User talk:Tomori Uriel

Welcome!

Hello, Tomori Uriel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Sowemimo Abiodun. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Danidamiobi (talk) 03:17, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Career Developed: Utilising the Digital Space, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 16:39, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Career Developed: Utilising the Digital Space

The article Career Developed: Utilising the Digital Space has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Personal essay, not an encyclopedic topic. Wikipedia is not a self-publishing platform.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Animalparty! (talk) 16:42, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing my block

Hello! I belong to Wikipedia Fan Club University of Ilorin. I was recently alleged for having more than one account and I was blocked. I am appealing my block as the accusation levelled against me is not true, I have no knowledge about the existence of the said account, as I am aware and committed to upholding the ethical standard of the Wikipedia Community. I will be glad if my block is reverted.

Tomori Uriel (talk) 16:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:GeneralizationsAreBad and User:KrakatoaKatie, I am still awaiting your consideration of this. Tomori Uriel (talk) 10:56, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the {{unblock}} template and follow the instructions at WP:GAB. Another CU will evaluate the evidence. Katie^talk 11:58, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tomori Uriel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My block wasn't necessary and my conduct is not in any way connected (under any account or IP address) with the block. I consider myself a competent editor of the wikipedia community, due to my involvement in meet ups and guidance to new editors. My edits have helped to support literacy and I am committed to stepping up my input and shall always abide my the ethical standard of wikipedia Tomori Uriel (talk) 13:10, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Behaviorally, you appear as one who is here to promote. We have a policy against undisclosed paid editing and you should also read the conflict of interest policy.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 15:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User: Berean Hunter I do appreciate your thorough investigation and tracking. It's true I have a record of editing for some pages, but I can confirm to you that I do not get paid by anyone for editing any page, I am aware of the undisclosed paid editing policy. I have a track record of volunteering and that was what lead me to volunteering for Wikipedia in my university, I am aware of the ethics that comes with volunteering, my records are online. Also, I do not own any account aside this. I hope you will consider unblocking. I will be more careful about this, I am committed to upholding wikipedia ethical standard. I seek your indulgenceTomori Uriel (talk) 16:39, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:KrakatoaKatie for your kind evaluation.Tomori Uriel (talk) 13:09, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser needed 2nd CU opinion requested as per KK suggestion, above. Just Chilling (talk) 16:40, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Just Chilling: I limited my check to some of the accounts Katie blocked at the same time as this user and to my own record when I created the case. A thorough review would take a very long time because so many accounts have been blocked, including different findings on different groups. Based on my review, Tomori Uriel is technically

Possible.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:47, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's great. I do appreciate your passion to uphold ethics and sanity. However, I have no links to the said account, and I edit on User:Tomori Uriel, which carries my full name any other one cannot be mine. You can check, the editing ladder of Wikipedia fan Club University of Ilorin for confirmation. Consider this;User:Bbb23 User:Just Chilling User:KrakatoaKatie Tomori Uriel (talk) 06:52, 11 October 2018 (UTC)]][reply]

Request to unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tomori Uriel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admit that I know Sowemimo Abiodun,he is my colleague. But, I had no prior knowledge that it is against the rules guiding Conflict of interest, although I was not paid for the said edit. But I am now aware of the ethical guidelines of Wikipedia, and I do promise to uphold this. It should be noted that, I do not have any other account aside this. I do plead your indulgence to be unblocked and given a chance to add value to this platform. Thanks Tomori Uriel (talk) 13:57, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only, user unresponsive to GoldenRing's question below. You are welcome to make a new unblock request if you would like to answer. 331dot (talk) 16:32, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'd be willing to unblock, I think, but could you please outline what topics you intend to edit in? GoldenRing (talk) 11:34, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User: GoldenRing Sure, I will be editing topics that bothers on up to date profiles of political leaders here in Nigeria, cases on corruption and reviews on consequential activities. Thanks Tomori Uriel (talk) 10:37, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Tomori Uriel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologise for my late response to the unblock message in my talk box, as I was offline as of the time. However, I will like to edit on Nigerian political office holders, tech companies in Nigeria and tech personalities. Tomori Uriel (talk) 16:28, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I note that the blocking administrator has agreed to defer to a 2nd CU opinion, and that the 2nd CU opinion is inconclusive. It does not appear to me that any behavioral evidence is overwhelming. I also note that User:GoldenRing has indicated provisional support of unblocking and that GoldenRing's request for more information has been fulfilled in a reasonable way. The editing history does not show a pattern of serious abuse. Accordingly, I will remove the block. Uninvited Company 21:42, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind review and unblock. User_talk:UninvitedCompany Tomori Uriel (talk) 18:56, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Roundmaster (talk) 11:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Roundmaster Your judgement of the page is prejudicial, wrong and is a question on my credibility. A proper background check will help clarify your perception. I do understand that attack pages are not allowed and punitive measures can be taken. Please do have a proper background check. Stereotypes are wrong.Tomori Uriel (talk)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lanre Adisa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lanre Adisa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sajid 12:39, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lanre Adisa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lanre Adisa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Josalm64rc (talk) 21:30, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image Merchants Promotion Limited moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Image Merchants Promotion Limited, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 13:54, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Image Merchants Promotion Limited concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Image Merchants Promotion Limited, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, HasuteurBot. I will respond to the most recent edit in my talk on the article. Thank you for drawing my attention to that. Tomori Uriel (talk) 03:11, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Image Merchants Promotion Limited

Hello, Tomori Uriel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Image Merchants Promotion Limited".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:41, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, UnitedStatesian, there are sufficient resources on the topic, but I couldn't get substantial background information. I will work on it once that is available. Tomori Uriel (talk) 03:17, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Daniels (Chief Marketing Officer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Robin Daniels (Chief Marketing Officer), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 17:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Sagotreespirit I was trying to avoid bombarding the page with too many links. Will rework it. Tomori Uriel (talk) 17:50, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robin Daniels (Chief Marketing Officer) (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robin Daniels (Chief Marketing Officer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robin Daniels (Chief Marketing Officer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 18:50, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tomori Uriel! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 18:50, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robin Daniels (Chief Marketing Officer) (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SuperHamster was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please note that press releases do not contribute to a subject's notability. Sources should be reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robin Daniels (Chief Marketing Officer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robin Daniels (Chief Marketing Officer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 23:02, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I will work on it. Tomori Uriel (talk) 23:21, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Seyi Tinubu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seyi Tinubu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seyi Tinubu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stormy Chamber (talk) 14:38, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sidmach Technologies

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sidmach Technologies, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sidmach Technologies. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Celestina007 (talk) 20:24, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been duly contested in its talk page. Thank you Celestina007 for your observation. Tomori Uriel (talk) 20:41, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Undisclosed Paid Editing

Hello Tomori Uriel. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Sidmach Technologies, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Tomori Uriel. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Tomori Uriel|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. An unblock is a privilege & it’s very rare also, it’s an opportunity given to very few to prove they are of value to the collaborative project and can be trusted once again, so believe me when I tell you UPE is definitely the antithesis of showing character reformation. Celestina007 (talk) 20:50, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have an unblock privilege, my response stated I was unblocked by an admin. Also, I have never been involved in paid editing, as I have been aware of the ethical guidelines of the community since I was in the University. This article was created as a result of my research on the role Technology companies are playing in Africa, and especially during the pandemic. We do not have enough of such articles in Africa. All of these can be verified if you do the same. Tomori Uriel (talk) 20:59, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged it with a G4 so if it doesn’t “match” the old one it wouldn’t be speedy deleted. Furthermore this is blatant UPE & I wasn’t born last night. Lastly, I did do a before and nothing substantial was observed. Celestina007 (talk) 21:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, like I said earlier. I got the content from my research online. And other mainstream media while using similar Wikipedia pages as examples to avoid discussions such as this, but here we are. Also, I wasn't paid. I understand that it's easy to doubt people, but it's unfair to undermine their efforts based on past experiences with other people. This is discouraging, I must confess. I can never be a part of paid editing, my community knows this. Tomori Uriel (talk) 21:24, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

= }} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Tomori Uriel|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. An unblock is a privilege & it’s very rare also, it’s an opportunity given to very few to prove they are of value to the collaborative project and can be trusted once again, so believe me when I tell you UPE is definitely the antithesis of showing character reformation. Celestina007 (talk) 20:50, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have an unblock privilege, my response stated I was unblocked by an admin. Also, I have never been involved in paid editing, as I have been aware of the ethical guidelines of the community since I was in the University. This article was created as a result of my research on the role Technology companies are playing in Africa, and especially during the pandemic. We do not have enough of such articles in Africa. All of these can be verified if you do the same. Tomori Uriel (talk) 20:59, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged it with a G4 so if it doesn’t “match” the old one it wouldn’t be speedy deleted. Furthermore this is blatant UPE & I wasn’t born last night. Lastly, I did do a before and nothing substantial was observed. Celestina007 (talk) 21:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, like I said earlier. I got the content from my research online. And other mainstream media while using similar Wikipedia pages as examples to avoid discussions such as this, but here we are. Also, I wasn't paid. I understand that it's easy to doubt people, but it's unfair to undermine their efforts based on past experiences with other people. This is discouraging, I must confess. I can never be a part of paid editing, my community knows this. Tomori Uriel (talk) 21:24, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You just somehow managed to recreate an article that was deleted because of UPE concerns & non notability? Come on, it doesn’t get any more convenient than that & believe me you, you would invariably come to realize no anti spam editor here was born last night. We done heard it all. Celestina007 (talk) 22:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I did not know of the page being involved in UPE, I am only documenting profile of tech companies in Africa. Assumptions are wrong, and bias without adequate fact checking will truncate the growth of this community. I understand this community has a thing with some editors in some parts of the world, I have argued in the past with my immediate community here that it isn't so, but here we are. You had accused me of being blocked without checking my talk page, which was wrong. Blocked or banned editors cannot edit. You haven't been fair. Some of us joined this community out of the passion to add knowledge to others from our previous communities. It is wrong to assume. Tomori Uriel (talk) 04:49, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Softcom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Softcom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Softcom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 21:02, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article is created as a part of my research on Technology companies in Africa and their impact during the pandemic. I will do well to expand on it. Tomori Uriel (talk) 21:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sidmach Technologies moved to draftspace

Article meets WP:DRAFTIFY as per UPE concerns coupled with article falling short of WP:ORG. Sources used in the article are almost all primary sources thus are of no value.

Sources cited in this article meet WP:ORG requirements in this region. This can be confirmed from other Wikipedia pages related to the country. The sources are not primary as claimed but are credible platforms with printed dailies selling thousands of copies nationwide. The links are from their online sites and were carefully researched and verified on Google news and other objective channels independent of Sidmach Technologies. Tomori Uriel (talk) 22:39, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify per possible covert UPE concerns and non notability of organization

I have moved Sidmach Technologies to Draft:Sidmach Technologies per UPE concerns and non notability, please used the WP:AFC process to submit the article and per involved I wouldn’t be the editor to accept or decline it. Thank you. Celestina007 (talk) 14:43, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you dropped the "blatant UPE" allegations in your use of words. And your interest in this page is noticeable. The sources referenced in this article are credible mainstream media platforms with a wide online presence, not mere blog posts, but are the same used for other pages (This can be confirmed by checking this page's coverage under the News tag in Google search). I appreciate your efforts towards upholding the values of this community, but not all editors have the wrong motives for creating pages as you wrongfully assumed in my case. It hasn't been a smooth ride since I started, but my community members have been helpful. I will expand my research and do the needful before making the necessary submission for approval. Thanks. Tomori Uriel (talk) 22:59, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, I'm Celestina007. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Softcom have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Celestina007 (talk) 07:36, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If another editor had labelled my contributions as not being constructive it would have been more objective, although it was an open discussion. I made contributions to offer more context to the discussions after a thorough followup on the discussion and a background check. However, I will do as you suggested. Sandbox works well. Tomori Uriel (talk) 14:50, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robin Daniels (Chief Marketing Officer)

Hello, Tomori Uriel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Robin Daniels".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sidmach Technologies

Hello, Tomori Uriel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sidmach Technologies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sidmach Technologies

Hello, Tomori Uriel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sidmach Technologies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:38, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Seyi Tinubu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Seyi Tinubu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seyi Tinubu. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ASUKITE 15:17, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Seyi Tinubu

Hello, Tomori Uriel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seyi Tinubu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Seyi Tinubu

Hello, Tomori Uriel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Seyi Tinubu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:25, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]