User talk:Torothetiger

Welcome!

Hello, Torothetiger, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Sakanaction, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ironholds (talk) 19:34, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Sakanaction

A tag has been placed on Sakanaction requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 19:34, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles have to fulfill certain guidelines as to how "notable" the subject is. For the guidelines you will have to satisfy regarding a band, please see WP:MUSIC. Ironholds (talk) 21:12, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of GO TO THE FUTURE (album)

A tag has been placed on GO TO THE FUTURE (album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 20:52, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How to create an article on Wikipedia

Please read the following, they will help you write articles that will not be deleted:

The links in the "welcome" message above.
Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Wikipedia:Verifiability
Wikipedia:No original research

and when writing about individual musicians who are still alive:

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons

Also, read through Wikipedia:List of policies and Wikipedia:List of guidelines.

To help you understand why some articles are deleted, read

davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 22:48, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of GO TO THE FUTURE (album)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article GO TO THE FUTURE (album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet the criteria for albums. Even the band is of dubious notability, being signed with an unknown label and having no major tours or sales/chart info.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. The article was proposed for deletion by the non-logged-in editor 24.6.151.226 (talk · contribs) at 03:51, 26 December 2008. I'm just the message-bearer. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 19:04, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NIGHT FISHING (album)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article NIGHT FISHING (album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No indication the album meets the criteria for music. Even the band is of dubious notability, being signed to an unknown with no major tours or sales info

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. The article was proposed for deletion by the non-logged-in editor 24.6.151.226 (talk · contribs) at 03:49, 26 December 2008. I'm just the message-bearer. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 19:04, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:News large sakana 0121a1c.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:News large sakana 0121a1c.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:47, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, this was my fault. It's fixed now, I forgot the {{Non-free fair use in}} tag. However, if the image is GFDL then please undo my edits and provide evidence that it's GFDL. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 17:53, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sakanaction.jpg

File:Sakanaction.jpg appears to be a commercially-produced image. Please provide evidence that it has been released under the GFDL, such as a link to the creator's web site saying it's been released, or remove that copyright tag and replace it with another copyright or fair-use tag, such as {{Non-free fair use in|Sakanaction}} or one of the other non-free fair use templates listed at Category:Non-free image copyright tags. If you use any Non-free fair use tag, be sure to read WP:COPYRIGHT, Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline, and WP:IMAGES first, as this image may not qualify for fair use in that article. Also, most non-free fair use use requires either {{Non-free use rationale}} or both {{Non-free image data}} and {{Non-free image rationale}} together.

Please fix the licensing information on your other files as well. It is very important that files uploaded to Wikipedia have correct copyright licensing on them. Other web sites may rely on the license you put up and if it is incorrect, may unintentionally commit copyright infringement, subjecting them to lawsuits from the copyright holders. In the case of the image above, the copyright holder is probably the band, the record label, or the person or company that created the original artwork. Sometimes these companies do release their images under the GFDL. If they have done so, it should be on their web site, all you need to do is to provide a link back to that web page on the page for the image file. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 19:13, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Utada Hikaru 2009.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Utada Hikaru 2009.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Keiko Fuji.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Keiko Fuji.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:42, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Utada Hikaru 2009.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Utada Hikaru 2009.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Apoc2400 (talk) 20:12, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is a free image, so we cannot use a non-free one. --Apoc2400 (talk) 20:13, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Utada Hikaru 2009.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Utada Hikaru 2009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:50, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:News large sakana 0121a1c.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:News large sakana 0121a1c.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:21, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:GO TO THE FUTURE.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:GO TO THE FUTURE.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:11, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Sakanaction.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sakanaction.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 20:14, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Remixion.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Remixion.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 21:44, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]