Jump to content

User talk:Trincres17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Krai album, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.whatrecords.co.uk/items/60779.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Krai album requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.whatrecords.co.uk/items/60779.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  GILO   A&E 14:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nothankyou
added links pointing to Alternative and Classical
Olga Bell
added a link pointing to Alternative

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on God damn band, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Non-Dropframe talk 10:39, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on God Damn (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Anarchyte 12:00, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did you even read any of my answers to your questions on my talk page? I have deleted the page again. Please read and understand the things I linked to before you ask about this, and do not create the page again. —Kusma (t·c) 11:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the kind message :) Would be kind enough to explain exactly why, in simple terms, I am unable to create this page for God Damn? As I have previously created very similar pages from other artists, and they have been fine. Sorry, I am struggling to understand and navigate the Wikipedia jargon. Thanks a lot!

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited God Damn (band), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Heavy rock and Garage. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

You should check out Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure and follow the instructions there. —Kusma (t·c) 12:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wild Palms (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://allevents.in/events/popular-reading-w-wild-palms-younghusband-ctm-djs/290483287640304. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fylbecatulous talk 18:08, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nothankyou requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.music-news.com/shownews.asp?H=Tom-Vek-and-Olga-Bell--collaborate-on-new-single&nItemID=68800. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fylbecatulous talk 18:24, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Trincres17. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
  • instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. —Kusma (t·c) 13:44, 17 September 2015 (UTC) {subst:coin-notice}} Brianhe (talk) 15:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

[edit]

Hi Joe,

please have another look at this discussion, which has useful advice. Also, please remember you have to follow the wmf:Terms of Use (search for "Paid contributions"). You should declare your conflict of interest in the manner described there before your next article edit. Also, please stick to one account. Thank you, —Kusma (t·c) 11:39, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you even listening to me? Please follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure or you will be blocked from editing. —Kusma (t·c) 14:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fufanu

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fufanu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Non-Dropframe talk 14:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Foxtrott (September 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yann was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Yann (talk) 19:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Trincres17, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Yann (talk) 19:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance with your COI issue

[edit]

Hello Trincres17, I have good news for you: One of my "hobbies" here at Wikipedia is helping people with a conflict of interest get articles created or edited the way they want (insofar as that is possible within Wikipedia rules), and your situation has come to my attention. I see that you have worked on a number of articles and draft articles since creating your account. It's unlikely that I will be able to help you with all of them, but if you would pick one or two articles you most want assistance with, I'll see what I can do.

When replying to this message, please copy and paste [[User:GrammarFascist|GrammarFascist]] (it will display as just my username, but Wikipedia's software will alert me to your reply) somewhere in your response. If you don't, it could be days (or longer) before I see you have responded. Also don't forget to use a colon : at the beginning of every paragraph to indent your response, and to put four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your response so that it's "signed" with your username and timestamp. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 00:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GrammarFascist. Hi, Thanks a lot for noticing my predicament and offering to help, it is much appreciated. In terms of Artist pages that I would appreciate help with the most, I would focus on maybe 2 or 3 initially. Foxtrott is one that I tried to set up via the article recommendation area of Wikipedia, but was rejected. I still have the text saved if you need it? Along with this, there are warnings looming over Fufanu, God Damn (band) and Olga Bell, it would be nice to clear these up somehow? I'm sure you have the knowledge. Thanks, Joe Trincres17 (talk) 16:36, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Just to reassure you, Trincres17 (or Joe if you prefer), the deletion evaluation for Fufanu has already ended with the consensus reached being to keep the article; the deletion evaluation for God Damn (band) has voting currently at 5 to keep and only 2 to delete; and it does not appear Olga Bell was ever nominated for deletion. The other notices at the top of each of those pages are found on many thousands of Wikipedia articles, and just mean that Wikipedia is aware the articles should be improved. (To link to any Wikipedia article from within Wikipedia, just put double square brackets around the article title, like so: [[Fufanu]] will display as Fufanu.)
I will evaluate the availability of sources to establish the notability of Draft:Foxtrott (Wikipedia has saved it as well) and, if there seem to be good reliable sources for that, I will start with it. Note that one benefit to being involved with the label, in terms of Wikipedia policies, is that it should be relatively easy for you to get photos which can be uploaded with the appropriate license for use in each of these articles.
I will probably only be able to work on one article about artists you represent at a time, aside from perhaps some minor edits. You should consider what your second choice of band/musician should be in case it looks like there are not (yet) enough reliable sources to establish Foxtrott's notability. Be aware, however, that the draft article will be saved so long as it is being worked on at least every few months, so waiting for articles to be written in major publications, then citing those properly in the draft and resubmitting, would be an option. Articles can be resubmitted indefinitely.
I know Wikipedia has a number of policies and guidelines and it can all be a bit bewildering to newcomers. Don't hesitate to ask if you have more questions, either by copy and pasting [[User:GrammarFascist|GrammarFascist]] here, or by going to the Teahouse. Just as a reminder, though, while you are not forbidden from editing articles for which you have a conflict of interest, you are discouraged from doing so. It's better to post on the Talk page of the article in question stating what additional information, correction or other edit you think should be made is. You can find instructions for making such a request at Wikipedia:Edit requests. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 18:49, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Unfortunately, it appears that Foxtrott does not meet Wikipedia's notability standard at this time. You should keep an eye out for in-depth articles about her, her albums, and/or her performances; articles should be at least a full page (for magazines), and ideally run multiple pages. A minimum of two such articles (that are not simply interviews, though they can include quotes from her) from notable publications are needed in order for Foxtrott to be eligible for a Wikipedia article. I did make a few improvements to the draft including adding a new source and putting in source information for a quotation that was in the draft but unattributed.
I am now going to evaluate the artists for whom you previously tried to create an article which was deleted. Perhaps one of them can have an article after all. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 22:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
GrammarFascist, Hi, Thank you so much for your continued help. Wild Palms (band) is another article i created that appears to be up for deletion soon, it might might worth some editing to ensure that it complies with Wikipedia guidelines and standards to help avoid deletion. Trincres17 (talk) 11:15, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have contributed to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wild Palms (band) with a vote to keep the article. The voting is now tied. Note that you can also vote in that discussion; just be sure to identify yourself as an employee of the label.
On another note, you described that article as "another article i created" but the page history shows Joewood91 as the page creator. You should know that on Wikipedia, using more than one account is strongly discouraged (in some ways even more so than editing with a conflict of interest) and may be considered a sign of wrongdoing. If you are the sole person operating both accounts (Joewood91 and Trincres17), you should declare that on both user pages, and also choose one account to use and stop using the other one. Whichever account you choose to stop using can be marked with a
{{retirement|duplicate account}} notice on its user page.
Accounts should also only be used by one individual, not shared by multiple users. The policy is one account for one person, to put it simply.
Also, don't forget to address my questions about Krai (album) below. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 12:56, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article about Olga Bell's Krai album

[edit]

Great news! Olga Bell's album Krai, for which you previously tried to create a Wikipedia article, is sufficiently notable to have its own article. I will begin working on it now. You will be able to view the draft at this link: Krai (album). You can leave any suggestions or corrections here, just be sure to paste my username code so that Wikipedia notifies me. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 23:40, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've run into something that confuses me. Some sources say Krai was released on New Amsterdam Records, but others say One Little Indian Records released the album. Can you clarify which it is? Is this maybe a US vs. UK distribution thing? Also, is there a way you can give me access to the liner notes from the album so I can fill in other performers, any co-writers, etc.? Credits for the album don't seem to be up online even at the labels' websites. As you can see in the draft, the Track listing table is kind of empty. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 01:35, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've discovered my guess was correct regarding the two labels, and the distinction is now in the article with a source cited. I would still like information about album credits such as any other credited writers, credited musicians, etc.
  • Since this article is (I think) nearly ready to be upgraded from draft status, you should consider the feasibility of making an album cover image available for use on Wikipedia. A promotional image from the Krai premiere performance would also make a nice illustration for the article, if the label owns copyright to any such images.
  • Please check the draft carefully for any incorrect information. Sources, even reliable ones, aren't always 100% correct. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 06:55, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[image with incorrect licensing information removed] —GrammarFascist contribstalk
Unfortunately, the licensing information seems not to have been filled out correctly when you uploaded the Krai album art. It is listed as "Own work" — unless you personally created the layout of that album cover, this is incorrect and could lead to the image being deleted. It should probably be under a Fair Use claim, which I will gladly take care of if you could clarify whether you personally (not the label) own the copyright to the image. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 05:05, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
: GrammarFascist Hi, my mistake, no I didn't personally make this artowork unfortunately but the label does own the copyright. Thanks Trincres17 (talk) 11:52, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry about it, even I find copyright confusing. I have reuploaded a low-resolution version of the image to Wikipedia for use in the article under a Fair Use claim, which is the standard way to do things for album covers. You should delete the image you uploaded from Wikimedia Commons since it is incorrectly listed as being your own work. If the label wants to make a higher-resolution image available for use on Wikipedia — and therefore by anyone who wants to use the album art for any purpose — then you should have someone from your company's legal department contact Wikimedia Commons. I can find out more specific instructions if this seems to be something the label wants to do.
I have also promoted the draft to article status; it still needs some work, but not so much that anyone is likely to nominate it for deletion. It is now found at Krai (album). I will be happy to continue working with you on the article about Krai and in particular would like to add musician credits for whoever played the instruments Ms. Bell did not. I am still waiting for the liner notes / album credits information from you, remember. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 17:28, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
GrammarFascist Hi, apologies for the delay, it has been very busy here and thanks again for your help. Here is the list of the album credits for Krai.
composed, produced and arranged by Olga Bell
lyrics: Olga Bell, Marina Bell (I, II, V, VI, VIII, IX) Traditional (III, IV, VII)
Ensemble: Olga bell - voices, synths, samples, jaw harp
Andrea Lee - cello
Grey Mcmurray - electric guitar
Gunnar Olsen - drum kit (II, II, IV, VIII), percussion, samples
Jason Nazary - drum kit (II, III, IV, VIII), vibraphone, glockenspiel, percussion, samples
Recording and Mixing: Keith Souza and Seth Manchester, Machines and Magnets
Mastering: Heba Kadry, Timeless Mastering
Cover Lettering Art: Jessica Hische.
Hope this is ok, Thanks, Joe. Trincres17 (talk) 10:02, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Joe / Trincres17, that was just what I needed. The additional information has been added to the article. I also activated the categories, which I had neglected to do when moving the draft to article space. This will make it easier for Wikipedia readers to find the article.
I think we are done with Krai, unless / until there are more singles released, or other news. Did you have a particular album or article you wanted me to create or edit next? —GrammarFascist contribstalk 20:46, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
GrammarFascist Hi, Thank you very much, you've done a sterling job with Krai. There are a few acts on the label that I think are worth looking at, Wild Palms are probably one that I would begin with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wild_Palms_(band). They currently have a page, but it definitely needs work, any help would be much appreciated. Trincres17 (talk) 15:28, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
GrammarFascist Hi, I have also just noticed that the One Little Indian Records Wiki page has been significantly reduced. Is this something that you would possibly be able to help with as well, as it is a label with a very rich history and is worth noting all achievements, successes and accomplishments. Thanks, Joe Trincres17 (talk) 12:14, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trincres17. It looks like information was removed from the One Little Indian Records article due to not having reliable sources cited. I already know there is such a source for Olga Bell being on One Little Indian Records, because I used it in the other article; there will probably be similar sources for other artists, but it will take time to find and attribute them all. However, you should also bear in mind that the purpose of a Wikipedia article is not to include all of any person's or organization's accomplishments; it is to provide a summary of the most significant ones. With that in mind, as I am not familiar with all of the artists whose names were removed, would you pick let's say the dozen or so you think would be most germane to the article, and I will see about finding sources so they can be added back in?

(Sorry for not having made a start on the Wild Palms article yet; I have been busy with other projects these last few days.) —GrammarFascist contribstalk 13:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GrammarFascist Hi, the most important artists aside from the ones already listed would be, Wild Palms, Marry Waterson, Kathryn Williams, God Damn, The Computers, Olga Bell, Big Scary. This should be fine to begin with :) Cheers Trincres17 (talk) 15:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I have added a bunch of sources, and most of the artists you listed. Since they're mentioned in the source I cited for Kathryn Williams, I thought I would also add the Pernice Brothers and The Twilight Singers, but I wasn't sure whether they should go in the past artists section or the current artists section. (Is Sinead O'Connor still with One Little Indian? If so, she should be listed; if not, do you want her listed as a past artist?) I'm also planning to source the last few names in both sections that didn't already have sources. Hope you're having a good week! —GrammarFascist contribstalk 21:59, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GrammarFascist Hi. Firstly, thanks a lot for taking a look at this. Regards to the Pernice Brothers, the Twilight Singers & Sinead, they would all be classed as past artists now as they are not currently active on One Little Indian Records. It would still be useful however to have a section for past artists, just to demonstrate the labels diverse roster. Also, some further artists that are worth adding are Cody Chesnutt, Stubborn Heart, Dan Sartain, Olof Arnalds, FiniTribe, these are all currently active. Thanks Trincres17 (talk) 13:03, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GrammarFascist Hi. I have a page that I need help with fairly urgently if you were still up for helping me out? It's an artist from One Little Indian Records called Kathryn Williams, she is actually going to send me a document at the start of next week with all of the up to date information regarding her career including citations hopefully, which will make your life much easier in theory. Would be great to hear back from you, and hope you're well. Thanks, Joe Trincres17 (talk) 17:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your post at WT:Centralized discussion

[edit]

Your comment at Wikipedia talk:Centralized discussion was posted in the wrong place and has been deleted. It should have been posted under a new section heading at User talk:Jayen466.

Wikipedia:Centralized discussion is a list of current discussions of community-wide interest, and Wikipedia talk:Centralized discussion is only for discussion of that list. --Pipetricker 11:30, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Foxtrott, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Foxtrott

[edit]

Hello, Trincres17. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Foxtrott".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Azealia911 talk 14:33, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help editing a page

[edit]

GrammarFascist Hi there, long time no speak. Hope you're well. I wondered if you could help me urgently with a page for an artist called Asgeir? A lot of the information on his page is out of date and inaccurate, what would you need from me to get this updated?

Don't delete previous labels, please.

[edit]

It's fine you're adding One Little Indian to the Crass article but don't delete their previous label(s), please. Thanks. Yintan  15:32, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarah Walk (August 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MapleSoy were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MapleSoy (talk) 16:52, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]