User talk:Tobyo1

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of George cowie (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Elizabeth I of England, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Elizabeth I of England was changed by Tobyo1 (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-11-19T08:59:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 08:59, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for experimenting with the page C. S. Lewis, and for reverting your edits. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. In the future, please do not experiment on article pages; instead, use the sandbox. Thank you. Mayalld (talk) 13:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My new article

Everyone please look at my article "Nelson Kumah"

Don't add any more trash to the article. Got it? DS (talk) 01:42, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Settle

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Settle, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Keith D (talk) 20:21, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Lewes Priory School

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Lewes Priory School. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox.

Keith D (talk) 20:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also in reply to Tobyo1's message on our Talk page you do not seem to understand how IP addresses work. It is not fact that Priory Students abuse wiki therefore we are banned. The IP the school appears to come from is shared across a whole county of schools & why there has seemed to be a lot of abuse. Also why that is deemed necessary on an encyclopedic page I have no idea, it is definitely not down to a worry about parents seeing a negative response. If that is a parents main worry when reading about a school on Wikipedia then I fear they have other things to be worrying about! If you have a problem with this do come and see us as I am sure you know which is our office. PriorySchool (talk) 09:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Jonleeprofilepic.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Jonleeprofilepic.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Feederdayindayoutvideo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Feederdayindayoutvideo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:08, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Feederinsomniavideo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Feederinsomniavideo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:20, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User talk:George cowie may be offensive or unwelcome. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Atyndall93 | talk 08:24, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ogley T.

Visit "Ogley T.". From Anonymous Tipster (aka Curt Kobain) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.87.242 (talk) 14:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Firelord1116. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gwernol 10:54, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to GEORGE (computer).
Any further vandalism will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 10:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Thank you for experimenting with the page Mount Vesuvius on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Alvestrand (talk) 20:04, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you add an inappropriate image to a page, as you did to George W. Bush, you will be blocked from editing.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Keith D (talk) 13:43, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 14:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nelson Kumah

The article Nelson Kumah has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Snowycats (talk) 07:10, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]