ES webhost. Have you changed any aspect of your editing habits since January 21(when you last edited before today), such as your physical location (I don't need to know specifically where you are)? 77.126.118.74 is also not blocked. 331dot (talk) 17:05, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- 331dot I also restarted my internet so I'm on a diff ip address now, and I'm still blocked... 77.126.118.74 TMagen (talk) 17:03, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not - I just restarted my computer and didn't open any programs other than my browser in order to check it. The only VPN I ever use is my work VPN, and it doesn't mask my IP anyway. TMagen (talk) 16:53, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- It's going to be a couple hours before I can look at this further, if you want you can make another unblock request and someone else might be able to look at it sooner. 331dot (talk) 17:18, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- 331dot, thank you, I can wait. I'd rather not open multiple conversations. TMagen (talk) 17:27, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- As you have an extensive edit history, I've given you an IP block exemption for 6 months. If this problem recurs, we can look at it again. 331dot (talk) 21:55, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- 331dot, thank you! TMagen (talk) 22:42, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- As you have an extensive edit history, I've given you an IP block exemption for 6 months. If this problem recurs, we can look at it again. 331dot (talk) 21:55, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- 331dot, thank you, I can wait. I'd rather not open multiple conversations. TMagen (talk) 17:27, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
331dot - as you can see this has happened again. I'd appreciate an unblock... Cheers, TMagen (talk) 11:49, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Every IP you have pointed out so far is part of Forcepoint, they seem to have several different networks, so going through each one and reducing the blocks is impractical. IPBE is better here. The problem is, I only have you editing from one of those ranges ever, which means I can't verify if it's appropriate to give IPBE in first place. Are you sure you are disabling this software properly? Because if so, you should be on a residential range very easily. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- (aka DQ) Yes, now I'm getting a block from home as well. Message reads: "Editing from 85.115.44.0/22 has been blocked (disabled) by ST47 for the following reason(s):..." Not the same IP, still blocked. So can I get a block exemption? TMagen (talk) 17:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Every IP you listed is using Forcepoint VPN, there was no regular IPs. It's blocked because it's a VPN, and people use that to hide sockpuppets, as it hides their real IP and location. Policies like WP:PROXY and m:NOP govern this. I would normally take your editing history into account and just give it on that based on hewiki but you are indefinitely blocked there. While I can't fully understand why, there is a clear allegation that you used User:Tempest 88 in violation of their sock policy, and now potentially in violation of our policies without us knowing. So your good standing to apply for IPBE (a block exemption) doesn't exist at the moment. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 17:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- I understand your position, however I am connected to IP 77.127.98.41, not the one listed. Why would my work IP appear to you when I am at home? TMagen (talk) 10:39, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Also, the first Forcepoint IP was not a VPN but our company's on-premises server. TMagen (talk) 10:40, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Every edit that you have made is coming from the Fairpoint servers, not 77.127.98.41. If you were editing from 77.127.98.41, you would not have a block affecting you. There is no VPN/Server on that IP. If you can make an edit from home, like that 77 IP, then i'd be happy to consider IPBE for work after dealing with the potential sock issue.
- And if you work at Fairpoint or a subsidiary, then yes, it would not be a VPN/proxy for you, but it would be for everyone that doesn't work at that company. I hope that provides clarity. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 21:14, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Every IP you listed is using Forcepoint VPN, there was no regular IPs. It's blocked because it's a VPN, and people use that to hide sockpuppets, as it hides their real IP and location. Policies like WP:PROXY and m:NOP govern this. I would normally take your editing history into account and just give it on that based on hewiki but you are indefinitely blocked there. While I can't fully understand why, there is a clear allegation that you used User:Tempest 88 in violation of their sock policy, and now potentially in violation of our policies without us knowing. So your good standing to apply for IPBE (a block exemption) doesn't exist at the moment. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 17:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- (aka DQ) Yes, now I'm getting a block from home as well. Message reads: "Editing from 85.115.44.0/22 has been blocked (disabled) by ST47 for the following reason(s):..." Not the same IP, still blocked. So can I get a block exemption? TMagen (talk) 17:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Please unblock IP
[edit]TMagen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 157.167.3.2. This is my workplace, a very respectable institution :) . TMagen (talk) 11:45, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No response over a month. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 09:09, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- 157.167.3.2 is not blocked. Is there a specific IP (or range) mentioned in the block message?
Usually, the message will look something like this (in this example, I'm using Opera's built-in VPN):
You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia. You are still able to view pages, but you are not currently able to edit, move, or create them.
Editing from 2001:67C:2660:0:0:0:0:0/48 has been blocked (disabled) by SQL for the following reason(s):
The helpful part is going to be the "Editing from (ip that is blocked will appear here) has been blocked (disabled) by BlockingAdmin for the following reason(s):". You might also try clearing your cache and cookies, and trying to edit again. SQLQuery me! 01:00, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
[edit]Greetings!
The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.
Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.
We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap fillers - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
The Deep (novella) reviewed
[edit]New article The Deep (novella) reviewed | ||
Greetings. I wanted to thank you for creating The Deep (novella) and let you know I marked it as reviewed. It sounds like a good book; I placed it on my reading list. Best wishes from Los Angeles, // Timothy :: talk 06:51, 6 November 2020 (UTC) |
- I hope you like it! I am a huge fan of Rivers Solomon. TMagen (talk) 11:37, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
[edit]Greetings,
Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.
It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.
Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap filler - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!
Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Orphaned non-free image File:St. John’s International Women’s Film Festival.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:St. John’s International Women’s Film Festival.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
An award for you
[edit]
The Mary Wollstonecraft award for all your contributions on Women Writers, including biographies and books |
---|
--Ipigott (talk) 10:38, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you! How exciting :) TMagen (talk) 19:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
April 2021
[edit]Your edit to The Starless Sea has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Bennv123 (talk) 16:56, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Your edit to A Desolation Called Peace has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. The "synopsis" was in large parts a copyvio of https://bookpage.com/reviews/26054-arkady-martine-desolation-called-peace-science-fiction-fantasy. Sandstein 15:01, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Your edit to The Bone Shard Daughter has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. The content you added was a copyvio of https://wikinews.club/en/The_Bone_Shard_Daughter-4604442866 Sandstein 15:08, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- User:Sandstein - how are my synopses violations? I wrote them, I didn't copy them!
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Sandstein 10:25, 25 April 2021 (UTC)- See my detailed explanation at: [1]: ":TMagen, see WP:CLOP. You copied whole sentences and turns of phrases, which is a copyright violation. In the first example, from [2], this is no longer apparent since somebody has now removed the text you copied from that wiki. But your copyright violation that I removed here can still be seen here. For example, among many other examples, you copied the first two sentences verbatim, without marking them as a quotation: "It has been two months since Mahit Dzmare and Three Seagrass foiled an attempted military coup on Teixcalaan—though they may have started a war to do it. Dzmare is back on her native Lsel Station, among her people but unsure if she still belongs there."
- Your message leads me to conclude that you do not understand copyright or that you do not intend to abide by Wikipedia's copyright policy. This puts Wikipedia into legal jeopardy. I am therefore blocking your user account until you can convince myself or another administrator that you understand and will comply with copyright rules." Sandstein 10:27, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Unblock please
[edit]TMagen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
excessive and mistaken action TMagen (talk) 11:11, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Accept reason:
See below. Sandstein 11:35, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
I was blocked summarily without any opportunity for discussion, which is extreme. The long version:
I was blocked because user:Sandstein does not believe I intend to honor copyright, and required that I convince him otherwise, but he is not answering my emails. Allow me to present my case:
The first incident, which you can see above, was about the synopsis of The Starless Sea. This was 100% my bad, and was published by mistake. When I'm editing I often copy paragraphs onto my desktop for reference, and I saved it thinking I had already edited that section. I am sorry for that.
But here is a copyright analysis of The Bone Shard Daughter - there is no part of what was erased that is actually a copyright violation. Nothing was erased from the original, it is my synopsis.
Regarding Desolation - the first two sentences are close to the original, but the rest of what what was removed isn't, and so this is a disproportionate response. The two sentences are easily fixed.
In any event, I am now familiar with the Copyvio Detector tool, and I commit to using it for any future edits, to avoid mistakes or misunderstandings, because I really do take this issue seriously.
TMagen (talk) 11:11, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- TMagen, it is good to hear that you aim to take copyright more seriously in the future. But above you continue to assert that you did not commit copyright violations, and characterize my block as "excessive and mistaken".
- This is only true in part. It appears that my removal of your addition to The Bone Shard Daughter was a false positive because it matched text in a website that seems to copy its content from Wikipedia. Sorry about that. But at least your edits to The Starless Sea and A Desolation Called Peace were copyright violations because they copied somebody else's content verbatim. Not every copyright violation, particularly not close paraphrasing, can be detected by an automated tool, so don't rely on that. Instead, write all content in your own words. Don't copy anything, use only brief quotes and mark them as such.
- I'm unblocking you for the time being, but will keep an eye on your edits and will re-block you if I see you commiting another copyright violation. Sandstein 11:35, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you! I appreciate it very much, and promise you that I will take proper care with this. TMagen (talk) 12:12, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- LOL never mind, I see we are in agreement. TMagen (talk) 12:21, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Who's Afraid of Vagina Wolf.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Who's Afraid of Vagina Wolf.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:09, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
[edit]Greetings!
The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!
Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.
The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap fillers - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
[edit]Greetings,
It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.
Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.
We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap filler - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Question about African Cinema Global Contest deadline
[edit]Hello TMagen! Seeing as you are one of the contest's juries, I thought you'd be the right person to ask.
Will the contest end when the target of 1000 created articles is reached, or at the end of this month?
Thanks for your time! Moonswimmer Mooonswimmer
- Hi Mooonswimmer :) I'm so glad you are participating in AfroCine! I have not been active in this year's contest, and I probably should not have been listed on the jury... I think Jamie Tubers can answer your question. Cheers, TMagen (talk) 12:56, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Afrocine Jury Process
[edit]Hello TMagen, thanks for showing interest in being a jury member of the Afrocine contest. The review process starts soon and I am the head of the jury process. I would love to have your email address for easy communication in assigning articles to you. Send a mail to swiftlampard@yahoo.com for more details. Many thanks. SuperSwift (talk) 11:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi SuperSwift, I thank you for asking me, but this year I will not be able to participate. Good luck with this truly awesome project! TMagen (talk) 13:06, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
The article Kim Michele Richardson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not appear to meet the Notability standard. Also, since May 2021, a warning that the major contributor to this article has a close connection with its subject. Strong possibility of COI or paid editing occurring; current discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest; thread: Kim Michele Richardson
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Bechdel test and Wikidata
[edit]Hello TMagen! I found this and I am very interested in the topic. How is it going with adding Bechdel test status to the wikidata and showing the result in film cards on Wikipedias? Did you or somebody else made films sortable by Bechdel test criteria? I don't work with cards a lot, but the function you described is essential :) And if so, where can I find relatable information? Thank you for any answer, Franzekafka (talk) 17:30, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not aware of any further action on this, unfortunately. I have since scaled back my wiki-related activity. TMagen (talk) 09:25, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi TMagen. Thank you for your work on Stormsong. Another editor, Bastun, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Excellent work on your new article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 20:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)