User talk:Tktru

September 2013

Hello, I'm DKqwerty. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to John Patrick Foley seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DKqwerty 06:20, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to The Daily Show, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DKqwerty 06:23, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

United States Senate elections, 2006

Why use current images? Why not use contemporary images?—GoldRingChip 02:36, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Current members of the United States House of Representatives, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin McCarthy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rolling Rock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Rolfe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:42, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of current United States governors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stamford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mondale pic

At this edit, you replaced an image of Walter Mondale as a Senator with him as VEEP. Shouldn't a contemporary picture be used?—GoldRingChip 19:00, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dirty Hungarian Phrasebook may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

he wants to say. Many of them are plainly bizarre and some of them are mildly sexual in nature (for example: "do you want to come back to my place — [[sexual intercourse|bouncy-bouncy?]]"

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:57, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to United States presidential election, 2016 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Romney presidential campaign, 2012|2012 Republican presidential candidate]]<ref>Parker, Ashley (18 January 2014 [http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/19/us/politics/an-interview-with-mitt-romney.html?_

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:43, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dumb Starbucks

A tag has been placed on Dumb Starbucks, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Aerospeed (Talk) 01:19, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of burial places of Presidents of the United States may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| 43 || [[George W. Bush]] || {{sort|z|Not applicable: still alive}}}<br>{{small|Future burial site: [[Texas State Cemetery]], Austin, TX}} || {{sort|z|Not applicable}}
|}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:46, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Onion headlines

Would appreciate your input on headline examples at Talk:The Onion - as I think I've said before, it'd better to establish a rough consensus on two particularly good headlines to use as examples in the lede, rather than trying to keep them up to date. "'No Way To Prevent This,' Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens" is a great one and worth keeping, but "Something Apparently Going On With Mom And Her Best Friend" doesn't seem a great example of mundane-as-newsworthy, when better examples exist. --McGeddon (talk) 18:42, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Natalia Poklonskaya

On 5 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Natalia Poklonskaya, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Prosecutor General of Crimea, Natalia Poklonskaya, is barred from entering European Union countries? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Natalia Poklonskaya. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:36, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Worst movie death scene ever

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Worst movie death scene ever, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 04:39, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Yahoo.com Main Page 9-4-2013.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yahoo.com Main Page 9-4-2013.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:14, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Obama and DA logos

Hi Tktru. I am struggling to see the connection between your edit and what the source says. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 10:24, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of assassinated American politicians

The shooting death of Daniel Crespo was not "deliberate, premeditated murder of a prominent figure, often for religious or political reasons," the definition of "assassination" used here, or "by a surprise attack," used here. Every violent death of a politician cannot and should not be considered an assassination, and there is no evidence to suggest that the shooting of Mr. Crespo by his wife was deliberate or premeditated. At this time she has not been charged.[1][2][3] Dwpaul ^Talk 13:40, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Choom Gang listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Choom Gang. Since you had some involvement with the Choom Gang redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 02:03, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of The Colbert Report episodes (2014), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Richard Clarke, Andy Cohen and David Gregory. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Patriarch Teoctist of Romania

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Patriarch Teoctist of Romania, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wiki.healthhaven.com/Teoctist_Ar%C4%83pa%C5%9Fu.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:36, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Death of Lee Kuan Yew

Your recent move of this article has been reverted. Evidently the choice of the best title is controversial. If you still want the article moved, consider opening up a full move discussion per the instructions at WP:RM#CM. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:56, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Series Box Edits

While I do appreciate the work your put into these updates, their reversion was necessary for the maintenance of proper style format. The series boxes feature the seal of the highest held office, in Presidents' case, the office of President, and so on. see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States Presidents. I will be sending a manual of style for these live soon. The problem is, like for TR, the inclusion of every possible seal and medal is excessive, and gets in the way. Spartan7W § 14:33, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Honorifics

Hi Tktru. I see that you've been adding honorific prefixes to the infoboxes of US politicians. So you know, there is currently a consensus not use these titles for US politicians. A discussion at the United States Congress WikiProject reaffirmed that consensus (see MOS:HONORIFIC). Thanks, gobonobo ⁺ ^c 13:28, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have undone most of these additions. - Cwobeel (talk) 14:32, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries

It is very helpful and much more efficient and courteous to other editors to use summary edits after making revisions. Otherwise, one has to go to the edit history, and compare selected revisions to know what you did. Please describe your edits to make things easier for everyone! Thanks! Spartan7W § 19:17, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Referendums by country, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.We try to maintain a neutral point of view in articles, and the description you inserted was counter to that policy. : Noyster (talk), 16:44, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TFD

Hi Tktru. I have just nominated some navboxes you created for deletion (see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Australian political navboxes) -- Ianblair23 (talk) 08:57, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arnold Schwarzenegger

There was no basis for removing the infobox of Arnold Schwarzenegger's biography to one which doesn't mention his gubernatorial service. Moving that down to a lower section isn't a proper action. He was one of only two people to ever recall and replace a sitting Governor in U.S. history. That alone is notable enough. Plus, he was there for over seven years. Being an actor employed in Hollywood doesn't supercede service in such a high public office. Clint Eastwood was a Mayor for a short time in an unincorporated town, that, not this, is the case for non-prominence in the infobox. Also, please use edit summaries. Spartan7W § 21:04, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ted Williams 2016

Hey- you recently removed Ted Williams from the 2016 Presidential Election page. Could you please give me the source, so that I can update the other page? Thanks! Vote 4 DJH2036 (talk) 02:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ted apparently dropped out via an announcement on his FB page. Source Tktru (talk) 03:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Vote 4 DJH2036 (talk) 03:48, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Queen Elizabeth

Did you take that idea from me? I don't really care, just curious. I'll add a couple useful/stylistic tweaks. Spartan7W § 02:49, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Elizabeth II sidebar

Template:Elizabeth II sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DrKiernan (talk) 07:23, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pranab Mukherjee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page His Excellency. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Corporations are people, my friend listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Corporations are people, my friend. Since you had some involvement with the Corporations are people, my friend redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 20:28, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eternal flame, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Bradley (politician). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bqhatevwr listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bqhatevwr. Since you had some involvement with the Bqhatevwr redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. LittleWink (talk) 12:39, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016 does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! - Mr X 11:26, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hillary Clinton edits

I reverted your edit because we probably should wait for the results of the election before declaring either candidate the president-elect. Thanks. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:37, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And I reverted your corresponding edit to Tim Kaine. Please don't edit Wikipedia to make a point, even if it's only visible in edit mode. Bishonen | talk 05:34, 24 October 2016 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tktru. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Kathryn Barger) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Kathryn Barger, Tktru!

Wikipedia editor Meatsgains just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Consider adding reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

To reply, leave a comment on Meatsgains's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

KFWB

This edit is uncalled for. You've been here seven years, and you know better. Don't do it again. Nate • (chatter) 05:58, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Group of Seven does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Of course, living in the US, I'm well aware that Mr. Trump has just been sworn in. Editors in other parts of the world may not be. Since "Trump" has been widely used as vandalism, these editors may confuse your edit for vandalism. --Non-Dropframe _talk 17:20, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at President of the United States. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RoCo^(talk) 18:32, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bo (dog). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Millionsandbillions (talk) 20:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Deaths in 2017. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ref ^(chew)(do) 05:40, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, I'm JimRenge. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Buddhist initiation ritual, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 21:26, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tktru. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Ed Lee (politician) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mark Farrell

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Māori Party MPs

Template:Māori Party MPs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 17:35, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BIO

Please make sure if you are editing WP:BLP that you take careful note of the WP:RS please - thanks JarrahTree 06:03, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- Mr X 🖋 22:06, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello, I'm Thewolfchild. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to USS John S. McCain (DDG-56) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. - ^theWOLFchild 13:21, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alexander Bustamante, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Order of National Hero (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Nelson Mandela does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. I have also reverted the edit as it was done without consensus and to an image which is far older than the one currently in use. Waddie96 (talk) 08:06, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at F.W. de Klerk. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Waddie96 (talk) 08:08, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tsai Ing-wen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Hey! I see that you've been warned about this before, and ask that you please use an edit summary to help other editors easily understand the "why" and the "what" of your edits. I patrol recent changes and know that an edit without a summary is always suspicious to me and more likely to be seen as vandalism and reverted. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!} 19:29, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Corky 23:29, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it looks like I'm not the first one to ask you. Next time I see an edit of yours that you haven't given a reason for change, I'm reverting it. It is considered disruptive editing. Corky 23:30, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Steve King

You are invited to participate at Talk:Steve King#RfC: Most openly affiliated with white nationalsm. R2 (bleep) 17:34, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tktru. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths in 2018 and the "rule of three"

HI. Although not always known to every editor, the current consensus existing at the Deaths pages is for the number of any credits, achievements or (in the case of George H. W. Bush) offices held should not exceed three, and these should be in order of importance. It was agreed in order that any entry in the Deaths page should be concise and not overlong. If you have any queries on this, please visit the Talk page for more information. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 07:13, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jumping the gun?

Howdy. Why are you booting lame-ducks out of Congress, before they're actually out? The change over doesn't happen until Noon EST, today. GoodDay (talk) 16:08, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing it again. California & Nevada in are in PST. Their governors & lieutenant governors don't take office, until NOON PST. GoodDay (talk) 18:32, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Aaron Peskin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mark Farrell

Sandra Lee Fewer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mark Farrell

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Corky 18:34, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sad onion listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sad onion. Since you had some involvement with the Sad onion redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. MB 01:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:United Future MPs

Template:United Future MPs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:19, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:United Kingdom Supreme Court composition row

Template:United Kingdom Supreme Court composition row has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Can I apologise for apparently mistaking your edit at Michael D. Higgins for vandalism, of which that article has been subject to a lot of. Please accept my apologies. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 12:45, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Huy Fong Foods, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Teochew (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to RfC (Request for Comment) at Reagan article on Iran-Contra

Hi,

You're invited to an RfC on the question of, "Within the section on the Iran-Contra affair, should we include the aspect of drug trafficking on the part of some Nicaraguan Contras?"

Talk:Ronald_Reagan#rfc_85A761C

Thanks,

FriendlyRiverOtter (talk) 16:26, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tsem Tulku Rinpoche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malaysian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:08, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from DESiegel

Hello, Tktru. You have new messages at Talk:Holy Family Church (Orange, California).
Message added 12:36, 9 October 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please respond to questions about your edit there. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 12:36, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Hello, I'm Pingpongball722. I noticed that you recently removed content from 2019 Speaker of the British House of Commons election without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Pingpongball722 (talk) 18:25, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Please take special note of the custom sanction applied to Jeff Van Drew, explained at Talk:Jeff Van Drew#Discretionary sanctions. – bradv🍁 18:09, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Pokémon with the "poke" and the "mon" and the thing where the guy comes out of the thing" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pokémon with the "poke" and the "mon" and the thing where the guy comes out of the thing. Since you had some involvement with the Pokémon with the "poke" and the "mon" and the thing where the guy comes out of the thing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 22:42, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kobe Bryant

Here is his official death certificate, which is included in the provided source on his page. Pacific View Mortuary was the funeral establishment but his final disposition was at Westwood Village Memorial Park. There is a sentence in the provided article saying “Gigi will be laid to rest near her father at Pacific View Memorial Park in Orange County.” but since the source is using their death certificates for this information they clearly misread funeral establishment to mean the final place for burial. I’ve seen this before when people assumed Cameron Boyce was being buried at Forest Lawn Memorial Park because they were handling his funeral services but he was in reality just cremated and his ashes returned to family. Rusted AutoParts 23:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm YoungForever. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Plot Against America (miniseries), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 05:26, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 22:05, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you were thinking; maybe you are intoxicated? Either way, you should know better, even without that DS warning for American Politics. I hope 31 hours is enough time for you to come to your senses. Drmies (talk) 22:06, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Deaths in 2020, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ^{Babymissfortune} 07:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths in 2020

Please do not introduce unconfirmed causes of death into the above list, as you did with the Kenny Rogers entry. Not all deaths of elderly people at this worrying time are due to COVID-19. If that does turn out to have been the cause, wait for a reliable source to confirm it. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 07:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Benny Gantz

Hi

Do you have as source that he is Deputy Prime Minister, instead Vice Prime Minister of Alternate Prime Minister? --Panam2014 (talk) 17:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at United States twenty-dollar bill. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ZLEA _T\^C 12:40, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Rubin

Tktru, please see this talk page discussion related to your changes to the Dave Rubin article [[4]]. Consensus is strongly against stating "conservative" in the opening sentence. Springee (talk) 21:34, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Arrested Development characters. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Democratic National Convention

Hello, I'm EnoughDNCInaccuracies. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2020 Democratic National Convention, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. EnoughDNCInaccuracies (talk) 19:25, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You added an assertion about the DNC platform without a reliable source on August 18. Please don't do this. Try to explain where you're getting your information by citing sources. -- AndySimpson ^talk? 07:08, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Brendan Boyle

added a link pointing to Robert Garcia

Colin Allred

added a link pointing to Robert Garcia

Elizabeth Warren

added a link pointing to Robert Garcia

Kathleen Clyde

added a link pointing to Robert Garcia

Nikki Fried

added a link pointing to Robert Garcia

Raumesh Akbari

added a link pointing to Robert Garcia

Sam Park

added a link pointing to Robert Garcia

Stacey Abrams

added a link pointing to Robert Garcia

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Brendan Boyle

added a link pointing to Robert Garcia

Kathleen Clyde

added a link pointing to Robert Garcia

Nikki Fried

added a link pointing to Robert Garcia

Raumesh Akbari

added a link pointing to Robert Garcia

Sam Park

added a link pointing to Robert Garcia

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Arrested Development characters, you may be blocked from editing. DonIago (talk) 13:31, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Yoshihide Suga, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Prolix 💬 17:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SYNTH, UNDUE concerns with your edits

Your recent edits are clear WP:SYNTH and WP:UNDUE violations. Please self-revert. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 00:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This edit is vandalism, too. Almost no one uses the singer Josh Groban's name for California Supreme Court Justice Joshua Groban. Please stop. It is not entertaining. TJRC (talk) 03:39, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Death and state funeral of Winston Churchill. TJRC (talk) 03:38, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Shinzo Abe. TJRC (talk) 22:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Portal:Current events/2020 September 25. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 23:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent unresponsive addition of unsourced content about living persons after a block for the same behavior.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:22, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:New Zealand First MPs

Template:New Zealand First MPs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"William IV of the Netherlands" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address a potential problem with the redirect William IV of the Netherlands and it has been listed for discussion. Anyone, including you, is welcome to participate at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 12 § William IV of the Netherlands until a consensus is reached. Estar8806 (talk) 16:36, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Pope Pius XII: Illness and death" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Pope Pius XII: Illness and death has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 3 § Pope Pius XII: Illness and death until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 03:23, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Incumbent U.S. House Speaker

Template:Incumbent U.S. House Speaker has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Lu Tianna" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Lu Tianna has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 2 § Lu Tianna until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:18, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]