User talk:Tksb

Hi. I appreciate your efforts to improve the chamei article, but there are some errors in your edits. For example, not all chamei of tea practitioners begin with or even incorporate the character sō. I'm therefore restoring some of the information you altered. Exploding Boy (talk) 06:58, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, I have never seen the term さんせんけ romanised as "san-Senke," and it doesn't appear to be a standard romanisation, Sansenke being the more common form by far. As you've altered it, it also doesn't follow Wikipedia's rules for subheadings in certain places. If you feel strongly about it, you may wish to request comment on one of the romanisation pages, or on the Japanese topics noticeboard. Exploding Boy (talk) 07:11, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chamei of iemoto, sure. But not every tea practitioner's chamei contains that character. Exploding Boy (talk) 04:21, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Culture of Japan

Hi! It would be grateful if you could create a Japanese tea ceremony section in Culture of Japan when you are not too busy. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 14:00, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your confidence in me to attempt it. The page on Culture of Japan is way too broad for me to even try to fit in a section about Japanese tea ceremony, especially considering that chado is involved with a great many aspects of the traditional culture of Japan. Regards.

Kamo Shrine

Graphic representation explaining why Kamo Shrine is construed as a unitary entity.

I re-worked the introduction to this article; and I created new "main" articles for Kamigamo Shrine and Shimogamo Shrine.

In terms of the Venn diagram at right:

If A=Kamigamo Shrine; and
If B=Shimogamo Shrine; and
If U=Tadasu no Mori and/or
If U=activities related to Kami-no-Kaml and/or
If U=all matters relating to Kamo clan

Then, it becomes reasonable to discuss anything to do with this shrine as if it were a unitary entity; and at the same time, it is possible to discuss the shrine's constituent parts as plural entities.

Does this help to clarify what I've been trying to say? --Tenmei (talk) 23:08, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:technical question

Hi! Thank you for the image. I added it to the article chaki. [1] Hope this page is helpful. Regards. Oda Mari (talk) 15:56, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oda Mari: Thank you! That is exactly where I planned to put the photo.Tksb (talk) 12:14, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Residences

Hi! I noticed your interest in Japanese residential architecture. It would be great if you could have a look over User:Bamse/List_of_National_Treasures_(residences)#lead (three paragraphs) which is meant as intro for List of National Treasures of Japan (residences) and let me know of any errors or suggestions. bamse (talk) 20:07, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thanks for your contact and show of confidence. I have taken a quick look at the "lead". Before getting into details, I wonder, generally, how this rather technical explanation fits in as an intro for List of National Treasures of Japan (residences). I would understand it better if the List connected, where appropriate, to a/this information about features of the particular style of architecture (shoin-zukuri, or whatever), and readers could thus learn more there about the particulars of that National Treasure, or if a/this information (wikipedia article about shoin-zukuri, or whatever), were connected where appropriate to the List.Tksb (talk) 13:10, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Let me explain. The residence NT are of three styles (plus a gate): shoin-zukuri, sukiya-zukuri, teahouse style (sōan). The lead is meant to explain roughly (due to length limitations) what each of these styles looks like. It also connects to the treasure table by mentioning NT structures which are representative for each style. Reversely, the list connects to the lead through the "remarks" column, in which the particular style is mentioned. BTW, I moved the section from my user page to List of National Treasures of Japan (residences). bamse (talk) 09:01, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citation tagging

Hi! I just noticed your edit to the Green tea article requesting citations in a section of the article. The proper method of requesting citations is to use the {{citation needed}} tag. Hope this helps! SpecMode (talk) 06:58, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sensō Sōshitsu, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kanazawa and Raku (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Murata Jukō

On 3 November 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Murata Jukō, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Murata Jukō created the Japanese tea ceremony? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Murata Jukō. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:04, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tksb. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tksb. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Urasenke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Honpō-ji (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:49, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Urasenke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Owari (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]