User talk:Tommi1986/Archive Mar21

Revert

Hi, I noticed you restored some vandalism that I reverted at Nafees; would you mind explaining why you did that? P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 18:47, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@P,TO 19104: I noticed that, I apologize! There were about three of us, all trying to fix the vandalism at once it got confusing, no offense meant, I restored the wrong version and was going to fix my mistake but decided it would be easier to leave it and let either you or the other editor fix it to avoid even more mistakes! Apologies once again! Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 18:53, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, I'm Shinyedit. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Shinyedit^bonjour. 11:43, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Shinyedit: - how was it unconstructive, I was reporting racist comments? Exactly what you have described is what I reported?

If you have an issue with a user, generally you should leave a message on their user talk page. AIV is strictly for vandals who are doing nothing but being disruptive. Panukhat is a contributor here with thousands of edits, almost all of which are constructive. I'd recommend reading what is and isn't vandalism. Thanks, Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 12:00, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page that led to your report was indeed vandalism, but it wasn't created by Pahunkat, but by an LTA. Blablubbs|talk 16:23, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As I suspected, hence the report Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 16:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RfPP

I would recommend filing one for this page here. Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 18:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to second this. Please request temporary semi-protection on your talk page. Ashley yoursmile! 18:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've semi'd mine, and set up a mini system for directing IPs & non-confirmed users - you can copy it if you would like (just check my contribs). My RfPP for my TP should also still be up so you can use the wording too, if you wish. Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 19:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Boppin'B moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Boppin'B, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unconstructive edit

For some reason, you used an anti-vandalism tool in this edit on Bobby Moynihan, I am unsure why. As the edit you undid was a restoration of status quo on a matter that has discussion to the Talk page, it was a cromulent edit. Your edit summary gave no understandable reason why the edit was not constructive, it did not address the concerns raised in my edit summary in any way. If you feel that "voice actor" needs to be included as a separate item, you are free to join in on the discussion at Talk:Bobby Moynihan. --Nat Gertler (talk) 19:24, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at Feedback request service

Mind telling me why you used a vandalism tool on my edits? Seem pl ez ^{{{ping}} me} 10:44, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it was an accident. Be more careful next time, and happy editing! Seem pl ez ^{{{ping}} me} 10:45, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removing bias

The portion removed is not fact based and has no place on the article.

then you need to take it to the talk page and get consensus per WP:Consensus Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 15:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like cooler heads prevail as the correct change was made. Have a good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7080:D53E:C9FE:28B2:A218:BD24:6319 (talk) 15:25, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Challengers Bangalore

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I am adding original support staff of rcb Bshjsn (talk) 01:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are not adding anything you are removing large sections of content without WP:Consensus. To make the changes you are trying to make (which appear to be vandalism and have been reverted by multiple other editors) you must first gain consensus on the article talk page, please refrain from further edits without discussion. Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 12:20, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bshjsn: I also see you have been blocked from editing due to this, while you are blocked I suggest you use the time to read through some of WP policies, if, once your block is lifted, you require any help please feel free to reach out and I will do my best to assist you. In the meantime, these articles may be of use to you :-

All the best! Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 12:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

71.224.82.240

Hi, if an IP is vandalising after a recent block (especially, as in this case, when they resumed vandalising the very day their second block expired), there's no need to warn them. You can report them straight back to AIV, and feel free to ping the blocking admin in the report (especially if it's me). Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Right ok, thanks for the heads up, I'll remember that for next time! Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 15:52, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

CLOSED

Signature changed. Conflict resolved.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hey there! I noticed that you seemed to have copied my signature. Please read WP:SIGFORGE, as it's absolutely forbidden to copy someone else's signature. You should be able to come up with your own design (at least change the color), and not copy mine or anyone else's. Sorry but these are Wikipedia's rules and not mine. Thanks! :) CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:58, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@CycloneYoris: My apologies, I had no idea my signature was copying someone else, I asked for help creating a signature when I was a newbie last year and was sent that code to use. I would never have used it if I knew it belonged to anyone else! Again I apologise and I have now changed it. Thank you for alerting me to the issue! Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 10:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.