User talk:TruxtVerified/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Republic TV into Republic Media Network. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:47, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Ok TruxtVerified [Message] 08:50, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Page

We should expand this and this page. Currently they are redirects. ✠ ZenDragoX✠ (contact) 07:32, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

I agree that expanding the List of List of channels owned by Sun TV Network and Warner Bros. Discovery India pages would be beneficial ✓, especially if they are currently redirects. It's important to provide comprehensive information for users interested in these topics. TruxtVerified | (Message) 08:54, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into MTV Beats (TV channel). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. This is NOT how you do a page move. Please get this cleaned up as soon as possible. An editor with 2000 edits should not be doing something like this. Follow the directions in the message above for how this needs to be corrected, and do this for any other pages you've incorrectly moved. Ravensfire (talk) 02:00, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

I know how to move, but the page is a translation and doesn't appear in Google Search. Therefore, I created a new page and pasted it. TruxtVerified | [Message] 02:03, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

No. You did a cut and paste move. The contents are IDENTICAL. That isn't a translation. That's the definition of a cut and paste move. [1] vs [2]. It's the same text. Please get this fixed by following the directions above. Ravensfire (talk) 02:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Bro, I mean that the first page is created by translation of a Hindi article. 🙄 Okay? TruxtVerified | [Message] 02:18, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Which has no relevance. It's been created well in the past. You cannot do cut and paste moves like you did. Clearly this is something too challenging for you. I've taken care of it this time. Please review your previous edits to see if you've done this before and if so, follow the same process. Ravensfire (talk) 02:22, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

I understand your concerns. I apologize for any inconvenience caused. I'll make sure to review my previous edits and follow the correct process in the future. Thank you for taking care of it this time." TruxtVerified | [Message] 13:09, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Source

I recently edited WBD India article, can you please add some source there in history? ✠ ZenDragoX✠ (contact) 11:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Ok, i will check it. Also, check newly created Neru (film) article. TruxtVerified | [Message] 12:13, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your signature

Your signature broke the {{RMassist/core}} template. Please consider changing it to prevent such instances occurring again. Polyamorph (talk) 10:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

can you provide template after fix it TruxtVerified | [Message] 10:54, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

I already fixed it for you at WP:RM/TR, but it is now your responsibility to fix your signature, per WP:SIG. Polyamorph (talk) 11:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Fixed✓ TruxtVerified | [Message] 14:28, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Neru (film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Neru (film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Upcoming film that does not meet WP:NFF - needs development to show that the production itself is notable, or wait until film is released. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ravensfire (talk) 15:49, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic Media Network. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 17:40, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

No, He is also an editor and expander of that article, so his decision is also valuable than others. TruxtVerified | [Message] 12:53, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Nope - it's canvassing plain and simple. First, you notified only one editor of the related article (not the one in discussion). That's a problem, you only picked someone that shared your view. Second, you left a very non-neutral request to them. That's the other problem. That is the definition of canvassing. Please respect the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia, not your preferences. Ravensfire (talk) 14:51, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Dear Ravensfire,Thank you for your message and your concerns regarding my recent notifications on user talk pages. I appreciate your vigilance in upholding Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.I understand your point about the potential appearance of canvassing, and I want to clarify my intentions. My aim was not to selectively target those who share a particular viewpoint but to engage with fellow editors who have previously shown interest in the topic of the article under discussion. I acknowledge that my initial approach might not have been entirely neutral, and I apologize for any unintended bias.I genuinely value your input, and I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's principles of neutrality and consensus-building. In the future, I will ensure that my notifications are more in line with these principles.Please feel free to share any further guidance or suggestions you may have, as I am open to constructive feedback.Sincerely, TruxtVerified | [Message] 16:50, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Neru (film) poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Neru (film) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Fourth News (TV channel)

Hello, TruxtVerified. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Fourth News (TV channel), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

The Fourth News (TV channel) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Fourth News (TV channel). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ravensfire (talk) 16:53, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of channels owned by Zee Entertainment Enterprises, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. The one source provided has no content and had no content when copied. This is disingenuous editing.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   15:38, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Ok TruxtVerified | [Message] 16:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Also, DO NOT just add the featured article/list or good article templates to articles on your own. These represent specific levels of quality that have been reviewed by highly experienced peers. An article with a single source and nearly everything unsourced is barely even a stub and probably should just be a draft. You have over 2000 edits, disruptive editing like this is not helpful and cannot be tolerated from someone with this many edits. Ravensfire (talk) 19:16, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

List of channels owned by Viacom18 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of channels owned by Viacom18. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Needs independent sources for the list. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ravensfire (talk) 19:18, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Report moved to ANI

Hi TruxtVerified, thanks for your report. I have moved it to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents § Ravensfire reported by TruxtVerified because this isn't the type of obvious vandalism we're usually dealing with at AIV, and because it likely benefits from discussion that isn't possible to have at AIV. I have notified Ravensfire about the ANI thread and answered with a small request for a diff or two that currently seems to be missing. Please don't quit Wikipedia; I'm sure this can be handled at ANI. Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:26, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Despite their name similarity, Ravensfire and Ravenswing are two separate persons. The former has been here for 16 years and made about 80,000 contributions, the latter has been here for 18 years and made about 60,000 contributions. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:26, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Ok, but he used offensive words. He must be punished. TruxtVerified | [Message] 13:32, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Why? Canterbury Tail talk 14:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

He used bad words in Wikipedia against a person. Ok TruxtVerified | [Message] 14:17, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

We don't use blocks as punishment. And his words weren't that bad and were not directed at you as an editor but at the article. Canterbury Tail talk 14:45, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Fu*king is not a bad word? TruxtVerified | [Message] 15:26, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

You can, by the bye, TruxtVerified, apologize to me at once for that unwarranted and objectionable personal attack. Ravenswing 17:00, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Ok, you are all team. I'm alone. Okay. See you soon TruxtVerified | [Message] 17:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Yes, you may safely conclude that a number of editors don't agree with you here that swearing is more objectionable than accusing people of sockpuppetry with zero evidence, or falsifying an article's status. I hope and trust the message you're taking from this is not "Oh, I'm right, everyone else is wrong, they're ganging up on me." Ravenswing 18:14, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

You are saying he is 100% right. TruxtVerified | [Message] 00:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

I am saying what I said. While it seems you have a deep-set need to redefine just about anything anyone is saying to you to mean what you want them to have said, I assure you I'm quite capable of speaking for myself. Luckily for you, the ANI was closed before you could shoot yourself in the foot any further. The next time might not go so well. Ravenswing 09:38, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

I know my fault, do you think about @Ravensfire Fault? TruxtVerified | [Message] 12:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Only warning: Logged-out editing

Technical evidence shows that you have edited logged-out in ways that violate Wikipedia policy. This is your only warning: Any future violations of the sockpuppetry policy will be met with an indefinite block. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

What? You have to submit evidence before Warning. TruxtVerified | [Message] 12:27, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

You do not have to provide evidence. Checkusers have access to private logs that indicate your IP address has participated in logged out editing. They are not required to disclose evidence, and if they did it would not work out well for you as your IP address includes your approximate location and other information that should not be disclosed publicly. Zippybonzo | talk | contribs (he|she|they) 11:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

which account? TruxtVerified | [Message] 12:28, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

You are here to Revenge me against Reporting @Ravenfire. TruxtVerified | [Message] 12:29, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

That statement can only be regarded as a personal attack on the integrity of a previously uninvolved admin. Any form of sincere apology might help limit the damage but I doubt it.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   14:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC)