User talk:Tlwm

Welcome!

Hello, Tlwm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Kaitlan Collins. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! – S. Rich (talk) 05:24, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Tlwm (talk) 22:06, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Isha Sesay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HLN (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thanks bot :) Tlwm (talk) 11:38, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kate Bolduan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kanada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Bot :) Tlwm (talk) 11:48, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mammal Hands for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mammal Hands is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mammal Hands until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 15:12, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Civility warning

This comment was wholly inappropriate. Your edit at Stephanie Sy was unsourced and correctly reverted as such.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:58, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo:yes un-sourced, yet. But being pregnant is a part of a biography not irrelevant. Tlwm (talk) 23:04, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo:He hunts people. Openly saying that on his description page. Tlwm (talk) 23:05, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have to show that it's relevant, this is done through the inclusion of reliable sources. PaulCHebert notes only that he focuses on removing spam and promotion from music articles, which is a benefit to Wikipedia, nowhere does it say "he hunts people". Your edit to their talk page crossed a bright line regardless of how angry or frustrated you are.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:17, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo:Yep! I am.Tlwm (talk) 23:19, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo:PaulCHerbert followed me now since three articles today, he deleted a lot in a band site Mammal Hands, ok, he deleted my edit in Stephanie Sy right now he is still on my tail by editing Gondwana Records. He is following me. Tlwm (talk) 23:34, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If there are concerns regarding your edits (e.g. adding unsourced and/or promotional content across multiple articles), then it is not unusual for other editors to review your contributions. It's why we have a public user contributions list. You can read more about it here.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:11, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo:Again he or she deletes descriptions of a musical style in Mammal Hands. I can not add my, reviewers or even their own description of their own style. How shall I describe it then? I argued with music theory. He called it Atrocious and indecipherable writing. None of this was backed up by the cited reference. Which is not true. This was also written in the reviewers pages and I came myself to that conclusions. second edit when I quoted Mammal Hands them self his delete comment was "play, write reactively and dynamically " is empty verbiage that means nothing, and this reeks of self-promotion by quoting the band's on self-critique. That is self description, damnit. This pedantic and restrictive approach is wrong for arts. Tlwm (talk) 16:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo:The user also introduces wrong information in Kate Bolduan for example where a Jet-Ski and a car accident are merged into two car accidents. That are personal informations. And extra-Typos. I am not a fan of this behaviour. Quality standards do not justify this.Tlwm (talk) 16:22, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you find yourself in a dispute over specific content, this page outlines the methods for resolving such disputes.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:21, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As a side note, could you please stop marking your edits as minor? Only minor typographical changes that don't affect the meaning or content of the page and vandalism reverts should be marked as minor (see WP:MINOR). Thank you, --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:24, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do not need anger management when people not intentionally pick me out to prove them self.Tlwm (talk) 20:27, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo:You and User:PaulCHebert work together, don't you? Are you one person?Tlwm (talk) 20:30, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some sort of hunter killer team or what?Tlwm (talk) 20:30, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Another comment like that, and you will be blocked. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:38, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo:He is on a private hunt Ponyo read his discussion tab, please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tlwm (talk • contribs)

I did see his talk page, and what I see is you continuing to cast aspersions and making inappropriate comments regarding PaulCHebert's motivations. If you want to add content to articles, the onus is on you to ensure that it is reliably sourced, neutral, and does not contain any personal supposition. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:02, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo: CHerbert deletes facts from articles and covers up and fakes history. Deleting is an active action, like denying the Holocaust. He is working destructive, not constructive and he is belittling me. You make yourself also guilty by helping him Ponyo. He deleted my passage just out of his subjective view that my writing is not clear. What does that mean? Ponyo? I didn't invented something and my passage is based on facts. Tlwm (talk) 19:08, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo: He is following me now since three days insulting me. Do something, Ponyo.Tlwm (talk) 19:11, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:12, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tlwm, if you wish to say something at the ANI thread, post it here and I or another editor will copy your comments over there. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 19:23, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@FlightTime: Honestly, no. I did not harassed him, no interest. I am open for critics and improvements but not for massive cuts because He doesn't like my writing style. I asked him to improve it, but now we are here. I have to ask myself about his intentions. Every word I posted in his discussion went very fast to Jezebel's Ponyo. They were hunting. PaulCHerbert was very belittling like many here. He introduces false information (I think by accident) and typos. I can not write like this. I am not here for my ego or winning, then I prefer to leave wikipedia. I like Kate Bolduan and I am on her side. I am for the freedom of press and the Reporters privilege. When PaulCHerbert deletes this just to hurt me, ok. But he also breaks that principle then. When you delete something, you also make a statement. At least in this context.Tlwm (talk) 19:33, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing to attack other editors after you've been blocked for attacking other editors is a very good way to get the block extended and your ability to make your case for an unblock to the community restricted. Be careful what you say going forward. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:42, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did not do that, was defending, but I agree.Tlwm (talk) 19:45, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

He provokes people into reaction. Watch him, too.Tlwm (talk) 19:46, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TheFamousPeople.com as a source

Hi Tlwm. I noticed that you recently used thefamouspeople.com as a source for biographical information in Erin Burnett. Please note that there is general consensus that thefamouspeople.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for such information. (Discussions here and here). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 00:01, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ok, sorry. I did not know. Will try to find a better one.Tlwm (talk) 00:08, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

had added two ref's, will leave it like it is.Tlwm (talk) 00:15, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Chênée

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Tlwm, thanks for creating Chênée!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for one issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:13, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about W.E. Can Lead

Hello, Tlwm,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether W.E. Can Lead should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W.E. Can Lead .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

_signed,Rosguill^talk 03:19, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

INARA moved to draftspace

I appreciate that you are passionate about writing articles for charities on Wikipedia. However, content on Wikipedia must be sufficiently notable in order to be verifiable. An article you recently created, INARA, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). Currently the article exclusively cites sources affiliated with the project. Searching online, I was not able to find any coverage in independent secondary reliable sources–the closest thing I could find was an article published at CNN, but upon investigating, the article's author is Arwa Damon, INARA's founder, and is thus not independent enough to be considered reliable.

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:48, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ryan Nobles

Hi, I'm Cwmhiraeth. Tlwm, thanks for creating Ryan Nobles!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please rewrite the Career and Awards sections of the article which are copyright infringements of [https://edition.cnn.com/profiles/ryan-nobles this source. The Personal life section needs a citation.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:00, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That is not true, I did not copy anything.Tlwm (talk) 13:44, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ryan Nobles

The article Ryan Nobles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no real evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 06:19, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Italics

Please stop putting the names of organizations and other random terms in italics. I've had to correct this tendency of yours several times. PaulCHebert (talk) 17:59, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ok, was criticized before for the opposite. Tlwm (talk) 18:02, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, one does not "write on a book." One "writes a book about" a topic. PaulCHebert (talk) 18:12, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

At This Hour with Kate Bolduan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, At This Hour with Kate Bolduan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:12, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwmhiraeth It was cut down and many references were lost. I will search for more.Tlwm (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwmhiraeth I merged it back into Kate Bolduans biography and created redirects to that paragraph. Tlwm (talk) 16:02, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: INARA (September 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at INARA. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft reads like an information brochure about the organization. This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the company.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:INARA and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:INARA, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:14, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tlwm! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:14, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tlwm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:At This Hour with Kate Bolduan

Hello, Tlwm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "At This Hour with Kate Bolduan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 10:24, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:INARA

Hello, Tlwm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "INARA".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:34, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been pruned from a list

Hi Tlwm! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:42, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]